Dear Members of the House Education Policy Committee, As a 193-A Home Educating Veteran (we've graduated 2 of 5 kiddos) with our youngest in 2nd grade (by Compulsory standards) I am writing to you with great concerns with HB 1268. How we got where we are, with amendments being worked on with public refusal from legislators to work with 193-A Home Educators (multiple times) is a sorry reflection of the state of our system. Is it done all the time? Sure. Is it a Best Practice? Definitely not. Over the course of the last several months, myself and other liberty-minded Home Educators with the "Long-Range View" reached out to the Sponsor with concerns. Thankfully, the placeholder that we saw at the end of 2025 is nowhere in sight, and the Sponsor has shared revision language that addresses some concerns that have been brought up - but so far any revision ideas have fallen short of being a solid step forward in Home Education Freedom in NH. I watched the last 1/3 of the hearing, and there were missed opportunities to understand concerns better. I share some of the same concerns - though I missed the introduction, so I don't know which unregistered "draft" idea was presented, I am basing my comments off one that the Sponsor shared in a semi-public Facebook group the night before the hearing. 193:1, I (f)(2) "at the high school level" is removed. This is significant. Without it, it diminishes the value of the completion. What is to stop a family from notifying and then subsequently determining that the program is complete, without pursuing education beyond, say, a 4th grade level? The words "at the high school level" are protective and bring uniformity to the value of a Home Education. //Certificate of Completion// again, removal of the text that it is "equivalent to a high school diploma" and replacing with "completed a home education program" without defining what such a program is, leaves parents open to scrutiny of the value of a Home Education. Asking for this language to remain isn't inviting the government in, it is asking the government to legally recognize the parents rights to issue such a declaration. What/Where is the definition of a Home Education Program, as described in this statute? III - Declaration - it is stated to be optional and meets state compulsory attendance requirements. Such requirements are elsewhere defined by number of days and hours. If a family does not make an optional declaration and is challenged about Truancy, there is no legal protection. This Bill proposes to make all children 6-18 in NH Defacto Home Educators, in absence of enrollment in a Public, Charter, Non-public or EFA Pathway. This is troubling, as that by default declares that Truancy no longer exists. Who do we have to show the declaration to in order to obtain Equal Access? This is missing - without instruction, where are districts left in verifying Pathway Status? I have concerns relate to the SLDS - families receiving the ETC or VLACS are tracked through that system. There needs to be a provision in those programs to not exclude Home Educating Families. I am disturbed by the inclusion of the Optional certificate of completion by the state. This is a mandate on the State to provide a document, which carries NO legal weight, for an education that the state did not participate in. It devalues the authority of the parent to issue their own completion. I have done this twice, and printed diplomas and written transcripts - all without a recognition from the state. This is a "solution searching for a problem" and a feel-good measure that has NO place in law. Without these concerns addressed, I cannot support HB 1268 in it's current (draft) amendment form. Respectfully, Michelle Rohrbacher
HB1268
House · 2026 sessionRepublicanSigned into lawHome education rules and drug pricing
AIReplaces the framework for home education programs with new definitions, parental rights, and privacy protections, and separately requires written agreements between pharmacy benefits managers and health carriers while raising fines for pharmacy benefits manager violations.
(Second New Title) modifying the structure and administration of home education programs and relative to pharmacy benefits managers, managed care laws, notice of drug pricing options and pharmacy benefit manager business practices.
Status
Signed into law · July 16, 2026- ✓Introduced
- ✓House
- ✓Senate
- ✓Governor
- ✓Law
Division of testimony
1,535 submissionsHatched = form letter · 240 of 1,535 written submissions (16%) came from organized campaigns
Argument digest · AI-generated
from 355 of 594 written submissionsHB1268 is titled a home education reform bill (with a separate, second title also covering pharmacy benefit managers, though the written testimony collected addressed only the home-education provisions). The bill would make notification of home education optional in most cases and make annual evaluations, portfolios, and other reporting voluntary rather than mandatory; supporters frame this as restoring parental authority and cutting unnecessary bureaucracy, while opponents argue it removes the state's only mechanisms for detecting educational neglect, abuse, or children who fall outside any system of accountability.
- Parents, not government, should direct educationSupport42 of 355 reviewed · 240 via form letter
Supporters argue parents have the primary right and responsibility to direct their children's education, and that the bill reduces unnecessary government oversight, intrusion, and bureaucracy in family decisions.
“parents possess the primary right and duty to direct the education of their children, and that right does not originate from the state.”
— Shaylyn Maran, Wolfeboro · #638431 — read full submission →
“New Hampshire families deserve the freedom to educate their children without unnecessary government involvement. Parents know their children best — their strengths, their challenges, their learning styles, and their values.”
— Kayla Gallagher, Atkinson · #638698 — read full submission →
- Bill removes burdensome, low-value paperworkSupport22 of 355 reviewed · 240 via form letter
Supporters argue mandatory notification, annual evaluations, and portfolio requirements are bureaucratic burdens that do not improve outcomes for responsible homeschooling families and should be made voluntary.
“Removing the mandate for annual state testing or evaluations does not remove accountability — it removes one-size-fits-all bureaucracy.”
— Emily Morgan, Rochester · #640089 — read full submission →
“This bill creates more clear options for families who wish to work with their public schools without adding unnecessary requirements for those who do not want to work with their local school.”
— Anastacia Webb, Littleton · #636198 — read full submission →
- Personal accounts of children thriving after leaving schoolSupport18 of 355 reviewed
Many supporters describe their own children succeeding academically, emotionally, or socially after moving to homeschooling, often citing bullying, unmet needs, or failure to be challenged in public school.
“He was put in a closet and kept there every single day. He was sat on and scolded. He was not being taught.”
— Carolyn Burke, Somersworth · #638272 — read full submission →
“My son is in 3rd grade. He is working at 9th grade math at home. Everytime he BEGS his teacher to give him more advanced work, the answer is that it would be "disruptive" to the other students.”
— Catharine Evans, Portsmouth · #640167 — read full submission →
- Bill prevents homeschooling being used against familiesSupport17 of 355 reviewed · 240 via form letter
Supporters describe the bill as protecting families from DCYF overreach and from school districts treating the choice to homeschool itself as evidence of neglect or grounds for harassment.
“the fact that we home educate our children was used as evidence of neglect to bolster a separate accusation. I was forced to spend significant time and money defending against educational neglect charges in court”
— Jen Deml, Bedford · #634596 — read full submission →
“The bill also creates protections so that choosing to home school can’t be used as evidence of educational neglect.”
— Kelly Cataluna, Nashua · #639441 — read full submission →
- Bill protects homeschool family data from state trackingSupport11 of 355 reviewed · 240 via form letter
A number of supporters cite the bill's privacy provisions, which they describe as preventing the state from tracking homeschooled students through data systems.
- Would make NH a top-tier, business-friendly homeschool stateSupport5 of 355 reviewed · 240 via form letter
A smaller number of supporters frame the bill as positioning New Hampshire alongside other low-regulation states, arguing this attracts families and benefits the state's economy.
- State has a duty to ensure all children are educatedOppose24 of 355 reviewed
Opponents argue every child is subject to compulsory-education law and that the state retains a duty to ensure children are being educated regardless of setting, which this bill undermines.
“Every child is subject to compulsory education laws, and there has to be at least this minimal level of assurance that it’s happening.”
— Diana Schuman, DOVER · #635057 — read full submission →
“Every child in NH has a right to a free public education and is subject to compulsory education laws.”
— Holly Cooper, Concord · #633265 — read full submission →
- Removing oversight risks hidden abuse and neglectOppose18 of 355 reviewed
Opponents warn that making notification and evaluation optional removes the community's ability to notice abuse, neglect, or children who effectively disappear from any monitored system.
“By making notification optional, it eliminates a vital community safety net, removing children from public view and increasing the risk that abuse or neglect will go undetected.”
— Claudia Slaney, Londonderry · #637616 — read full submission →
“This bill would allow more child predators to utilize the homeschool programs to disappear children indefinitely without the state knowing.”
— Deanna Wilson, Rindge · #636962 — read full submission →
- Public funds for homeschoolers need accountabilityOppose21 of 355 reviewed
Opponents note that homeschooling families increasingly receive public money through EFA stipends and argue that removing reporting requirements would leave that spending with no meaningful oversight.
“NH taxpayers are now paying a stipend for children being homeschooled in NH. There is already little oversight of how this stipend is used.”
— Kerri Choate, Rollinsford · #638935 — read full submission →
“If homeschool parents want taxpayer money to educate their children then they should be required to participate in the same standards and testing as public and private school students.”
— Erin Morris, Merrimack · #639120 — read full submission →
- Bill is poorly written and legally inconsistentOppose19 of 355 reviewed
Opponents, including some independent home-education advocates who otherwise favor deregulation, argue the bill's language is vague or confusing and conflicts with other unchanged statutes governing truancy and child protection.
“HB 1268 makes multiple changes that reduce family choice, expand district involvement, and create additional regulatory openings. Some provisions are redundant; others generate new confusion or eliminate existing protections.”
— Janelle Lorento, Bow · #629411 — read full submission →
“It is written in a way that makes the language too vague and opens up the possibility of people using this to not register at all. Changes from “shall” to “may” make things too vague and confusing.”
— Katherine Rasco, Pelham · #639143 — read full submission →
- No way to verify children are actually learningOppose11 of 355 reviewed
Opponents argue that making evaluations and portfolios optional removes any objective way to confirm a homeschooled child is progressing academically or acquiring basic skills.
“Without required evaluation, there is no consistent assurance that children are learning to read, write, perform math, or understand civics.”
— Rachel Wolski, Northfield · #639846 — read full submission →
“leaving no practical way to distinguish between children who are being responsibly homeschooled and children who simply disappear from the system altogether”
— Sinehan Kerman, Epsom · #636561 — read full submission →
- Vulnerable children need protective touchpointsOppose14 of 355 reviewed
Some opponents argue removing oversight would especially harm children with disabilities or in at-risk homes, since notice and evaluation requirements can serve as one of the few outside checks on their wellbeing.
“its effect would be to strip away critical notice, evaluation, and accountability requirements that protect the education and safety of all children — especially children with disabilities.”
— Jesse Forrest, Haslet · #637813 — read full submission →
“What I don’t support is taking away checks and balances to ensure ALL children get a quality education regardless of the source.”
— Justin Charles, Rindge · #629861 — read full submission →
Generated by claude-sonnet-5 (claude code agent) on Jul 20, 2026. Quotes are verbatim excerpts, verified against the cited submission before publication. Summaries are AI interpretation of the record, not part of it.
Form-letter campaigns
240 of 594 written submissions (40%)240 submissions match a shared template; 354 are individually written.
- Support for Homeschooling LegislationSupport240 submissions on this bill
The legislation is supported because it aims to reduce bureaucratic burdens and establish New Hampshire as a leading state for homeschooling families by protecting parental rights.
The letter · submitted 240 times I am writing to express my strong support for HB 1268, which will make New Hampshire the most homeschool-friendly state in the nation. This transformative legislation addresses key concerns for homeschooling families: • Makes notification optional, reducing bureaucratic burden on families • Eliminates mandatory evaluations while preserving voluntary options • Provides crucial DCYF protections with statutory presumption that home education satisfies compulsory requirements • Prevents school district harassment through clear anti-interference provisions • Protects family privacy by preventing tracking through state data systems • Provides employment flexibility for homeschooled students HB 1268 will position New Hampshire alongside Alaska, Idaho, and Texas as a Tier 1 homeschool state with minimal regulation. This attracts families, grows our economy, and reinforces our commitment to educational freedom and parental rights. New Hampshire has always championed individual liberty and limited government. This bill embodies those principles while supporting the thousands of families who choose home education for their children. I urge you to vote in favor of HB 1268 and help make New Hampshire the premier homeschool destination in America. Respectfully, Vivian Bates Hampstead, NH
Detected by text-similarity clustering; campaign names are AI-generated.
To whom it may concern. I have homeschooled my son for over two years. When we moved to New Hampshire, I thought perhaps we could attempt public school again. My son is in 3rd grade. He is working at 9th grade math at home. Everytime he BEGS his teacher to give him more advanced work, the answer is that it would be "disruptive" to the other students. I have volunteered to provide the appropriate papers if he could be allowed to do them in class. Nope. Not possible. The school does not even KNOW where my son is in reading or math. They have only ensured that he is on grade level. We will be homeschooling again next year. With all due respect, it is an insult to think a school who refuses to ALLOW my child to learn should be required to review his work. Furthermore, since there is actually no interest in relating a test score to level of academics offered, why should he be required to go through that.... unless it is to embarass your public schools.
Happy homeschool momma!
I am a RSA193-A unsubsidized home educator and I oppose this bill as written in its latest iteration. The vast majority of the testimonies for HB1268 are from people who don’t understand the current home ed law and have not seen the actual HB1268 text. They have clicked a button to submit a form testimony because someone they trust told them to, and all they know about the bill is from propagandistic analyses — I am referring to BOTH Support and Oppose sign-ins here. So, where does that leave the rest of us, the parents who have chosen the RSA193-A pathway because we want to avoid government intrusion into our family’s education. This bill has thrust those who just want to quietly raise and teach our children into the middle of a battle between School Choice evangelists who want the street cred of turning NH into a “top homeschooling destination,” and leftist opponents who hate parental rights, think Home Educators receive public money, and would just as well make all homeschooling illegal. My peers and I did not ask for this bill. Please consider us as you draft the final amendment. We are the ones who will be attacked by the other side in the years to come. Since you are able to bring OPTIONAL Certificates of Completion into statute, please also include OPTIONAL notification letters of intent to participating agencies (nonpublic schools) and OPTIONAL recommendation to keep portfolios of student work for at least two years. We heard today that NH Home Education advocates and even HSLDA would still recommend parents keep good documentation of their children’s education as a protective measure. By laying out these methods in statute, it will serve as guidance for parents who are trying to safeguard their family. It would be as simple as changing the words “shall” to “may” in those sections. I also believe that the language in current law surrounding notification and assessments was written very carefully and intentionally by Home Education advocates in years past. If enemies of home education attempt to introduce new regulations in the future, it would help if language that focuses on families’ rights and autonomy was still present in law. I would much rather that they try to switch back to “shall” in the future, than start with a blank state and come up with their own ideas on how to evaluate a homeschooling student. Liberty-focused Republicans will not be in control forever. Please consider those of us who still have a decade or more left until our children have graduated. Thank you.
Thriving and very happy homeschool family!
I am especially concerned about DCYF overreach and over-regulation. Homeschoolers consistently perform well in standardized testing and college admissions BECAUSE parents can adjust the educational style for each child to maximize their learning.
I don’t support this bill. I do not think it is in the best interest of NH home education students to take away requirements for notification or annual assessments. I’m a home educator and I don’t support this bill. Homeschool families need to be accountable for providing an education to their children. Taking away the notifications and annual assessment requirements may lead to educational neglect in some instances. I also feel the bill is not well written and leaves too many unanswered questions that may have unforeseen consequences for homeschooling families in NH.
I am a former homeschooled student urging you to oppose HB 1268. I currently live in Massachusetts, not New Hampshire, but I have lived the consequences of the kind of deregulation this bill would create. I was homeschooled in Texas under minimal oversight. I was never formally evaluated for academic progress. My work was not graded. I did not receive math instruction beyond geometry and was not taught Algebra II, physics, or pre-calculus. When I applied to college, I struggled because I could not provide official transcripts. Some institutions did not accept the document my parent created. When there are no recordkeeping requirements, students are left to prove an education that was never independently verified. I was taught material presented as scientific and historical fact that is widely rejected by experts, including biblical creationism as literal science. Without assessment requirements, there was no mechanism to ensure I received even a basic, standards-aligned education. Because I was homeschooled and isolated from teachers and other mandated reporters, medical concerns went unaddressed. My chronic migraines were untreated, and I did not receive routine medical or dental care after age nine. Oversight is not just about academics; it is also about visibility and protection. This bill removes safeguards. I am not against “parents’ rights,” but children’s rights must be protected. Every child deserves a quality education, and this bill would rob many of that right. Please do not pass HB 1268.
Homeschooling grandma. I support this bill.
This bill would make homeschooling for children like my son easier and less stressful. He has ADHD and doesn’t not do well with on the spot recall testing. Like many children, he also excels in some subjects that would be considered a higher education “level” than where he’s at, and others he is taking longer to comprehend to the point of being able to meet what would be considered his “level”. Homeschooling on our own terms without the stress of having to meet milestones set for him by neurotypical standards is what New Hampshire should be embracing!
As a New Hampshire parent, I strongly support the Homeschooling Freedom Act reform. New Hampshire has long valued individual liberty and parental rights. This reform continues that tradition by trusting parents to make the best educational decisions for their own children without unnecessary government oversight. Removing the mandate for annual state testing or evaluations does not remove accountability — it removes one-size-fits-all bureaucracy. Homeschooling families are deeply invested in their children’s success. Education in a homeschool setting is highly individualized, adaptable, and often exceeds traditional benchmarks precisely because parents can tailor learning to each child’s needs. For many families, especially those with children who have unique learning styles, disabilities, or advanced abilities, rigid testing requirements can be limiting rather than helpful. This reform would allow families to focus on meaningful learning rather than paperwork compliance. New Hampshire has the opportunity to become the most homeschooling-friendly state in the nation — a place that truly trusts families and protects educational freedom. I encourage lawmakers to support this reform and stand with parents.
Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong support for HB 1268, which will make New Hampshire the most homeschool-friendly state in the nation. This transformative legislation addresses key concerns for homeschooling families: • Makes notification optional, reducing bureaucratic burden on families • Eliminates mandatory evaluations while preserving voluntary options • Provides crucial DCYF protections with statutory presumption that home education satisfies compulsory requirements • Prevents school district harassment through clear anti-interference provisions • Protects family privacy by preventing tracking through state data systems • Provides employment flexibility for homeschooled students HB 1268 will position New Hampshire alongside Alaska, Idaho, and Texas as a Tier 1 homeschool state with minimal regulation. This attracts families, grows our economy, and reinforces our commitment to educational freedom and parental rights. New Hampshire has always championed individual liberty and limited government. This bill embodies those principles while supporting the thousands of families who choose home education for their children. I urge you to vote in favor of HB 1268 and help make New Hampshire the premier homeschool destination in America. Respectfully, Brittany Horton
Homeschooling has changed so much for the better for my child she was being heavily bullied because parents told their children about my daughters father ( whom she hates ) about his prison sentences ext. or because she has medical issues . Has memory loss due to ptsd . She’s not by the book and leave her to figure it out she’s hands on visual to make her grow. She’s had tests done of her in a group verses one on one and how she excelled so much being one on one at her level .
Honorable Committee Members, For the record, my name is Sayra DeVito. I am a New Hampshire State Representative, and I am testifying today on behalf of my constituents, many of whom homeschool their children and have entrusted me to be their voice in this process. I rise in strong support of HB 1268, the Home Education Freedom Act. New Hampshire families deserve the freedom to educate their children without unnecessary government intrusion. Parents , not bureaucracies, are best positioned to make decisions about their children’s education, values, pace of learning, and overall development. HB 1268 restores that fundamental right. This legislation modernizes our home education laws by removing burdensome requirements that treat law-abiding families as if they require supervision simply for choosing a different educational path. It makes notifications and evaluations voluntary rather than mandatory, protects families from having their educational choices weaponized against them in child protective proceedings, and clearly prohibits school districts from imposing regulations on homeschool families beyond what statute allows. Perhaps most importantly, HB 1268 establishes what should always be the presumption in a free society, that parents who choose home education are fulfilling their duty to educate their children. The state should not begin from a posture of suspicion. New Hampshire has long valued individual liberty, parental rights, and limited government. HB 1268 reflects those principles. It ensures that families who are successfully educating their children at home can do so without fear of overreach, unnecessary data collection, or bureaucratic hurdles. Parents deserve trust. Families deserve freedom. And children deserve an education shaped by those who know and love them most. I respectfully urge the committee to vote Ought to Pass on HB 1268. In Liberty, Sayra DeVito
I appreciate the sponsors of this bill and all who helped craft it. I know a lot of work went into it. Thank you. While this bill addresses some important issues, I feel more time is needed to construct it to be better. There were proposed amendments that were not heard at today's hearing. I kindly ask you to listen to the people who spoke at today's hearing and read the written online submissions with an openness to others who opposed the bill. Those who opposed it had valid concerns that need to be addressed. I do not wish to add to what others have shared. I oppose this bill. Thank you for your time.
100% support. NH public schools have failed my children. My husband and I have been fully invested in our kids education, 100% involved. Our oldest 2 have achieved more in home school in this school year than they did in multiple years combined in public school.
Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong support for HB 1268, which will make New Hampshire the most homeschool-friendly state in the nation. This transformative legislation addresses key concerns for homeschooling families: • Makes notification optional, reducing bureaucratic burden on families • Eliminates mandatory evaluations while preserving voluntary options • Provides crucial DCYF protections with statutory presumption that home education satisfies compulsory requirements • Prevents school district harassment through clear anti-interference provisions • Protects family privacy by preventing tracking through state data systems • Provides employment flexibility for homeschooled students HB 1268 will position New Hampshire alongside Alaska, Idaho, and Texas as a Tier 1 homeschool state with minimal regulation. This attracts families, grows our economy, and reinforces our commitment to educational freedom and parental rights. New Hampshire has always championed individual liberty and limited government. This bill embodies those principles while supporting the thousands of families who choose home education for their children. I urge you to vote in favor of HB 1268 and help make New Hampshire the premier homeschool destination in America. Respectfully, Allen Stevens Berlin, NH
Accountability for homeschoolers is quite reasonable in NH already, This bill will not help anyone to be a better parent or homeschool educator.
I support this bill
What a bad idea! This is leaving NH kids wide open for child abuse and neglect. While many families provide great homeschooling, there need to be SOME safeguards. Do your duty to protect the most vulnerable -- children. Thank you.
I'd like to have less state interference in my children's programs. Homeschooling has always been the choice of the elite, and I do want my children to have a better education than in public school. This can be obtained in many ways, but parent's should be in charge of this, not the state.
Honorable Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong support for HB 1268, which will make New Hampshire the most homeschool-friendly state in the nation. This transformative legislation addresses key concerns for homeschooling families: • Makes notification optional, reducing bureaucratic burden on families • Eliminates mandatory evaluations while preserving voluntary options • Provides crucial DCYF protections with statutory presumption that home education satisfies compulsory requirements • Prevents school district harassment through clear anti-interference provisions • Protects family privacy by preventing tracking through state data systems • Provides employment flexibility for homeschooled students HB 1268 will position New Hampshire alongside Alaska, Idaho, and Texas as a Tier 1 homeschool state with minimal regulation. This attracts families, grows our economy, and reinforces our commitment to educational freedom and parental rights. New Hampshire has always championed individual liberty and limited government. This bill embodies those principles while supporting the thousands of families who choose home education for their children. I urge you to vote in favor of HB 1268 and help make New Hampshire the premier homeschool destination in America. Respectfully, William Angelli North Conway, NH
Kids will be much better educated.
I am in support of the homeschoolers.
I wholeheartedly support the homeschooling efforts.