Let’s be honest: this is another attempt to NOT fund public schools. Shameful!
HB1358
House · 2026 sessionRepublicanVeto — override pendingStudying charter school conversion
AIEstablishes a legislative commission, including school and education officials, to study the feasibility and impact of transitioning all New Hampshire public schools to operate as public charter schools, reporting by November 2026.
(New Title) establishing a commission to study transitioning all public schools to public charter schools.
Status
Vetoed by the governor — the override vote has not been held yet · July 10, 2026- ✓Introduced
- ✓House
- ✓Senate
- Governor
- Law
Division of testimony
1,043 submissionsHatched = form letter · 12 of 1,043 written submissions (1%) came from organized campaigns
Argument digest · AI-generated
from 339 of 350 written submissionsHB1358 would establish a commission to study transitioning all New Hampshire public schools to public charter schools and would also lower the vote threshold for converting an individual public school to a charter from a two-thirds supermajority to a simple majority. Testimony was overwhelmingly opposed, with submitters arguing the bill would strip local, democratically elected control from schools and reduce oversight, while a small number of supporters argued charter schools would offer better quality education than what they see as declining public schools.
- Charter schools would offer better, more affordable educationSupport5 of 339 reviewed
Supporters argue traditional public schools are declining in quality while costs rise, and that transitioning toward charter schools would produce better educational outcomes at a lower cost.
“Most public schools are providing a declining quality of education with an increasing cost. A dramatic change is needed in order to ensure our children a quality education at an affordable price.”
— Jay Schechter, Dublin · #646265 — read full submission →
“I support this bill because public charter schools are better than public schools.”
— Samuel Hoehn, Lancaster · #643951 — read full submission →
- Eliminates local, democratically elected school controlOppose56 of 339 reviewed
Opponents argue the bill would replace elected, locally accountable municipal school boards with privately operated charter boards whose members are appointed rather than elected, removing a direct line of community representation over education.
“Our municipal school boards are elected by the people in their communities. They reflect the values, priorities, and needs of local families and taxpayers. Eliminating them removes a direct line of democratic representation”
— Emeran Langmaid, Merrimack · #643366 — read full submission →
“Charter schools offer less control at the local level. Charter school board members are appointed while public school board members are elected by their community.”
— REBECCA STOUGHTON, Amherst · #641745 — read full submission →
- Charter schools lack oversight and have a record of failureOppose45 of 339 reviewed
Opponents point to charter schools' comparatively light regulation, lower credentialing requirements, and cases of financial mismanagement or closure, such as an Exeter charter school investigated for embezzlement, as evidence that expanding charters statewide would reduce accountability.
“Charter schools don't face the same oversight as public schools. Case in point, a charter school in Exeter closed in 2024, less than two years after it opened. The former school officials faced an investigation for embezzlement and fraud.”
— Douglas Carmel, Exeter · #642714 — read full submission →
“they have a record of failure and do not have enough oversight to prevent fraud, such as Coastal Waters in Exeter, or ability to manage fiscal needs, as Leaf Charter School in Alstead.”
— Dorothy Bauer, Antrim · #640850 — read full submission →
- Lowering the conversion threshold enables an irreversible change without real deliberationOppose20 of 339 reviewed · 12 via form letter
Opponents object to reducing the vote needed to convert a public school to a charter from a two-thirds town-meeting supermajority to a simple majority at a general election, arguing this permanent governance change deserves broad community consensus, not a bare majority in a low-turnout election.
“This bill would reduce the voting threshold for converting a public school to charter school from a 2/3 majority to a simple majority. Changing from a public school to a charter school severely limits local control”
— David Watt, East Kingston · #645231 — read full submission →
“HB 1358 seeks to dismantle these safeguards by allowing a simple majority vote to trigger a permanent change in governance, bypassing the local meetings where neighbors discuss long-term impacts on children and taxes.”
— form letter, submitted 12 times · #641653 — read full submission →
- State should fund existing public schools rather than study conversionOppose25 of 339 reviewed
Opponents argue that instead of spending resources studying a statewide charter conversion, the legislature should focus on adequately funding public schools, which they say already serve the vast majority of students and often outperform charter schools academically.
“The 2025 NH Department of Education data shows traditional public schools outperform charter schools statewide — by about 12 points in math and several points in reading.”
— Kathleen Malsbenden, Newmarket · #640458 — read full submission →
“It's imperative for the state ;legislature to focus on adequately funding the public schools that serve the 90% of New Hampshire's students.”
— Rina Petit, Litchfield · #642473 — read full submission →
- Hearing scheduled during school vacation week to limit public inputOppose9 of 339 reviewed · 12 via form letter
Opponents argue the committee scheduled this hearing during a school vacation week specifically to make it harder for parents and teachers, the people most affected, to attend and testify.
“Furthermore, I am deeply concerned that this hearing was scheduled during school vacation week. This timing limits the ability of the parents and teachers affected by this bill to be present.”
— form letter, submitted 12 times · #641653 — read full submission →
“I also strongly oppose scheduling the hearing of it during school vacation when many of the voters who are most interested in and affected by it- i.e. parents and teachers - are out of town or busy caring for their kids.”
— Elaine Warshell, Moultonborough · #642233 — read full submission →
- Charter schools can selectively enroll, skewing comparisonsOppose15 of 339 reviewed
Opponents argue charter schools effectively self-select a narrower student population, leaving traditional public schools with a disproportionate share of students with disabilities and higher needs, and that this selection bias explains any test-score advantage cited by supporters, not superior quality.
“Proponents of this bill like to point to some charter schools as having higher test scores. But, they score higher because it is a self-selected group of students.”
— Kara LaMarche, Bedford · #641613 — read full submission →
“families with fewer needs are the ones most able to opt into those schools. Over time, that can leave district schools with a disproportionate share of students with disabilities and other high needs”
— Danielle Harvey, Northwood · #645414 — read full submission →
- Bill reflects an ideological 'Free Stater' agenda against public educationOppose15 of 339 reviewed
Opponents question the motives of the bill's sponsors, particularly House Majority Leader Jason Osborne, describing them as libertarian 'Free Staters' seeking to dismantle public education rather than genuinely study policy options.
“HB1358 is sponsored by Rep. Jason Osborne (R-Auburn) who is the House Majority Leader, a known adamant Free Stater and vocal critic of public schools, and one of the most conservative State Reps. His children do not attend public school.”
— Claire Holston, Milford · #641864 — read full submission →
“There is already a mechanism for setting up charter schools under our public education system if a district wishes to do so. Rep. Osborne and other Free Staters want to abolish public education.”
— Catharine Farkas, Sanbornton · #650763 — read full submission →
- Committee chair's reported segregation remarks undermine trust in the billOppose11 of 339 reviewed
A number of opponents cite reports that committee chair Kristin Noble discussed segregating schools in a private message chain as a reason to distrust the committee's handling of this bill and call for accountability.
“Kristin Noble is the same representative that proposed segregated schools in a private Signal chat discussing 2026 education policy (a clear violation of RSA91a).”
— Jennifer Siegrist, Milford · #644639 — read full submission →
“Why has there been no repercussions for Kristin Noble wanting to segregate our schools?”
— Patricia Doyle, Windham · #637921 — read full submission →
Generated by claude-sonnet-5 (claude code agent) on Jul 20, 2026. Quotes are verbatim excerpts, verified against the cited submission before publication. Summaries are AI interpretation of the record, not part of it.
Form-letter campaigns
12 of 350 written submissions (3%)12 submissions match a shared template; 338 are individually written.
- Oppose Charter Conversion ChangesOppose12 submissions on this bill
The template argues that the proposed bill weakens existing safeguards by allowing a simple majority vote to change public school governance, bypassing local community input.
The letter · submitted 12 times I am writing to strongly oppose HB 1358. Public schools are the backbone of our community. Currently, converting a public school to a charter school requires a deliberate process involving school board approval and a two-thirds majority vote. HB 1358 seeks to dismantle these safeguards by allowing a simple majority vote to trigger a permanent change in governance, bypassing the local meetings where neighbors discuss long-term impacts on children and taxes. Furthermore, I am deeply concerned that this hearing was scheduled during school vacation week. This timing limits the ability of the parents and teachers affected by this bill to be present. I urge the committee to vote Inexpedient to Legislate (ITL) on HB 1358.
Detected by text-similarity clustering; campaign names are AI-generated.
This is a ridiculous bill, further attempting to destroy public education. There is already a mechanism for setting up charter schools under our public education system if a district wishes to do so. Rep. Osborne and other Free Staters want to abolish public education. I believe strong public schools are a foundation of a strong democracy.
Charter schools, like private schools, will push Christian conservative principles and teachings. If we lose our public schools, it will be very difficult to get them back. This is a terrible idea.
The way I understand it, this bill would establishing a commission to study converting all public schools to Charter Schools. This just seems like a waste of time and money. We should not even think about converting all of our schools to charter schools. We should finally commit to funding our local neighborhood public schools.
This is wrong. Not so subtle attempt to ruin public schools. VOTE NO!!!
New Hampshire needs to smarten up and support quality public schools, not undermine them consistently.
There is no need to transition to a charter school if the state pays it's fair share. I believe this is a way to decrease the number of certified teachers and their benefits. Why do we need ceritfied teachers and not computers: I had a freshman student in my honors geometry class who came from a charter school. She had an A in algebra 1 and an A in geometry at her charter school so the father assumed she'd be ready for honors geometry at the local public HS. Needless to say the father was very surprised when I met with him concerning his daughters readiness for Honors geometry. After checking her skills, the daughter was place in a regular level Algebra 1. He had heard good things about the charter school and wasn't concerned because she was getting A's. No accountability of those in charter schools. Do they even do state testing? ALSO: Certification Requirements: At least 50% of the teaching staff must hold a New Hampshire teacher certificate or have a minimum of three years of classroom experience. Flexibility: Charter schools can hire individuals without traditional certification for the remaining positions. Governing Rules: These requirements fall under New Hampshire’s charter school regulations, which allow for more flexibility in staffing compared to traditional public schools.
I am a product of public school systems and completed a PhD in physics never feeling my education lacking. These institutions are the bedrock of our country and we should be investing in and supporting them. I am not totally opposed to Charter Schools but I have seen the dark side too years ago in DC. The legislature needs to be focused on funding and improving our public schools system, first and foremost, to ensure all our granite state children are being given opportunity.
Charter schools are private. I OPPOSE this nail in the coffin.
This bill is stupid. t is critical that the people filling these positions are experts in public education and not part of the political system. Superintendents absolutely should not be elected and thus beholden to the games of politics and concerns of reelection, but rather carefully selected by the school board to best suit the needs of their district. Equally important is the fact that a single superintendent per county will result in a lack of support, dedicated superintendent time, and resources for EVERY SINGLE DISTRICT. One person cannot possibly have a real presence in every district within a county, much less truly get to know the districts, their individual needs, and be available at any moment for their students and staff. It is an impossibility. . Constrained by time. the role would became reactive instead of proactive, and a disservice to students and families, teachers, and the communities they serve. This bill is another attempt to dismantle our public schools, brick by brick.
I Oppose HB 1358
This is crazy. The function of our public schools is to provide equal education to raise up productive thoughtful citizens. That take professionals, not wannabe policymakers who can't even read the US Constitution, apparently.
Please ITL HB 1358. It is an ill-conceived effort to further dismantle our public schools. If you truly want to save money, repeal the "no limits" payments to fund private and parochial schools with tax payer dollars. Thank you.
This is another attempt to weaken public schools and local control. Charter schools are less accountable than public schools and have less local control.
Charter schools are draining our public schools where everyone is able to learn.
I completely oppose transitioning public schools to charter schools - even the suggestion of it is corrosive. Our public school system is what built this nation offering a good free education as a stepping stone into a career regardless of economic background. It's slow erosion over the past couple of decades through disastrous politics that have continually cut funding and support has contributed to our country's overall decline- not just academically but economically. We need to reinvest in public schools, support teachers and administers to offer the best local and free education to the children of New Hampshire so that the next generation can thrive. Eroding and then dismantling the public school system (to be replaced with charter schools) will particularly impact children in very rural and less affluent areas, it could set these citizens behind for generations to come. Protect our public schools!
I oppose all fascist attempts to destroy public education and the commons
Charter schools will not improve education. Stop mucking about and support the school structure as it is.
As a parent of three school aged sons, I support NH public schools and do not want to see changes that will move education in NH towards a charter school system.
This is an attempt to destroy public education I am opposed to this on every level Don’t let these folks tear down our country.
I am strongly opposed to this bill. It does not support the concept of public education for all children in our communities.
This is another attempt to destroy public education in New Hampshire
Another attempt to to destroy public education
Killing public schools to replace them with charter schools will destroy education in New Hampshire. It will replace publicly accountable schools for scattered private schools subject to no oversight and thus open to misuse. HB 1358 is dangerous and must be stopped.
I am writing to strongly oppose HB1358. Public schools are the backbone of our community. Currently, converting a public school to a charter school requires a deliberate process involving school board approval and a 2/3 majority vote. HB1358 seeks to dismantle these safeguards by allowing a simple majority vote to trigger a permanent change in governance, by bypassing the local meetings where neighbours discuss long-term impacts on their children and their taxes. Furthermore, I am deeply concerned that this hearing was scheduled during school vacation week. This timing limits the ability of Parents and teachers affected by this Bill to be present. I urge the committee to vote Inexpedient to Legislate on HB 1358.