NH House Testimony

HB1333

House · 2026 sessionRepublicanKilled in House

Murder charge for forced abortion drugs

AI

Allows a first-degree murder charge against a person who administers pregnancy-terminating medication to a pregnant woman without her knowledge or consent, and moves the point at which a fetus can be a homicide victim from 20 weeks gestation to conception or implantation.

relative to nonconsensual provision of medication intended to terminate a pregnancy and the homicide of a fetus.

Crimes, Crim.Proc. & Corr.Public and Mental Health

Status

Killed in the House — Inexpedient to Legislate · February 5, 2026
  1. Introduced
  2. House
  3. Senate
  4. Governor
  5. Law

Division of testimony

1,661 submissions
Support 37Oppose 1,624(15 form letter)Neutral 0

Hatched = form letter · 15 of 1,661 written submissions (1%) came from organized campaigns

Argument digest · AI-generated

from 413 of 427 written submissions

HB1333 would make nonconsensual provision of medication to end a pregnancy a crime and would move the point at which a fetus can be a homicide victim from 20 weeks back to conception (or implantation in IVF). A minority of supporters frame it as protecting unborn life and preventing coerced or secret abortions, while the large majority of submitters oppose it, arguing it amounts to fetal "personhood" that would criminalize and surveil pregnant people, is scientifically inaccurate, threatens IVF and miscarriage care, and undermines reproductive autonomy.

Generated by claude-sonnet-5 (claude code agent) on Jul 20, 2026. Quotes are verbatim excerpts, verified against the cited submission before publication. Summaries are AI interpretation of the record, not part of it.

Form-letter campaigns

15 of 427 written submissions (4%)

15 submissions match a shared template; 412 are individually written.

  • Opposition to Personhood LegislationOppose15 submissions on this bill

    The legislation is argued to create legal confusion, potentially criminalize pregnancy outcomes, and contradict established science and medical consensus.

    The letter · submitted 15 times

    So-called “personhood” measures like this one create confusion and chaos in our legal system, and often result in the surveillance of and criminalization of pregnant people, including those that experience negative pregnancy outcomes like miscarriage and stillbirth. HB 1333 is out of line with mainstream science and medicine -- and out of touch with the will of the majority of Granite Staters.

Detected by text-similarity clustering; campaign names are AI-generated.

Carla BillinghamOpposeSalem, NHfor MyselfJan 14, 2026

Logic and critical thinking are the foundation of intelligence. Together they create the ability to make wise decisions throughout one's growth and development.

Carolyn RohdenburgOpposeMeredith, NHfor MyselfJan 14, 2026

Any bill that would give a fetus or cluster of cells legal personhood is an ill-disguised attempt to remove the legal personhood of actual people: women. In this case, women who might be forced to carry that cluster of cells in her body against her will or against the advice of her medical doctor, or both. Protect actual women, not theoretical future people.

Donna PetersonSupportLoudon, NHfor MyselfJan 14, 2026

Dear members of the House Judiciary Committee, As a NH citizen in Loudon, I want to strongly urge you to vote OTP on HB1333, the bill protecting unborn children from fetal homicide. There have been an alarming number of incidences of abortion pills being put in pregnant women's drinks, without their consent or knowledge. The purchase of these abortion pills is poorly regulated with purchase permitted by persons other than the pregnant mothers and without their consent. The unborn children of women who have not chosen to abort them, should be protected!Thank you for voting OTP on HB 1333! Sincerely, Donna Peterson

Amanda BannerOpposeNashua, NHfor MyselfJan 14, 2026

I oppose this bill. Personhood does not include unborn fetuses.

Michael TremblayOpposeNorthfield, NHfor MyselfJan 14, 2026

This bill is an attempt to undermine abortion rights,abortion rights are a part of our state constitution, if the nh committee approves this bill, it directly contradicts our state constitution, which nh has repeatedly voted against changing that particular section for a reason. Stop trying to tell women what they are allowed to do with their bodies, cause if you remove bodily autonomy from one of us, you remove bodily autonomy from all of us. Make the correct decision and shut down this targeted attack against women as if its a reasonable legal position

Megan DillonOpposeHooksett, NHfor MyselfJan 14, 2026

The governor campaigned and promised no changes to NH abortion laws. That should include back door attempts to restrict women’s rights.

Bethany PerkinsOpposeNashua, NHfor MyselfJan 14, 2026

This is a back door attempt to roll back abortion rights. Abortion is legal in NH and we can’t pass laws that would challenge that.

Melissa Kaizer De SouzaOpposeHooksett, NHfor MyselfJan 14, 2026

We need to stop taking away women’s rights. If we want to do that we need to be able to show that we support her after the birth and possibly an unwanted child. Think of the mental health issues a child gets from being born to a mother who does not want them. And we don’t provide adequate mental health care. Why does what other people choose to do with their life bother everyone else I thought We were live free or die?

Kathleen KowalskiOpposeNew London, NHfor MyselfJan 14, 2026

We have to stop treating women as though they do not deserve the same rights to their bodies as men. New Hampshire should have no legislature that limits or restricts a woman’s right to choose. To put the well-being of a fetus, which to clarify: is not medically designated a person (despite religious fanatic’s best efforts) above the well-being of a woman who already has an established life with loved ones is abhorrent. The decision whether to carry a fetus to term or not, should be only up to the person carrying said fetus with advisement of her medical providers. Crusty old men who don’t even know where the clitoris is, that urine comes out of a different hole, and who are likely too embarrassed to ever buy their grand daughters tampons should not be making decisions that do not affect them.

Robert DrysdaleOpposeHanover, NHfor MyselfJan 14, 2026

Laws like this undermine the rights of pregnant people, limit access to sexual and reproductive health care, and control people’s abilities to build the families they want.

Lois CoteOpposeManchester, NHfor MyselfJan 14, 2026

Part of this bill grossly distorts and misleads regarding solid science and medicine. It is not justice, This crime as described is against the person who is pregnant.

Susan WoodsOpposeConcord, NHfor MyselfJan 14, 2026

Stop it. Just stop it. The assault on women’s rights. Enough. ENOUGH. You have nothing better to do? You’ve removed public funding. You’ve reduced access. Why don’t you focus on offering services and support that might make it easier for a woman to bear and raise children. You don’t supports child care, education, school food programs. But you have time and money to spend on this.

Kathy GrossmanOpposeHollis, NHfor MyselfJan 14, 2026

I oppose giving fetuses legal rights. This is an attempt to outlaw abortion, and would greatly limit women’s rights to have control over their own bodies and their healthcare. Please vote against this bill.

Patricia SockeyOpposeAmherst, NHfor MyselfJan 14, 2026

Unacceptable.

Jason KnightsOpposeLondonderry, NHfor MyselfJan 14, 2026

This bill is nothing more than yet another attempt by the GOP to restrict abortion by "nibbling at the edges". Time and again, NH voters have shown their intention to keep abortion safe and legal. This is just another example of the Legislature, led by the GOP and their Free State overlords to disregard the will of the people and try to turn us into Alabama with snow. They know that outright banning it would be political suicide, so they are attempting all of these end arounds to essentially make it illegal without actually making it illegal. It's time for the voters to let them know that, see you and know what you're trying to do.

carol staugaardOpposeHampton, NHfor MyselfJan 14, 2026

Embryos are not able to live outside the womb and therefore do not have rights as a human being

Priscilla DrouinOpposeCandia, NHfor MyselfJan 14, 2026

I do NOT support laws that infringe on women's rights and healthcare. These extreme bills have caused harm to families.

Courtney McIverOpposeHooksett, NHfor MyselfJan 14, 2026

A fetus is not a living breathing human being and should not be treated as such when confronted with choices concerning the mother who is carrying it

Kristen bannisterOpposeManchester, NHfor MyselfJan 14, 2026

Fear of legal consequences may deter providers from offering necessary treatments, even in emergencies. It will lead to confusion and dangerous inaction for cases of miscarriage and ectopic pregnancies.

Graham CullenOpposeBedford, NHfor MyselfJan 14, 2026

I am a NH native and love this state more than most. But our moto is Live FREE or Die and by limiting a women's right to choose is not freedom. Why would I want more Government oversight into what we can and cannot do!

James ChapmanOpposeGilsum, NHfor MyselfJan 14, 2026

I oppose this bill most vehemently. Let me remind you about separation of church and state.

Amy SterndaleOpposeDurham, NHfor MyselfJan 14, 2026

Abortion is legal. This bill would affect women's ability to access one. I needed one and I'm alive because I had access to one in a hospital setting. Please do more to protect women's health and less to control women's lives.

Racheal StuartOpposeLancaster, NHfor MyselfJan 14, 2026

This is government over reach. Just polarizing political hooey and a waste of time. We have more important things to deal with: economy, health care and infrastructure. Get to work on something that matters!

Julia MeadOpposeConcord, NHfor MyselfJan 14, 2026

I am testifying in opposition to HB1333 on behalf of myself. I am an ob-gyn and I am the vice-chair of New Hampshire ACOG- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. I trained at Dartmouth and now work in Concord, New Hampshire. HB 1333 does not reflect mainstream science and medicine, and would lead to confusing language and uncertain interpretation. I had a patient last week who presented to the emergency room with bleeding and a positive pregnancy test. Her ultrasound report was suggestive of a miscarriage, but not diagnostic. How can we not know whether or not she is having a miscarriage or not? Believe it or not, this happens every day. There are weeks when women may have a positive pregnancy test but there is no way to know whether they will go on to have a miscarriage, an ectopic pregnancy or a healthy pregnancy. The decisions that they make during these times of uncertainty should be made with their doctors and their families, not by legislators. Considering an embryo or a fetus to legally be a person threatens the autonomy of pregnant people and leads to the criminalization of health care professionals attempting to provide evidence-based, essential health care to pregnant patients. Requiring physicians to assess and treat patients according to legislation based on ideology rather than science, medicine, and the individual patient in front of them, gives legislators and the courts significant power over decisions made in the exam room, rather than relying on physician experts. Measures like this one use confusing and inaccurate language to create confusion and chaos in our legal system, and often result in the surveillance of and criminalization of pregnant people, including those that experience negative pregnancy outcomes like miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy and stillbirth. HB 1333 is out of touch with the will of the majority of Granite Staters, and would threaten the ability of New Hampshire to retain Ob-Gyn physicians and Ob-Gyn subspecialty physicians in our state, such as IVF providers. I urge the committee to oppose this bill.

lauren reckOpposelebanon, NHfor MyselfJan 14, 2026

I oppose this bill. scientifically speaking the language of this bill is grossly inaccurate.