I oppose allowing religious exemptions from vaccination requirements. The importance of religious freedoms are in this case outweighed by the danger posed to vulnerable individuals by rampant, deadly infections. Allowing polio, measles, rubella, etc to run rampant through our communities because people are distrustful of vaccines is outrageous and will harm Granite Staters who had no say in the decision. We do not allow people to drive drunk because of the risk posed to others, we should not allow people to forego life-saving vaccinations.
HB1022
House · 2026 sessionRepublicanKilled in SenateReligious vaccine exemption form wording
AISpecifies the exact wording of the attestation form parents or guardians must sign to claim a religious exemption from childhood immunization requirements.
relative to religious exemption from immunization requirements.
Status
Killed in the Senate — Inexpedient to Legislate · May 8, 2026- ✓Introduced
- ✓House
- ✕Senate
- Governor
- Law
Division of testimony
773 submissionsArgument digest · AI-generated
from 172 of 172 written submissionsHB1022 would change how religious exemptions from childhood immunization requirements are handled in New Hampshire. The large majority of submitters, including many physicians, nurses, and other clinicians, oppose the bill on the grounds that broadening or simplifying religious exemptions would lower vaccination coverage, undermine herd immunity, and put vulnerable populations at risk. A smaller number of submitters support the bill as a way to protect parental medical decision-making and to fix what they describe as an overly complicated or intrusive exemption-form process.
- Medical decisions should belong to individuals, not governmentSupport9 of 172 reviewed
Submitters frame the bill as protecting the right of parents and individuals to make their own healthcare and vaccination decisions without government interference, describing this as a matter of medical freedom or bodily autonomy.
“I fully support all legislation that confirms the right of sovereign individuals to make their own healthcare decisions.”
— Donna Meuse, Kingston · #609380 — read full submission →
“We need to support informed consent, medical frreedom and religious exemptions and human rights. Support this bill.”
— Marina Zlatin, Portsmouth · #608840 — read full submission →
- Bill would fix a complicated, intrusive exemption formSupport6 of 172 reviewed
Submitters argue the bill solves a real problem by requiring DHHS to supply a standardized, non-intrusive exemption form with explicit inclusions and exclusions, rather than leaving the process to local or regional entities.
“This bill would resolve the issues with religious exemption forms as they currently exist. DHHS should have a standardized form with explicit inclusions/exclusions not left to local or regional entities.”
— Nancy Louth, Hampton · #593639 — read full submission →
“The state requiring a complicated exemption form and process is antithetical to the exercise of free, religious rights.”
— Christine Macpherson, Chesterfield · #606882 — read full submission →
- Personal experience of vaccine injury or exemption denialSupport2 of 172 reviewed
A small number of submitters describe personal or family harm they attribute to vaccination or to being denied a religious exemption, including a claimed vaccine injury and a job loss, and cite these experiences as reasons to support the bill.
“My son was damaged for life by the MMR vaccine. Those that oppose this legislation should be ashamed.”
— Anthony papoulias, Kensington · #597748 — read full submission →
“I lost my job as an EMT because my religious exemption was denied. This directly affects my ability to pursue the natural born right to pursue life, liberty and happiness.”
— Mary McGregor, Bow · #590972 — read full submission →
- Exemption records should not enable future data collectionSupport1 of 172 reviewed
A submitter argues exemption requests should not become an opportunity for the state to collect data on families that could later be used against them, citing concerns raised by the COVID-19 emergency.
- Informed consent is undermined by unknown vaccine risksSupport1 of 172 reviewed
A submitter argues that because some risks of vaccines are not fully known or disclosed, meaningful informed consent to vaccination is not truly possible.
- Foster families should get the same exemption treatmentSupport1 of 172 reviewed
A submitter argues foster families should receive the same vaccination requirements and exemption process already available to others under existing law.
- Broader exemptions undermine herd immunity, endanger vulnerableOppose123 of 172 reviewed
Many submitters, including numerous physicians and nurses, argue that making religious exemptions easier to obtain will lower vaccination rates and erode herd immunity, putting infants, the immunocompromised, and other vulnerable people at greater risk of disease.
“In my clinical experience, lowering immunization standards directly threatens herd immunity, leaving vulnerable populations — particularly infants and immunocompromised patients — at higher risk.”
— Hilary Yehling, Auburn · #596849 — read full submission →
“Changing the form of religious exemptions from vaccine requirements would endanger our people, our schools, our hospitals, and our communities.”
— Martha Jane Rich, Enfield · #605995 — read full submission →
“Granting exemptions from immunizations due to religious preference endangers ALL of us!”
— Naomi Kornhauser, Durham · #611037 — read full submission →
- No major religion actually forbids vaccinationOppose12 of 172 reviewed
Submitters argue that no major religious tradition opposes vaccination, so a religious exemption functions as a pretextual loophole for people who are simply against vaccines rather than a genuine religious accommodation.
“This bill would allow anyone to claim a religious belief against vaccines, even though no major religion does that.”
— Gwendolyn Gladstone, Exeter · #590403 — read full submission →
“Vaccines are one of the most effective medical innovations. They have saved millions of lives. Protect our children! Religious exemptions are a scam.”
— Daniel Hooberman, Laconia · #604881 — read full submission →
- State has a duty to protect children and the publicOppose8 of 172 reviewed
Some submitters argue that the state's obligation to protect children and the broader community from harm outweighs individual religious objections, comparing the situation to other harm-prevention laws and arguing religious practice should not extend into endangering others.
“the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others.”
— Viking Hedberg, Plymouth · #611959 — read full submission →
“If we can protect children from rabies, under a law that requires dogs to be vaccinated against this deadly disease, why cannot we protect people from polio and measles?”
— Deborah Bruss, Concord · #610197 — read full submission →
- Existing exemption process is already adequateOppose7 of 172 reviewed
Submitters contend that New Hampshire already has a workable religious exemption process and form, making this bill an unnecessary use of legislative time and resources.
“There is already a "Religious Exemption" option for parents to sign if they do not wish for their children to be vaccinated.”
— Lynn McRae, Lyme · #605835 — read full submission →
“Safeguards are already in place to provide religious exemptions for vaccine requirements. There is no need to use time and resources debating HB 1022.”
— Terry Ellen Carter, Dover · #609766 — read full submission →
- Recent outbreaks elsewhere show the real dangerOppose6 of 172 reviewed
Submitters point to current measles and other disease outbreaks in other states and countries as evidence of what happens when vaccination coverage declines, arguing New Hampshire should not follow that path.
“I am appalled that we have a Measles outbreak and now have 60 students at a San Francisco high school suffering from tuberculosis! We are returning to the Dark Ages.”
— Deborah McCollister, Walpole · #606004 — read full submission →
“Today's newspaper notes that in one South Carolina town there are 600 cases of measles even though 90% of the population has been vaccination.”
— Shirley Montgomery, Hanover · #608041 — read full submission →
- Bill would make exemptions a 'rubber stamp' without oversightOppose5 of 172 reviewed
Submitters argue the bill would make obtaining an exemption too easy, removing meaningful scrutiny of whether a claimed religious belief is sincere and inviting abuse by people who simply oppose vaccination.
“HB 1022 seeks to simplify exemptions to the point of making them a "rubber stamp" for anyone who wishes to bypass community safety standards.”
— Mary Bernatas, Amherst · #608581 — read full submission →
“Getting a religious exemption should be a DIFFICULT and thorough process, because we don’t exist in a void, and everything you do affects the people around you.”
— Molly Litt, Dunbarton · #610973 — read full submission →
- Religious exemptions for health care workers risk patientsOppose1 of 172 reviewed
One submitter, a nurse, specifically argues that allowing health care workers to claim religious exemptions from vaccination endangers patients in medical facilities and could jeopardize Medicaid funding if facilities are drawn into legal disputes.
Generated by claude-sonnet-5 (claude code agent) on Jul 20, 2026. Quotes are verbatim excerpts, verified against the cited submission before publication. Summaries are AI interpretation of the record, not part of it.
This is insanity.
If we cant have a right to choose then we cmshpuld have a right to exemption without crazy explanations
As John Stuart Mill wrote in On Liberty: "the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others. His own good, either physical or moral, is not a sufficient warrant.... Over himself, over his body and mind, the individual is sovereign" Vaccinating your children not only protects them, but prevents the harm to others. As a government, there is an obligation to create rules that optimize the safety of the children in our schools.
This is a link to a map of confirmed measles cases in the United States, Canada, and Mexico prepared by Johns Hopkin s Center for Health Security. https://www.arcgis.com/apps/dashboards/dd314001921f4d2eac160f89ded0b49a, States like Maine with mandatory vaccines immunization coverage of 95-100 percent have few cases of measles (with the exception of California). Texas is interesting, The areas with 95-100 percent immunization coverage have no cases. The other areas with lower immunization coverage have measles cases. NH is lucky that it is in the 90-95 percent immunization coverage range and it does not have any reported cases of measles. Approval of this bill will lower our immunization coverage percentage. A vote for this bill is a political choice not a health choice for NH.
Vaccines save lives. No more needs to be said.
Poor people need to have good and sufficient food.
A terrible bill! sincerely, Mark Meess, MD
We need vaccines to keep our kids safe.
I strongly oppose this bill. Immunizations have been proven to work. Please don’t cause undo harm to this most vulnerable in our society.
Vaccines are a vital part of keeping everyone in society free from preventable illnesses. We don't need to make exemptions easier. We should be doing all it takes to avoid a measles outbreak not finding ways to make one more likely.
No major world religion explicitly forbids vaccinations. This bill is unnecessary and a tool to allow parents to skip childhood vaccines.
We need to maintain the public health safety ever our community!
It is a person religious right to chose not to vaccinate their own children.
What happened to separation of church and state!
I am opposing all of the bills being heard today (1811, 1022, and 1671) all are disastrous to the health and well-being of our general public and could only be considered a good idea by someone without personal experience with pre-vax diseases. Polio, TB, Measles, etc.
Granting exemptions from immunizations due to religious preference endangers ALL of us!
I oppose this bill and any bill that undermines the administering of life-saving vaccines. This is a see-through attempt to make it even easier for uneducated parents to lie about their “deeply held religious beliefs” so as not to make their Sweet Little Timmy autistic with the evil vaccines. That was sarcasm, because vaccines are perfectly safe, and do NOT cause autism—which any real scientist or immunologist will tell you. Robert Kennedy Jr. has no medical knowledge or degrees and taking his advice on medicine is foolish and dangerous. We can’t know if “God” is real, and mad at you for taking a life-saving vaccine. We DO know that vaccines save lives. And this is supposed to be a safe, developed country in which children do not need to die from preventable illnesses. Getting a religious exemption should be a DIFFICULT and thorough process, because we don’t exist in a void, and everything you do affects the people around you. If you want to be free from the responsibilities of society and basic public health, perhaps you should live in some remote cave in a mountain, where your polio and pox can’t cripple anyone else. I want my children safe. (Also, autistic people are awesome and creative and smart—just saying.)
This should have a clause that if these people feel strongly that their religious beliefs prevent them from getting vaccines, then they should need the signature of their faith leader as well as themselves. This leads to a huge loophole where anyone can write this at any time for any reason without any kind of oversight.
I oppose this bill for the benefit of NH voters.
Vaccines are vitally important for the health of our citizens and communities.
Please protect ALL the citizens on NH by opposing this bill. Immunizations are important to protect us all!!!!!!!!
I am a retired Pediatrician who worked for Dartmouth Health for 25 years. I cannot state strongly enough how dangerous it would be to repeal statutory immunization requirements for children! We are already seeing the damage inflicted by decreasing vaccine rates in the Measles outbreaks happening around the country. Please contact me with questions. Thank you!
Policies should balance religious freedom with community health protections and maintain strong vaccination coverage standards
I am strongly against this assault on the public health of our populace and our children. Thank you.