Policy promotes planning uniformity but may slow ADU growth and reduce housing flexibility for marginalized communities. Municipalities should implement equity-focused approval processes.
HB1006
House · 2026 sessionBipartisanKilled in HouseOn-site parking rules for accessory units
AIRequires that parking for accessory dwelling units be located on-site or at a legally dedicated off-site location approved by the municipality, removing property owners' discretion over parking placement.
relative to on-site parking requirements for accessory dwelling units.
Status
Killed in the House — Inexpedient to Legislate · February 5, 2026- ✓Introduced
- ✕House
- Senate
- Governor
- Law
Division of testimony
10 submissionsThe Members of the NH Council on Developmental Disabilities believe this will could have a negative effect on the NH disability community.
I opposed this bill because it’s taking the right of people who try to get into homeless for the first time and out of apartments or those who lost their homes to go back into a home environment. It’s not fair that the only available Homes are over $500,000 are not available to somebody like me a retired person or somebody like my daughter and her husband who can’t afford to even buy a home we’ll have to continuously live in an apartment. This is not about your right to profit, but our right to find a home and happiness in the state of New Hampshire and this is not what you are doing. This is totally against everything that a resident of New Hampshire is! Mobile homes from anything before 1980s are not the same as what is being built today and anybody who looks at some of these modular homes now as double wide or singles wide it’s totally different different than what was done then. They have different different codes. They have different different standards. This is not not fair to take away anyone’s right to be able to purchase or to be able to add in a town. It’s not fair when a town says that mobile homes can only be on a certain size lot and make it look like a slum just to be able to get rid of them. That’s not fair to anyone not the people who live beside them whatever, but if they were given the opportunity to have large larger, lots bigger place to expand a yard and have some of these modular homes come in it’s a whole different story today and a lot of different places. I will invite you to come take a look at someplace nice and that’s Freedom Hill Co-op in Loudon, New Hampshire? There are many co-ops in this state that are in a lot better shape than what some of the old places are, but they are nevertheless homes for somebody. It’s the landlords of the other properties or the combination of the co-op itself. That makes it better.
Letter of Support for HB 1006 To the House Housing Committee Dear Chair and Members of the Committee, I write in strong support of HB 1006, which restores local authority and basic common sense to how parking for accessory dwelling units (ADUs) is regulated in New Hampshire. ADUs can be a valuable part of a community’s housing mix — but they only work when the real-world impacts of added residents, vehicles, and neighborhood capacity are addressed honestly. Parking is not an abstract issue. It affects emergency access, road safety, snow plowing, drainage, neighborhood congestion, and the ability of first responders to do their jobs. These are all matters that municipalities, not distant lawmakers or individual property owners, are best positioned to evaluate. Current law wrongly strips municipalities of the ability to ensure that required parking is located where it belongs — on the site being developed or at a location the town has approved. That creates predictable conflicts: cars overflowing into narrow streets, blocked driveways, unsafe winter conditions, and pressure on towns to solve problems they were prohibited from preventing. HB 1006 fixes this by doing something entirely reasonable: it requires that parking for ADUs be provided either on-site or in an off-site location that has been reviewed and approved by the municipality. This does not block housing. It does not ban ADUs. It simply ensures that development is done responsibly, transparently, and in a way that does not shift costs and risks onto neighbors and taxpayers. This bill also protects homeowners who are already playing by the rules. When parking is left entirely to private discretion, the result is unfairness — some properties absorb the consequences while others reap the benefits. HB 1006 creates a level playing field and reinforces the principle that growth should be planned, not imposed. Most importantly, this bill respects New Hampshire’s long-standing commitment to local land-use control. Towns and cities know their road widths, sight lines, soils, snow loads, fire access needs, and neighborhood layouts. They should not be forced to accept parking arrangements that are unsafe, unworkable, or simply fictional. HB 1006 supports housing while protecting safety, infrastructure, and community trust. That is exactly the balance good public policy should strike. I respectfully urge the Committee to recommend Ought to Pass. Sincerely, David John Preece State Representative, Hillsborough District 17
Position recorded without written comment.
Position recorded without written comment.
Position recorded without written comment.
Position recorded without written comment.
Position recorded without written comment.
Position recorded without written comment.