NH House Testimony

HB1717

House · 2026 sessionRepublicanKilled in House

Restructuring family division court jurisdiction

AI

Redefines the jurisdiction of the circuit court family division, replaces marital masters with administrative law judges, and assigns additional duties to the administrative judge of the circuit court.

relative to the jurisdiction of the circuit court, family division.

Courts and ProcedureDomestic RelationsState Government

Status

Killed in the House — Inexpedient to Legislate · February 12, 2026
  1. Introduced
  2. House
  3. Senate
  4. Governor
  5. Law

Division of testimony

11 submissions
Support 3Oppose 8Neutral 0
Georgina LambertOpposeBelmont, NHfor MyselfJan 13, 2026

Opposition Testimony on HB 1177: Defining Remote Work in Labor Law I unequivocally oppose HB 1177, which seeks to redefine remote work within our labor laws. While the bill may appear to offer clarification, it presents severe risks to employment protections and benefits, ultimately undermining workforce equity, particularly in a post-pandemic landscape. Detrimental Effects on Employee Protections The legal redefinition posed by this bill carries the potential to weaken essential employment protections that remote workers have come to rely on. In a time when many individuals are balancing work and personal responsibilities—such as caregiving and health considerations—removing or diluting these protections would disproportionately impact vulnerable workers. We cannot afford to regress on the critical advancements made to protect employees through flexible work arrangements. Erosion of Benefits Furthermore, this bill risks eroding benefits that are vital to the financial stability of remote employees. By failing to ensure that remote workers retain access to health care, paid leave, and retirement benefits, we are inviting a scenario where working class families face greater instability. The post-pandemic workforce deserves protections that support their well-being, not diminutions of benefits that help them navigate their responsibilities. Ignoring Intersectional Disparities It is essential to recognize that not all employees have the same experiences or capacities to work remotely. This bill overlooks the intersectional disparities that exist within the workforce—disparities related to race, gender, socioeconomic status, and more. A rigid definition of remote work may inadvertently exclude marginalized groups from the benefits and protections that remote work can provide, perpetuating existing inequities. A Step Backward for Workforce Equity HB 1177 represents a significant step backward in our efforts to establish a more equitable workforce. Instead of seizing this opportunity to enhance labor protections for all workers, we risk codifying a system that favors employers over employees. In a time when we should be promoting inclusion and equity, this bill fails to address the nuances of remote work in a diverse labor market. Conclusion In summary, I urge the committee to reject HB 1177. We must prioritize a labor framework that supports all workers and acknowledges the unique challenges faced in the evolving work environment. Let us work together to ensure that our labor laws reflect a commitment to equity, benefit retention, and robust protections for all employees, particularly in this new post-pandemic world. Thank you for your attention to this pressing matter.

Mary Hakken-PhillipsOpposeHanover, NHfor MyselfJan 13, 2026

I oppose HB1717 because it disrupts current law and existing court system. It is clear that modifications to the law are an attempt to appease a minority group of families who were unhappy with their legal outcomes rather than a significant majority of citizens who are pleased with the court’s deliberative procedures. Let the existing law stand.

Dylan GoodwinSupportRochester, NHfor MyselfJan 13, 2026

Chairwoman DeSimone and Members of the Committee, Thank you for the opportunity to submit testimony in support of HB 1717. I am a father who has been involved in extended family court proceedings affecting my daughter. My experience has shown me how unclear or fragmented jurisdiction within the family court system can prolong conflict, delay resolution, and ultimately harm children. In my case, decisions affecting parenting time and parental rights were influenced by: • Reliance on outdated or superseded orders • Jurisdictional confusion across proceedings • Delays caused by uncertainty over which court had authority When courts lack clear jurisdictional boundaries, families are left in limbo—and children lose stability, consistency, and time they can never get back. HB 1717 is necessary because it strengthens clarity and consistency within the Circuit Court, Family Division. It helps ensure that: • Family matters are handled by the court best positioned to address them fully • Parenting orders are evaluated in their proper procedural context • Jurisdictional loopholes are not used to delay or obstruct resolution This bill does not expand authority unfairly. It clarifies it—benefiting judges, litigants, and most importantly, children. Children need courts that can act decisively, consistently, and with full understanding of the family history before them. HB 1717 helps make that possible. For these reasons, I respectfully urge the committee to vote Ought to Pass on HB 1717. Thank you for your time and service. Respectfully submitted, Dylan Goodwin Sodus NY Father

Cassandra KnappSupportRochester, NHfor MyselfJan 13, 2026

Relative to the Jurisdiction of the Circuit Court, Family Division Children and Family Law Committee January 13, 2026 Chairwoman DeSimone and Members of the Committee, Thank you for the opportunity to submit testimony in support of HB 1717. I am a parent and step-parent who has been directly involved in prolonged family court proceedings affecting a child named Addelin (“Addie”). Our experience illustrates exactly why clear, consistent jurisdictional authority within the Circuit Court, Family Division is essential to protecting children and ensuring fairness. Our Experience With Jurisdictional Confusion In our case, decisions affecting Addelin’s custody, parenting time, and family relationships have been impacted by: • Unclear jurisdictional boundaries • Orders relying on outdated or superseded agreements • Proceedings that spanned multiple states and divisions As a result, critical issues were not always reviewed cohesively, and decisions affecting a child’s daily life were sometimes made without full consideration of the most current family court record. When jurisdiction is unclear or fragmented, children pay the price. Why HB 1717 Is Necessary HB 1717 strengthens the authority and clarity of the Circuit Court, Family Division, ensuring that: • The court responsible for family matters has clear jurisdiction to address them fully • Parenting orders are evaluated in their proper legal and procedural context • Families are not caught in procedural limbo while courts debate authority In high-conflict or interstate cases, ambiguity about jurisdiction can delay justice, prolong separation, and compound harm to children. Consistency Protects Children Children need stability. They need predictability. They need courts that can act decisively and consistently. HB 1717 helps prevent: • Conflicting or overlapping orders • Reliance on outdated rulings • Procedural loopholes that can be exploited to delay resolution In our experience, jurisdictional uncertainty allowed harmful dynamics to persist far longer than they should have. Judicial Efficiency and Due Process This bill also promotes: • Efficient Efficient use of court resources • Clear appellate pathways • Fair notice to parties about which court has authority HB 1717 does not expand power recklessly—it clarifies it, which benefits judges, litigants, and most importantly, children. Conclusion Our family’s experience makes one thing clear: children are harmed when jurisdiction is unclear and accountability is fragmented. HB 1717 provides needed structure, clarity, and consistency within New Hampshire’s family court system. It would help ensure that decisions affecting children are made by the court best equipped to evaluate the full family context. For these reasons, I respectfully urge the committee to vote Ought to Pass on HB 1717. Thank you for your time, your service, and your commitment to New Hampshire’s children. Respectfully submitted, Cassandra Knapp Sodus, New York Parent / Stepparent / Advocate

Emily LawrenceOpposeConcord, NHfor WaypointJan 13, 2026

Position recorded without written comment.

Megan SchmittSupportCONCORD, NHfor MyselfJan 13, 2026

Position recorded without written comment.

Karen ChaseOpposeHanover, NHfor MyselfJan 13, 2026

Position recorded without written comment.

Carol MorrisonOpposeW Lebanon, NHfor MyselfJan 13, 2026

Position recorded without written comment.

Janet LucasOpposeCampton, NHfor MyselfJan 13, 2026

Position recorded without written comment.

Melissa Penson-MesaOpposeMerrimack, NHfor MyselfJan 13, 2026

Position recorded without written comment.

Dawn McKinneyOpposeCONCORD, NHfor NH Legal AssistanceJan 13, 2026

Position recorded without written comment.