Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong support for CACR 15, which would establish a constitutional right for New Hampshire citizens to hunt, fish, and harvest game and fish. Key reasons I support this constitutional amendment: • Hunting and fishing are integral parts of New Hampshire's heritage and culture that deserve constitutional protection • These activities contribute significantly to our state's economy through license fees, equipment purchases, and tourism • Hunters and anglers are among our most dedicated conservationists, funding wildlife management and habitat preservation • Constitutional protection ensures these rights cannot be eliminated by future legislative action • The amendment preserves existing regulatory authority while protecting the fundamental right to participate This constitutional amendment will safeguard traditions that have been passed down through generations of New Hampshire families while continuing to allow for proper wildlife management and conservation. I urge you to support CACR 15 and help protect these cherished rights for current and future generations. Respectfully, James Rowe hudson, NH
CACR15
House · 2026 sessionRepublicanDied in HouseRight to hunt and fish
AIProposes a constitutional amendment establishing an individual right to hunt, fish, and harvest game and fish, subject to conservation-related laws and regulations, to be voted on in November 2026.
relating to the right to hunt, fish, and harvest game and fish. Providing that citizens of New Hampshire shall have the constitutional right to hunt, fish, and harvest game and fish, subject to restrictions existing in law.
Status
Recommended for passage but never voted; died at adjournment · March 11, 2026- ✓Introduced
- ✕House
- Senate
- On the ballot
Division of testimony
928 submissionsHatched = form letter · 390 of 928 written submissions (42%) came from organized campaigns
Argument digest · AI-generated
from 248 of 637 written submissionsCACR15 would amend the New Hampshire Constitution to establish a right to hunt, fish, and harvest game and fish, and would declare public hunting and fishing the preferred means of managing wildlife, subject to existing law. Supporters describe it as a permanent safeguard for a treasured NH tradition and the license-funded conservation model against future legislative or political erosion, while opponents argue the 'preferred means' language and constitutional status would lock in disputed methods like trapping and hounding, reduce Fish and Game's ability to adapt science-based management, and invite litigation, when hunting and fishing are already legal and regulated.
- Hunting and fishing are cherished NH heritageSupport60 of 248 reviewed · 390 via form letter
Supporters describe hunting, fishing, and trapping as generations-old New Hampshire traditions and family practices that deserve constitutional protection so they can be passed to future generations.
“New Hampshire has a strong, prominent and storied hunting and fishing history that encompasses generations and entire familial lineages in some cases.”
— Erik Keyser, Nottingham · #601167 — read full submission →
“Hunting & fishing is a traditional right in New Hampshire going back over 400 years.”
— Adam Rankin, Hampstead · #597552 — read full submission →
“Hunting and fishing are generational traditions in my family that connect us to the land and to responsible stewardship of wildlife.”
— micah deshaies, Chester · #596590 — read full submission →
- Constitutional right guards against future repealSupport20 of 248 reviewed · 390 via form letter
Supporters argue that because hunting and fishing rights currently rest only on statute, they remain vulnerable to being weakened or eliminated by future legislatures or anti-hunting advocacy, and that constitutional status would make that protection permanent.
“CACR 15 provides a proactive safeguard against efforts that seek to limit or eliminate lawful hunting, fishing, and trapping.”
— Steve Crawford, Hopkinton · #597983 — read full submission →
“New Hampshire currently protects these rights only through statute, making them vulnerable to erosion. A constitutional amendment would provide the permanent protection our outdoor traditions deserve”
— Nathaniel Wiggin, Rye · #592739 — read full submission →
“Constitutional protection ensures these rights cannot be eliminated by future legislative action”
— form letter, submitted 390 times · #594020 — read full submission →
- License fees fund science-based conservationSupport13 of 248 reviewed · 390 via form letter
Submitters state that hunters and anglers are among the largest funders of wildlife conservation through license fees, and that protecting participation in hunting and fishing sustains that funding stream.
“hunters and anglers, through licensing fees and ethical practices, fund conservation efforts that sustain healthy populations and ecosystems for future generations”
— Ward Ashton, Goffstown · #592707 — read full submission →
“remind the people where the game and fish gets their moneys from and new taxes would have to be introduced to everyone to make up for the shortfalls of hunters and fishermen getting out of the sport.”
— Nathan Arnold, Northfield · #593345 — read full submission →
- Preserves science-based management, property rightsSupport12 of 248 reviewed · 390 via form letter
Supporters contend the amendment supports science-based, effective wildlife management and does not alter Fish and Game's regulatory authority, licensing requirements, or private property and trespassing laws.
“By designating public hunting and fishing as the preferred means of wildlife management, it promotes science-based conservation and maintains healthy populations for public use.”
— MARTIN FINN, WINDHAM · #596814 — read full submission →
“The amendment preserves existing regulatory authority while protecting the fundamental right to participate”
— form letter, submitted 390 times · #594020 — read full submission →
- Hunting and fishing support family food securitySupport12 of 248 reviewed
Some supporters emphasize that hunting and fishing let families provide their own food, describing this as a form of self-sufficiency worth protecting, especially during supply disruptions.
“These practices are deeply rooted in our history and are essential to wildlife conservation, food security, and personal responsibility.”
— Edward Ash, Plymouth · #591400 — read full submission →
“I want my future kids and grandkids to have the same opportunities I have had to enjoy the great outdoors and provide the most organic meat possible to our families.”
— Colby Forest, Raymond · #603445 — read full submission →
- Other states' precedent; let voters decide by ballotSupport4 of 248 reviewed
A smaller number of supporters note that other states already have similar constitutional protections and argue NH voters should be trusted to decide the question directly on the ballot.
“As of 2026, 24 states have enshrined a constitutional right to hunt, fish, and harvest wildlife, including traditional methods, in their state constitutions.”
— William Foster, New Boston · #599545 — read full submission →
“Twenty-four states have already recognized this by adding similar protections to their constitutions, following Vermont’s lead from 1777.”
— Nathaniel Wiggin, Rye · #592739 — read full submission →
- Trapping and hounding are cruel, inhumane practicesOppose30 of 248 reviewed
Many opponents focus specifically on trapping and hunting with hounds, arguing these 'traditional methods' cause prolonged animal suffering, injure non-target animals and pets, and should not be enshrined as a constitutional right.
“Trapping causes immense and unnecessary suffering. Animals caught in steel-jaw, body-gripping, or snare traps can remain restrained for hours or even days before being found.”
— Jill Peterson, New boston · #547546 — read full submission →
“Modern wildlife science and veterinary research have shown that many trapping methods cause prolonged suffering: animals may struggle for hours, suffer broken limbs, exposure, dehydration, or self-mutilation.”
— Kristina Snyder, Chester · #607944 — read full submission →
“CACR15 would trigger a statewide vote on a constitutional amendment to codify CRUEL, OUTDATED and INEFFECTIVE practices like trapping, baiting and hounding.”
— Jennifer Gasbarro, Amherst · #598568 — read full submission →
- Locks wildlife policy, reducing scientific flexibilityOppose25 of 248 reviewed
Opponents argue that embedding hunting and fishing in the constitution would make it harder for Fish and Game to adjust seasons, bag limits, and methods in response to new science, population data, or changing ecological conditions.
“Right now New Hampshire Fish and Game can adjust seasons, bag limits, and protections in response to population data, habitat changes, and public-safety concerns; putting these activities into the Constitution would make it much harder to adapt when conditions change.”
— Kathryn Doyle, Concord · #592197 — read full submission →
“Effective wildlife management requires flexibility and the application of appropriate tools for specific situations.”
— Kathy Henley, Marlborough · #587924 — read full submission →
- Hunting/fishing already legal; amendment unnecessaryOppose20 of 248 reviewed
Opponents describe the bill as a solution in search of a problem, noting hunting and fishing are already legal, statutorily recognized, and regulated in New Hampshire, so a constitutional amendment offers no meaningful new protection.
“I oppose CACR 15 as it is unnecessary in our State. Currently, New Hampshire statutorily recognizes the right to hunt and fish.”
— Charlene Andersen, Nottingham · #593152 — read full submission →
“Hunting and fishing are already legal, regulated, and protected; adding them to the NH constitution would introduce unnecessary risk and rigidity without providing meaningful new protections.”
— Heather Spears, Boscawen · #591974 — read full submission →
- Preferred-means clause favors lethal management toolsOppose14 of 248 reviewed
Opponents object specifically to declaring hunting and fishing the 'preferred means' of controlling wildlife, arguing it would bias policy toward lethal methods and undermine non-lethal tools like habitat conservation and aversive conditioning.
“this Amendment promotes lethal methods as the preferred way of controlling wlldlife, regardless of circumstance and species.”
— Kathy Peirce, Auburn · #588671 — read full submission →
“This phrase sets a preference for this policy whereas perhaps many of the tools NHFG has, such as habitat work, attractant/food management, targeted removal, aversive conditioning, translocation, or public-safety interventions may be the best management tool.”
— Weldon Bosworth, Gilford · #553166 — read full submission →
- Hunting is a licensed activity, not a fundamental rightOppose10 of 248 reviewed
Some opponents argue it is inconsistent to call hunting and fishing constitutional rights on par with speech or religion when they require a license and are closely regulated, and warn this could set a precedent for other interest groups.
“Hunting, fishing, and trapping are recreational activities and should not be elevated to the same status as the fundamental rights the constitution affords us.”
— Tone Grochala, Milford · #602130 — read full submission →
“how can something be a right if it requires a license and the exercise of which is closely controlled by a state agency?”
— Steve Barlow, Harrisville · #598295 — read full submission →
- Amendment risks litigation over wildlife regulationsOppose10 of 248 reviewed
Opponents warn a constitutional right could be used to challenge existing regulations in court, including animal-welfare laws and fishing protections such as fly-fishing-only and catch-and-release rules meant to protect species like brook trout.
“This bill is going to open the door to eliminate ALL fly fishing only and ALO regs in NH, which will absolutely decimate the native brook trout population, among many others.”
— Brooke Cormier, Kingston · #603046 — read full submission →
“the state risks undermining animal cruelty laws and public safety regulations. Courts could be forced to weigh a trapper’s constitutional “right” against laws”
— Kristina Snyder, Chester · #607944 — read full submission →
- Concern for declining wildlife and ecosystem healthOppose9 of 248 reviewed
Some opponents point to what they describe as already-declining wildlife populations and argue the state should prioritize wildlife and ecosystem health over expanding hunting rights.
“I have seen first hand, as well as from Fish and Game data, that our state's wildlife has been dwindling for many years. Our wildlife is crucial in supporting our ecosystems in NH, which in turn support the health of every single citizen in our great state.”
— Helen Tam-Semmens, Stoddard · #602208 — read full submission →
“If this bill passes, which I am STRONGLY opposed to, our declining wildlife population will be further eradicated. They can barely survive as it is.”
— Laura Sonovick, Bedford · #600664 — read full submission →
Generated by claude-sonnet-5 (claude code agent) on Jul 20, 2026. Quotes are verbatim excerpts, verified against the cited submission before publication. Summaries are AI interpretation of the record, not part of it.
Form-letter campaigns
390 of 637 written submissions (61%)390 submissions match a shared template; 247 are individually written.
- Constitutional Right to Hunt, Fish, and HarvestSupport390 submissions on this bill
The template argues that establishing a constitutional right to hunting, fishing, and harvesting game and fish is necessary to protect New Hampshire's cultural heritage, economy, and conservation efforts.
The letter · submitted 390 times I am writing to express my strong support for CACR 15, which would establish a constitutional right for New Hampshire citizens to hunt, fish, and harvest game and fish. Key reasons I support this constitutional amendment: • Hunting and fishing are integral parts of New Hampshire's heritage and culture that deserve constitutional protection • These activities contribute significantly to our state's economy through license fees, equipment purchases, and tourism • Hunters and anglers are among our most dedicated conservationists, funding wildlife management and habitat preservation • Constitutional protection ensures these rights cannot be eliminated by future legislative action • The amendment preserves existing regulatory authority while protecting the fundamental right to participate This constitutional amendment will safeguard traditions that have been passed down through generations of New Hampshire families while continuing to allow for proper wildlife management and conservation. I urge you to support CACR 15 and help protect these cherished rights for current and future generations. Respectfully, Everett Brown Epping, NH
Detected by text-similarity clustering; campaign names are AI-generated.
I am writing in opposition to CACR15, the proposed constitutional amendment relating to the right to fish, hunt, and harvest game which includes trapping. Fishing and hunting are already legal, regulated, and widely supported in New Hampshire. What is new and concerning in this amendment is the decision to elevate these activities—especially trapping—to the level of a constitutional right. Modern wildlife science and veterinary research have shown that many trapping methods cause prolonged suffering: animals may struggle for hours, suffer broken limbs, exposure, dehydration, or self-mutilation. Traps also do not discriminate. Pets, non-target wildlife, and even protected species are routinely injured or killed. These are not rare accidents—they are inherent risks of the practice. By enshrining trapping as a constitutional right, the state risks undermining animal cruelty laws and public safety regulations. Courts could be forced to weigh a trapper’s constitutional “right” against laws meant to prevent suffering or protect the public. That creates legal conflict, uncertainty, and costly litigation. This is not about banning hunting or fishing. It is about whether we permanently elevate a specific method of killing wildlife above public oversight and ethical progress. I urge you to reject this amendment.
Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong support for CACR 15, which would establish a constitutional right for New Hampshire citizens to hunt, fish, and harvest game and fish. Key reasons I support this constitutional amendment: • Hunting and fishing are integral parts of New Hampshire's heritage and culture that deserve constitutional protection • These activities contribute significantly to our state's economy through license fees, equipment purchases, and tourism • Hunters and anglers are among our most dedicated conservationists, funding wildlife management and habitat preservation • Constitutional protection ensures these rights cannot be eliminated by future legislative action • The amendment preserves existing regulatory authority while protecting the fundamental right to participate This constitutional amendment will safeguard traditions that have been passed down through generations of New Hampshire families while continuing to allow for proper wildlife management and conservation. I urge you to support CACR 15 and help protect these cherished rights for current and future generations. Respectfully, James Barous Newton, NH
The constitution is NOT for recreational activities! Hunters and trappers already have what they need to be able to hunt and trap. I'm all for hunting, if you're going to feed your family. Therefore, there is no need to be able to hunt whenever you WANT to. There are valid scientific reasons for seasons and restrictions. This is just a piece of legislation that if passed, would allow one to hunt whenever and for all I know, where ever one wants to. I'm just trying to help you NOT kill everything first before there is nothing left. Trapping is a dying sport anyway. I think there is well beyond enough selfish grabbing of resources in the state, including the unwillingness to deal with our property tax problems.. try working some real legislation instead of wasting everyones time.
Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong support for CACR 15, which would establish a constitutional right for New Hampshire citizens to hunt, fish, and harvest game and fish. Key reasons I support this constitutional amendment: • Hunting and fishing are integral parts of New Hampshire's heritage and culture that deserve constitutional protection • These activities contribute significantly to our state's economy through license fees, equipment purchases, and tourism • Hunters and anglers are among our most dedicated conservationists, funding wildlife management and habitat preservation • Constitutional protection ensures these rights cannot be eliminated by future legislative action • The amendment preserves existing regulatory authority while protecting the fundamental right to participate This constitutional amendment will safeguard traditions that have been passed down through generations of New Hampshire families while continuing to allow for proper wildlife management and conservation. I urge you to support CACR 15 and help protect these cherished rights for current and future generations. Respectfully, Colton Gregg Pittsfield, NH
I urge the Committee to support this NH Constitutional Amendment.
I support this bill because Granite State values should be enshrined within our constitution.
Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong support for CACR 15, which would establish a constitutional right for New Hampshire citizens to hunt, fish, and harvest game and fish. Key reasons I support this constitutional amendment: • Hunting and fishing are integral parts of New Hampshire's heritage and culture that deserve constitutional protection • These activities contribute significantly to our state's economy through license fees, equipment purchases, and tourism • Hunters and anglers are among our most dedicated conservationists, funding wildlife management and habitat preservation • Constitutional protection ensures these rights cannot be eliminated by future legislative action • The amendment preserves existing regulatory authority while protecting the fundamental right to participate This constitutional amendment will safeguard traditions that have been passed down through generations of New Hampshire families while continuing to allow for proper wildlife management and conservation. I urge you to support CACR 15 and help protect these cherished rights for current and future generations. Respectfully, Bradford Jones Effingham, NH
I support the constitutional right to hunt and fish subject to state and federal laws. Conservation starts with the hunters and fishermen of the state of New Hampshire and should be a right provided by the state constitution. If you don't like hunting stay out of the woods. If you don't like fishing stay out of the waters. Thanks Rob Bellerose
Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong support for CACR 15, which would establish a constitutional right for New Hampshire citizens to hunt, fish, and harvest game and fish. Key reasons I support this constitutional amendment: • Hunting and fishing are integral parts of New Hampshire's heritage and culture that deserve constitutional protection • These activities contribute significantly to our state's economy through license fees, equipment purchases, and tourism • Hunters and anglers are among our most dedicated conservationists, funding wildlife management and habitat preservation • Constitutional protection ensures these rights cannot be eliminated by future legislative action • The amendment preserves existing regulatory authority while protecting the fundamental right to participate This constitutional amendment will safeguard traditions that have been passed down through generations of New Hampshire families while continuing to allow for proper wildlife management and conservation. I urge you to support CACR 15 and help protect these cherished rights for current and future generations. Respectfully, Linda Camarota Bedford, NH
I support this amendment wholeheartedly. This is an amazing opportunity for NH to commit to science based conservation, wildlife management, and public access to the greatest resources in the state. This allows the state to affirm its stance as one of the leading voices in the nation on outdoor management. I am advocating that we support this amendment to our state constitution and continue to position ourselves as a leader in the nation and New England in conservation and wildlife management.
Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong support for CACR 15, which would establish a constitutional right for New Hampshire citizens to hunt, fish, and harvest game and fish. Key reasons I support this constitutional amendment: • Hunting and fishing are integral parts of New Hampshire's heritage and culture that deserve constitutional protection • These activities contribute significantly to our state's economy through license fees, equipment purchases, and tourism • Hunters and anglers are among our most dedicated conservationists, funding wildlife management and habitat preservation • Constitutional protection ensures these rights cannot be eliminated by future legislative action • The amendment preserves existing regulatory authority while protecting the fundamental right to participate This constitutional amendment will safeguard traditions that have been passed down through generations of New Hampshire families while continuing to allow for proper wildlife management and conservation. I urge you to support CACR 15 and help protect these cherished rights for current and future generations. Respectfully, Warren Witkowski Salisbury, NH
Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong support for CACR 15, which would establish a constitutional right for New Hampshire citizens to hunt, fish, and harvest game and fish. Key reasons I support this constitutional amendment: • Hunting and fishing are integral parts of New Hampshire's heritage and culture that deserve constitutional protection • These activities contribute significantly to our state's economy through license fees, equipment purchases, and tourism • Hunters and anglers are among our most dedicated conservationists, funding wildlife management and habitat preservation • Constitutional protection ensures these rights cannot be eliminated by future legislative action • The amendment preserves existing regulatory authority while protecting the fundamental right to participate This constitutional amendment will safeguard traditions that have been passed down through generations of New Hampshire families while continuing to allow for proper wildlife management and conservation. I urge you to support CACR 15 and help protect these cherished rights for current and future generations. Respectfully, Bryan Stevens Candia, NH
I oppose this bill due to the fact that the actions it entails are cruel and unnecessary.
Hunting fishing and trapping is a way of life for many people in New Hampshire and also the way they feed themselves and their families. In my opinion hunting fishing and trapping should be a constitutional right
Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong support for CACR 15, which would establish a constitutional right for New Hampshire citizens to hunt, fish, and harvest game and fish. I urge you to support CACR 15 and help protect these cherished rights for current and future generations.
Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong support for CACR 15, which would establish a constitutional right for New Hampshire citizens to hunt, fish, and harvest game and fish. Key reasons I support this constitutional amendment: • Hunting and fishing are integral parts of New Hampshire's heritage and culture that deserve constitutional protection • These activities contribute significantly to our state's economy through license fees, equipment purchases, and tourism • Hunters and anglers are among our most dedicated conservationists, funding wildlife management and habitat preservation • Constitutional protection ensures these rights cannot be eliminated by future legislative action • The amendment preserves existing regulatory authority while protecting the fundamental right to participate This constitutional amendment will safeguard traditions that have been passed down through generations of New Hampshire families while continuing to allow for proper wildlife management and conservation. I urge you to support CACR 15 and help protect these cherished rights for current and future generations. Respectfully, August Gibson Pittsfield, NH
Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong support for CACR 15, which would establish a constitutional right for New Hampshire citizens to hunt, fish, and harvest game and fish. Key reasons I support this constitutional amendment: • Hunting and fishing are integral parts of New Hampshire's heritage and culture that deserve constitutional protection • These activities contribute significantly to our state's economy through license fees, equipment purchases, and tourism • Hunters and anglers are among our most dedicated conservationists, funding wildlife management and habitat preservation • Constitutional protection ensures these rights cannot be eliminated by future legislative action • The amendment preserves existing regulatory authority while protecting the fundamental right to participate This constitutional amendment will safeguard traditions that have been passed down through generations of New Hampshire families while continuing to allow for proper wildlife management and conservation. I urge you to support CACR 15 and help protect these cherished rights for current and future generations. Respectfully, Kyle Bassler Derry, NH
My wife and family moved to Plymouth, New Hampshire recently. We love living in the Lakes Region and enjoy hiking in the mountains. Where we live is situated at the foot of the White Mountains, so we are treated to "leaf peeping" without having to go anywhere! Hunting despoils the environment and is contrary to God's divine plan. You don't have to be Catholic or Christian to appreciate the beauty and majesty of Nature. You just have to be respectful and grateful for this blessing. We want to be proud of living in a state that values and protects wildlife -- not with hunters ravaging the forests with no regard for other species who have the right to live in peace. The idea of giving them "carte blanche" to do as they please is revolting and contrary to what we've taught our children, in appreciating the beauty of creation all around us. To enshrine the "right to kill" in our state's Constitution would be a grievous mistake. I hope you see that and OPPOSE this Bill. Thank you. J. D. Calhoun
As a proud resident of New Hampshire, where our state's motto is "Live Fee or Die" embodies a deep respect for individual liberties and outdoor traditions, I strongly support CACR 15, the proposed constitutional amendment to enshrine the right to hunt, fish, and harvest game and fish for all Granite Staters. This legislation recognizes that these activities are not just pastimes but integral to our cultural heritage, economy, and way of life in the Granite State. Hunting and fishing have been foundational to New Hampshire since its founding, providing sustenance, recreation, and a means of wildlife management that benefits our ecosystems. By embedding this right in our state constitution, CACR 15 ensures that future generations can continue these traditions without undue interference, while still respecting existing laws and regulations that promote conservation and safety. This amendment does not create new privileges; it safeguards against potential future restrictions that could erode our freedoms, as seen in other states where anti-hunting groups have pushed for bans. Economically, hunting and fishing contribute millions to the New Hampshire economy through licenses, equipment sales, and tourism. They also play a vital role in controlling wildlife populations, preventing overpopulation issues that could lead to disease or habitat destruction. CACR 15 affirms that traditional methods of harvesting wildlife remain the preferred approach, aligning with sustainable practices that have served our state well for centuries. I urge the New Hampshire House to pass CACR 15 and put this amendment on the ballot, allowing voters to affirm our commitment to liberty and the outdoors. This is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to protect what makes New Hampshire unique. Let's stand together for our rights and our heritage. Thank you for the opportunity to present my thoughts on this legislation, and thank all of you for your continued service to the citizens of New Hampshire.
Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong support for CACR 15, which would establish a constitutional right for New Hampshire citizens to hunt, fish, and harvest game and fish. Key reasons I support this constitutional amendment: • Hunting and fishing are integral parts of New Hampshire's heritage and culture that deserve constitutional protection • These activities contribute significantly to our state's economy through license fees, equipment purchases, and tourism • Hunters and anglers are among our most dedicated conservationists, funding wildlife management and habitat preservation • Constitutional protection ensures these rights cannot be eliminated by future legislative action • The amendment preserves existing regulatory authority while protecting the fundamental right to participate This constitutional amendment will safeguard traditions that have been passed down through generations of New Hampshire families while continuing to allow for proper wildlife management and conservation. I urge you to support CACR 15 and help protect these cherished rights for current and future generations. Respectfully, Elizabeth Miller Bristol, NH
I do not have an issue with hunting within reasonable limits, i.e. specific species, specific limit numbers by species, types of weapons etc. What I am concerned with this Constitutional amendment is the phrase "Public hunting and fishing shall be the preferred means of managing and controlling wildlife in New Hampshire." Hunting can be a means to help control species numbers I am concerned with it being ..."the preferred means of managing and controlling wildlife in New Hampshire" There are many means of controlling a species populations other than hunting and to add on to this there are many species where it is difficult to actually hunt, such species as the coyote that breed to quickly and move to easily for a hunter to be able to maintain a proper species population. NH. Fish and Games are a group of well educated people that has a large array of management tool and techniques at their disposal to use to control a species population. Making hunting the preferred method would eliminate many effective and probably more effective tools Lastly, the passage of this amendment written as listed would probably bring lawsuits against the state over seasons, bag limits, methods, and closures. I encourage you to vote against this amendment as written.It is my opinion, that we, in the state of New Hampshire, have an excellent Fish and Game department, who are highly trained in determining which method, when necessary, to use. I would feel more comfortable to let Fish and Game determine if hunting is the best method needed and if so then having Fish and Game determine how many of the species is allowed to be taken.
Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong support for CACR 15, which would establish a constitutional right for New Hampshire citizens to hunt, fish, and harvest game and fish. Key reasons I support this constitutional amendment: • Hunting and fishing are integral parts of New Hampshire's heritage and culture that deserve constitutional protection • These activities contribute significantly to our state's economy through license fees, equipment purchases, and tourism • Hunters and anglers are among our most dedicated conservationists, funding wildlife management and habitat preservation • Constitutional protection ensures these rights cannot be eliminated by future legislative action • The amendment preserves existing regulatory authority while protecting the fundamental right to participate This constitutional amendment will safeguard traditions that have been passed down through generations of New Hampshire families while continuing to allow for proper wildlife management and conservation. I urge you to support CACR 15 and help protect these cherished rights for current and future generations. Respectfully, Kevin Burrow Thorton, NH
Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong support for CACR 15, which would establish a constitutional right for New Hampshire citizens to hunt, fish, and harvest game and fish. Key reasons I support this constitutional amendment: • Hunting and fishing are integral parts of New Hampshire's heritage and culture that deserve constitutional protection • These activities contribute significantly to our state's economy through license fees, equipment purchases, and tourism • Hunters and anglers are among our most dedicated conservationists, funding wildlife management and habitat preservation • Constitutional protection ensures these rights cannot be eliminated by future legislative action • The amendment preserves existing regulatory authority while protecting the fundamental right to participate This constitutional amendment will safeguard traditions that have been passed down through generations of New Hampshire families while continuing to allow for proper wildlife management and conservation. I urge you to support CACR 15 and help protect these cherished rights for current and future generations. Respectfully, Mr. Ryan V. Turner
Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong support for CACR 15, which would establish a constitutional right for New Hampshire citizens to hunt, fish, and harvest game and fish. Key reasons I support this constitutional amendment: • Hunting and fishing are integral parts of New Hampshire's heritage and culture that deserve constitutional protection • These activities contribute significantly to our state's economy through license fees, equipment purchases, and tourism • Hunters and anglers are among our most dedicated conservationists, funding wildlife management and habitat preservation • Constitutional protection ensures these rights cannot be eliminated by future legislative action • The amendment preserves existing regulatory authority while protecting the fundamental right to participate This constitutional amendment will safeguard traditions that have been passed down through generations of New Hampshire families while continuing to allow for proper wildlife management and conservation. I urge you to support CACR 15 and help protect these cherished rights for current and future generations. Respectfully, Justine Baldassara Berlin, NH