Dear members of the House Children and Family Law Committee, I want to strongly urge you to vote OTP on HB1376. Parents, while raising their children with their preferred family values, should be free of the fear of being accused of endangering or abusing their child for acknowledging their biological sex. Our NH Governor has already signed into law legislation banning medical and surgical gender transitioning of minors. Minor children do not have the emotional maturity to make permanent decisions to alter their sex. Research has shown thatsuicide rate is higher within 5 years of transitioning than forthose who don't. Please vote OTP!
HB1376
House · 2026 sessionRepublicanSigned into lawProtecting parents' biological-sex parenting choices
AIExcludes a parent raising, referring to, or making medical decisions for a child consistent with the child's biological sex from constituting child abuse, neglect, or endangerment, or a basis for adoption and custody determinations.
(New Title) relative to a parent's ability to raise their child in a manner consistent with the child's biological sex and relative to breast surgeries for minors.
Status
Signed into law · July 20, 2026- ✓Introduced
- ✓House
- ✓Senate
- ✓Governor
- ✓Law
Division of testimony
911 submissionsHatched = form letter · 12 of 911 written submissions (1%) came from organized campaigns
Argument digest · AI-generated
from 237 of 248 written submissionsHB1376 would exempt raising a child consistent with the child's biological sex from the legal definitions of child abuse, neglect, and endangerment, and remove it as a factor in custody, adoption, and best-interests determinations; it also touches on breast surgeries for minors. Supporters frame it as protecting parental authority and biological reality from what they see as ideological overreach by schools, courts, and medical institutions, while opponents argue it strips child-welfare protections from transgender and gender-nonconforming youth by shielding non-affirming or coercive parenting from scrutiny and restricting access to care they describe as evidence-based and life-saving.
- Parental rights: parents, not the state, should raise their childrenSupport21 of 237 reviewed
Supporters argue parents have the primary right and responsibility to raise their children, including according to biological sex, without fear that good-faith parenting decisions will be labeled abuse or used against them by schools, courts, or child-welfare agencies.
“Parents—not agencies, courts, or politics—are responsible for raising children. HB 1376 protects families by ensuring that acknowledging a child’s biological sex and making common-sense parenting decisions cannot be twisted into claims of abuse, neglect, or unfitness.”
— Erin Beal, Newmarket · #624672 — read full submission →
“The 14th Amendment allows parents to raise their child as they see fit. It's been a LONG, LONG, LONG, LONG standing law that is currently being trampled upon.”
— Marci Strange, Concord · #618138 — read full submission →
- Biological sex is scientific reality; "gender ideology" is notSupport11 of 237 reviewed
Supporters argue biological sex is an immutable, scientific fact and that gender-identity concepts and gender-affirming care are ideological rather than medically sound, so raising a child consistent with biological sex cannot reasonably be called abuse.
“we can not be blind to the simple fact of biological sex as a concrete reality of greater importance than any subjective self-identity”
— Louis Epstein, Kent · #622661 — read full submission →
“"Social transition" is a form of gaslighting reality, and should not be undertaken by teachers and administrations, and more importantly these ideas should not triangulate children away from their parents”
— Christine Goff, Sierra Madre · #625506 — read full submission →
- Personal accounts of detransition and resolved gender dysphoriaSupport6 of 237 reviewed
Some supporters share their own or family members' experiences of transitioning as minors and later regretting it, or of gender dysphoria resolving with age, and cite these as reasons to protect parents who decline to affirm a child's stated gender identity.
“I transitioned at a minor, starting a social transition in 6th grade at age 11 that my parents were not aware of.”
— Kayla Lovdahl, Lodi · #624435 — read full submission →
“she was adamant about a transgender identity for years, though we did not affirm her in the male identity. During this period, our relationship with her was difficult”
— Sharon Lee Cowan, Middleboro · #619228 — read full submission →
- Medical transition itself, not non-affirmation, is the real harmSupport5 of 237 reviewed
Some supporters argue that puberty blockers, hormones, and surgery cause irreversible damage to children's bodies, and that it is this medicalization—not parents declining to affirm a child's gender identity—that constitutes abuse.
- Schools socially transitioned children without parental knowledgeSupport2 of 237 reviewed
A small number of supporters describe specific instances where school staff socially affirmed or transitioned a child at school without informing or obtaining consent from the parents, citing this as the kind of overreach the bill would guard against.
- Religious and moral freedom to raise children per one's faithSupport2 of 237 reviewed
A few supporters frame the bill as protecting religious freedom, arguing parents should be able to raise children according to their faith's understanding of sex and gender without government or cultural pressure to affirm a different identity.
- Bill removes life-saving protections for trans/nonbinary youthOppose64 of 237 reviewed · 12 via form letter
Opponents argue gender-affirming care and affirming home environments are evidence-based and reduce depression, self-harm, and suicide risk, and that the bill would strip protections that currently allow young people to access this care or be raised in an affirming way.
“it would remove protections from young people who are being prevented from accessing gender-affirming care or being raised in a gender-affirming way by one or more parent or guardian”
— form letter, submitted 12 times · #615919 — read full submission →
“At 11-years-old he has already attempted suicide, had suicidal thoughts, and thoughts of self harm - all because he doesn’t feel safe, welcome, or right in his body. To me, keeping him alive is my goal.”
— Aubrey Torres, Bedford · #618802 — read full submission →
“"Transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) youth report more than four times greater rates of suicide attempts compared with their cisgender peers. Gender identity acceptance from others can reduce the risk for these youth."”
— Daniel Aronson, Keene · #622968 — read full submission →
- Bill is government overreach into private family and medical decisionsOppose25 of 237 reviewed
Opponents argue decisions about a child's gender identity and care should be left to families, children, and their doctors on a case-by-case basis, and that the state legislature has no business dictating or restricting these private matters.
“State legislators should butt out of the privacy of families. If you value families, you need to vote this atrocious bill down.”
— Charles Rhoades, Dover · #615076 — read full submission →
“I do not believe politics has any place in the discussion of a person's sexuality. This is a private discussion meant only for family and physicians, professionals.”
— Pam Chamallas, Newmarket · #619359 — read full submission →
- Bill specifically targets and discriminates against trans peopleOppose16 of 237 reviewed
Opponents characterize the bill as singling out transgender and LGBTQ+ people for discriminatory treatment, describing it as cruel, hateful, or politically motivated targeting of a vulnerable minority rather than genuine child-welfare policy.
- Bill undermines best-interests standard and child-welfare reviewOppose11 of 237 reviewed
Opponents argue the bill creates a blanket exemption that prevents caseworkers, clinicians, and courts from exercising individualized judgment about harm, undermining the existing best-interest-of-the-child standard used in abuse and custody determinations.
- Bill is effectively another "bathroom ban" with privacy risksOppose6 of 237 reviewed
Some opponents describe the bill as functionally identical to prior vetoed bathroom-ban legislation permitting classification by biological sex, arguing enforcement would create privacy and safety risks for transgender people and others.
- Bill fails to account for intersex childrenOppose3 of 237 reviewed
A small number of opponents note that the bill does not define or account for intersex children, arguing that a binary concept of "biological sex" is scientifically incomplete and creates ambiguity in custody and welfare determinations.
Generated by claude-sonnet-5 (claude code agent) on Jul 20, 2026. Quotes are verbatim excerpts, verified against the cited submission before publication. Summaries are AI interpretation of the record, not part of it.
Form-letter campaigns
12 of 248 written submissions (5%)12 submissions match a shared template; 236 are individually written.
- Oppose Removal of Gender-Affirming Care ProtectionsOppose12 submissions on this bill
The template argues against the bill because it would remove protections for young people accessing gender-affirming care or being raised in an affirming environment.
The letter · submitted 12 times I oppose this bill because it would remove protections from young people who are being prevented from accessing gender-affirming care or being raised in a gender-affirming way by one or more parent or guardian despite what we know to be true about the positive and life-saving benefits of being raised in an affirming environment.
Detected by text-similarity clustering; campaign names are AI-generated.
Please stop trying to make these laws. They are 1) a waste of our time and tax money and 2) EXTREMELY HARMFUL!!! Stop trying to make things harder for people who are already hurting! Please!
Having supportive adults is essential for children, and having their identity respected and celebrated is a massive life-saving measure against various mental health conditions and serious risks, including suicide, for young trans youth. Every child deserves that protection, regardless of their gender identity. This bill is putting children at risk for the comfort of their parents, and kids will suffer because of it. Please keep their freedoms and their right to express themselves protected, and oppose this bill.
As a parent of two children, one of each gender, I want to share my perspective. My daughter, who has an intellectual disability, has never questioned or shown any interest in changing her gender or misgendering her loved ones. From my experience, puberty can naturally bring discomfort, especially for girls, but I believe our focus should be on teaching children to love their bodies and embrace the differences that make each of them unique. I believe that decisions about gender transition should generally wait until the brain has finished developing—around the mid-20s—so that individuals can make fully informed, mature choices. At a minimum, we owe children the ability to wait until 18. Discomfort with puberty is usually temporary, and if gender dysphoria persists into adulthood, they can make that decision with greater self-awareness and maturity. It’s also important to recognize the experiences of those who have detransitioned. Their voices matter just as much as those who have transitioned and use their success as evidence for early interventions. Both perspectives deserve consideration when shaping policy and guidance for children. Speaking from my own life, at 36, nearly 37, I can say with confidence that the choices I made in my early 20s—about my career, education, and life direction—were made with far less knowledge and maturity than I have now. Children benefit from guidance, support, and the freedom to grow into themselves before making irreversible decisions.
Gender affirming care is vital to the well being of a transgender person, regardless of their age. I completely oppose this bill which only takes away a person’s right to healthcare!
Utilizing a transgender person's name that they were born with contributes to depression and suicidality. Around here we care about our kids mental health. A caregiver being in denial about a child announcing their transgender status and utilizing a different name, isn't going to make that child all of a sudden agree with their parent- but it will contribute to their mental health struggles. Research clearly shows that this bill would harm children.
This bill encourages sex-based discrimination against children.
We OPPOSE HB 1376. We disagree with the central presumption of this bill—that parental rights should supersede the safety and rights of children who are LGBTQ+. The state has a fundamental responsibility to ensure that all children are protected and safe from every form of abuse. This testimony is about protecting children and ensuring that New Hampshire’s child protective services are not constrained in their ability to respond to evidence that would otherwise be considered harmful, abusive, or negligent. We OOPPOSE HB 1376 because this legislation establishes a standard of care in which parental rights override the health and safety of children, many of whom face disproportionate risks of abuse, as well as mental and physical harm. The State, in its role as an advocate for children, must retain the authority to consider the full range of factors that affect a minor’s mental health, physical health, and overall safety. We urge you to vote ITL on this bill.
I oppose HB1376. Inhumane
I oppose this bill because it would remove protections from young people who are being prevented from accessing gender-affirming care or being raised in a gender-affirming way by one or more parent or guardian despite what we know to be true about the positive and life-saving benefits of being raised in an affirming environment.
This bill would be harmful for children.
The prevalence of this kind of legislation is a primary reason why it is unsafe for me and my family to move “home” to NH. We were “live free and die”, but more and more the freedom to be who we are and for our children to be who they are is being limited by this government. I moved away from NH for college and when I was able to move back East, I realized I could no longer trust NH and moving “home” was not an option.
I believe this bill as currently drafted will have significant negative consequences for the LGBTQ+ community. HB1375 restricts the ability of citizens to access essential services by creating unnecessary bureaucratic hurdles and prevents gender-affirming care and guidance. This imposes a government hand in private family matters that should not be considered.
Just another attempt to bully transgender children and the families who love them. Vote ITL on this dangerous and discriminatory bill.
"Biological" gender isn't always correct. Trust doctors, protect kids.
This bill is "relative to a parent's ability to raise their child in a manner consistent with the child's biological sex." It would remove protections from young people who are being prevented from accessing gender-affirming care or being raised in a gender-affirming way by one or more parent or guardian despite what we know to be true about the positive and life-saving benefits of being raised in an affirming environment. This is dangerous, cruel, and and an overreach of state power.
Please stop proposing bogus legislation that purports to protect parents and or children but are really about making life more difficult for people and children who are transgender.
Raising a child consistent with their biological sex should not be considered child abuse, child neglect or used against parents to remove custody.
I do not support LGBTQ in any schools.
Honorable Members of the Committee on Children and Family Law, Often I write you with lengthly reasonings. However, this bill is so common sense, so self-explanatory, that I can only say that I support this HB 1376 AN ACT relative to a parent's ability to raise their child in a manner consistent with the child's biological sex. To not vote yea on ought-to-pass would display utter irrationality. Hon. Daniel C. Itse Former Chairman of Constitutional Review and Statutory Recodification (2011/2012) Former Vice Chairman of Children and Family Law (2017/2018) Former Senior Policy Advisor Children and Family Law (2007/2008, 2009/2010, 2013/2014)
??LET PARENTS PARENT - HB1376 clarifies that raising a child consistent with their biological sex should not be considered child abuse, child endangerment, or used against families in custody, adoption, or licensing decisions. I support this bill and so should you.
This is just common sense. I am a dyed in the wool liberal. I fully support the LGB community. The Trans movement is totally different. It is unfortunate and counterproductive the way the MAGA people are using this issue. I'm not a MAGA person, Not even close. My two daughters were groomed by online influencers. One of them was actually persuaded to leave home as soon as she graduated from a prestigious college prep high school and give up her plans to attend college. She was the only child in her class that did not got college. She was the only one from that school that did not go on to college for as far back as they kept records. Both daughters have now desisted. The one that left home lost two years of her life but is now in community college. She desisted when she realised she was not trans but rather a lesbian. The other daughter, who is autistic and has a lot of trouble making friends, did go to college and at college she realize she only wanted to be trans because she received a lot of praise and attention for that in high school. When she had college friends that didn't care that she was trans or not she began to talk to me about possibly desisting. The final straw for her though was that she only wanted to date biological males. Not trans males. She realised that biological males prefer biological females. She now no longer pretends to be a boy. She wears makeup, womens clothes, etc. She posts cute pictures of herself on dating sites. What a relief that she never had surgery or took drugs. She almost did but I talked her into waiting until after she graduated. By then she was starting to desist. I think it is totally irresponsible to let children decide such import, life changing things at such a young age. A child 16 years old can't get a tattoo but can get cross sex hormones? That is crazy.
Parents know what is best for their children and have a God-given right to raise their children consistent with their biological sex.
As a parent of a transgender adult, I am writing in opposition to HB 1376. My child came out as transgender at the age of 15 and he is now 24 years old. There are numerous studies and statistics which show the emotional and psychological harm done to a transgender child who is not supported and accepted by parents and family. For example, here is a report from the American Psychological Association: http://www.apa.org/topics/lgbtq/mental-health-anti-transgender-legislation. This report discusses the devastating effects of denying transgender children the autonomy to express themselves as they experience themselves in the world. When my child initially told my husband and I that he is transgender we sought advice and direction from my child's pediatrician, psychologists, psychiatrists, and therapist. After meeting with my child, husband, and I, all of these healthcare professionals advised the best way we could help our child was to support him and follow his lead. My husband and I did just that and have never regretted doing so. As mentioned above, my child came out as transgender at age 15 and is now almost 25 years old. He has been living as a transgender person for almost 10 years. He is transgender and always will be. To pass HB 1376 out of committee will be cruel and detrimental to transgender children who already face constant insurmountable scrutiny and misunderstanding from some members of the public and the government. Please do not pass this grievous bill out of committee.
This bull is dangerous for children. It goes against research showing gender affirming care and support saves lives and decreases the chances of suicide and self-harm.