I am writing to ask for you to oppose this bill. Thank you
HB1675
House · 2026 sessionBipartisanDied in HouseInvestigating domestic violence coalition funding
AICreates a legislative commission to investigate the New Hampshire Coalition Against Sexual and Domestic Violence, subjects it to annual audits, restricts its state funding to direct survivor services, and removes its seats on state commissions.
establishing a commission to investigate the New Hampshire Coalition Against Sexual and Domestic Violence and requiring funding only be provided for the direct services materially benefitting survivors of sexual and domestic assault.
Status
Died on the table in the House · March 11, 2026- ✓Introduced
- ✕House
- Senate
- Governor
- Law
Division of testimony
1,404 submissionsArgument digest · AI-generated
from 321 of 513 written submissionsHB1675 would create a legislative commission with subpoena power to investigate the New Hampshire Coalition Against Sexual and Domestic Violence and would restrict its state funding to only "direct services" materially benefitting survivors. Supporters frame the bill as routine financial accountability for a heavily taxpayer-funded nonprofit, sometimes citing specific allegations about the Coalition's finances and leadership. Opponents, who submitted the large majority of testimony, argue the bill is a politically motivated attack rooted in a personal grievance against the organization, that it duplicates oversight that already exists, and that it would destabilize a statewide network of crisis centers that survivors depend on.
- Taxpayer-funded nonprofits should face routine auditsSupport60 of 321 reviewed
The most common support argument is a general position that any nonprofit receiving large amounts of public money should be subject to regular auditing and accountability measures, independent of specific allegations against the Coalition.
“I support auditing of any NGO receiving government funds. As a taxpayer who doesn’t receive government funding, I am subject to audits by the IRS.”
— Laurie Downey, Franklin · #615553 — read full submission →
“With major fraud rampant across the country and within our own state, it would be negligent to not investigate our own programs to be sure our taxpayers are not being agregiously stolen from.”
— Ashley Scanlan, Gilford · #614763 — read full submission →
“It is important for the taxpayers of this state to have confidence in tax money going to it's intended destination, especially when it's intended use is for a vulnerable population.”
— Catherine Abbott, Portsmouth · #615257 — read full submission →
- Specific finance and conflict-of-interest allegationsSupport5 of 321 reviewed
A smaller set of submitters cite specific allegations that the Coalition's IRS Form 990 filings contain discrepancies, that it has engaged in improper lobbying, and that its leadership has undisclosed conflicts of interest, including ties to media and government figures.
“A commission with subpoena power is essential to thoroughly examine discrepancies in financial reporting, past lobbying activities that may have violated nonprofit rules, and any conflicts of interest involving leadership”
— Olga Duclerc, Laconia · #627628 — read full submission →
“received over $10 million of tax payer funds and has many discrepanies in IRS 990 fillings. Conflict is of interest and undo influence over an attorney general.”
— Daniel Gialanella, Chester · #626070 — read full submission →
“The NH Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence is 98% funded by taxpayer money, and receives about $10,800,000 of your hard-earned dollars annually in state, federal and local funds.”
— A S Quimby, Epsom · #623165 — read full submission →
- Bill redirects funds to survivors, not defunds themSupport5 of 321 reviewed
Some supporters frame the bill as protecting rather than harming survivors, arguing it merely ensures taxpayer funds reach direct victim services instead of administrative overhead, advocacy, or political activity.
“I want to be clear at the outset: this bill is not an attack on victims, nor is it an attempt to dismantle domestic-violence services. It is a call for oversight, transparency, and accountability”
— Grace Gato, Hudson · #621683 — read full submission →
“This bill does not defund victims. It does the opposite: it creates a commission to investigate, to ensures that public funds are used for actual victim services, not political advocacy”
— Gayle Drobat, Amherst · #628314 — read full submission →
- Personal accounts of being failed by the current systemSupport4 of 321 reviewed
A few supporters describe their own experience as survivors who felt they received inadequate, unhelpful, or revictimizing responses when they sought help, and cite this as justification for scrutinizing how services are delivered.
“despite doing everything survivors are told to do — seeking medical care, submitting to a sexual assault forensic exam, and participating in a police interview — I received no meaningful help, no accountability, and no trauma-informed response.”
— kimberly Plaisted, Laconia · #620330 — read full submission →
“As a survivor of violence and sexual assault I’ve attempted to reach out to get support and every link or lead is a whole lot of nothing, and havent had it materialize.”
— Rebekah Fox, Bow · #618457 — read full submission →
- Bill is a politically motivated, out-of-state-driven attackOppose45 of 321 reviewed
Many submitters describe HB1675 as driven by personal animus toward the Coalition or its leadership rather than genuine oversight concerns, frequently pointing to an out-of-state individual's long-running campaign against the organization as the real source of the bill.
“it has been filed by Rep. Ellen Read on behalf of a resident of CALIFORNIA who has been hharassing and attempting to intimidate and undermine an organization dedicated to protecting victims of violence in New Hampshire”
— Kathryn Whalen, Hartford · #626733 — read full submission →
“Gain a foothold in an over six year misguided "crusade" to discredit the NHCADSV and specific individuals within that organization because none of the other dubious tactics have worked.”
— Robin Christopherson, SULLIVAN · #626200 — read full submission →
“This language is lifted directly from Clare Best’s crazed ramblings on Granite Grok. This bill is a waste of tax payer dollars and it plays politics with the lives of victims. Shame on Representative Ellen Read”
— Dan Ackerman, Nashua · #617864 — read full submission →
- "Investigative authority" over nonprofits is abuse of powerOppose47 of 321 reviewed
A large number of submitters argue that granting the legislature investigative and subpoena power over a specific nonprofit is an abuse of power and sets a dangerous precedent that could be used against any New Hampshire nonprofit in the future.
“Granting the legislature so-called “investigative authority” over non-profit organizations represents a dangerous abuse of power and a direct threat to independence and accountability.”
— Elaine French, Littleton · #617086 — read full submission →
“Granting the legislature “investigative authority” over non-profit organizations is a dangerous abuse of power that threatens not only the Coalition but every New Hampshire-based non-profit.”
— Ashling LaMarque, Dunbarton · #615477 — read full submission →
“We cannot allow someone with devious intentions to wreak havoc on our state’s social services. This would set a dangerous precedent.”
— Gayle Hoisington, Merrimack · #616163 — read full submission →
- Coalition already faces sufficient state/federal oversightOppose39 of 321 reviewed
Opponents note the Coalition is already subject to independent audits, IRS Form 990 disclosure, and oversight by the Attorney General's Charitable Trusts Unit and its federal/state grantors, making a special legislative investigation unnecessary and duplicative.
“There is currently a pathway to investigate any and all non-profits in NH through the Attorney General Division of Charitable Trusts.”
— Kim Bock, Hooksett · #619997 — read full submission →
“The state of NH and the federal government already have protocols in place for regular monitoring of operational and financial compliance of NH nonprofits who have federal and/or state contracts.”
— Kathleen McDonald, Peterborough · #623309 — read full submission →
“The Coalition, like every other non-profit, already operates with strong state and federal oversight. They have a decades-long record of unblemished, transparent fiscal reporting.”
— Isabella Romero, Dover · #613494 — read full submission →
- Bill would destabilize statewide crisis-center networkOppose38 of 321 reviewed
Submitters warn that investigating, defunding, or restricting the Coalition would undermine the statewide infrastructure of local crisis centers, coordination, and training that survivors across New Hampshire depend on for safety.
“HB 1675 establishes an extraordinary, punitive legislative investigation targeting a single nonprofit, grants lawmakers sweeping subpoena powers, and presumes misconduct without due process.”
— Alexandra Carter, Rochester · #627706 — read full submission →
“HB1675 is an unconstitutional attempt to weaken the infrastructure that protects victims and supports local crisis centers across New Hampshire.”
— Em Barrett, Hudson · #616970 — read full submission →
“This is a far right wing politically motivated bill to defund the Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Abuse’s statewide work that helps and supports victims.”
— Kathleen Dustin, Ccontoocook · #620668 — read full submission →
- Firsthand experience shows Coalition's work is life-savingOppose54 of 321 reviewed
Many submitters, including survivors, advocates, medical and mental-health professionals, and clergy, describe firsthand how the Coalition or its member crisis centers helped them or others, and argue the organization should be supported rather than investigated.
“The coalition is a lifeline to thousands of abused women and children (and men, as well). People in this position are at a complete loss as how to even start getting help”
— Charlene Mehegan, Enfield · #626343 — read full submission →
“That changed when she was finally connected with the New Hampshire Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence. For the first time in her life, she found support, validation, and healing.”
— Marie Knoetig, Hooksett · #613163 — read full submission →
“I am a survivor of domestic violence. I am alive and well today because of my local crisis center. They helped keep me safe while I was trying to get out of an abusive relationship.”
— Sara Meier, Campton · #622559 — read full submission →
- Bill would silence victims and help abusersOppose31 of 321 reviewed
A recurring argument is that investigating or restricting the Coalition sends a message that survivors and their advocates cannot be trusted, which submitters say will discourage victims from coming forward and effectively benefits abusers.
“I am writing today to express my deep opposition to HB1675, which seeks to investigate, defund, and silence the New Hampshire Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence.”
— Marie Knoetig, Hooksett · #613163 — read full submission →
“Targeting the Coalition doesn’t help survivors. It helps abusers silence victims and their advocates.”
— Christa Fredericks, Manchester · #613642 — read full submission →
- "Direct services" limit misunderstands survivor supportOppose13 of 321 reviewed
Some opponents argue that limiting funding to narrowly defined "direct services" ignores that training, policy coordination, prevention education, and legal advocacy are equally essential to survivor safety and cannot be separated from direct care.
“The Coalition’s work does not compete with or detract from direct services, it makes those services possible, particularly in a rural state with limited resources.”
— Tina Mulleavey, Tilton · #614948 — read full submission →
“Limiting grants to what would "materially benefit" survivors is a narrow framework that will leave people behind. Direct support is important, but it is far from the only important way to address violence”
— Carolyn Stoller, Londonderry · #627569 — read full submission →
- Removal from state commissions strips survivor expertiseOppose16 of 321 reviewed
Several submitters object to provisions removing the Coalition from state boards and task forces, arguing this eliminates trauma-informed, survivor-centered expertise from policy discussions on abuse and public safety.
“I am horrified at the language in the bill that removes the Coalition from representation on the Task Force on Sexual Misconduct. No other group has the breadth and depth of experience of representing survivors of abuse”
— Maureen Dunn, Concord · #615840 — read full submission →
“Removing the New Hampshire Coalition Against Sexual and Domestic Violence (NHCADSV) from state committees—such as the Domestic Violence Fatality Review Committee—strips these groups of trauma-informed expertise”
— Lynne Abt, Brookline · #613799 — read full submission →
Generated by claude-sonnet-5 (claude code agent) on Jul 20, 2026. Quotes are verbatim excerpts, verified against the cited submission before publication. Summaries are AI interpretation of the record, not part of it.
This bill would undermine a well knows and respected organization that helps the victims of sexual abuse. I am not sure who would benefit from this bill other that abusers. It only serves to hurt victims and our community at large. The sponsors of this horrible bill should be ashamed of themseufor openly supporting abusers and turning there backs on the victims of such horrible crimes.
NH’s Multi-Tiered System of Supports for Behavioral Health and Wellness (MTSS-B) is a framework that helps provide behavioral health support to our students. The three tiers of this system work together to ensure that all kids in our public schools are given positive behavioral expectations. Some children can benefit from Tier 2, which simply means they will receive coping support and skill building. This can help children who are struggling in school. The kids with the highest needs have access to individualized behavioral health services through local community health care partners. There will always be some children who need more supports to be successful, and this is a thoughtful and impactful way of helping those children. MTSS-B can reduce exclusionary practices like suspension and expulsion. It can improve instructional time by decreasing disruptive behaviors in the classroom, and it can increase academic success. This initiative had bipartisan support and was signed into law by a republican governor just a few short years ago. I am not sure why this committee is considering ending the Multi-Tiered System of Supports before we see the impact it could have on our students. Please give this framework a chance to make a difference. Please vote ITL on this bill.
The fact that this is even a debate is ridiculous. Stand up for the victims!
Talk about being "inexpedient to legislate", this bill creates more wasteful government oversight. The Executive Council, the Bureau of Federal Compliance in DHHS and the Governors Office are already set up to review the New Hampshire Coalition Against Sexual and Domestic Violence, if needed. Sincerely, Hon. Timothy T Egan Sugar Hill, NH
I have personal accounts with this organization, they are needed in this community.
The Coalition does invaluable work and should be funded to protect people from domestic violence and abuse.
The New Hampshire Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence is being wrongly targeted by HB1675. HB1675 focuses solely on one nonprofit due to a complaint from another state about how grants are managed. Grantmakers conduct their own oversight of their grantees. As a former federal government employee of an agency that issued grants, I can attest to the oversight we conducted of our grantees. This bill is duplicating at best, and overriding at worst, an oversight role that is best handled by grantmakers themselves. I oppose HB1675.
As an emergency room nurse I have seen a desperate need for support for victims of domestic assault and violence. Please give all the support you can to this vunerable group.
As a recently retired Army Soldier of 26 years, it is important for all to understand that the Coalition has helped MANY in our Veteran Community and we TRUST the work the Coalition does. This work this organization does absolutely must be protected, and legislators MUST PROTECT victims, not silence them. We CANNOT allow politics to intimidate and undermine victims in NH. I firmly OPPOSE this ridiculous bill. Enough of the conspiracies, false "investigations" and weak attempts to erode trust in organizations that are here to protect.
Committee: Executive Departments and Administration RE: HB1675 Establishing a commission to investigate the New Hampshire Coalition Against Sexual and Domestic Violence and requiring funding only be provided for the direct services materially benefitting survivors of sexual and domestic assault. Madam Chair, Vice Chair, and Members of the Committee, I respectfully submit testimony in strong support of this legislation. As our elected policy makers, you have the greatest ability to reform outdated laws to better protect New Hampshire citizens. This bill does not defund victims. It does the opposite: it creates a commission to investigate, to ensures that public funds are used for actual victim services, not political advocacy, institutional self-interest, or unaccountable influence over state systems. The New Hampshire Coalition Against Sexual and Domestic Violence receives substantial state and federal funding—through VAWA, VOCA, and other programs—on the condition that it serves all victims, without discrimination, and uses funds for direct, lawful purposes. Yet numerous victims report being denied assistance, redirected, or excluded altogether, while the organization continues to expand its role in lobbying, policymaking, and institutional control. These very concerns, plague New Hampshire Government, affiliated agencies, organizations and third-party stakeholders. This bill restores three fundamental principles, (1) Accountability for public money – through audit and investigation. (2) Equal access to services – regardless of sex or viewpoint. (3) Institutional neutrality – by removing a private advocacy group from embedded control over state councils and justice systems. No private nonprofit should operate as both: a taxpayer-funded service provider, and a dominant political actor shaping laws, prosecutions, court access, and policy outcomes. That is not victim advocacy. This legislation does not accuse; it authorizes investigation. It does not punish; it conditions funding on actual service to survivors. It does not silence; it separates advocacy from governance. At its core, this bill simply asks a reasonable question: Are public funds being used to help victims—or to preserve an organization? The people of New Hampshire deserve a transparent answer. I believe this is a starting point and that all governmental, non-governmental agencies, entities, corporations and third-party contractors must be fully audited and get back to the congressional intent of each program, restore transparency, trust and protect the citizens over government. Victims and survivors of Domestic Violence and victims of false reports, need to be protected at all times and the appropriate resources need to be readily available. For these reasons, I urge the committee to recommend this bill as Ought to Pass.
I have serious concerns about today's coalitions. For the last two-and-half years, I have encountered difficulty with coalitions in several states. They do not support and have even opposed domestic violence courses and continuing education for licensed counselors, marriage and family therapists, psychologists, and clinical social workers. (Only 15 out of 885 programs require a class). They have not provided valid objections or alternatives. They have prioritized the mental health professionals' conveniences over the welfare of paying clients. They also need to provide more education and better content, For example, they should include a list of books or documentaries like the 2024 "The Life and Murder of Nicole Brown Simpson (produced with the help of her sisters). They should also use their funds to offer high-quality CEs on batterer interventions, medical screening on strangling, and conducing ethical custody evaluations from top experts like Lundy Bancroft, Barry Goldstein, Vanessa York, Chuck Derry, Patricia Davenport, Duluth, and SANE Ellen Kennedy, I've provided more information in an email sent to your official addresses. Thank you for your consideration.
I am in full support of investigating potential fraud especially with taxpayers money
My cousin was the victim of domestic violence. She was killed when the boyfriend she was trying to leave came to her apartment and shot her in the head. My cousin is not alone. There are countless others who experience domestic violence every day, some of whom will lose their lives as a result. The New Hampshire Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence is vital to protecting survivors, strengthening prevention, and making sure help is there when people need it most. Please don't let unnecessary politics ruin yet another service that is critical to the safety and well-being of some of the most vulnerable citizens of New Hampshire.
To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to respectfully oppose the proposed bill that would restrict the New Hampshire Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence fund. During one of the most volatile and frightening periods of my life, the support funded through the Coalition — including services provided by Starting Point — was essential to my ability to safely separate from a harmful situation and protect both myself and my child. Without that support, I honestly do not know where we would be living today, nor what circumstances my child might have been exposed to. Before I needed these services, I did not fully understand the depth of what the Coalition provides: advocacy, education, safety planning, and, most importantly, a voice during a time when fear and confusion can be overwhelming. When someone is navigating domestic violence or sexual abuse, having knowledgeable, compassionate advocates can be the difference between safety and continued harm. Unfortunately, I know I am far from alone. There are many women and families across New Hampshire who have relied on these services during moments of crisis. At a time when we are already seeing a striking number of women lose their lives to domestic violence in the state of NH, and within my county. Removing funding for these supports would only reduce safe options for victims and increase risk for those trying to leave dangerous situations. I am endlessly grateful for the help I received, and I strongly believe that defunding the New Hampshire Coalition would have devastating consequences for individuals and families who depend on these life-saving resources. I urge you to consider the real, human impact of this decision and to protect funding for services that quite literally save lives. Thank you for your time and consideration. Respectfully, Alexandria Feck New Hampshire
Please vote "yes" to support this important anti-corruption bill. We need to know the truth about how taxpayers dollars are spent. Thank you. Karen Monasky Goffstown, NH
The NH coalition against sexual and domestic violence is an essential program. They are the parent organization to SHARPP at my university, wich is a vital program for providing a safe space for students. They educate about harassment and assault on campus, how to prevent it and what to do if it happens. These programs are essential for public and student safety.
The work that the coalition and individual crisis centers do is absolutely vital. These are already underfunded resources that at times are not able to meet the extreme demand of how many people need their help.
I am in direct opposition to this bill
I oppose HB1675. The New Hampshire Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence plays a critical role in supporting survivors across our state. Weakening or defunding this organization does not protect taxpayers — it risks destabilizing the network of crisis centers that many families rely on during their most vulnerable moments. Domestic and sexual violence services are not abstract policy issues. They are lifelines. The Coalition provides coordination, training, and statewide infrastructure that allows local crisis centers to operate effectively and consistently. Undermining that structure could have real consequences for survivor safety and access to help. If accountability questions exist, there are already established oversight mechanisms for nonprofit organizations. Creating additional politically driven investigative authority risks diverting time and resources away from direct services. Our legislature should focus on strengthening protections for survivors and ensuring stable funding for programs that work — not destabilizing them. I respectfully urge the committee to vote Ought to Inexpedient to Legislate on HB1675.
I oppose this bill because I believe that survivor services and prevention work must be protected. T.his organization does that.
I am here to speak on behalf of UNH students. This bill will lead to less funding to our UNH organization SHARP. This organization helps many students to either express their struggles with sexual violence or report events of abuse. This bill will limit SHARP’s ability to aid students looking for a place to go to in times of struggle. I am in opposition of this bill.
Please find this bill inexpedient to legislate. It is base on unfounded conspiracy theories. Don't waste valuable resources on this pointless investigation. The New Hampshire Coalition Against Sexual and Domestic Violence provides vital services to victims and survivors and should be allowed to continue it's work unimpeded by unnecessary investigations. As a charity they are under sufficient oversight by the NH Attorney General's Charitable Trusts Unit.
As a survivor of domestic violence, keeping survivors safe is very important to me.
I oppose HB 1675 because it authorizes a politically driven investigation without clear evidentiary justification, diverting state resources and staff time from substantive policy work. Legislative oversight should be grounded in credible evidence and a defined public interest, not speculative or partisan concerns. This bill risks setting a precedent for using investigative authority as a political tool rather than a governance tool.