NH House Testimony

HB1005

House · 2026 sessionBipartisanKilled in House

Repeal of zoning history study commission

AI

Repeals the commission established to study the historical evolution of the New Hampshire zoning enabling act.

repealing the commission to study the historical evolution of the New Hampshire zoning enabling act.

Zoning and PlanningMunicipalities

Status

Killed in the House — Inexpedient to Legislate · March 11, 2026
  1. Introduced
  2. House
  3. Senate
  4. Governor
  5. Law

Division of testimony

17 submissions
Support 8Oppose 9Neutral 0
Elizabeth SingerOpposeStratham, NHfor MyselfFeb 3, 2026

I oppose this bill.

Sharon MonahanSupportPeterborough, NHfor MyselfJan 22, 2026

Dear Members of the Housing Committee: I am in strong support of HB1005 which Repeals the "Commission to Study the Historical Evolution of the NH Zoning Enabling Act". I also echo Mr. Preece"s testimony of support and concerns that the Commission does not study or provide any unbiased research into municipal zoning. That the purpose of the commission is to politically dismantle and undermine RSA 672 and local land-use authority regarding planning and zoning for their own community's' health safety and welfare. RSA 672 enables local authority and governance of this. Instead, this Commission is trying to justify state pre-emption through one size fits all planning and zoning mandates and bypassing a municipality's rights by disabling their authority. Serve your communities and constituents and recognize that NH communities are not subjects of the State. Support HB 1005 and recommend OTP. Sincerely, Sharon Monahan

Georgina LambertOpposeBelmont, NHfor MyselfJan 13, 2026

"HB 1005 may reduce administrative costs but simultaneously erodes a critical institutional mechanism for understanding and addressing housing inequities in New Hampshire. The repeal disproportionately impacts historically marginalized communities by removing oversight that could prevent the perpetuation of exclusionary zoning practices. From an inclusive, intersectional, trauma-informed, and evidence-based perspective, the bill risks perpetuating structural inequities and intergenerational housing trauma without significant compensatory benefits. "

David PreeceSupportManchester, NHfor MyselfJan 13, 2026

Dear Chair and Members of the Committee, I write in strong support of HB 1005, which repeals the so-called “Commission to Study the Historical Evolution of the New Hampshire Zoning Enabling Act.” This commission does not exist to solve a problem. It exists to undermine local land-use authority by rewriting history to justify state preemption. New Hampshire’s zoning system is not broken. It has been deliberately designed for nearly a century to place planning and land-use decisions in the hands of municipalities and voters. That principle is not accidental — it is the foundation of RSA 672 and the home-rule structure that has allowed our towns and cities to grow responsibly while protecting property rights, infrastructure, and community character. The study commission was never about neutral research. Its mandate was framed to question whether zoning should exist at all — not how to improve it, but how to dismantle it. That makes it a political instrument, not a fact-finding body. At a time when New Hampshire faces real housing, infrastructure, and affordability challenges, the last thing we need is a taxpayer-funded committee whose purpose is to lay the groundwork for stripping communities of their authority and replacing it with one-size-fits-all mandates from Concord. If the Legislature believes zoning law should change, that debate belongs here — in public hearings, with municipal officials, residents, and elected representatives at the table — not inside a commission created to reach a predetermined conclusion. HB 1005 restores honesty and transparency to the process. It eliminates an unnecessary body, saves public resources, and sends a clear message: New Hampshire’s communities are not subjects of the state — they are partners in governing it. I respectfully urge the Committee to recommend Ought to Pass on HB 1005. Sincerely, David John Preece State Representative, Hillsborough District 17

Daniel RichardsonSupportNashua, NHfor MyselfFeb 3, 2026

Position recorded without written comment.

Jeremiah GithuSupportPLYMOUTH, NHfor MyselfFeb 3, 2026

Position recorded without written comment.

Kaitlyn DuguaySupportManchester, NHfor MyselfFeb 3, 2026

Position recorded without written comment.

Daniel RichardsonSupportNashua, NHfor MyselfJan 22, 2026

Position recorded without written comment.

Christopher FreemanOpposeKeene, NHfor MyselfJan 22, 2026

Position recorded without written comment.

Sara PersechinoOpposeContoocook, NHfor MyselfJan 22, 2026

Position recorded without written comment.

Nancy BishopOpposePlaistow, NHfor MyselfJan 22, 2026

Position recorded without written comment.

Sarah ScottOpposeSomersworth, NHfor Americans for Prosperity New HampshireJan 13, 2026

Position recorded without written comment.

Andrew ClineOpposeBedford, NHfor Josiah Bartlett Center for Public PolicyJan 13, 2026

Position recorded without written comment.

Julie SmithSupportEpsom, NHfor MyselfJan 13, 2026

Position recorded without written comment.

Kate CoonOpposePeterborough, NHfor MyselfJan 13, 2026

Position recorded without written comment.

Daniel RichardsonSupportNashua, NHfor MyselfJan 13, 2026

Position recorded without written comment.

Eric PauerOpposeBrookline, NHfor MyselfJan 13, 2026

Position recorded without written comment.