There needs to be more transparency and accountability on this issue and while this bill is not ideal, it is a step in the correct direction.
HB1364
House · 2026 sessionDemocraticDied in HouseReporting on immigration enforcement deals
AIRequires counties, municipalities, and other political subdivisions that have 287(g) agreements with federal immigration enforcement to submit quarterly reports on program activity to the attorney general, who must then issue a consolidated quarterly report.
requiring quarterly reports from counties, municipalities, or any other political subdivisions of the state that enter into certain agreements with the federal government concerning assistance with federal immigration enforcement.
Status
Committee recommended Inexpedient to Legislate; died at adjournment · March 2, 2026- ✓Introduced
- ✕House
- Senate
- Governor
- Law
Division of testimony
663 submissionsArgument digest · AI-generated
from 162 of 162 written submissionsHB1364 would require counties, municipalities, and other political subdivisions that enter into federal immigration-enforcement agreements (such as 287(g)) to file quarterly public reports. The overwhelming majority of submissions support the bill as a transparency and accountability measure that does not itself restrict local cooperation with ICE, with many citing ICE conduct in Minneapolis/Minnesota and concerns about taxpayer costs, masked agents, and unchecked federal power; a small number of submissions raise other angles, including one arguing the reporting requirement should extend beyond ICE to all federal agreements.
- Basic transparency and accountability for ICE cooperationSupport101 of 162 reviewed
Most submitters argue the public and elected officials deserve regular, clear reporting on when and how local and county agencies cooperate with federal immigration enforcement, framing this as basic government accountability rather than a restriction on cooperation.
“This bill is fundamentally about accountability, transparency, and responsible governance.”
— David Holt, SOMERSWORTH · #588728 — read full submission →
“I support this bill that requires basic transparency and accountability for counties, municipalities, and political organizations that are collaborating with federal immigration enforcement.”
— Julianne Carignan, Rollinsford · #573035 — read full submission →
- ICE misconduct elsewhere justifies oversightSupport11 of 162 reviewed
Submitters point to reported violence, killings, and due-process violations by ICE agents in places like Minneapolis and Minnesota as evidence that New Hampshire needs reporting requirements to prevent or expose similar abuses at home.
“The disastrous actions we have witnessed during the past month in Minneapolis demonstrate that Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents have engaged in extreme and violent behaviors toward immigrants and bonafide citizens”
— Margaret Franckhauser, New Hampton · #575086 — read full submission →
“The State of New Hampshire must ensure public accountability for police assisting ICE in our state. We have seen ICE agents murder unarmed US citizens in Minnesota. We can not allow this to happen in New Hampshire.”
— Gerard Kiernan, Keene · #587014 — read full submission →
- Taxpayers deserve to know the financial cost of cooperationSupport39 of 162 reviewed
Submitters argue that when local police or county resources are spent assisting federal immigration enforcement, taxpayers have a right to know the financial and staff time costs involved.
“Financial transparency is needed to maintain public confidence in local authorities if they are cooperating with ICE.”
— Jeffrey Fetter, Concord · #589875 — read full submission →
“Citizens and taxpayers have a right to know when a government entity has contracted with a federal agency.”
— Leonard Cadwallader, Hanover · #566566 — read full submission →
- Officers assisting ICE should not be masked or unidentifiedSupport8 of 162 reviewed
Some submitters connect the reporting requirement to a broader call for law enforcement participating in immigration enforcement to remain identifiable by badge and face rather than masked.
- ICE operates like an unaccountable force that must be checkedSupport6 of 162 reviewed
Submitters describe ICE as functioning like a secret police or private army with no state-level accountability, and argue the bill provides a needed check on that federal power.
“ICE is a private army with no state accountability, and I fear for our coming elections.”
— C Porter, Fitzwilliam · #588652 — read full submission →
“New Hampshire residents deserve to see accountability. The live free or die state is quickly turning into the police state.”
— Joanna Lally, Holderness · #559642 — read full submission →
- Bill only requires reporting, does not restrict cooperationSupport4 of 162 reviewed
A number of submitters emphasize that the bill does not prohibit or dictate local immigration-enforcement policy choices, only requires that existing cooperation be documented and reported.
- A modest but useful first stepSupport4 of 162 reviewed
Some submitters frame the bill as an imperfect but worthwhile initial measure toward greater oversight of ICE-related activity, rather than a complete solution.
“I support this bill as a first step action to control and contain the actions of ICE in this state.”
— Nicholas Ferrigno, Newbury · #585091 — read full submission →
“There needs to be more transparency and accountability on this issue and while this bill is not ideal, it is a step in the correct direction.”
— Denise Daniel, Boscawen · #589884 — read full submission →
- Reporting requirement should extend beyond ICE agreementsNeutral1 of 162 reviewed
One submission argues the bill's transparency requirement is too narrow because it applies only to ICE-related agreements, and calls for statewide reporting on all forms of federal cooperation and funding.
Generated by claude-sonnet-5 (claude code agent) on Jul 20, 2026. Quotes are verbatim excerpts, verified against the cited submission before publication. Summaries are AI interpretation of the record, not part of it.
Financial transparency is needed to maintain public confidence in local authorities if they are cooperating with ICE. For example the Merrimack warehouse detention facility will decrease tax revenues an estimated half million dollars, and the costs of public services to a building designed as a warehouse but which would be tasked with housing 500 detainees plus staff will be a financial burden on the town that should be transparent.
Cutting the business profit tax when the state is struggling to balance its budget makes no sense. We should at least revert to our previous level.
I’m writing in support of the proposed HB 1364, which would require NH law enforcement entities that assist ICE to submit a quarterly report to the NH AG’’s Office.. given the sensitive issues around immigration, and the significant I’m growing allegations of abuse and questionable law-enforcement practices by ICE and related DHS agencies, it seems only prudent that the government established some standard mechanism of oversight and a uniform means of reporting. This will serve to protect not the residents of our state, but also the participating law-enforcement agencies, who can only benefit from thorough and proper documentation of their activities if questions arise.
ICE is out of control and not accountable. Hopefully, this bill will be able to provide some accountability in NH as well as data on what activity NH law enforcement is involved in on behalf of ICE.
I support the requirement for our counties, municipalities, or any other political subdivisions of the state of NH that enter into agreements with the federal government concerning assistance with federal immigration enforcement to submit a quarterly report. The violence, death, destruction, and vitriol that is the norm under our current administration must be held accountable. Requiring quarterly reports concerning assistance with federal immigration enforcement is one SMALL measure we can put into place to hold DHS and ICE accountable.
ICE needs to be held accountable and the public needs to be informed of their actions NH Law Enforcement can serve as a check. We also need accountability for the funding and allocation for state funds (time) for a federal department. Thanks.
Transparency in distribution of funds is critical to a healthy democracy. Please vote to support transparency.
I support this bill because it’s important we track our NH police participation in ICE for their safety and ours. Thank you
In light of recent events in Minnesota involving ICE, it makes sense to have clear truthful information regarding NH law enforcement involvement with ICE available to NH's Attorney General's office.
As the past weeks have made very apparent, ICE officers are given immunity and are not constrained by the US Constitution. Free speech is being suppressed by ICE through being very physically aggressive and even more concerning, creating a database of protesters using facial recognition which can then be used to harass citizens for their speech. No due process is provided to those that are arrested. Home searches are being done without a warrant. This is not a right/left disagreement, but one about Federal overreach. Our Bill of Rights was drafted in an effort to curtail such activities, however it is being ignored at the highest level. New Hampshire is a wonderful state whose residents value freedom and limited government. This bill is a step toward creating some accountability for the Federal governments aggressive and violent overreach. Please support this bill.
Thank you for supporting transparency in funding. This is a good thing for NH.
We should have clarity on what our law enforcement are doing to assist ICE and the cost to our communities. The federal government should be paying all the costs.
I am shocked and disturbed that this is not already being done as a basic standard operating procedure.
It is imperative that the public and state government have easy access to knowledge surrounding where local finances go. As the tax paying public, we should be aware of any funding for federal immigration enforcement from our counties and municipalities.
The public deserves full transparency regarding funding for ICE
This bill provides critical accountability of our public safety employees. It seems reasonable and important and should be supported by law enforcement and others who expect government in New Hampshire to to transparent and open to public scrutiny. It does not provide person information.
Come on, folks. Where in our Constitution does it say that masked unidentified characters in full military regalia should be running rampant in our streets shooting American Citizens, snatching children, and creating general fear and mayhem is a fine idea? Stopping any part of this invasion has to be done immediately.
As seen in Minnesota, oversight and accountability is critical. Pass this Bill!!!!!
This is a critically needed oversight !!! Pass this Bill!
We need to know how much money Is being spent funding ICE. We need government transparency with finance
It is common sense to require any NH law enforcement entity that assists DHS, Border Patrol, and/or ICE to submit a quarterly report to the NH Attorney General's Office. It gives residents of N.H. some modicum of information on how our law enforcement staff are being used to assist with federal immigration enforcement, which is not a normal part of their work. It provides transparency, which is a critical part of government functioning. I support the bill and want it to be enacted into law.
Pleaase support this bill. It is essential to put some controls on this!
Please support HB 1364, a bill requiring quarterly public reporting by counties, municipalities, and political subdivisions that enter into agreements with the federal government related to immigration enforcement. This bill is fundamentally about accountability, transparency, and responsible governance. When local governments choose to enter into agreements that involve federal immigration enforcement, those decisions carry real consequences—financial, legal, and operational—for local taxpayers and communities. Quarterly reporting ensures that elected officials, legislators, and the public can clearly understand what agreements exist, what activities are being carried out, what resources are being used, and what impacts those agreements have on public safety and local services. This legislation does not prohibit cooperation with the federal government, nor does it dictate immigration policy. Instead, it establishes a basic oversight mechanism so that decisions made at the local level are subject to regular review and public accountability—standards that already apply in many other areas of government contracting and law enforcement activity. Transparency protects everyone involved. It helps prevent mission creep, unfunded mandates, civil liability, and inconsistent practices across jurisdictions. It also ensures that local governments are acting within their authority and in alignment with the expectations of the residents they serve. Quarterly reporting is a reasonable, minimal requirement that strengthens legislative oversight and public trust. For those reasons, I urge the committee to support this bill. Thank you for the opportunity to testify.
I would hope the “small government” and “Live Free or Die” state would want some accountability and oversight of a massive, tax-payer funded armed, federal secret police force coming into our.