Catharine FarkasSupportSanbornton, NHfor MyselfJan 28, 2026
Absolutely support! These people are dangerous and are more likely to kill their "prey" than if they don't have a deadly weapon.
HB1084
House · 2026 sessionDemocraticDied in HouseSurrendering guns under protective orders
AIRequires defendants subject to domestic violence protective orders to immediately relinquish all deadly weapons, firearms, and ammunition they control, own, or possess, and mandates that courts issue search warrants when relinquishment is incomplete.
relative to the relinquishment of deadly weapons by those subject to a domestic violence protective order.
Civil ActionsDomestic RelationsCourts and ProcedurePolice
Status
Committee recommended Inexpedient to Legislate; died at adjournment · February 24, 2026- ✓Introduced
- ✕House
- Senate
- Governor
- Law
Division of testimony
342 submissionsSupport 184Oppose 158(139 form letter)Neutral 0
Hatched = form letter · 139 of 342 written submissions (41%) came from organized campaigns
Argument digest · AI-generated
from 31 of 169 written submissionsHB1084 would require people subject to a domestic violence protective order to relinquish deadly weapons. The large majority of individually-written submissions support the bill, arguing that firearm access sharply raises the risk of lethal outcomes in domestic violence situations and citing personal or real-world examples. Opposition, driven mainly by a form-letter campaign, centers on Second Amendment and due-process concerns about removing weapons based on allegations without adequate safeguards, plus a few practical or process objections.
- General support: keep weapons from domestic abusersSupport13 of 31 reviewed
Many submitters offer brief, unelaborated statements that abusers or those subject to protective orders should not possess weapons and urge lawmakers to pass the bill as a common-sense public safety measure.
“Anyone subject to a domestic violence protective order shouldn't be allowed to possess deadly weapons. Domestic abusers should be required to turn over all weapons to authorities.”
— Nancy Jerauld, Litchfield · #579155 — read full submission →
“This is a common sense gun law, there is no reason to be against this bill as it will make our community safer. Please vote yes.”
— Jessica Syner, Windham · #574115 — read full submission →
- Firearm access increases lethality of domestic violenceSupport6 of 31 reviewed
Submitters cite research and statistics showing that when an abuser has access to a firearm, victims are far more likely to be killed, framing the bill as an evidence-based safety measure.
“Research consistently shows that the presence of firearms significantly increases the risk of lethal outcomes in domestic violence situations.”
— Kai Berger, San Jose · #556114 — read full submission →
“facts corroborate that when an abusive partner has a firearm, the chances are five times more likely that the partner will be shot and killed.”
— Helene Bickford, Hancock · #579586 — read full submission →
- Personal and real-world accounts of victims harmed by armed abusersSupport4 of 31 reviewed
Several submitters describe specific cases, including their own experiences or named local incidents, where a domestic violence victim was harmed or killed because their abuser retained access to weapons.
“In the summer of 2025, Sandra Marisol Fuentes Huaracha was shot and killed by her estranged husband Micheal Gleason Jr, although he was out on bail, after being accussing raping Fuentes only weeks before.”
— Anita Klein, Newmarket · #583604 — read full submission →
“she was hiding in the bathroom after having been physically assaulted by her partner who had a history of violence against her (she had tried leaving). He was armed despite his felony record.”
— PJ Whitney, Dover · #579535 — read full submission →
- Bill does not conflict with Second AmendmentSupport1 of 31 reviewed
At least one submitter directly rebuts Second Amendment objections, arguing the constitutional right is tied to a regulated militia and does not bar removing weapons from proven dangerous individuals.
- Constitutional due-process and Second Amendment concernsOppose2 of 31 reviewed · 139 via form letter
A form-letter campaign and several individually-written submissions argue the bill creates prior restraint on Second Amendment rights, allowing firearm removal based on allegations alone without adequate due-process protections or a meaningful hearing.
“This legislation creates prior restraint on constitutional rights without adequate due process protections for law-abiding citizens.”
— form letter, submitted 139 times · #574388 — read full submission →
“As written, the bill appears to create a form of prior restraint on Second Amendment rights without what I believe are adequate due process safeguards for law abiding citizens.”
— Patrick Leblanc, Whitefield · #576321 — read full submission →
- Practical concerns about immediate relinquishment logisticsOppose1 of 31 reviewed
A submitter argues the bill's drafters have not accounted for the practical logistics of requiring someone to immediately hand over valuable personal property to an officer serving an order.
- General claim the bill reduces fairness without improving outcomesOppose1 of 31 reviewed
A submitter opposes the bill in general terms, asserting it reduces transparency and fairness in public processes without meaningfully improving outcomes for residents.
Generated by claude-sonnet-5 (claude code agent) on Jul 20, 2026. Quotes are verbatim excerpts, verified against the cited submission before publication. Summaries are AI interpretation of the record, not part of it.
Form-letter campaigns
139 of 169 written submissions (82%)139 submissions match a shared template; 30 are individually written.
- Opposition to HB 1084Oppose139 submissions on this bill
The legislation is opposed because it raises constitutional concerns regarding prior restraint on Second Amendment rights and due process protections.
The letter · submitted 139 times I am writing to express my strong opposition to HB 1084 and urge you to vote Inexpedient to Legislate (ITL). While I recognize the seriousness of domestic violence, this bill raises significant constitutional concerns that warrant your careful consideration: • Second Amendment Rights: This legislation creates prior restraint on constitutional rights without adequate due process protections for law-abiding citizens. • Due Process Concerns: The bill may allow for the removal of firearms based on allegations alone, without sufficient safeguards to protect the rights of the accused. • Effectiveness Questions: There is little evidence that such measures effectively reduce domestic violence while they clearly infringe on constitutional rights. • Dangerous Precedent: This bill sets a concerning precedent that could lead to further erosions of Second Amendment rights in New Hampshire. New Hampshire has a strong tradition of protecting both public safety and constitutional rights. I believe we can address domestic violence concerns through existing legal mechanisms without compromising the fundamental rights of our citizens. I respectfully urge you to vote ITL on HB 1084. Respectfully, Brendan Rainville Plaistow, NH
Detected by text-similarity clustering; campaign names are AI-generated.
Arthur NortonOpposeForm letterGilford, NHfor MyselfJan 28, 2026
Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong opposition to HB 1084 and urge you to vote Inexpedient to Legislate (ITL). While I recognize the seriousness of domestic violence, this bill raises significant constitutional concerns that warrant your careful consideration: • Second Amendment Rights: This legislation creates prior restraint on constitutional rights without adequate due process protections for law-abiding citizens. • Due Process Concerns: The bill may allow for the removal of firearms based on allegations alone, without sufficient safeguards to protect the rights of the accused. • Effectiveness Questions: There is little evidence that such measures effectively reduce domestic violence while they clearly infringe on constitutional rights. • Dangerous Precedent: This bill sets a concerning precedent that could lead to further erosions of Second Amendment rights in New Hampshire. New Hampshire has a strong tradition of protecting both public safety and constitutional rights. I believe we can address domestic violence concerns through existing legal mechanisms without compromising the fundamental rights of our citizens. I respectfully urge you to vote ITL on HB 1084. Respectfully, Arthur Norton Gilford, NH
Charlotte ConstantianOpposeForm letterHollis, NHfor MyselfJan 28, 2026
Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong opposition to HB 1084 and urge you to vote Inexpedient to Legislate (ITL). While I recognize the seriousness of domestic violence, this bill raises significant constitutional concerns that warrant your careful consideration: • Second Amendment Rights: This legislation creates prior restraint on constitutional rights without adequate due process protections for law-abiding citizens. • Due Process Concerns: The bill may allow for the removal of firearms based on allegations alone, without sufficient safeguards to protect the rights of the accused. • Effectiveness Questions: There is little evidence that such measures effectively reduce domestic violence while they clearly infringe on constitutional rights. • Dangerous Precedent: This bill sets a concerning precedent that could lead to further erosions of Second Amendment rights in New Hampshire. New Hampshire has a strong tradition of protecting both public safety and constitutional rights. I believe we can address domestic violence concerns through existing legal mechanisms without compromising the fundamental rights of our citizens. I respectfully urge you to vote ITL on HB 1084. Respectfully, Charlotte Constantian Hollis, NH
Jerry GieseckeOpposeForm letterMerrimack, NHfor MyselfJan 28, 2026
Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong opposition to HB 1084 and urge you to vote Inexpedient to Legislate (ITL). While I recognize the seriousness of domestic violence, this bill raises significant constitutional concerns that warrant your careful consideration: • Second Amendment Rights: This legislation creates prior restraint on constitutional rights without adequate due process protections for law-abiding citizens. • Due Process Concerns: The bill may allow for the removal of firearms based on allegations alone, without sufficient safeguards to protect the rights of the accused. • Effectiveness Questions: There is little evidence that such measures effectively reduce domestic violence while they clearly infringe on constitutional rights. • Dangerous Precedent: This bill sets a concerning precedent that could lead to further erosions of Second Amendment rights in New Hampshire. New Hampshire has a strong tradition of protecting both public safety and constitutional rights. I believe we can address domestic violence concerns through existing legal mechanisms without compromising the fundamental rights of our citizens. I respectfully urge you to vote ITL on HB 1084. Respectfully, Jerry Giesecke Merrimack, NH
Carla RamirezOpposeForm letterHollis, NHfor MyselfJan 28, 2026
Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong opposition to HB 1084 and urge you to vote Inexpedient to Legislate (ITL). While I recognize the seriousness of domestic violence, this bill raises significant constitutional concerns that warrant your careful consideration: • Second Amendment Rights: This legislation creates prior restraint on constitutional rights without adequate due process protections for law-abiding citizens. • Due Process Concerns: The bill may allow for the removal of firearms based on allegations alone, without sufficient safeguards to protect the rights of the accused. • Effectiveness Questions: There is little evidence that such measures effectively reduce domestic violence while they clearly infringe on constitutional rights. • Dangerous Precedent: This bill sets a concerning precedent that could lead to further erosions of Second Amendment rights in New Hampshire. New Hampshire has a strong tradition of protecting both public safety and constitutional rights. I believe we can address domestic violence concerns through existing legal mechanisms without compromising the fundamental rights of our citizens. I respectfully urge you to vote ITL on HB 1084. Respectfully, Carla Ramirez
Brian HoodOpposeForm letterNew Ipswich, NHfor MyselfJan 28, 2026
Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong opposition to HB 1084 and urge you to vote Inexpedient to Legislate (ITL). While I recognize the seriousness of domestic violence, this bill raises significant constitutional concerns that warrant your careful consideration: • Second Amendment Rights: This legislation creates prior restraint on constitutional rights without adequate due process protections for law-abiding citizens. • Due Process Concerns: The bill may allow for the removal of firearms based on allegations alone, without sufficient safeguards to protect the rights of the accused. • Effectiveness Questions: There is little evidence that such measures effectively reduce domestic violence while they clearly infringe on constitutional rights. • Dangerous Precedent: This bill sets a concerning precedent that could lead to further erosions of Second Amendment rights in New Hampshire. New Hampshire has a strong tradition of protecting both public safety and constitutional rights. I believe we can address domestic violence concerns through existing legal mechanisms without compromising the fundamental rights of our citizens. I respectfully urge you to vote ITL on HB 1084. Respectfully, Brian Hood New Ipswich, NH
Tina HoodOpposeForm letterNew Ipswich, NHfor MyselfJan 28, 2026
Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong opposition to HB 1084 and urge you to vote Inexpedient to Legislate (ITL). While I recognize the seriousness of domestic violence, this bill raises significant constitutional concerns that warrant your careful consideration: • Second Amendment Rights: This legislation creates prior restraint on constitutional rights without adequate due process protections for law-abiding citizens. • Due Process Concerns: The bill may allow for the removal of firearms based on allegations alone, without sufficient safeguards to protect the rights of the accused. • Effectiveness Questions: There is little evidence that such measures effectively reduce domestic violence while they clearly infringe on constitutional rights. • Dangerous Precedent: This bill sets a concerning precedent that could lead to further erosions of Second Amendment rights in New Hampshire. New Hampshire has a strong tradition of protecting both public safety and constitutional rights. I believe we can address domestic violence concerns through existing legal mechanisms without compromising the fundamental rights of our citizens. I respectfully urge you to vote ITL on HB 1084. Respectfully, Tina Hood New Ipswich, NH
Rene LeclercOpposeForm letterCandia, NHfor MyselfJan 28, 2026
Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong opposition to HB 1084 and urge you to vote Inexpedient to Legislate (ITL). While I recognize the seriousness of domestic violence, this bill raises significant constitutional concerns that warrant your careful consideration: • Second Amendment Rights: This legislation creates prior restraint on constitutional rights without adequate due process protections for law-abiding citizens. • Due Process Concerns: The bill may allow for the removal of firearms based on allegations alone, without sufficient safeguards to protect the rights of the accused. • Effectiveness Questions: There is little evidence that such measures effectively reduce domestic violence while they clearly infringe on constitutional rights. • Dangerous Precedent: This bill sets a concerning precedent that could lead to further erosions of Second Amendment rights in New Hampshire. New Hampshire has a strong tradition of protecting both public safety and constitutional rights. I believe we can address domestic violence concerns through existing legal mechanisms without compromising the fundamental rights of our citizens. I respectfully urge you to vote ITL on HB 1084. Respectfully, Rene Leclerc Candia, NH
Eric RothkopfOpposeForm letterNashua, NHfor MyselfJan 28, 2026
Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong opposition to HB 1084 and urge you to vote Inexpedient to Legislate (ITL). While I recognize the seriousness of domestic violence, this bill raises significant constitutional concerns that warrant your careful consideration: • Second Amendment Rights: This legislation creates prior restraint on constitutional rights without adequate due process protections for law-abiding citizens. • Due Process Concerns: The bill may allow for the removal of firearms based on allegations alone, without sufficient safeguards to protect the rights of the accused. • Effectiveness Questions: There is little evidence that such measures effectively reduce domestic violence while they clearly infringe on constitutional rights. • Dangerous Precedent: This bill sets a concerning precedent that could lead to further erosions of Second Amendment rights in New Hampshire. New Hampshire has a strong tradition of protecting both public safety and constitutional rights. I believe we can address domestic violence concerns through existing legal mechanisms without compromising the fundamental rights of our citizens. I respectfully urge you to vote ITL on HB 1084. Respectfully, Eric Rothkopf Nashua, NH
Joanna AndrosSupportWalpole, NHfor MyselfJan 28, 2026
I support this bill which would require relinquishment of weapons when there is known domestic violence. This is necessary to protect all people in contact of a person who cannot control emotions and is prone to violence. This could save many lives: family, friends and law enforcement who may be called to intervene.
DAVID FRESCHIOpposeForm letterHOOKSETT, NHfor MyselfJan 28, 2026
Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong opposition to HB 1084 and urge you to vote Inexpedient to Legislate (ITL). While I recognize the seriousness of domestic violence, this bill raises significant constitutional concerns that warrant your careful consideration: • Second Amendment Rights: This legislation creates prior restraint on constitutional rights without adequate due process protections for law-abiding citizens. • Due Process Concerns: The bill may allow for the removal of firearms based on allegations alone, without sufficient safeguards to protect the rights of the accused. • Effectiveness Questions: There is little evidence that such measures effectively reduce domestic violence while they clearly infringe on constitutional rights. • Dangerous Precedent: This bill sets a concerning precedent that could lead to further erosions of Second Amendment rights in New Hampshire. New Hampshire has a strong tradition of protecting both public safety and constitutional rights. I believe we can address domestic violence concerns through existing legal mechanisms without compromising the fundamental rights of our citizens. I respectfully urge you to vote ITL on HB 1084. Respectfully, DAVID FRESCHI HOOKSETT, NH
Sikt GroteOpposeForm letterNashua, NHfor MyselfJan 28, 2026
Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong opposition to HB 1084 and urge you to vote Inexpedient to Legislate (ITL). While I recognize the seriousness of domestic violence, this bill raises significant constitutional concerns that warrant your careful consideration: • Second Amendment Rights: This legislation creates prior restraint on constitutional rights without adequate due process protections for law-abiding citizens. • Due Process Concerns: The bill may allow for the removal of firearms based on allegations alone, without sufficient safeguards to protect the rights of the accused. • Effectiveness Questions: There is little evidence that such measures effectively reduce domestic violence while they clearly infringe on constitutional rights. • Dangerous Precedent: This bill sets a concerning precedent that could lead to further erosions of Second Amendment rights in New Hampshire. New Hampshire has a strong tradition of protecting both public safety and constitutional rights. I believe we can address domestic violence concerns through existing legal mechanisms without compromising the fundamental rights of our citizens. I respectfully urge you to vote ITL on HB 1084. Respectfully, Sikt Grote Nashua, NH
Hannah GregorySupportGilford, NHfor MyselfJan 28, 2026
As a survivor of domestic violence that almost took my life I strongly support this bill.
Heather PikeSupportPittsfield, NHfor MyselfJan 28, 2026
This is a law long overdue. We have a militia, well regulated and it is the NH National Guard, so the whole 2A things is not valid for removing deadly weapons from a person of whom there is proof known to many beforehand, to prevent harm others or themselves. Enough deaths of victims by those who should not have deadly force in their possession. If NH leads on this, we save lives and most NH residents want it. There are some out on the edge who do not, but most of NH does.
Susan RomitoOpposeForm letterHollis, NHfor MyselfJan 28, 2026
Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong opposition to HB 1084 and urge you to vote Inexpedient to Legislate (ITL). While I recognize the seriousness of domestic violence, this bill raises significant constitutional concerns that warrant your careful consideration: • Second Amendment Rights: This legislation creates prior restraint on constitutional rights without adequate due process protections for law-abiding citizens. • Due Process Concerns: The bill may allow for the removal of firearms based on allegations alone, without sufficient safeguards to protect the rights of the accused. • Effectiveness Questions: There is little evidence that such measures effectively reduce domestic violence while they clearly infringe on constitutional rights. • Dangerous Precedent: This bill sets a concerning precedent that could lead to further erosions of Second Amendment rights in New Hampshire. New Hampshire has a strong tradition of protecting both public safety and constitutional rights. I believe we can address domestic violence concerns through existing legal mechanisms without compromising the fundamental rights of our citizens. I respectfully urge you to vote ITL on HB 1084. Respectfully, Susan Romito Hollis, NH
Mark ConstantianOpposeForm letterHollis, NHfor MyselfJan 28, 2026
Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong opposition to HB 1084 and urge you to vote Inexpedient to Legislate (ITL). While I recognize the seriousness of domestic violence, this bill raises significant constitutional concerns that warrant your careful consideration: • Second Amendment Rights: This legislation creates prior restraint on constitutional rights without adequate due process protections for law-abiding citizens. • Due Process Concerns: The bill may allow for the removal of firearms based on allegations alone, without sufficient safeguards to protect the rights of the accused. • Effectiveness Questions: There is little evidence that such measures effectively reduce domestic violence while they clearly infringe on constitutional rights. • Dangerous Precedent: This bill sets a concerning precedent that could lead to further erosions of Second Amendment rights in New Hampshire. New Hampshire has a strong tradition of protecting both public safety and constitutional rights. I believe we can address domestic violence concerns through existing legal mechanisms without compromising the fundamental rights of our citizens. I respectfully urge you to vote ITL on HB 1084. Respectfully, Mark Constantian Hollis, NH
Edward SaltalamacchiaOpposeForm letterHollis, NHfor MyselfJan 28, 2026
Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong opposition to HB 1084 and urge you to vote Inexpedient to Legislate (ITL). While I recognize the seriousness of domestic violence, this bill raises significant constitutional concerns that warrant your careful consideration: • Second Amendment Rights: This legislation creates prior restraint on constitutional rights without adequate due process protections for law-abiding citizens. • Due Process Concerns: The bill may allow for the removal of firearms based on allegations alone, without sufficient safeguards to protect the rights of the accused. • Effectiveness Questions: There is little evidence that such measures effectively reduce domestic violence while they clearly infringe on constitutional rights. • Dangerous Precedent: This bill sets a concerning precedent that could lead to further erosions of Second Amendment rights in New Hampshire. New Hampshire has a strong tradition of protecting both public safety and constitutional rights. I believe we can address domestic violence concerns through existing legal mechanisms without compromising the fundamental rights of our citizens. I respectfully urge you to vote ITL on HB 1084. Respectfully, Edward Saltalamacchia Hollis, NH
Lauren SaltalamacchiaOpposeForm letterHollis, NHfor MyselfJan 28, 2026
Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong opposition to HB 1084 and urge you to vote Inexpedient to Legislate (ITL). While I recognize the seriousness of domestic violence, this bill raises significant constitutional concerns that warrant your careful consideration: • Second Amendment Rights: This legislation creates prior restraint on constitutional rights without adequate due process protections for law-abiding citizens. • Due Process Concerns: The bill may allow for the removal of firearms based on allegations alone, without sufficient safeguards to protect the rights of the accused. • Effectiveness Questions: There is little evidence that such measures effectively reduce domestic violence while they clearly infringe on constitutional rights. • Dangerous Precedent: This bill sets a concerning precedent that could lead to further erosions of Second Amendment rights in New Hampshire. New Hampshire has a strong tradition of protecting both public safety and constitutional rights. I believe we can address domestic violence concerns through existing legal mechanisms without compromising the fundamental rights of our citizens. I respectfully urge you to vote ITL on HB 1084. Respectfully, Lauren Saltalamacchia Hollis, NH
Eric MorinOpposeForm letterHollis, NHfor MyselfJan 28, 2026
Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong opposition to HB 1084 and urge you to vote Inexpedient to Legislate (ITL). While I recognize the seriousness of domestic violence, this bill raises significant constitutional concerns that warrant your careful consideration: • Second Amendment Rights: This legislation creates prior restraint on constitutional rights without adequate due process protections for law-abiding citizens. • Due Process Concerns: The bill may allow for the removal of firearms based on allegations alone, without sufficient safeguards to protect the rights of the accused. • Effectiveness Questions: There is little evidence that such measures effectively reduce domestic violence while they clearly infringe on constitutional rights. • Dangerous Precedent: This bill sets a concerning precedent that could lead to further erosions of Second Amendment rights in New Hampshire. New Hampshire has a strong tradition of protecting both public safety and constitutional rights. I believe we can address domestic violence concerns through existing legal mechanisms without compromising the fundamental rights of our citizens. I respectfully urge you to vote ITL on HB 1084. Respectfully, Eric Morin Hollis, NH
Peter StaubleOpposeForm letterHollis, NHfor MyselfJan 28, 2026
Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong opposition to HB 1084 and urge you to vote Inexpedient to Legislate (ITL). While I recognize the seriousness of domestic violence, this bill raises significant constitutional concerns that warrant your careful consideration: • Second Amendment Rights: This legislation creates prior restraint on constitutional rights without adequate due process protections for law-abiding citizens. • Due Process Concerns: The bill may allow for the removal of firearms based on allegations alone, without sufficient safeguards to protect the rights of the accused. • Effectiveness Questions: There is little evidence that such measures effectively reduce domestic violence while they clearly infringe on constitutional rights. • Dangerous Precedent: This bill sets a concerning precedent that could lead to further erosions of Second Amendment rights in New Hampshire. New Hampshire has a strong tradition of protecting both public safety and constitutional rights. I believe we can address domestic violence concerns through existing legal mechanisms without compromising the fundamental rights of our citizens. I respectfully urge you to vote ITL on HB 1084. Respectfully, Peter Stauble Hollis, NH
Virgina GradyOpposeForm letterHollis, NHfor MyselfJan 28, 2026
Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong opposition to HB 1084 and urge you to vote Inexpedient to Legislate (ITL). While I recognize the seriousness of domestic violence, this bill raises significant constitutional concerns that warrant your careful consideration: • Second Amendment Rights: This legislation creates prior restraint on constitutional rights without adequate due process protections for law-abiding citizens. • Due Process Concerns: The bill may allow for the removal of firearms based on allegations alone, without sufficient safeguards to protect the rights of the accused. • Effectiveness Questions: There is little evidence that such measures effectively reduce domestic violence while they clearly infringe on constitutional rights. • Dangerous Precedent: This bill sets a concerning precedent that could lead to further erosions of Second Amendment rights in New Hampshire. New Hampshire has a strong tradition of protecting both public safety and constitutional rights. I believe we can address domestic violence concerns through existing legal mechanisms without compromising the fundamental rights of our citizens. I respectfully urge you to vote ITL on HB 1084. Respectfully, Virgina Grady Hollis, NH
janine byronOpposeForm letterhollis, NHfor MyselfJan 28, 2026
Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong opposition to HB 1084 and urge you to vote Inexpedient to Legislate (ITL). While I recognize the seriousness of domestic violence, this bill raises significant constitutional concerns that warrant your careful consideration: • Second Amendment Rights: This legislation creates prior restraint on constitutional rights without adequate due process protections for law-abiding citizens. • Due Process Concerns: The bill may allow for the removal of firearms based on allegations alone, without sufficient safeguards to protect the rights of the accused. • Effectiveness Questions: There is little evidence that such measures effectively reduce domestic violence while they clearly infringe on constitutional rights. • Dangerous Precedent: This bill sets a concerning precedent that could lead to further erosions of Second Amendment rights in New Hampshire. New Hampshire has a strong tradition of protecting both public safety and constitutional rights. I believe we can address domestic violence concerns through existing legal mechanisms without compromising the fundamental rights of our citizens. I respectfully urge you to vote ITL on HB 1084. Respectfully, janine byron hollis, NH
Cheryl HinckleyOpposeForm letterHollis, NHfor MyselfJan 28, 2026
Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong opposition to HB 1084 and urge you to vote Inexpedient to Legislate (ITL). While I recognize the seriousness of domestic violence, this bill raises significant constitutional concerns that warrant your careful consideration: • Second Amendment Rights: This legislation creates prior restraint on constitutional rights without adequate due process protections for law-abiding citizens. • Due Process Concerns: The bill may allow for the removal of firearms based on allegations alone, without sufficient safeguards to protect the rights of the accused. • Effectiveness Questions: There is little evidence that such measures effectively reduce domestic violence while they clearly infringe on constitutional rights. • Dangerous Precedent: This bill sets a concerning precedent that could lead to further erosions of Second Amendment rights in New Hampshire. New Hampshire has a strong tradition of protecting both public safety and constitutional rights. I believe we can address domestic violence concerns through existing legal mechanisms without compromising the fundamental rights of our citizens. I respectfully urge you to vote ITL on HB 1084. Respectfully, Cheryl Hinckley Hollis, NH
Don DignanOpposeForm letterNashua, NHfor MyselfJan 28, 2026
Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong opposition to HB 1084 and urge you to vote Inexpedient to Legislate (ITL). While I recognize the seriousness of domestic violence, this bill raises significant constitutional concerns that warrant your careful consideration: • Second Amendment Rights: This legislation creates prior restraint on constitutional rights without adequate due process protections for law-abiding citizens. • Due Process Concerns: The bill may allow for the removal of firearms based on allegations alone, without sufficient safeguards to protect the rights of the accused. • Effectiveness Questions: There is little evidence that such measures effectively reduce domestic violence while they clearly infringe on constitutional rights. • Dangerous Precedent: This bill sets a concerning precedent that could lead to further erosions of Second Amendment rights in New Hampshire. New Hampshire has a strong tradition of protecting both public safety and constitutional rights. I believe we can address domestic violence concerns through existing legal mechanisms without compromising the fundamental rights of our citizens. I respectfully urge you to vote ITL on HB 1084. Respectfully, Don Dignan Nashua, NH
Sharon RacusinSupportHanover, NHfor MyselfJan 28, 2026
I was the victim of domestic violence where my partner had guns. In VT he was required to relinquish them immediately. Then I felt a little safer but then he wanted them back to be able to "hunt" and I was again, fearing for my life. He ultimately committed suicide ten years later but I was always looking over my shoulder. We need red flag laws and keep people safe.