I have concerns that HB1095 may increase environmental damage, safety risks, and infrastructure strain without adequate environmental or community protections.
HB1095
House · 2026 sessionRepublicanSigned into lawHeavier utility terrain vehicles allowed
AIIncreases the maximum weight allowed for certain utility terrain vehicles.
(New Title) relative to the maximum weight of utility terrain vehicles.
Status
Signed into law · July 9, 2026- ✓Introduced
- ✓House
- ✓Senate
- ✓Governor
- ✓Law
Division of testimony
12 submissionsTo: NH House Resources, Recreation and Development Committee C/o The Honorable Robert Herb, Chairman Re: HB 1095, increasing the maximum weight of a utility terrain vehicle to 3,000 pounds. Dear Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee: NH Farm Bureau opposes HB 1095. We oppose increasing weight limits on some state-owned trails and state lands, as the bill does, without a corresponding commitment of enforcement by the state. Farm Bureau members own and manage hundreds of thousands of acres of farm and forest land in the state, much of it with OHRV trails running through it that are open to the public. OHRV enthusiasts utilizing the trails governed by the statute being amended – trails in Coös County, and the Ammonoosuc and Warren recreational trails - do not and will not restrict their travels to these trails. A vast majority of trails in the state are located on private property and an increase in weights on some state-owned lands and certain other trails will have impacts on trails throughout in the state, most of which are located on private property. These impacts will cost landowners time and money. Heavier vehicles result in greater wear and tear on trails. This concern may result in landowners closing or restrict public access to their land. It should be noted that landowners already see significant impacts to their property at current weight limits. Landowners take pride in making their land available for public use but unless resources for enforcement are provided, which this bill does not do, we ask the committee to recommend HB 1095 as Inexpedient-to-Legislate. We thank you for your consideration of our testimony. Sincerely, Robert Johnson, II, Policy Director/Administrator New Hampshire Farm Bureau (NHFB) is a non-profit federation, established in 1916, of New Hampshire’s 10 county Farm Bureau organizations which consist of 2,500 NH farm families and supporting members statewide. NHFB is dedicated to advocating for and educating the public about agriculture. NHFB is a general farm organization where the members establish policy and direction through a member driven policy development process. We are “The Voice of Agriculture” in New Hampshire.
TO: Robert Harb, chairman, House Resources, Recreation & Development Committee CC: Ron Dunn, vice chairman, and members of the committee – Brian Taylor, Heather Baldwin, Nicholas Bridle, Thomas Buco, Will Darby, Arnold Davis, Tanya Donnelly, Pierre DuPont, Linda Gould, Allison Knab, Linda Ryan, Gregory Sargent, Marcy Tremblay, and Suzanne Vail FROM: Ann Davis, NH Timberland Owners Association (NHTOA) and NH Farm Bureau Federation (NHFBF) representative on the HB 1188 Commission to study Off Highway Recreational Vehicles (OHRVs) RE: Kill House Bill 1095 and any potential amendments My name is Ann Davis. My husband, Marc, and I own a 530-acre Tree Farm in Springfield and Wilmot. We maintain eight miles of trails that are open to hiking, cross-country skiing, snowshoeing, etc. The Woods Without Gile also is open to hunting and fishing. We actively manage the timber on our property and use an ATV in areas our tractor can’t access. Please vote to kill HB 1095 and any amendments the bill’s sponsor or others might present to your committee. This bill proposes to increase the weight limit for Off Highway Recreational Vehicles from 2,000 pounds to 3,000 pounds on any state trail in Coös County and the Ammonoosuc recreational trail from Haverhill to Bethlehem and the Warren recreational trail in Warren in Grafton County. I oppose this proposal for several reasons. 1. These are “state trails”; they are commonly designated along woods roads on private property. Therefore, anything negatively impacting these roads (e.g., heavier OHRV traffic) also negatively impacts private landowner access. 2. Negative impacts on roads cost landowners time and money to repair. Heavier vehicles will cause greater wear and tear on private property. 3. Although the bill limits the weight increase to trails in Coös County, and the Ammonoosuc and Warren trails, OHRV enthusiasts will not understand nor want to restrict their travels to just one county or specific trails. 4. Advocates for the bill argue the weight increase is justified since NH Fish and Game currently does not enforce this law. This is not a good reason to remove a law designed to protect landowner assets and natural resources. 5. Advocates for the bill argue OHRV tires have low ground pressure and therefore we can “afford” to increase the allowable weight limit. Landowners, including members of the NHTOA and NHFBF, already see significant negative impacts with current weight limits and traffic. Increasing weight limits will only make the negative impacts worse. Please vote to kill HB 1095. Thank you to all members of this committee for your service to the people of New Hampshire. Respectfully submitted, Ann Davis, forest landowner Wilmot and Springfield
This testimony is for the amendment to exclude any formal weight designation. 1. Unenforceable - NH does not have the resources to calculate or enforce weight. Other states, such as Maine has already learned this the hard way when they tried to get Registration Agents to use manufacturer-listed weight during registration. 2. The 65" width restrictions already limit weight based on physics. 3. "unlayden dry weight" is without engine fluids, accessories, persons, extra gas, and gear. (I take at least three versions of clothing for rain, cold, hot) 4. Heavy machines 4-6 seats, heater and air conditioning are already out on the trails now and have been for at least 5 years. 5. These larger 65" vehicles are driven by Moms, Dads, and Grandparents who are not "ripping it up" on the trails. 6. Manufacturers have been paying attention to complaints and are advancing tire and noise technology now. (variable tread, modifying engine operation) 7. Education - NH laws and regulations for OHRVing are very, very confusing for the riders. A coordinated effort between NHOHVA, OHRV Clubs, NH Fish&Game, Bureau of Trails is sorely needed. Having a weight limit at all opens a can of worms especialy if there can be no resource for enforcement. Many of the concerns are from those who don't have any experience with these trails and are making assumptions based on what they fear. These days, the biggest amount of trail damage comes from larger rainstorms, where water mitigation with trail maintenance is key. The OHRV community is self-funded and has the money for mitigation. I am speaking here as a Grandmother who has been a part of the OHRV community not only as a rider but a volunteer in the state association, the clubs, and even the national OHV community. Please consider this amendment to remove any weight destination for a more meaningful outcome. Thank you for your time and your dedication to New Hampshire!
As technology advances with side by sides i believe better for the off riding enthusiasts and their families the machines become heavier due to increase safety features for the enthusiast in their families. Such as smart suspension systems four point harness systems traction control, power steering lights. So I believe that this bill should be passed for families to continue to enjoy our natural resource resources from a different perspective.while operating safer and better handling side by sides.
I mis typed my previous testimony stating overweight ohrvs. There is no current weight for an ohrv. Please see the revised testimony. I am suggesting the weight of a utv be totally removed. Currently fish and game can not weigh vehicles in the field so there is no enforcement. These overweight utvs are already utilizing state trails
I only dabble with work UTVs, but any trip to the Gorham Walmart will tell you recreational UTVs have gotten larger/heavier and this is a necessary change to keep up with current technology/trends. Even my work UTV which I bought from Jon Parks Tractor in Lancaster specs at 2050 pounds new. I've since added a couple hundred pounds of "stuff" to it. Source(see dimensions): https://www.kioti.com/products/utility-vehicles/k9/2400#specs
Position recorded without written comment.
Position recorded without written comment.
Position recorded without written comment.
Position recorded without written comment.
Position recorded without written comment.