This budget as proposed includes troubling cuts to Medicare and childcare funding, necessary services for many residents in New Hampshire. With these cuts, working families could be forced to choose between holding down a job and finding childcare, increasing the burden on New Hampshire's most vulnerable. Additionally, the budget increases funding for Education Freedom Account vouchers. Meanwhile, New Hampshire is ranked the lowest in the country for state funding of public schools, leaving our education system struggling to function. Allocating money to these vouchers that could be spent on supporting local school districts will place more pressure onto already struggling taxpayers and leave New Hampshire's students at a disadvantage. Please support a budget proposal that addresses the needs of New Hampshire's children and working families, rather than prioritizing tax breaks for corporations and private school funds for wealthy families. Thank you.
HB1
House · 2025 sessionRepublicanSigned into lawState budget appropriations
AISets department-by-department state budget appropriations and administrative footnotes for the two fiscal years ending June 30, 2026 and June 30, 2027, including funding rules, position eliminations, and agency spending authority.
making appropriations for the expenses of certain departments of the state for fiscal years ending June 30, 2026 and June 30, 2027.
Status
Signed into law · June 30, 2025- ✓Introduced
- ✓House
- ✓Senate
- ✓Governor
- ✓Law
Division of testimony
702 submissionsArgument digest · AI-generated
from 298 of 298 written submissionsHB1 is New Hampshire's biennial state budget bill for FY2026-2027. Testimony splits along program lines: many submitters oppose specific provisions such as Medicaid premiums/co-pays, expanded Education Freedom Account (school voucher) eligibility, University System funding cuts, and a Renewable Energy Fund transfer, arguing they harm vulnerable residents and shift costs to property taxpayers, while other submitters urge full funding of programs such as developmental disability services, the Alcohol Fund, and Meals on Wheels.
- Fully fund developmental disability services (BDS)Support23 of 298 reviewed
Many submitters, including family caregivers and service providers, urge full funding of the Governor's budget and the Bureau of Developmental Services prioritized needs list, citing understaffing, waitlists, and low wages for direct support professionals.
“I urge you to fully fund Governor Ayotte’s proposed state budget for fiscal years 2026 and 2027 and fund the Bureau of Developmental Services (BDS) prioritized needs list.”
— Madeline Boughter, Hanover · #500965 — read full submission →
“Families and providers in New Hampshire continue to struggle to hire Direct Support professionals who provide essential care and supports to individuals. Without rate increases, there is no long-term mechanism to increase rates and subsequently wages for DSPs.”
— MICHELLE Donovan, Farmington · #503782 — read full submission →
- Fully fund the Alcohol Abuse Prevention and Treatment FundSupport14 of 298 reviewed
Submitters, including recovery program staff, urge the state to fund the Alcohol Fund at its full statutory 5% of liquor gross profits to sustain prevention, treatment, and recovery services.
“I am writing to express my strong support for the full funding of the Alcohol Abuse Prevention and Treatment Fund (Alcohol Fund) in the upcoming state budget.”
— Randy Stevens, MANCHESTER · #503648 — read full submission →
“I request you fully fund the alcohol fund at 5% this fiscal year as Governor Ayotte and the statues provide.”
— Whitney Brown, Portsmouth, New Hampshire · #505383 — read full submission →
- Fund Meals on Wheels for older adultsSupport4 of 298 reviewed
A few submitters urge increased funding for Meals on Wheels programs to address nutrition needs and social isolation among seniors.
“Meals On Wheels makes such a huge difference filling in the gaps that family or community cannot (OR WILL NOT) provide..”
— Patricia Linnett-Tuttle, Goffstown · #500689 — read full submission →
“The state budget proposal must prioritize increasing funding for Meals On Wheels to ensure our older adults not only receive the meals they depend on but also to combat the epidemic of social isolation among them.”
— Audrey Fletcher, Manchester · #500876 — read full submission →
- Oppose expanding Education Freedom Account vouchersOppose69 of 298 reviewed
Submitters argue removing income limits on the school voucher program will divert public education funding to wealthy families and private/religious schools with little accountability, at a cost far exceeding budgeted estimates.
“They're draining our tax dollars to support families who are sending their kids not only to private schools, but who are using the funds for dance classes, soccer lessons, Circus Smirkus, summer camp, driving schools, skiing, and mountain biking!”
— Julie Gingras, Brookline · #503255 — read full submission →
“This means our wealthiest families can use this money to pay for private and sometimes religious schools, pulling money out of our public schools which are there for all families regardless of wealth.”
— Ingrid Markman, Hollis · #502161 — read full submission →
- Oppose cuts to the University System / higher educationOppose55 of 298 reviewed
Submitters, many affiliated with Plymouth State University, argue New Hampshire already ranks at or near the bottom nationally in public higher education funding and that further cuts would eliminate humanities programs, faculty, and majors.
- Oppose Medicaid premiums, co-pays, and cutsOppose39 of 298 reviewed
Submitters argue new Medicaid premiums and increased co-pays would force low-income, disabled, and recovering residents to forgo or delay care, ultimately raising costs elsewhere in the health system.
“Ayotte’s budget is a direct attack on working families in New Hampshire. It forces NH's most vulnerable families and those in recovery to pay hundreds - or even thousands - more just to keep their health insurance”
— Susan Fanburg, Bedford · #503062 — read full submission →
“My understanding is that HB1 & HB2 make changes to the Medicaid program by instituting premiums for individuals & families and increasing co-pays as well.”
— Kimberly Shaw, NASHUA · #503905 — read full submission →
- Oppose tax cuts for the wealthy and corporationsOppose32 of 298 reviewed
Submitters object to the repeal of the Interest and Dividends Tax and other business tax reductions, arguing it is unfair to pair tax relief for wealthier residents and corporations with new costs imposed on low-income families.
“the Legislature has repealed the Interest and Dividends Tax to favor business and the wealthy while you are seeking to add a 5% income tax premium on healthcare for the folks least able to pay that.”
— Penny Reynolds, Portsmouth · #504437 — read full submission →
“With the repeal of the interest and dividend tax, NH will lose out in 184 billion dollars of revenue while charging a 5% income tax premium to the states lowest earners!”
— Sharon Eaton, Pembroke · #503688 — read full submission →
- Oppose cuts to childcare fundingOppose26 of 298 reviewed
Submitters argue cuts to childcare workforce development and scholarship programs make it harder for working families to afford care, keeping parents out of the workforce.
- Oppose downshifting costs onto local property taxesOppose24 of 298 reviewed
Submitters argue the budget shifts financial burdens for education and other services onto local property taxpayers rather than the state, worsening an already high property tax burden.
“The State continues to not take responsibility for adequately funding a balanced budget and for adequately funding our schools, thus pushing the burden down to the local level and unfairly stressing property owners, like myself.”
— Mary Meyers, Hancock · #503259 — read full submission →
“I am especially concerned about cuts to town side resulting in higher property taxes!!!”
— Charlie Cotton, Lancaster · #500968 — read full submission →
- Oppose transferring Renewable Energy Fund money to the General FundOppose6 of 298 reviewed
Submitters argue diverting $10 million from the Renewable Energy Fund undermines its dedicated purpose of funding local energy projects that lower residents' energy bills and increase energy independence.
“HB1 inappropriately transfers $10 million of the Renewable Energy Fund to the General Fund. These funds should be used to fund local energy projects to reduce residents energy bills and increase energy independence.”
— richard DeMark, Meredith · #503768 — read full submission →
“I oppose the proposal to move 10 million dollars from the Renewable Energy Fund into the General Fund.”
— Susan Richman, Durham · #502754 — read full submission →
- Budget relies on unrealistic or unconfirmed revenueOppose6 of 298 reviewed
Submitters argue the budget depends on optimistic or speculative revenue sources, such as rainy day fund withdrawals and slot machine revenue from not-yet-passed legislation, making it fiscally unsound.
- Insufficient opportunity for public inputOppose2 of 298 reviewed
A few submitters criticize the budget process itself, noting only a single public hearing was held on a bill of this scope and complexity.
“They have decided to hold only a single public hearing, which is not past practice.”
— Richard Christiansen, Walpole · #503616 — read full submission →
“There also needs to be MANY more opportunities for public input on this budget than was provided here.”
— Giana Gelsey, Madbury · #505950 — read full submission →
Generated by claude-sonnet-5 (claude code agent) on Jul 20, 2026. Quotes are verbatim excerpts, verified against the cited submission before publication. Summaries are AI interpretation of the record, not part of it.
Services like Medicaid, childcare workforce development and public education funding are not only vital from a humanitarian perspective, but also the fiscally responsible choice. Access to affordable childcare will enable more parents to work, allowing more families to build financial stability that will reduce their reliance on government programs. A public school education is in many cases the only resource a student can afford to gain the skills necessary for employment or further education post-graduation. I urge you to please consider how these public services provide many of your constituents with the health and security necessary for creating independent stability.
Please keep Medicaid funding at its current level, this is a lifeline for people experiencing hardship and disability. Defacto Medicaid expansion elimination will have adverse effects across the state and lead to people dying of preventable conditions due to lack of access to medical care.
Hello, my name is Avery Opland and I am firmly against cuts to funding for higher education. I am a senior political science major at Plymouth State University, from Antrim NH. As a first-generation college student with solidly working-class father and a mother not in the picture. I came to Plymouth without a clear sense of what college would like for me, I just knew that I loved to learn, and I wanted to succeed. I found my passion in politics with a goal of being a public servant in NH state and municipal government, which I will being doing after graduation. Plymouth State gave me a place to grow, explore new interests and become the best version of myself, primarily through the student community and Professors Like Dr. Lappie who have deeply inspired me. These cuts will take that opportunity away from others. We need to create an environment where young people in NH have the opportunities they need to stay here and eventually give back to this great state, funding for higher education is an integral part of that. It is an investment in the future of the state. I beg for you to consider the very real impact of these budget cuts on NH kids like I was. Thank you.
Fully funding the NH Alcohol Fund at 5% is crucial for ensuring that the state can continue to support essential public health initiatives, substance use prevention programs, recovery community organizations, and local communities that rely on these resources for critical services. By allocating five percent of gross profits from alcohol sales to the Alcohol Fund, New Hampshire can invest in improving public safety, providing treatment for those struggling with addiction, and addressing the root causes of substance misuse. Adequate funding ensures that the state's approach to these complex issues remains effective, sustainable, and responsive to the needs of its residents.
My name is Emily Harmon, and my school, Plymouth State University, has been discussing cutting all of the humanities majors and firing 30+ out of the 45 humanities professors -- their reasoning being financial strain and low enrollment. By doing this, they will be getting rid of me and all of my friend's majors, and most of us will end up having to leave, or graduate with a degree that isn't what we signed up for. I love this school, and my professors are the biggest reason why I am still here. They work one on one with students, and have personally provided me opportunities I never would have if they didn't actively care about me and my peers individually. If you cut even more money from higher education, you are going to harm the universities here that are already struggling to educate their students well. It is going to kill the humanities first, and they are necessary to run our society and save us from fascism.
Please support fully funding the DHHS, Bureau of Developmental Services Budget.
Thank you for this opportunity and on behalf of my daughter and so many others, I respectfully ask the House of Representatives to fund the Governor's Budget for FY2026-2027 in its entirety. In addition, please also fund the BDS Prioritized Needs List. We need your help and appreciate your compassionate consideration in this matter. Again, thank you!
Please support fully funding the DHHS, Bureau of Developmental Services Budget.
I urge you to oppose HB 1 in its current form. It includes cuts to vital programs for children, the elderly, and working families, while expanding the EFA school voucher program which syphons funds away from our public schools.
I am Lauranne Wingard and I work as a Certified Peer Specialist at Strafford County’s Community Mental Health Center (CMHC), on the Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) Team as mandated. I have been a consumer of mental health services and Medicaid, as well as being a provider. I feel strongly that that funding for Medicaid programs be maintained or increased. Our Team works with the people who most need mental health treatment such as people coming out of the NH Mental Health Hospital (NHH), people coming out of jail, and people who need significant mental health assistance to stay in the community and not in a hospital. Most people we support require multiple visits a week from Mental Health providers to stay healthy, out of crisis, and receive basic supports such as housing, utilities, and food. Things like phones, transportation, dental care, and new shoes are often luxuries that these people must do without. Currently, our Team is able to provide: - A Therapist who provides appropriate counselling for trauma, anxiety, depression, hearing voices, medication management, and many other symptoms and diagnosis including schizophrenia, as well as contributing to the process of deciding if someone needs more intense treatment. - A Case Manager who provides resources for food, phones, utility assistance, Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security Income (SSI), Social Security Disability Income (SSDI), physical health treatment, medical specialists, shoes, dentists, housing, landlord relations, etc., and is often able to advocate with service providers on behalf of the people we support. - A Functional Support Specialist who assists with day-to-day challenges like mental health support, substance abuse, transportation to appointments and grocery, budgeting, family relationships, community relationships, domestic violence, medication monitoring, suicidal ideas and other harmful behaviors, etc. - A Supported Employment Specialist who provides assistance with anything related to getting a job, like aptitude assessments, applications, interview support, skill building, relationships with the Office of Vocational Rehabilitation (VR), and even accompanying people to their workplace after finding a job to help with anxiety, interpersonal communications, standard workplace procedures (time cards, time off, supervision, etc.) - A Substance Use Specialist who helps with the stages of change that can happen when someone is trying to quit a habit, provides education surrounding Substance Abuse, and offer suggestions and support during withdrawal, if necessary. - A Peer Support who uses their own lived mental health experience in a non-clinical way to be the evidence that someone with significant mental health diagnosis can have a happy and productive life, much like the relationships that exist in many recovery groups such as Alcoholics Anonymous (AA). They coach and inspire people to move forward in many aspects and enrich the quality of their lives. - A Doctor who can prescribe and monitor mental health mediations, as well as provide education about medications. Without Medicaid, this is what we are able to provide: - A Therapist - A Doctor Even if you just look at people on ACT Teams at CMHCs around the state, there are hundreds of people who will quite likely not be able to stay in the community if cuts are made to Medicaid’s budget. Add to that people who do not utilize services at a CMHC but rely on Medicaid to pay for mediation co-pays, deductibles, and Medicare premiums to stay healthy. This creates a huge number of people who are likely to end up at NHH because of their inability to stay healthy on their own, which NHH is not prepared to handle. Please carefully consider the Medicaid funding and management when making budgets and voting on legislation for same, and make decisions that show your support of continuing the Medicaid program either at its current funding level or more. Thank you.
The budget for NH shouldn't be built upon the backs of the citizens that can least afford the added burdens.
I write to strongly oppose the reduction in state funding for the USNH system. I work at Plymouth State and we are struggling financially. Cutting funding to this school will reduce our enrollment, maybe even causing us to close, and this university is the central economic driver of this town and region. Members of the PSU community drive the local and regional economies, including the tourist economy, and we want to encourage college-educated graduates to stay in New Hampshire and work. Supporting our USNH system is equivalent to supporting our state's economic future.
I want the House of Representatives to FULLY FUND THE GOVERNOR’S BUDGET FOR FY2026 - 2027. In addition, PLEASE ALSO FUND THE BDS PRIORITIZED NEEDS LIST. I am a working mother of three. My eldest daughter has Cornelia de Lange syndrome. She is currently 12 years old and requires full assistance with all activities of daily living. My daughter is healthy and happy. The services we have received in the State of NH have greatly contributed to her, and my entire family's wellbeing. However, as my child ages, and I do as well, the level of care my child needs continues to grow, and my ability to provide that care diminishes. I anticipate at some point my daughter will require services outside of my capability as I age. Increases to fund room and board expenses at residential programs is essential to provide quality care for my daughter. Although I am a fulltime working mom, my ability to cover the costs for these types of programs is very much outside of my ability to pay. With my daughter's limitations in all aspects (physically, cognitively, developmentally) she is unlikely to be able to earn even a limited income to support herself. Further, maintaining an adequate living space in my home for my daughter as long as possible will require extensive changes in the coming years in order to physically move my daughter, bath her, toilet her, etc. I will also require assistance in my home to provide her basic needs and am beginning to look to hire individuals to provide that care. Finding and attracting help has been and continues to be a big challenge. If I am unable to maintain a safe home and hire the supports needed to provide my daughter's ongoing medical and physical needs, I will be unable to care for her in my home and will need to seek placement for her elsewhere. This would mean my eldest daughter would no longer be in her supportive loving home with her brother and sister and myself. Alternatively, I would need to consider leaving employment in order to meet my daughter's growing needs. When my daughter was first born twelve years ago, we were immediately put in contact with early supports and services. Without the huge level of support we received in our home, we would not be where we are today. I would not have the tools or support to care for her, and would require extensive support in a medical or residential facility. Early intervention also allowed our daughter to develop crucial skills and avoid unnecessary confusion and panic for our household. Early intervention helped my family deal with the trauma of nearly losing our daughter at birth, and navigating the unknown medical diagnoses that she did not receive until nearly her first birthday. Without this support my career and ability to contribute to the community I live in would have been severely impacted, if not eliminated. With my daughter's limitations in communication, mobility and cognitive functioning, she needs unique therapies and activities to fully engage in the community. Aquatic therapy and hippo therapy are two recreational activities that have allowed our daughter to develop core concepts that have carried over to every aspect of her life. Our daughter's social circle would be nearly nonexistent otherwise. Her health and happiness would undoubtedly suffer as a result. To this end, I implore you to FULLY FUND THE GOVERNOR’S BUDGET FOR FY2026 - 2027. In addition, PLEASE ALSO FUND THE BDS PRIORITIZED NEEDS LIST. Thank you for your time and consideration. Our family is relying on this.
As the House Finance Committee works through the budget process, I urge the committee to prioritize investments that support New Hampshire families. I am submitting testimony in support of the Medicaid (and Granite Advantage) health insurance programs. I have a family member who struggled with substance use disorder (SUD) and today they are in recovery and employed due to the mental health treatment they received via Medicaid and Granite Advantage. Both health insurance programs need to remain affordable as well as accessible, so I respectfully ask the committee to carefully consider the budgetary impact of any premiums and/or co-payments on lower income families. Also, I urge the committee to continue to fund the Alcohol Fund at 5% of liquor gross profits and utilize the Alcohol Fund for the intended purpose of supporting contracted prevention, treatment, and recovery programs. Thank you for your service to New Hampshire and consideration of these critical issues.
I am a board member of Community Partners in Strafford County. Please do not cut Medicaid. I have witnessed first-hand how important Medicaid is to families struggling with a child with Autism. If you make these cuts, these families will have no support. The children will lose precious help at the different stages of Autism as they grow. Please keep the funding for Medicaid. You are helping our most vulnerable population.
Opportunity Networks Enriching Our Communities by Connecting Local Employers and Individuals with Opportunities to Succeed Testimony - HB1 Thank you for affording me the opportunity to provide testimony related to HB1. I am a lifelong resident of the great State of New Hampshire. I am submitting my support for Governor Ayotte’s proposed budget at a minimum. The two most important issues faced by our service system are: 1) additional funding for individuals with disabilities who are currently on a waiting list for services, and 2) funding that supports livable wages for Direct Support Professionals. I would also like to state my appreciation for the leadership being provided by the Commissioner of the NH Department of Health and Human Services, Lori Weaver and the Bureau Chief of the Bureau of Developmental Services, Jessica Gorton. Their oversight of the major systems change initiative that is occurring is admirable. It is imperative for this effort to succeed that Workforce issues be addressed. Wages for frontline workers has been under the mark set for a livable wage. We are all aware of the pressures being felt by increasing costs. We are not only struggling to recruit new employees, but we are at a significant risk of retaining some of our most skilled and valuable workers. I have been the Executive Director of Opportunity Networks since August 1987. Opportunity Networks provides training and support services to New Hampshire residents who are faced with the many challenges presented by living life with a disability. A significant portion of our funding comes from the Bureau of Developmental Services (Medicaid) and the Bureau of Vocational Rehabilitation. We customize and design services for the individuals we support to meet their unique needs in a productive and safe manner. We provide Day Program services that place a strong emphasis on employment, health and wellness, community participation and developing independence. Fourteen months after becoming the Director of Opportunity Networks I was diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis. Many individuals with my situation have gone onto permanent disability relying on government funded programs. I continued working by adopting a strategy based on utilization of medical treatment, lifestyle changes and relying on the support of my employer, coworkers and family. I have learned that with the right support I could be more independent in achieving the success that I knew that I was capable of. My experience has enhanced my ability to assist others with disabilities by supporting them to remain engaged in everyday life. The alternative is often heigh levels of social isolation, lethargic lifestyles, limited opportunities to learn and grow, and in many cases less than optimal health. Supporting services strengthens the community. Family members are able to maintain their careers without concerns of their adult children being at risk. Employment allows people to contribute to the fabric of local communities. Health and wellness activities reduce the need for further medical care. Community participation builds positive relationships among neighbors. Engaging people prevents social isolation that can be so damaging to anyone. Everyone deserves autonomy and the right to reach their fullest potential. Please support funding for the valuable services we provide to New Hampshire families who face the daily challenges resulting from disabilities. Respectfully submitted Rocky Morelli, Executive Director 11 Caldwell Drive, Amherst, NH 03031 • 603-883-4402 • Fax: 603-883-4468. 116A Perimeter Road, Nashua, NH 03063 • 603-889-0796 • Fax: 603-546-0128 402-403 Riverway Place, Bedford, NH 03110 • 603-518-8076 www.opportunitynetworks.org
As a student studying to become a teacher, and this bill affecting my education to do that, I find this a HORRIBLE way to support education in this state. I'm appalled at the idea that this kind of funding is being cut from education.
The Governor's proposed budget will undermine the living standards of Medicaid recipients and weaken our econony. Our state's most vulerable citizens rely on Medicaid to support healthcare and nursing home care. Medicaid recipients can not afford these cost increases. Additionally, this budget will result in further cuts to our underfunded university system, thereby increasing the likihood that our young adults will continue leaving the state for higher education. At a time when our labor pool is declining due to our aging population, we need younger residents to stay and work in New Hampshire. The inmigration to our state is not sufficient to meet the labor needs and fuel a healthy economy. This budgeted is both shortsighted and inhumane. I urge the Committee to oppose HB 1 and HB2. Sincerely, Sheryl Shirley
I do not want expansion of voucher system.
As a current university student and future educator of New Hampshire, I am appaled at the proposed budget cuts being made to education. Education is power, it is change, it is everything. This proposed cut would hurt my ability to pay for university tuition, and it would hurt my future career as a public school teacher. Our New Hampshire teachers deserve more support and more funding. We must protect them and protect each other.
As a student of the USNH specifically Plymouth State University to be honest we are already struggling. New Hampshire has some of the lowest funding in the country so this proposed budget cut would really just be rubbing salt into the wound when what we really need is some help. If we value education so highly why are we trying to weaken higher education? There is no need. We need more money not less, plants need sunlight and water to grow not darkness.
While HB 1 includes valuable investments in areas like public safety and workforce development, I strongly oppose it because it perpetuates New Hampshire’s overreliance on local property taxes, leaving poorer districts at a severe disadvantage. As the most comprehensive bill of the session, HB 1 should include meaningful school funding reform that reduces the property tax burden on low-wealth communities and provides equitable state support. I urge you to prioritize fair school funding so every child, regardless of ZIP code, can access a high-quality education.
I currently work in the field of Early Intervention and have for the past 30 years. We have always been underfunded and have had to sacrifice so much to serve the children in our community. Many years have gone by where we have not had a pay raise. We use our own cars to provide home based services but are reimbursed below the federal mileage rate. The work we do with families and children greatly impact both their future Academic and social emotional development. It can greatly reduced or prevent the need for more costly services as the child gets older. If we are not fully funded, our providers may not be able to meet the demand for services we are currently experiencing. Please consider fully funding and voting yes to this bill.
This budget is fundamentally flawed. It assumes revenue that likely doesn’t exist or is ridiculously inflated (ex. Lottery revenue) and ignores expenses that we absolutely know exist (ex lawsuit costs). The numbers simply don’t add up. We need a budget that doesn’t downshift more costs onto local property taxes and that supports people over corporations. This budget, as it stands, does not do that. There also needs to be MANY more opportunities for public input on this budget than was provided here.