Voting is our right, our responsibility, and our duty. I do not support any law that restricts the ability of the public to participate in the selection of their elected representatives.
HB172
House · 2025 sessionRepublicanKilled in HouseEnding same-day primary registration
AIEliminates same-day party registration for undeclared voters, preventing them from registering with a political party on the day of a presidential or state primary election in order to vote in that primary.
restricting undeclared voters from same-day voting in a presidential or state primary.
Status
Killed in the House — Inexpedient to Legislate · March 26, 2025- ✓Introduced
- ✕House
- Senate
- Governor
- Law
Division of testimony
648 submissionsArgument digest · AI-generated
from 204 of 204 written submissionsHB 172 would require undeclared voters to register with a political party in advance rather than allowing them to declare a party affiliation and vote the same day at a presidential or state primary. Of 204 written submissions reviewed, the overwhelming majority oppose the bill, arguing it disenfranchises New Hampshire's largest voting bloc and amounts to voter suppression, while a small number of submissions support it on the grounds that primary elections should be reserved for genuine, committed party members.
- Primaries should be reserved for genuine party membersSupport4 of 204 reviewed
Supporters argue that allowing undeclared voters to join a primary at the last minute permits last-minute strategic or 'raiding' voting that does not reflect true party-member preferences, and that only committed party members should choose a party's nominee.
“This measure ensures that voters have a pre-established political affiliation, reducing the potential for last-minute strategic voting that could skew primary outcomes.”
— Richard Horowitz, Portsmouth · #455729 — read full submission →
“I believe that only bonafide members ought to be able to vote in Republican primary elections. It should not be open to others who have no interest in republican views or politics.”
— Shelly Uscinski, Merrimack · #457172 — read full submission →
- Disenfranchises undeclared voters, NH's largest voting blocOppose60 of 204 reviewed
Submitters emphasize that undeclared/independent voters make up roughly 40% of the electorate, outnumbering either party's registered voters, and argue the bill would strip this large group of their ability to participate in primaries.
“Nearly 40% of New Hampshire voters are registered as undeclared, making them the largest voting bloc in the state.”
— Michelle Roberge, Goffstown · #449738 — read full submission →
“40% of NH voters register as Undeclared. DO NOT TAKE AWAY OUR VOTING RIGHTS.”
— Michael Bryant, Hollis · #457063 — read full submission →
- Amounts to voter suppressionOppose45 of 204 reviewed
Many submitters characterize the bill outright as voter suppression, framing it as an attempt to restrict a fundamental right to vote rather than a legitimate administrative reform.
“This bill is an attempt to make voter suppression law. This bill attempts to take away the freedom of choice from the voter.”
— Sean Guilford, Derry · #423960 — read full submission →
“This is an obvious voter suppression bill that has no place in our great state.”
— Tom McCormack, Derry · #436576 — read full submission →
- Undermines NH's independent-voter tradition and identityOppose20 of 204 reviewed
Submitters argue the bill conflicts with New Hampshire's 'Live Free or Die' ethos and its long tradition of independent-minded voters and first-in-the-nation primary status.
- Forces voters to decide affiliation before they have full informationOppose18 of 204 reviewed
Submitters object to having to declare a party affiliation weeks or months ahead of a primary, arguing this removes the ability to base a decision on late-breaking information about candidates.
- Bill perceived as partisan Republican effortOppose15 of 204 reviewed
Submitters point out that the bill's sponsors are exclusively Republican and argue it is designed to entrench party control or blunt independent influence on primary outcomes rather than address any genuine problem.
“This is an R sponsored bill and not the way to gain support for YOUR party. You have the numbers to pass this, but please don't. I believe this will hurt YOUR party the most”
— Deborah Sumner, Jaffrey · #423672 — read full submission →
“With only Republican sponsors on this bill, the intent of the bill seems disingenuous.”
— Peggy Sheets, Hollis · #440319 — read full submission →
- Creates administrative burdens and confusionOppose10 of 204 reviewed
Submitters warn that requiring advance registration would force voters to make extra trips to town clerks with limited hours, and that many voters would be caught unaware and turned away at the polls.
- No evidence of a real problem the bill would solveOppose8 of 204 reviewed
Submitters argue there is no documented issue with the current same-day registration system, including negligible voter fraud, making the bill an unnecessary solution to a nonexistent problem.
“They are suggesting a "fix" to a a "problem" that DOES NOT EXIST! I have voted as an independent for 43 years in the same town for 36 years. There has never been a problem voting in primaries”
— Patricia Thomas, Sandown · #452420 — read full submission →
“This is a solution seeking a problem that does not exist. Have respect for your elders and vote ITL on HB172.”
— Susan Connolly, Bridgewater · #450017 — read full submission →
- Primaries are funded by all taxpayers, so all should be able to voteOppose6 of 204 reviewed
Some submitters, using near-identical wording, argue that because municipal taxpayers fund primary elections regardless of party, all citizens should have the right to vote in them.
“Primary elections are paid for by the municipal taxpayers - not the political parties. As such, all municipal citizens should have the right to vote in their local primary”
— Beverly Donovan, Salem · #427509 — read full submission →
“the substantial cost of holding the primaries should be borne by the parties, not the taxpayers.”
— Pete Basiliere, Milford · #457561 — read full submission →
- Independent participation reduces polarization and extremismOppose8 of 204 reviewed
Submitters argue that allowing undeclared voters into primaries produces more moderate, electable candidates and cite the state's Citizens Assembly recommendation for a single-ballot primary as a better direction.
“we overwhelmingly supported recommending a single-ballot primary, where all properly registered candidates for all races would be on one ballot and every voter in the district would receive the same ballot. This type of ballot has been shown to decrease the likelihood that extreme candidates get into the general election”
— Douglas Babcock, Claremont · #444482 — read full submission →
“Letting the independents have a voice is allows for better representation for all and allows both parties a better chance to bring forth a candidate that could win in the general election”
— Lance Turgeon, Northfield · #455382 — read full submission →
- Disproportionately burdens vulnerable voters and election workersOppose8 of 204 reviewed
Submitters raise concern that advance-registration requirements would be especially hard on elderly, disabled, low-income, or unstably-housed voters, and could also deplete the pool of election workers who are themselves registered undeclared.
“The proposed changes will almost certainly disproportionately affect vulnerable residents, including renters or those without utility bills or leases (residing in shelters, sub-leasing, room rentals, temporary spaces with family or friends).”
— Sarah McCarthy, Manchester · #453133 — read full submission →
“If you do not allow undeclared voters to vote in a primary we will lose most of our election workers who are registered undeclared and in a presidential primary this is critical.”
— Belinda Yeaton, NHCTCA · #455609 — read full submission →
Generated by claude-sonnet-5 (claude code agent) on Jul 20, 2026. Quotes are verbatim excerpts, verified against the cited submission before publication. Summaries are AI interpretation of the record, not part of it.
This bill will take away my rights as an independent voter to make up my mind close to an election. I do not have months to research and select how I want to vote on issues or on candidates. I feel this rule is forcing me to be a republican or a democrat. Why are we trying to regulate voters like this? The America that I know is about choice and freedom. Scary Bill that would be an even scarier law. What are you thinking??
By restricting undeclared voters from registering with a party on the same day of a primary in order to vote in a presidential or state primary election you are creating a situation where many independent voters are not allowed to vote. It is untenable that a legal NH voter not be allowed to vote because they choose to be independent and want to keep their minds and options open to decide according to their interests and values what party's candidate they wish to vote for. To require an independent/undeclared voter to make the change ahead of time creates an unnecessary hardship. I am an undeclared voter because I want the freedom to pick the best person to represent me regardless of party, without having to remember to take another step ahead of time or risk by opportunity to vote.
Shame on the sponsors of this bill which seeks to disenfranchise the largest block of voters in NH. I strongly oppose this bill.
The founders of our constitution warned about factions. This bill is trying to further impose factions on us by forcing us to go out of our way to affiliate with either democrats or republicans. In case you haven't seen the polls this year, just know the general public is pissed off at both parties and many of us would rather vote in our own best interests instead of appearing to conform to the party line.
Stop voter suppression!
I oppose this bill.
My name is Andrew Harmon, and I am vehemently opposed to this bill. I have registered as Undeclared for years as it allows me the freedom to vote for the person best qualified to fill a political position, regardless of their party. This bill would strip me of this ability, and force me to continue to vote a specific party regardless of my personal affiliations or opinions. Please vote inexpedient to legislate.
I am a Supervisor of the Checklist in the town of Wolfeboro
Frankly, this bill is about as anti-NH as you can get, and it flies in the face of NH’s tradition of independent spirit. Undeclared voters, which make up the majority in NH, are an embodiment of that spirit. Our first in the nation status is impart because we are small and value independence. You don’t have to be the party darling or the candidate put forward by power and money from outside the state. Every candidate, every voter should continue to be heard in NH. This bill is meant to shift power away from all NH citizens and into the hands of political parties and a limited number of controlled voters. It’s sole purpose is to silence the majority of NH voters. Defend NH’s voter independence.
Once again, I oppose any bill that works to restrict people's ability to vote whether in an election or a primary. We should be making it easier to vote, not harder. There is NO good reason to keep non-affiliated voters from voicing their preference in a primary. I have done it ALL MY VOTING LIFE up until the point where I became an affiliated voter in 2016. MAKE IT EASIER TO VOTE, NOT HARDER.
Approximately 50% of NH voters are _not_ aligned with a political party. Every "independent" will be disenfranchised from primary elections if they cannot choose a party's ballot on election day because they cannot legitimately ask for an absentee ballot ahead of time - choosing a party is not a legal reason for using an absentee ballot. If independent voters are disenfranchised then the primaries become elections that only party members can participate in and, therefore, the substantial cost of holding the primaries should be borne by the parties, not the taxpayers.
No one should be denied the right to vote in a presidential or state primary.
I oppose this legislation. I was a registered Republican all my life until 2016. You can imagine what made me change my designation to unaffiliated. I consider this legislation to be disenfranchising to me as a registered unaffiliated voter. Any time you try to limit the number and kind of people who can vote, the likely reason is that if you let everyone vote, they wouldn't vote for you or your candidates. Try coming up with better policies that more people can agree on rather than trying to shut out voters who might not endorse your views.
I oppose this bill because a citizen has every right to pick a party affiliation, whether 6 months before a vote, within a few days of the vote, or even on the day of the vote.
I am an undeclared voter in NH. For the Republican party to seek to restrict the ability of undeclared voters from same-day voting in a presidential or state primary seems blatantly discriminatory. I believe the state should make it as easy as possible for citizens to vote.
Illegally preventing undeclared voters from selecting a ballot on election day for state or national elections.
This law will only perpetuate the election of more and more radical candidates. Allowing moderate independents to participate in the nominating process of either party is good for democracy, society, and our country.
I oppose this bell. No registered voter, whether Republican, Democrat, or undeclared, should not be. Restricted from same-day voting. Undeclared voters should not be penalized because they are not affiliated with the Democrat Democrats or Republicans.
As a dues paying member of the Republican Party in my town, I believe that only bonafide members ought to be able to vote in Republican primary elections. It should not be open to others who have no interest in republican views or politics.
40% of NH voters register as Undeclared. DO NOT TAKE AWAY OUR VOTING RIGHTS.
40% of NH voters register as Undeclared. DO NOT TAKE AWAY OUR VOTING RIGHTS.
Enough. Next are we going to deny election results like NC in their Supreme Court case? Ridiculous. Grow up, if you can't win an election fairly, go home.
New Hampshire does not allow residents to register as Independent so if you do not want to register as either a Republican or as a Democrat you run the risk of being turned away from a presidential or state primary election if you are unaware of this new law. It would require people to make an extra trip to their town hall prior to the election if they want their voice heard. It strikes me that this is simply a way to limit people's right to vote. If you want to avoid complications to the voting process then, perhaps, you should consider a bill to allow people to register as an Independent.
Please don't discourage voting.