Logic and critical thinking are the foundation of intelligence. Together they create the ability to make wise decisions throughout one's growth and development.
HB1719
House · 2026 sessionRepublicanInterim studyDropping Hepatitis B vaccine requirement
AIRemoves Hepatitis B from the list of diseases for which New Hampshire law requires childhood immunization.
removing Hepatitis B from the list of diseases for which immunization is required under state law.
Status
Referred to interim study (Senate) · May 5, 2026- ✓Introduced
- ✓House
- ✕Senate
- Governor
- Law
Division of testimony
492 submissionsArgument digest · AI-generated
from 119 of 119 written submissionsHB1719 would remove Hepatitis B from the list of diseases for which immunization is required for school and daycare attendance in New Hampshire. Opponents, including many physicians, nurses, and public health advocates, argue the vaccine prevents serious and often fatal chronic liver disease and that removal is not grounded in science, while supporters, citing ACIP's withdrawal of its recommendation and parental rights, argue the mandate is now unnecessary and that vaccination decisions should belong to families.
- ACIP withdrew its recommendation, so the mandate is outdatedSupport10 of 119 reviewed
Many supporters, several using near-identical wording, argue that since the federal Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices ended its recommendation for the Hepatitis B vaccine, New Hampshire's mandate is now out of step with federal guidance and should be updated accordingly.
“With the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) withdrawing its recommendation for this vaccine requirement, it is necessary for New Hampshire to update its public health policies accordingly.”
— Leslie Nuchow, Portsmouth · #535987 — read full submission →
“Now that ACIP has ended their Hep B vaccine recommendation, the state of New Hampshire needs to adjust their schedule and this bill is the proper vehicle.”
— Karen Monasky, manchester · #532989 — read full submission →
- Vaccination should be a parental/medical decision, not a mandateSupport12 of 119 reviewed
Supporters argue vaccination decisions, including for Hepatitis B, should rest with parents in consultation with their healthcare providers rather than being imposed by the state, framing the bill as restoring individual and parental autonomy.
“This bill restores choice to parents without eliminating access to the vaccine—families can still obtain it voluntarily if they choose. It reduces government overreach, respects individual rights, and aligns with informed consent principles.”
— Olga Duclerc, Laconia · #536715 — read full submission →
“Every American should have options not to take vaccinations if they don’t want them! Government has no right to mandate what happens with our bodies! Period!”
— Joanna Fouch, Henniker · #530969 — read full submission →
- Vaccine poses unnecessary risk to newbornsSupport6 of 119 reviewed
Some supporters raise safety concerns about the vaccine itself, citing ingredients such as aluminum and adjuvants, claims of vaccine injury, or general unease about administering it to newborns whose actual risk of infection is considered low.
“this vaccine has been a useless and dangerous injection of aluminum and toxic adjuvents into a infant on the first day of life and has seriously damaged and often has been implicated in death in some for decades.”
— DEBORAH POST MSN APRN, SALEM · #529935 — read full submission →
“No need to subject new babies to high doses of aluminum in the hep b vaccine that is transmitted sexually or through iv drug use.”
— Britany DeBernardo, Franklin · #534175 — read full submission →
- Low transmission risk in school settings makes mandate unnecessarySupport5 of 119 reviewed
Supporters argue Hepatitis B is mainly spread through blood, sexual contact, or drug use rather than casual school or daycare contact, so requiring the vaccine for school attendance is disproportionate to the actual risk in that setting.
“Hepatitis B is primarily transmitted through blood, sexual contact, or perinatal exposure—not casual contact or respiratory droplets common in school environments. The risk of child-to-child transmission in a classroom or daycare setting is extremely low.”
— Olga Duclerc, Laconia · #536715 — read full submission →
“It estimated that 25,000 children are born from a Hep B positive mother each year in the United States. 3.6 million children are born each year in the United States. 0.69% of children are born to a Hep B positive parent.”
— Natali Mills, Hill · #533887 — read full submission →
- Maternal screening makes universal newborn vaccination redundantSupport3 of 119 reviewed
Some supporters argue that because mothers are already tested for Hepatitis B during pregnancy, a positive case can be handled individually, making a blanket vaccination requirement for all newborns unnecessary.
“This vaccine is a completely unnecessary vaccine as the mother can be tested for Hepatitis B if if the mother tests positive that a medical decision can be made for that case.”
— JR Hoell, DUNBARTON · #524559 — read full submission →
“The hepatitis B vaccine is an unnecessary risk to young babies as the mother is screen led for hepatitis B throughout pregnancy.”
— Lauren Pesaresi, Stratham · #534551 — read full submission →
- Distrust of pharmaceutical industry motivesSupport3 of 119 reviewed
A few supporters frame the mandate as benefiting vaccine manufacturers financially, expressing distrust of the industry's influence and noting manufacturers' liability protections.
“Moreover, vaccine manufacturers are currently free from liability for these products. This means citizens have little recourse to hold these (very wealthy and powerful) corporations accountable for producing consistently safe products.”
— Oliver Renau, Nashua · #524430 — read full submission →
“People realize the powers that ought not be and mega corps are using vaccines to line their pockets. This must stop.”
— Jason Gerhard, Belmont · #526792 — read full submission →
- Vaccine prevents serious, often fatal liver diseaseOppose50 of 119 reviewed
Opponents argue the Hepatitis B vaccine is safe and highly effective at preventing chronic infection that can progress to cirrhosis, liver failure, and liver cancer, and that removing the requirement puts children's long-term health at risk.
“The hepatitis B vaccine prevents lifelong liver diseases, including liver cancer and liver failure.”
— Ashley Lamb, Durham · #525345 — read full submission →
“Hep B Vaccine should remain required - The Hepatitis B (Hep B) vaccine prevents Hepatitis B infection, a serious liver disease caused by the Hepatitis B virus (HBV)”
— Carolyn Eastman, Hampton · #523080 — read full submission →
- Disease spreads beyond sexual contact, including in school settingsOppose13 of 119 reviewed
Several submitters, many identifying as nurses or clinicians, push back on the framing of Hepatitis B as purely a sexually transmitted disease, noting it spreads via blood and can persist on surfaces for up to seven days, and can be transmitted from mother to child at birth, creating real exposure risk in schools and daycares.
“Contrary to stated reports that Hepatitis B is only a sexually transmitted disinfection. Hepatitis B vaccine, at birth, gives immediate protection to children from exposure..”
— Margaret Jenkins RN, Gilford · #522964 — read full submission →
“Protecting newborns from exposure to Hepatitis B - which is a virus capable of living outside of human bodies and tissues for at least 7 days - on common surfaces - invisible to the naked eye”
— Jennifer Boisvert, Canterbury · #534926 — read full submission →
- Removal contradicts medical consensus and is politically motivatedOppose17 of 119 reviewed
Opponents argue the bill disregards decades of evidence-based medicine and the positions of groups such as the American Academy of Pediatrics and the NH Medical Society, characterizing the push to remove the requirement as driven by politics or ideology rather than science.
“There are enough communicable diseases, and highly contagious viruses spreading through the pediatric population on a regular basis without adding in diseases that have been eradicated for 60+ years.”
— Samantha Malok, Northwood · #531530 — read full submission →
“the Hepatitis B vaccine is safe, effective, and provides significant, lifelong benefits. This position is grounded in decades of careful evaluation, ongoing safety monitoring, and contemporary, evidence-based research.”
— Cathryn Stratton, Concord · #536714 — read full submission →
- Projected savings are minimal compared to future costsOppose9 of 119 reviewed
Some submitters argue the fiscal savings cited for the bill are small and short-term, and would likely be outweighed by higher long-term healthcare costs and expenses from responding to disease outbreaks.
“This bill offers only minimal, short-term savings while exposing children, schools, and taxpayers to significant long-term health and financial risk.”
— Kim Lawrence, Bedford · #533401 — read full submission →
“An increase in Hepatitis B outbreaks requiring emergency response would also cost the state money.”
— Deb Baker, Concord · #524720 — read full submission →
- Endangers vulnerable populations and herd immunityOppose7 of 119 reviewed
Some submitters argue removing the requirement disproportionately endangers people who cannot be vaccinated for medical reasons or who have limited healthcare access, undermining community-wide protection.
“Removing this requirement jeopardizes the health of our most vulnerable populations, including low-income families and communities of color, who may have limited access to healthcare resources and information.”
— Georgina Lambert, Belmont · #535224 — read full submission →
“those who are unvaccinated, but could be, pose a risk to vulnerable people who cannot be vaccinated for health reasons.”
— Shirley Montgomery, Hanover · #536201 — read full submission →
- Sets a precedent for removing other required vaccinesOppose3 of 119 reviewed
A few submitters warn that removing Hepatitis B from the required list could open the door to future removal of other vaccines from the state's schedule.
“Removing Hepatitis B from New Hampshire's required vaccine schedule could lead to the removal of other vaccines one by one.”
— Laura Bonner, North Hampton · #532675 — read full submission →
“This is a bill which would have the effect of removing vaccines from the schedule sets a dangerous precedent that invites future bills to remove additional vaccines.”
— David McDonough, Moultonborough · #533877 — read full submission →
- Calls for transparency about exemption rights, separate from mandate itselfNeutral2 of 119 reviewed
A couple of submitters do not directly address whether Hepatitis B should remain required, instead expressing support for state health communications clearly disclosing that medical and religious exemptions are available.
“This bill represents a balanced and transparent approach to public health messaging. Including this information ensures that New Hampshire residents are clearly informed of their rights under existing state law.”
— John Barker, Nashua · #527317 — read full submission →
“I support this bill that will ensure there is transparency and disclosure from the NH state government that the are exemptions available whether the state recommends a vaccine.”
— Daniel Gialanella, Chester · #527356 — read full submission →
Generated by claude-sonnet-5 (claude code agent) on Jul 20, 2026. Quotes are verbatim excerpts, verified against the cited submission before publication. Summaries are AI interpretation of the record, not part of it.
I strongly oppose this bill. Hepatitis B is a very severe illness. Vaccination can protect our citizens from suffering the consequences of this illness.
I support this bill
Liver disease is not something to mess around with. Vaccines have helped eliminate or make super rare some very harmful diseases. That progress can be lost in one generation of unvaccinated humans. Vaccinations are a continuous endeavor for continued public health.
1. Prevents Chronic Hepatitis B Infection Infants and young children are at highest risk of developing chronic hepatitis B if infected. ~90% of infected infants ~30% of infected children under age 5 Chronic infection can persist for decades without symptoms. Vaccination prevents the infection before exposure occurs. 2. Protects Against Serious Long-Term Disease Chronic hepatitis B can lead to: Cirrhosis Liver failure Hepatocellular carcinoma (liver cancer) Hepatitis B is a leading cause of liver cancer worldwide, and infection acquired in childhood is a major driver. 3. Blocks Mother-to-Child Transmission Hepatitis B can be transmitted at birth, even when the mother has no symptoms. The birth dose of hepatitis B vaccine (within 24 hours) dramatically reduces perinatal transmission. This is critical even when maternal screening is negative, due to testing errors or late infection. 4. Provides Early, Durable Protection The vaccine induces long-lasting immunity, often lifelong. Vaccinating in infancy ensures protection before risk behaviors or exposures occur later in life. 5. Prevents Household and Community Transmission Hepatitis B spreads through blood and certain body fluids. Young children can acquire infection through: Close household contact Shared items (e.g., toothbrushes, minor cuts) Vaccination protects children in everyday, non-obvious exposure scenarios. 6. Safe and Highly Effective 95% effective in preventing infection Extensive safety record over decades of use Serious adverse events are extremely rare 7. Reduces Health Inequities Hepatitis B disproportionately affects: Infants born to infected parents Children in communities with higher HBV prevalence Universal childhood vaccination removes reliance on risk-based strategies, which miss cases. 8. Supports Elimination of Hepatitis B Universal pediatric vaccination is a cornerstone of national and global HBV elimination strategies (CDC, WHO). Countries with high vaccine coverage have seen dramatic declines in pediatric HBV infection and liver cancer rates. Hepatitis B vaccination in children prevents a silent infection that can cause devastating disease decades later. Early vaccination is safe, effective, equitable, and one of the most impactful public health interventions available.
Hepatitis B is a serious health threat,
I strongly support HB 1719, which removes Hepatitis B from the list of diseases for which immunization is required for school and child care attendance under RSA 141-C:20-a. Hepatitis B is primarily transmitted through blood, sexual contact, or perinatal exposure—not casual contact or respiratory droplets common in school environments. The risk of child-to-child transmission in a classroom or daycare setting is extremely low. Mandating this vaccine for all children overrides parental medical decision-making for a disease that poses minimal threat in this context. This bill restores choice to parents without eliminating access to the vaccine—families can still obtain it voluntarily if they choose. It reduces government overreach, respects individual rights, and aligns with informed consent principles. New Hampshire already allows medical and religious exemptions; removing this mandate avoids forcing unnecessary interventions on low-risk children. HB 1719 does not oppose vaccination broadly; it eliminates an unwarranted requirement that erodes parental authority and trust in public health policy. I urge a DO PASS recommendation on HB 1719
I am writing in opposition to this bill. The position of NH Medical Society members— physicians and experts with extensive training, education, and experience in public health and clinical medicine—remains clear and consistent: the Hepatitis B vaccine is safe, effective, and provides significant, lifelong benefits. This position is grounded in decades of careful evaluation, ongoing safety monitoring, and contemporary, evidence-based research. The New Hampshire Medical Society echoes the physician testimony provided today, which underscored the vaccine’s strong safety profile, the very low incidence of adverse effects, and its profound long-term impact on public health. Hepatitis B vaccination has been instrumental in preventing chronic liver disease, liver cancer, and the spread of infection—outcomes that benefit not only individual patients, but the health of our communities as a whole. It is also important to note that the state already provides a process for parents and patients to opt out of immunization requirements. For these reasons, we strongly urge the committee to oppose this bill and to continue to support evidence-based immunization policies that protect the health and safety of New Hampshire residents.
Removing HEPA B from children’s vaccination list is not based on facts or science. Please VOTE NO.
I urge you to oppose this bill that will harm the health of NH's children and vulnerable individuals. NH should be protecting, not injuring the public's health!
NH should be providing accurate public health information about the importance of vaccines and not trying to scare people and encourage them to have their children opt out of these lifesaving vaccines. Vaccines are being politicized in a coordinated national effort and this will only harm our NH families who have shown healthier outcomes than many other states due to strong public health education and the availability of evidence based information and easy access to vaccines. I urge you to oppose this bill. Thank you.
I oppose this bill because, as a nurse, I believe that we should take advantage of the benefits vaccines provide. Also, those who are unvaccinated, but could be, pose a risk to vulnerable people who cannot be vaccinated for health reasons.
I'm a pediatrician and this is insane
I oppose this bill because Hep B is a serious disease, easy to catch, even by exposure to blood on paper from a paper cup. I was very glad when this vaccine became available for me. Thank you for your work for our residents. Joanna Andros
The recent change in our universal childhood vaccine schedule by the US HHS was not a decision based in evidence-based medicine. The change has been criticized by groups like the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), the American Medical Association (AMA) and the American Public Health Association (APHA), all noting in recent statements the widely documented safety and effectiveness of the Hepatitis B vaccine. Following HHS guidance with the actions proposed in this HB1719 would undermine evidence-based practices and put our school-aged children and broader communities at unnecessary risk. I strongly oppose the change in vaccine requirements outlined in HB1719 and urge you to consider the both the information and recommendations shared by groups of national expert health care providers and the processes used to establish that guidance. Public health requirements keep people healthy because they are based in what the evidence shows us works to reduce illness and death across populations. Families always have choices about accepting those requirements. Legislation that: - limits access to evidence-based best recommendations/practices, - directly undermines the efforts of public health, - and diminishes family’s abilities to make decisions based on proven practices that keep our larger society healthy, is not the NH way.
Letter i?n Support of HB 1719 Dear Members of the New Hampshire Legislature, I am writing to express my support for HB 1719, which would end the hepatitis B vaccine mandate for school and daycare attendance. With the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) withdrawing its recommendation for this vaccine requirement, it is necessary for New Hampshire to update its public health policies accordingly. HB 1719 reflects sound, evidence-based policymaking. When federal health authorities revise their recommendations, state requirements should adapt to maintain consistency and credibility. This bill ensures that New Hampshire’s health regulations remain accurate, relevant, and grounded in the latest scientific and medical consensus. Additionally, HB 1719 upholds parental rights, religious freedom, and medical discretion by allowing families, in consultation with their healthcare providers, to make decisions that best reflect their children’s individual health needs and beliefs. Removing outdated mandates also strengthens public trust in health policy by showing that the state responds thoughtfully to evolving data, expert guidance, and diverse religious convictions. I strongly urge you to support HB 1719 and help keep New Hampshire’s health policies current, transparent, and respectful of medical judgment, religious beliefs, and personal choice. Thank you for your thoughtful consideration and continued service to our state. Sincerely,? Leslie Nuchow Portsmouth, New Hampshiref
Please do not remove Hep B vaccination from children! I oppose this bill.
Curious times, when state representatives assume the cumulative knowledge of 50 years of medical research and the accumulated clinical knowledge of health professionals. Hepatitis B vaccine is an extraordinary safe vaccine being used for more than 40 years - although not the highest prevalence, it is often undetected in the mother. We no longer see the diseases I trained to diagnose because of vaccines (measles, etc) but thanks to state representatives doing "their research" and using their political power to apply bizaarely partisan perspectives to serious public health decision-making, we will all see them again!
The vaccine recommendations made by this current CDC and ACIP are purposefully weak and confusing and do not hold the confidence of the public. More importantly, the new federal recommendations are not based on scientific evidence. NH should trust the voices of the American Academy of Pediatrics and the physicians in this state who have been advocating what is best for children for more than a hundred years.
Stop requiring Hep b vaccines
I strongly urge you to oppose this bill. There is no scientific evidence that supports removing Hepatitis B vaccine from the required school vaccinations. Hepatitis B is often called a "hidden" disease as people who have it are often unaware they have it. It is very easily transmitted through blood and body fluids (and the virus can live outside the body for a long time), putting our most vulnerable (children) at risk for the lifelong consequences (even death) from chronic Hepatitis B infection. In addition to clinical trials, decades of use in infants and young children and follow up surveillance show NO safety signals and immunizing young children has been successful in decreasing the burden of this disease. Please do not sow confusion among parents by politicizing health information. Please oppose HB 1719. Thank you.
Please support this bill and remove Hep B from the list of required childhood immunizations.
Hepatitis B, has no cure, and causes liver failure. I think it should remain on the NH required immunization schedule. Parents can easily get a religious exemption, in NH, if they do not want to get their child(ren) immunized for Hepatitis B.
Testimony Against HB 1719: Harmful Implications of Removing Hepatitis B Immunization I strongly oppose HB 1719, which seeks to remove the Hepatitis B vaccine from the required immunization list. This legislation poses a significant threat to public health, particularly for marginalized communities who already face disproportionate health disparities. Hepatitis B is a serious viral infection that can lead to chronic liver disease, and its vaccination is essential in preventing both individual and community transmission. Removing this requirement jeopardizes the health of our most vulnerable populations, including low-income families and communities of color, who may have limited access to healthcare resources and information. Additionally, the implications of this bill extend beyond individual health to the broader concept of community immunity. By diminishing the required vaccinations, we risk creating an environment where preventable diseases can re-emerge and spread, further straining our healthcare systems. The decision to eliminate this immunization requirement reflects a narrow, short-sighted understanding of public health that neglects the intersectional realities faced by many families. It is crucial that we prioritize comprehensive health measures that ensure the well-being of all community members, especially those who are historically underserved. Upholding immunization mandates, including Hepatitis B, is a necessary step toward fostering a healthier, more equitable society for everyone.
I never knew my grandfather because he died after contracting Hepatitis B through a blood transfusion in the 1980's. The Hepatitis B vaccine has saved so many lives including those of many children. It is not just an STD, it can be contracted through other means as well and it is a devastating condition that many have died or had permanent complications from. The vaccine makes Americans healthier, less children receiving the vaccine will not. Please think of the families who have already been impacted by this disease and other infectious diseases. These are not just hypothetical scenarios, we know what a world with fewer vaccines would actually look like. Children deserve a future free of infectious disease, and this bill and similar bills would bring them the opposite.