HB1627 is an EXCELLENT idea of a Election Law bill that should pass without any difficulty at all! As a registered undeclared voter, I don't mind having to request a particular political parties ballot but it shouldn't be needed. And also as one of the Rollinsford supervisors of the checklist it would be appreciated to receive one ballot with all candidates for the primary day. HB1627 should be passed and I'm looking forward to servicing voters on election day in Rollinsford with one primary ballot.
HB1627
House · 2026 sessionRepublicanKilled in HouseSingle combined primary ballot
AICreates a single party ballot combining candidates from all parties for use in state and congressional primary elections.
creating a single primary ballot.
Status
Killed in the House — Inexpedient to Legislate · February 19, 2026- ✓Introduced
- ✕House
- Senate
- Governor
- Law
Division of testimony
113 submissionsOne ballot, multiple votes. Why not make the process easier,
In general, every bill that makes it harder to vote in New Hampshire I oppose. This bill unnecessarily puts constraints on people exercising their constitutional right to vote. I was not born in New Hampshire, but have lived here for 28 years. I absolutely refuse to take an oath to the State of New Hampshire like I was someone who was trying to attain US citizenship. At some point we need to lose the fantasy that there is substantial voter fraud happening in New Hampshire elections. As someone who works long hours at the poll in Hooksett on election day, I'm offended by the notion that our elections aren't secure and we need bills like this "fluff" to make them safer.
This would merely consolidate power within the Duopoly even further. Private clubs should run their own popularity contests -- without taxpayer subsidies. And the subsequent 'general election' ballot should be more easily accessible to more of them. Add in 'preference voting', and we're getting somewhere: everybody CAN have representation.
Let's continue to open up opportunities to vote your real choice
Chairman Berry and Members of House Election Law I support HB 1627, creating a single primary ballot. With a single ballot nonpartisan primary all voters participate in the election. Undeclared voters can vote without having to declare a party before voting and then undeclare after. Voters can vote for their preferred candidate, regardless of party affiliation. Candidates would have to appeal to their full constituency, not just a smaller, more partisan group of voters. The two candidates with the most votes move on to the general election, regardless of party affiliation, which more fully reflects the wishes of the voters. Elected officials would not feel pressured to follow more partisan views. Voter participation is greater in places where single ballot primaries take place. Thirteen New Hampshire cities have nonpartisan primaries and voter turnout and engagement have increased. Single ballot primaries are better for voters and candidates. I respectfully ask the committee to vote Ought to Pass on HB 1627. Linda Bundy Antrim
I believe that this bill is necessary for ensuring fair and accurate primaries for all NH state voters. As almost 40% of New Hampshire voters are registered Undeclared, creating on single ballot for the primary would allow these voters to accurately and appropriately vote in the Primary, rather than being forced to choose a party in order to be allowed to vote. By creating one ballot, these voters would not be left out, and would allow all voters to better understand their options in our primary elections. For these reasons, I strongly support this bill.
I believe a single ballot primary system would help reduce partisanship and make elected officials accountable to all constituents.
This is all about making voting EASIER in New Hampshire, one of the hardest states to vote in. Around 40% of NH voters are undeclared, so if this bill is rejected, it will be MORE DIFFICULT for undeclared voters to participate—I do not stand for that. I support this bill because voting is for EVERYONE!
I support this bill on principle for the good of voters.
Primary elections are held so political parties can determine who their candidates will be in the final election. For that reason, a combined ballot that enables cross-overs up and down the ballot defeats the purpose. A better alternative is for the political parties, which spend millions of dollars on advertising their candidates, to reimburse the state, towns, and cities for the costs of hosting their elections.
A voter's Guide is an important part of fair and free elections.
I support this bill. Having a single part ballot in state and congressional primaries would put all the candidates on one ballot and a voter could choose a candidate from any party that they thought would be the best one.
It seems rather foolish to repeal the business entrprise tax when the state faces fiscal challenges. This will increase financial pressure on property poor towns.
This bill makes a lot of sense and makes primary voting easier.
Dear Election Law Committee I am respectfully requesting that you oppose bill HB1627, which would implement a top-two primary system, for the following reasons: - Cross-over coordination can sideline a party’s base choice. In a top-two primary, activists aligned against a party can strategically vote in that party’s primary lane to boost a weaker or more extreme candidate, preventing the party’s preferred nominee from reaching the general election—even if that nominee has the most support among the party’s own voters. - Well-organized minorities can exploit low-information, low-turnout primaries. Activist groups with strong mobilization (money, endorsements, ballot guides) can disproportionately influence who advances by consolidating behind a single candidate while the party’s broader electorate splits among several options, resulting in outcomes that don’t reflect majority preference within the party. - The system weakens parties’ ability to filter candidates, enabling ideological entryism. Because party membership and endorsements don’t control ballot access, activists can recruit or run candidates under a party label (or exploit name cues) who don’t align with that party’s platform, effectively hijacking the brand and advancing to the general election without genuine support from the party’s voters. The top-two primary system ultimately disenfranchises voters and allows the primary system to gamed for political an ideological purposes. In a time where faith in our state, local and federal elections is in question we do not need a system that would make it easier for bad actors to subvert the will of voters.
NH has a semi-open partisan primary system, which allows all eligible voters to participate, but forces them to vote for only those candidates that appear on either the Democratic or Republican ballot. Replacing the two major party ballots with a Single Ballot would 1) simplify the voting process by eliminating the need for voters to declare a party before voting, 2) provide voters with more choice among all candidates, and 3) encourage candidates to appeal beyond their party base.
I support his bill for a single primary ballot
I think this is a great idea to allow the strongest candidate that aligns with the entire pool of voters to be the one that gets elected. I'd love to see a way that puts policy in front of partisanship and I think this is a good start.
A single primary ballot increases voter choice, reduces barriers for undeclared and independent voters, and strengthens democratic participation by empowering all voters to select from all candidates in state and congressional primary elections.
Why HB 1627 Is Concerning Eliminates party control over nominations Parties lose the ability to determine who participates in choosing their candidates, undermining accountability and internal democracy. Enables strategic, bad-faith voting Voters and organized groups can deliberately influence another party’s primary to weaken or distort the general election field. Creates confusion without benefit NH already allows undeclared voters to participate flexibly in primaries. This bill replaces a working system with a more confusing one. Weakens clarity for voters Candidates may list a party preference without endorsement, blurring responsibility and misleading voters about party support. High cost for a non-problem The need for an expensive education campaign signals how disruptive this change would be — all to address a problem that doesn’t exist.
I support this bill. Other states have adopted this procedure, which surfaces the best candidates for the final election. It gives citizens a broader field of candidates than those supported in party-led primaries funded by out-of-state money. It will also get more people out to vote in the primaries, which traditionally have very low participation.
I support this bill because it will make voting in primaries faster for voters and make it easier for election officials and poll workers to discharge their duties during primaries. I bet printing one ballot instead of two will also save us some money.
In June 2024, New Hampshire residents participated in a groundbreaking initiative to address the growing challenges of political polarization, declining trust in elections, and a perceived lack of representation. Fifty delegates were selected from the listening sessions to mirror New Hampshire’s political and demographic diversity. Single-ballot and this bill or something like this was the solution NH citizens are looking for. I urge the election law to study this and to work together using the Citizens Assembly offers a new model for strengthening democracy and rebuilding trust in the process.
As an un-declared voter I do not want to be limited to only 1/2 of the choices at the primary. Many times the candidates I like the most are across parties. Some years my wife and I have had to coordinate so at least we could get one vote for the people we wanted to see move on to November. We pay for primary, the parties don't, so we should be able to vote for everyone who wants to make it to the November ballot. Four other States do this, two Red and two Blue. Also, don't use the "education excuse" It will not cost money to move to a simpler system. If people can make it to the polls to vote, they will figure out how to vote. Don't insult our intelligence saying we can't figure out or handle change.