This appears to be an authoritarian request and not one that makes any sense, especially with an exception for "educational" purposes. wouldn't ALL additions be educational? Who has time for students to be a "color guard" to deal with the daily raising and lowering of the flags??? Are we trying to prohibit a pride flag? And I'm against a fine for non-compliance? I'm fine with prohibiting a confederate flag, Nazi swastika, and other symbols of hate and exclusion, etc.
HB1345
House · 2026 sessionRepublicanKilled in HouseSchool flags and student color guards
AISets requirements for displaying the United States, state, and POW/MIA flags at schools, requires each school to designate a student color guard to raise, lower, and maintain the flags, and establishes penalties for violations.
requiring schools to establish rules related to the display of flags and designate students at each school to serve as the school's color guard.
Status
Killed in the House — Inexpedient to Legislate · March 5, 2026- ✓Introduced
- ✕House
- Senate
- Governor
- Law
Division of testimony
234 submissionsArgument digest · AI-generated
from 51 of 51 written submissionsHB1345 would require schools to adopt rules governing the display of flags and to designate a student color guard, effectively restricting non-official flags such as pride flags from classrooms. Supporters argue schools should remain politically and ideologically neutral and that flags addressing sexual orientation or gender identity are inappropriate for children, while opponents argue the bill violates free speech, removes a source of safety and belonging for LGBTQ+ students, and shifts a decision that belongs to local school boards to the state.
- Sexual/gender-identity flags are inappropriate for childrenSupport10 of 51 reviewed
Submitters argue that flags representing sexual orientation or gender identity are morally objectionable or sexually charged, and should not be displayed to children in taxpayer-funded schools.
“Sexual flags have no place in our tax payer funded schools. All should feel welcome and these flags are not something everyone agrees with.”
— Elsa Robinson, West Lebanon · #576249 — read full submission →
“I am against gay pride flags in Schools. This is demonstrating sexuality which is inappropriate for children .”
— Elizabeth Steele, Sugar Hill · #571865 — read full submission →
- Schools should remain politically/ideologically neutralSupport8 of 51 reviewed
Submitters argue schools exist for academics, not ideological or political advocacy, and that displaying non-official flags signals institutional endorsement of a particular viewpoint.
“the display of ideological or advocacy-based symbols—regardless of intent—moves schools away from a position of neutrality.”
— Casandra Mercer, Berlin · #565684 — read full submission →
“Schools are for teaching not preaching ideologies. Period”
— Mary Pavilonis, Bethlehem · #586165 — read full submission →
- Supports intent but enforcement mechanism is impracticalSupport1 of 51 reviewed
One submitter supports the bill's goal but criticizes the specific enforcement mechanism (a superintendent investigation window) as too slow and easily evaded.
- Bill violates First Amendment free speech rightsOppose6 of 51 reviewed
Opponents argue the bill improperly restricts protected student and teacher speech, citing case law such as Tinker v. Des Moines.
- Non-official flags provide safety/belonging for LGBTQ+ studentsOppose6 of 51 reviewed
Opponents argue that pride and other non-official flags signal safety and acceptance to marginalized students, including LGBTQ+ youth, and that removing them would harm vulnerable students.
“It made me feel less alone. It made me feel like I had a lifeline of if I was outed. It is simple. It is small. You may not understand it but a simple display of a pride flag can save someone’s life.”
— Jessica Marchesani, Dover · #585506 — read full submission →
“Students wearing a pride flag are also communicating that they are a safe person to go to and be around in your are queer.”
— Nicole Lockhart-Rios, Intervale · #558284 — read full submission →
- Misplaced priorities; legislature should focus on real issuesOppose5 of 51 reviewed
Opponents argue the legislature is wasting time on a symbolic culture-war issue instead of addressing more pressing problems like property taxes and school funding.
- Flag decisions belong to local school boards, not the stateOppose4 of 51 reviewed
Opponents argue these decisions should be made locally by elected school boards, which are accountable to their communities, rather than imposed by the state legislature.
- Mandated color guard is an unnecessary overreachOppose1 of 51 reviewed
One submitter argues that requiring schools to designate a specific color guard is overreach that limits the ability of all students to rotate through flag duties as many schools already do.
Generated by claude-sonnet-5 (claude code agent) on Jul 22, 2026. Quotes are verbatim excerpts, verified against the cited submission before publication. Summaries are AI interpretation of the record, not part of it.
Only official flags should be allowed on city and state properties.
You'd think with the number of bills about flags in schools that NH didn't have any problems at all. Property taxes are skyrocketing and pricing people out of their homes and our state, schools are literally falling apart, we've got a huge deficit thanks to Republicans, and THIS is your top priority? And what happened to local control and keeping government out of things? Come on! Flags don't hurt anyone, why don't you actually get to work on the issues that impact Granite Staters.
Schools are for teaching not preaching ideologies. Period
I oppose this bill because I don't think it is necessary. I would guess that if someone tried to put up a Nazi flag, for example, the school and community would be able to deal with it.
I was not out in high school. I can remember 2 teachers that had a pride flag on their door. It made me feel less alone. It made me feel like I had a lifeline of if I was outed. It is simple. It is small. You may not understand it but a simple display of a pride flag can save someone’s life.
This bill is an obvious free speech violation. It’s all Live Free or Die unless you disagree with your very specific point of view. Please reject this bill and do better.
As retired teacher, I look back on all the wonderful students I had. I worked to make each and every one feel comfortable in my classroom so that they could do their best. A small pride and BLM flag or sign lets kids know that they are all welcome.
I oppose this bill because it reduces transparency or public accountability and does not meaningfully improve outcomes for New Hampshire residents.
PLEASE focus on real life issues and not cultural divisions. We are all humans. As I have said before, be kind in the years you have on this planet. Does it hurt you to allow people to live their own way?
Isn't the motto of our state "Live Free or Die?" Why are we meddling in this issue? Is it really the place of the legislature to determine what flags can be flown in our classrooms? Sounds like Big Brother to me.
Are you not concerned that this bill is in violation of the First Amendment rights of students? For example, what if students in a Current Events class on the war in Ukraine wanted to display the Ukrainian flag in their classroom, to express empathy and solidarity with that country's struggle to remain a free and sovereign democratic nation? HB 1345 SEEMS TO SEEK TO REPRESS FREE EXPRESSION OF THOUGHT. If you read the second paragraph below, perhaps you may conclude that what this bill does is "invade the [FIRST AMENDMENT] rights of others". = from LEGAL CLARITY, Education Law "The Foundation of Minors’ Free Speech Rights The legal basis for students’ free speech rights in public schools was established by the Supreme Court in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969). The case involved students suspended for wearing black armbands to protest the Vietnam War, leading the Court to declare that students do not “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.” The Tinker ruling established that student expression is protected unless school officials can prove it would “materially and substantially interfere” with the school’s operation. Administrators cannot censor speech simply because they dislike its message; they must have concrete evidence that it will cause a significant disruption or invade the rights of others. The Court found no such evidence regarding the armbands, making the school’s actions unconstitutional."
This is overreach. Requiring schools to designate students to form a color guard limits the capacity for all students at a school to participate in honoring the flag. At the lower grade levels, most schools rotate the duty so that as many students as possible get a chance to learn protocol and participate. Legislating that each school designate a certain group of students is limiting, unnecessary, and political posturing. We don't need even more laws and strictures regarding what schools already do.
Freedom of speech is one of the Bill of Rights
Education related to gender and sexuality in our schools reinforces confusion and pushes an agenda to encourage children to change their gender and especially leaves parents out of the process as well as destroys families with Christian values. Youth are suffering from this pushed agenda and we don’t want it in our NH schools.
Sexual flags have no place in our tax payer funded schools. All should feel welcome and these flags are not something everyone agrees with. Children should not be influenced by others opinions or forced to look at flags that are against their beliefs. These flags can also be seen as very political and bias. This is not something schools need to thrive. The only flags should be the American flag. Not all children or families are comfortable with sexual orientation flags. We do not need this kind of display to teach kindness and respect. It only creates divide and greater problems. Elsa
I oppose this bill; I support our freedoms. We elect school boards for such decisions, the state has no reason to impose such a ruling.
What happened to Live Free or Die? This micromanagement is absolutely absurd. Time not well spent.
This is a ridiculous burden on taxpayers. People can barely afford to stay in their homes never mind register a bicycle.
NH's schools have better things to worry. I really don't see why anyone cares if a teacher puts up a rainbow pride flag. I really wish NH's lawmakers would devote their time to more useful ends rather than worrying endlessly about what goes on in classrooms.
As a Libertarian Catholic resident of this state, I among many other in this state believe this is morally wrong to be posting LGBTQ flags along with other SEXUALLY charged and driven flags in public schools. This is beyond ridiculous pushing your views onto the minds of young children. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. LEAVE THE KIDS ALONE. Sexually education class is one thing, but enabling and generating mental illness and confusion among the youth is another. LGBQT and liberalism as a movement has become almost religious in practice to a lot of the left leaning education board members and staff. If you want to continue with this non-sense you should allow students to take Real Religion classes and allow students to opt out of being exposed to these unnatural ideas that are being promoted as normal. Seeing what the public education system has become has made me vow to send my children to get a real education in a private school rather than be indoctrinated into this confusing liberal mess of garbage. Wake up people, this is ridiculous. I also suggest a full digital investigation into Paul Menard, pushing these ideologies onto children so heavily usually coincides with unlawful disgusting activity.
I am against gay pride flags in Schools. This is demonstrating sexuality which is inappropriate for children . The USA flag , New Hampshire State Flag and school flag should only be represented.
Another attempt to stifle speech some don't agree with.
I support PRIDE flags in school. It helps children struggling with those feelings to know it’s ok. It’s about inclusion which we so desperately need under our current regime that our awful governor supports.