Protect those protecting us.
HB1142
House · 2026 sessionDemocraticDied in HouseID rules for immigration enforcement officers
AIRequires state, county, and local law enforcement officers participating in the federal 287(g) immigration enforcement program to identify themselves by name, badge number, and agency, and to remain unmasked while operating under that authority.
relative to requirements for law enforcement officers assisting in immigration enforcement.
Status
Committee recommended Inexpedient to Legislate; died at adjournment · February 24, 2026- ✓Introduced
- ✕House
- Senate
- Governor
- Law
Division of testimony
3,468 submissionsArgument digest · AI-generated
from 238 of 1,712 written submissionsHB1142 would require state, county, and local law enforcement officers who assist federal immigration enforcement under 287(g) agreements to identify themselves by name, badge number, and agency, and to remain unmasked while doing so. Supporters frame this as a basic transparency and accountability measure needed to prevent impersonation and maintain public trust, frequently citing fatal encounters involving masked ICE agents in Minneapolis; opponents argue chiefly that masks are necessary to protect officers and their families from doxxing and targeted harassment amid heightened hostility toward law enforcement.
- Transparency and accountability require visible IDSupport69 of 238 reviewed
Supporters argue that government power exercised anonymously cannot be held accountable, and that officers exercising authority to detain or arrest must be identifiable by name, badge, and agency to protect public trust and enable oversight.
“When an officer is exercising state power while also assisting federal immigration enforcement, the public must be able to quickly answer three questions:”
— Desiree Crossley, Rochester · #573862 — read full submission →
“Requiring officers to identify themselves is not a burden. It is a basic safeguard that protects both the public and the officers themselves.”
— Brandy Cassada, Epsom · #586229 — read full submission →
“In a democracy, government power must never be anonymous. Police officers are granted extraordinary authority, the power to stop, search, detain, and use force.”
— Morgan Crandall, Ashuelot · #585687 — read full submission →
- Bill doesn't go far enough on ICE conductSupport19 of 238 reviewed
Many supporters describe broader alarm at ICE's tactics or existence, framing masked enforcement as part of a larger pattern they want curtailed, and some urge the state to go further by ending cooperation with ICE altogether or abolishing the agency.
“So why are we allowing these masked, unmarked, unwarranted thugs to brutilize, terrorize, and violate our communities.”
— Nathan Powell, rochester · #571616 — read full submission →
“This is a common sense and moral choice. NO state should allow ICE to wear masks while they terrorize us all. ICE shouldn’t be here at all.”
— Jennifer Brackett, Newmarket · #578015 — read full submission →
“Our state must reject these harmful attacks; refuse to provide any state funding or other assistance to ICE; and demand accountability, including unmasking, full reporting and oversight.”
— Ken Barnes, Hopkinton · #586706 — read full submission →
- Unmasking prevents impersonation of officersSupport15 of 238 reviewed
Supporters argue that masked, unidentified agents make it easier for criminals to impersonate law enforcement to rob, assault, or abduct people, and that visible identification lets the public distinguish real officers from impostors.
“This requirement is especially important today because it is alarmingly easy for someone to pose as an ICE or law enforcement agent by buying tactical gear, vests, patches, and equipment online.”
— Courtney Cray, Marlow · #584755 — read full submission →
“How many people do we have out there who are impersonating ICE agents? They wear masks, they don't display their names, they wear outfits one could easily order off of Amazon.”
— Jada Taylor, Dunbarton · #574750 — read full submission →
“Unidentified armed groups of agents detaining and absconding with people are indistinguishable from gangs of criminals robbing and kidnapping.”
— Nicholas Day, West Chesterfield · #583128 — read full submission →
- Cites Minneapolis incidents involving masked agentsSupport11 of 238 reviewed
Supporters point to specific, widely reported fatal encounters involving masked ICE agents in Minneapolis as evidence of the dangers of unaccountable, unidentifiable enforcement.
“He was tackled and beaten. And then, he was shot 10 times. To this day, we do not know the names of the masked men who murdered him.”
— Jonathan Caputo, North Conway · #582314 — read full submission →
“We even saw masked agents recently execute a man with a holstered gun who was empty handed except for a cell phone.”
— Aaron Osofsky, Hanover · #580511 — read full submission →
“Alex Pretti was shot by two masked men. Who are they? DHS knows but Mr. Pretti’s family doesn’t know.”
— Kathleen Cerutti, Derry · #585964 — read full submission →
- Masked agents frighten children and vulnerable groupsSupport10 of 238 reviewed
Supporters describe masked, unidentified enforcement as especially frightening and harmful for children, women, disabled individuals, and other vulnerable residents, with some also citing potential harm to tourism.
“Families raising disabled children depend on predictable systems: schools, medical providers, therapists, emergency services, and community supports.”
— Seana Hallberg, Dover · #571461 — read full submission →
“Hising behind a mask makes them a menacing figure to be feared- particularly in the eyes of vulnerable women.”
— Victoria Spearow, Pelham · #579489 — read full submission →
“what happens when Canadians, international tourists, and residents from other New England states fear coming here because they are on a tourist visa or because they are brown or speak a different language?”
— Em Friedrichs, Durham · #585111 — read full submission →
- ICE should meet standards NH police already followSupport11 of 238 reviewed
Supporters note that New Hampshire police and other professions already operate unmasked with visible identification, and argue ICE agents should be held to the same existing standard rather than an exception.
“If ICE agents are considered law enforcement personnel, they must receive the same training, wear standardized uniforms (not jeans, boots, masks, and some vest that says ICE which anyone could make)”
— Kathleen Thies, Bedford · #568362 — read full submission →
“I held an internship at a VA hospital and was required to have my badge on my scrubs at all times.”
— Kathryn Schnyer, Swanzey · #579094 — read full submission →
“Our brave NH law enforcement officers have always been expected to complete their work unmasked.”
— Giovanna Peruzzi, Unity · #584536 — read full submission →
- Anonymity undermines constitutional rightsSupport3 of 238 reviewed
A smaller number of supporters frame masked, unidentified enforcement as violating constitutional protections, including the rights to petition government, due process, and freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures.
“When officers of the law are unidentifiable, it goes against our first amendment right to petition the government to address grievances.”
— Juliette Sallaway, Merrimack · #576263 — read full submission →
“Law enforcement agents know full well that they MUST be identifiable, thus the wearing of a mask that obscures an agent's features flies in the face of the Fourth Amendment.”
— Robert Hamm, KEENE · #584560 — read full submission →
- Masked enforcement erodes trust in policeSupport5 of 238 reviewed
Some supporters argue that blurring the line between local police and immigration agents makes communities less willing to report crimes or cooperate with police, and question whether officer-safety justifications for masking are supported by evidence.
“When state and local law enforcement officers are placed in the role of immigration agents, entire communities become less willing to report crimes, cooperate with investigations, or seek help when they are victimized.”
— Corey Bouchard, Nashua · #570418 — read full submission →
“I researched the claims of the need for masks to protect officers from violent gangs like Tren De Aguoro. And there are no cases of any incidents with this gang in NH.”
— David Holt, Somersworth · #586501 — read full submission →
- Masks protect officers and families from doxxingOppose41 of 238 reviewed
Opponents argue that masks are a legitimate safety measure protecting officers and their families from doxxing, harassment, and targeted violence amid what they describe as heightened hostility toward law enforcement and ICE.
“Masks help protect the identities of officers and, more importantly, the safety of their families.”
— Eric Castanza, Franklin · #576484 — read full submission →
“Officers wear masks to prevent doxing, which is when a person’s private information, like their address, is posted publicly online. Doxing has put officers and their families at risk.”
— Deborah Aucoin, Milford · #584643 — read full submission →
“I support ICE. They are doing their jobs and they deserve protection from radicals who will doxx them and do harm to them and their families.”
— Danielle Evansic, Bedford · #573149 — read full submission →
- Protesters should unmask too, if officers mustOppose4 of 238 reviewed
Some opponents argue that requiring officers to unmask is unfair unless protesters and demonstrators are also required to remove face coverings.
“If anything it should be illegal for the rioters & "peaceful" protesters to wear masks!”
— Elizabeth A Levesque, HUDSON · #579496 — read full submission →
“When you write a law that forbids the protesters from wearing a mask then I would consider supporting this bill.”
— Michael Jubert, Nashua · #585226 — read full submission →
- Opposes any state cooperation with ICEOppose4 of 238 reviewed
A few opponents object to the bill not because they favor masked enforcement, but because they distrust ICE broadly and oppose any state or local role assisting immigration enforcement, regulated or not.
- General support for ICE's missionOppose3 of 238 reviewed
Some opponents express broad support for ICE's enforcement mission and object to placing additional restrictions on agents they see as doing necessary work.
“I feel ice should be able to wear masks and do their jobs privately and protected without concern of who they are. They are protecting us and America. God bless America and god bless ice”
— Michael Krasny, Nashua · #570957 — read full submission →
“I support ICE and their mission. They are just doing their jobs, and need to be anonymous for their safety.”
— Donna Quinn, Auburn · #574547 — read full submission →
- Bill improperly interferes with federal enforcementOppose2 of 238 reviewed
A few opponents argue that the state should not impede or place conditions on federal immigration enforcement activity.
“This "situation" is about enforcing laws and the state cannot impede federal enforcement.”
— Mason DeFrancesco, Concord, Nh · #585989 — read full submission →
“I do not support this bill. ICE is enforcing federal law any attempts to hinder that are seditious.”
— Frederick Murray, Nashua · #577249 — read full submission →
Generated by claude-sonnet-5 (claude code agent) on Jul 20, 2026. Quotes are verbatim excerpts, verified against the cited submission before publication. Summaries are AI interpretation of the record, not part of it.
This is literally the least we can do which also supports transparency.
I believe all officers should be transparent and traceable
Hello, I am an average citizen. I am an average citizen, concerned with the fate of our society. Most importantly, I am concerned about the small community that I reside in. New Hampshire has always meant "safety". New Hampshire has been a home I can call my own, and I haven't had to worry about my freedom, or my children's. Lately, I AM worried. Once a joker, where I saw politics as a war than cannot be won, a stand-up comedy routine between powerful entities, has now become something much more sinister. I see my sister states suffering; I see PEOPLE suffering. As an average citizen, I am not allowed to walk into a bank with a masked face, because I would be seen as a threat. Imagine, if I were to walk around town with a masked face, I would be immediately seen as a criminal with intent to harm. Take it another step further - imagine I am walking around town with a masked face, armed, and grabbing people off the street, using any type of force I deemed necessary - I would then be considered a felon. There is absolutely no justified means for any person, law enforcement or citizen, to be walking around masked, if not under the direction of a massive health outbreak, such as COVID-19. If we lose control over law enforcement and the regulations, we WILL, in result, lose complete control of society, and everything our Democracy stands for.
Transparency in government is important to me, our tax dollars fund our law-enforcement and we should be able to know who they are. By not wearing masks law-enforcement helps build trust in communities. When they remain masked they provoke fear in our communities and distance themselves from the communities they’re meant to protect.
quotes below this article that highlight the problem with masked ice and other federal and law enforcement officer wearing masks. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/masked-and-unidentifiable-the-risks-of-federal-law-enforcement-operating-without-identification/ "This is the new, frightening image of U.S. immigration enforcement under President Donald Trump: violence, covered faces, and unknown agency affiliations. These images signal a troubling move “away from democratic controls,” where officers are visible and accountable to the communities they serve, and toward militarization that serves to instill fear and stifle dissent." Enforcement actions by masked or unidentifiable officers, which have even included the arrests of elected officials and other U.S. citizens, are part of a broader effort to keep up with arbitrary and cruel immigration arrest quotas set by the Trump administration. "As a result, today, ICE is operating in ways akin to the actions of secret police forces, tasked with carrying out Trump’s political agenda. These practices have stoked fear in communities across the country and raised serious questions about the safety and legitimacy of their operations under the Trump administration." Recently, attorneys general from 21 different states called on Congress to pass legislation that both prohibits federal agents from wearing face coverings to conceal identity and implements requirements for showing identification and agency designation. In addition to potentially violating federal law, officers operating without providing their agency or personal identifiers make everyone less safe—from law enforcement to civilians to entire communities. The presence of unidentifiable officers makes policing more challenging and dangerous, as community members or fellow officers may mistake them for a lawbreaker. Moreover, this practice spurs dangerous impersonations, impedes accountability for officers who are engaged in misconduct, and undermines trust in law enforcement. I do not trust ICE and the federal goverments actions with ice and boarder security agents. I do not want any of our NH police officers being placed in difficult and compromising positions through 287g agreements at all. i certainly don't want our community police force wearing masks alongside this bunch
Dear Members of the House Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee, I am writing in support of HB 1142. I am a nurse midwife and have been a NH resident for 60 years. I am in favor of HB1142 because this bill promotes transparency and accountability. Clear identification of authority helps protect civil rights, reduce confusion, and maintain trust between law enforcement and the communities they serve. Strong community trust is essential for public safety in New Hampshire. HB 1142 is a reasonable and important step toward ensuring that trust. I respectfully urge the Committee to recommend HB 1142 as Ought to Pass. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Nicole Sczekan, MSN, CNM, FACNM
It is crucial that our local officers remain unmasked while assisting the federal 287(g) program.
The reckless, unethical and thug-like tactics of untrained ICE agents and NH officers assisting them will only deepen public distrust of law enforcement and the government as a whole.
I support this bill.
As a woman, I do NOT feel safe being approached or seeing any other person approached or physically handled by any masked person's. Women have been abducted and raped by posers. Honestly, if a masked person approaches me I will go into fight mode. You are putting citizens and officers in a dangerous situation. If I feel that my safety is in jeopardy and I can confirm who is approaching, I am going to shoot first and ask questions later as it is in written in stand your ground laws. You can not put people in these situations and not expect someone to get hurt. New Hampshire has many citizens who carry a gun legally for self protection. You put laws in place for me to protect myself, but then complicate it with how you run ICE.
We don't need any more anonymous masked thugs on our streets who are not accountable for their actions! (I would rather our local and state LEOs support and protect the residents of NH and not be involved in federal immigration procedures.)
I believe it is essential that the rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights, Articles 1, 4, and 5, especially, be supported by reining in the decidedly unconstitutional abuses now being perpetrated by ICE and Border Patrol Agents, under the leadership of DHS. This Bill is an important first step in restoring the rule of law during this tumultuous and perilous time.
Local police have never worn masks even when arresting people suspected of homicide and other terrible crimes. They should not be masking when assisting ICE with immigration enforcement. Imnigration violations are a civil defense. It's the mission of our local police to build relatonships in our communities. Masked police destroy community trust and thus render police incapable of fulfilling their. primary mission. Please put at end to this horrendous practice.
What is happening with ICE is way out of control and is terrifying people. We must reform ICE and stop this frightening behavior. It has gone way beyond arresting the true criminals. Please protect our citizens .
No law enforcement or federal authorities located within NH should be allowed to hide behind a mask. This bill absolutely should pass, but additionally, it should be amended to include all federal officers operating within the state. When they can hide behind a mask, they are emboldened to break the law, misuse their power, and mistreat people.
I, Victoria Garcia, believe that people have the right to visibly see the federal ICE agents, and that their identities and actions should not remain anonymous, especially if anything should need to be addressed in the court of law
I am afraid of these masked men. They are the type of people that as a woman I automatically dread. I have three daughters, and they are the exact type of men I warn them away from. There are credible, verified accounts of men posing as ICE agents and sexually assaulting women; masks make it much easier for them to act with impunity. As a military spouse and strong supporter of the Constitution, I want more guardrails and expectations for law enforcement, not fewer. Being able to operate in secrecy enables ICE agents the ability to act as murderous thugs, as we have tragically seen. We expect unmasked faces, names, and badges for police forces; we should expect the exact same for ICE agents.
Transparency and accountability are vital to democracy.
There is no accountability with anonymity. The fact that this bill is only for those assisting ICE and not including ICE is awful. But yes, the identities of anyone who will bear witness to the atrocities of these small men and assist them must be made public. We must know who to trust. We must know who is safe. Any assistance to this terror must be documented. There will be no hiding in Argentina for this lot. Abolish ICE.
Uphold our Constitutional values: require any state, county, or local law enforcement officer to identify themselves by name, badge number, and agency, clearly state they are working under I.C.E. authority, and remain unmasked while doing so.
As a citizen of New Hampshire I am concerned that Constitutional rights are being violated. Specifically the 1st, and 4th amendment. Brazen acts of intimidation and violence are being perpetrated by masked men. The lack of transparency facilitated by anonymity of these individuals shields them from accountability. New Hampshire cannot tolerate such behavior.
Not allowing ICE or anyone helping them to hide their identity puts their lives in danger because we have so many violent mentally ill leftists in this country who will dox and attack them and their families. They should not be put in added danger for doing their jobs which are already dangerous.
This will help bring transparency to the ICE presence in our state and quell the concern of citizens who feel as though they are being threatened. If the actions are appropriate there should be no need for an agent to act surreptitiously.
I support HB1142 because transparency and accountability are essential to public trust in law enforcement.