I strongly support the availability of MTSS-B in schools. So many children and youth today are facing challenges to their mental and emotional help. Schools ARE and WILL BE places that can help these kids have productive, happier lives. MTSS-B supports that. Let’s not turn our backs on kids with needs.
HB1754
House · 2026 sessionRepublicanKilled in HouseRepealing school behavioral health system
AIRepeals the statutory requirement for statewide use of the multi-tiered system of supports for behavioral health and wellness (MTSS-B) in New Hampshire schools.
repealing the statewide use of the multi-tiered system of supports for behavioral health and wellness relative to systems of care for children's mental health.
Status
Killed in the House — Inexpedient to Legislate · March 5, 2026- ✓Introduced
- ✕House
- Senate
- Governor
- Law
Division of testimony
445 submissionsArgument digest · AI-generated
from 108 of 108 written submissionsHB1754 would repeal the statewide mandate requiring New Hampshire schools to use the Multi-Tiered System of Supports for Behavioral Health and Wellness (MTSS-B). A large majority of submitters, including many teachers, school counselors, clinicians, and parents, oppose repeal, arguing MTSS-B is an evidence-based framework that identifies student needs early, reduces classroom disruption, and keeps schools coordinated with families and community mental-health providers. A smaller group of submitters support repeal, arguing the framework duplicates existing supports, oversteps into matters better left to parents and local districts, or raises concerns about parental consent.
- Behavioral health decisions should rest with parents/local controlSupport3 of 108 reviewed
Supporters argue responsibility for children's behavior and emotional needs belongs with parents and local districts rather than a state-mandated program funded by taxpayers.
“I support the repeal of the MTSS-B, as schools should not be the place for this. Parents should be responsible for their own children, and the taxpayer should not bear the burden of supporting MTSS-B. ”
— Paul Beaulieu, Sandown · #616992 — read full submission →
“I support this legislation to remove MTSS-B from state statute, leaving this to local control. ”
— James Martineau, Rollinsford · #613196 — read full submission →
- Framework duplicates existing supports and lacks proven resultsSupport2 of 108 reviewed
Supporters argue MTSS-B/SEL programming duplicates supports already provided by teachers, counselors, and existing plans like IEPs, and that there is no local data showing it improves outcomes while it takes time from academics.
“SEL curriculum duplicates supports already in place such as: teachers, guidance counselors, administrators and discipline code, IEPs and 504s, parents and family. It takes away from precious instructional time while our test scores are very low.”
— marie berry, merrimack · #619216 — read full submission →
“I want our children to be taught the basics, reading, math, history, science, critical thinking, responsibility, these are needed for success in life. Please stop all these emotional programs!!”
— Melodye Smith, Manchester · #613739 — read full submission →
- Concerns about parental consent and schools as clinicsSupport2 of 108 reviewed
Supporters express concern that MTSS-B turns schools into de facto mental-health clinics without adequate parental involvement, including concerns about student data being collected without parental consent.
“MTSS - B is a way to turn schools into mental health clinics, of which I am absolutely NOT in favor of. I do not believe that parents will be involved in the decisions made in these "on-site clinics".”
— Jeanine Baberadt, Manchester · #613014 — read full submission →
“it has been reported that the curriculum companies and others are collecting data on individual students without parental consent, to which I am highly opposed!”
— marie berry, merrimack · #619216 — read full submission →
- MTSS-B is an evidence-based framework for early supportOppose55 of 108 reviewed
Opponents describe MTSS-B as a proven, prevention-focused system that identifies students' behavioral and mental health needs early and provides tiered support before problems escalate, rather than relying on reactive discipline.
“MTSS-B is not a program but a system—one that ensures all students receive the level of support they need, when they need it. Removing this framework risks returning schools to a reactive model of discipline, where problems escalate before help is provided.”
— Fern Seiden, Nashua · #610998 — read full submission →
“New Hampshire’s Multi-Tiered System of Supports for Behavioral Health and Wellness (MTSS-B) is a proven, prevention-focused framework that ensures all students receive support, while providing more intensive, individualized help when needed.”
— Kelly Dussault, Lancaster · #619312 — read full submission →
- Repeal would fragment coordination across providersOppose18 of 108 reviewed
Opponents argue MTSS-B coordinates schools, families, and community mental health agencies, and that repeal would revert the state to a fragmented, disjointed system of care less able to meet students' needs.
- Community mental health resources are already overwhelmedOppose14 of 108 reviewed
Opponents note that outside mental health services have long waitlists, distance, and cost barriers, especially in rural areas, making schools one of the few consistent access points for many children.
“Community mental health support is few and far between with long waiting lists, long drives, and many other barriers to access. Having these needs addressed in schools removes these barriers”
— Erma Krupic, Laconia · #618783 — read full submission →
“Long wait-lists, service cost, driving time and appointment times outside of school hours are some examples of difficulties families face when seeking mental health support for their child.”
— Hilary Diehl, New Hampton · #618849 — read full submission →
- MTSS-B reduces disruption and protects instructional timeOppose15 of 108 reviewed
Opponents argue MTSS-B lowers suspensions and classroom disruptions and helps keep students regulated and ready to learn, benefiting the whole classroom rather than only students with identified needs.
“In Milford, MTSS-B frameworks have decreased time out of the classroom and decreased student suspensions.”
— Karin Cevasco, Milford · #628463 — read full submission →
“MTSS-B doesn’t replace academics—it *protects* academic learning time by reducing classroom disruptions, helping students stay calmer and more focused on their learning”
— Debrah Howes, Bow · #628455 — read full submission →
- This is the wrong time given rising youth mental health needsOppose10 of 108 reviewed
Opponents point to elevated rates of youth stress, anxiety, and suicide risk, particularly since the pandemic, arguing this is the wrong moment to remove a proactive support system.
“In a time when youth suicide rates remain alarmingly high, schools cannot rely on reactive discipline alone; they must be equipped with proactive, layered systems that identify distress early and respond with care rather than punishment.”
— Amy Rich Crane, Epping · #628783 — read full submission →
“Today, we are seeing more than one-third of children in any given classroom struggle with managing stress, working well with others, and developing the resilience needed to thrive.”
— Kelly Dussault, Lancaster · #619312 — read full submission →
- MTSS-B is a proven, bipartisan framework already workingOppose12 of 108 reviewed
Opponents note MTSS-B passed with bipartisan support and is already producing positive results in NH districts, arguing repeal would move the state backward on an approach that is demonstrably working.
“MTSS-B was created to support children's mental health. It was bipartisan and passed without opposition.”
— Emily Holland, Manchester · #613251 — read full submission →
“MTSS-B has proven to be a great help to students who need this support. Please oppose this bill so they can continue to receive what they need”
— Nancy Lucci, Manchester · #618662 — read full submission →
- Repeal would burden and strain teachers and school staffOppose10 of 108 reviewed
Opponents argue MTSS-B provides teachers and staff with training and coordinated support that reduces burnout, and that removing it would increase strain on educators managing behavioral issues alone.
“These disruptions place additional strain on teachers and support staff, contributing to increased burnout and decreased staff retention.”
— Corrine Noel, Nashua · #614582 — read full submission →
“It provides support to teachers by allowing there to be other supporting adults in the building so they can continue teaching the class when other”
— Jenna Hardy, Merrimack · #622275 — read full submission →
- Repeal would shift costs onto districts without supportOppose5 of 108 reviewed
A few opponents argue eliminating the statewide framework would push financial burdens onto local school districts and towns that cannot absorb the added expense.
“Do not download more vital expenses to the towns. This financial support is crucial to our school districts and can't be made up by many/most districts.”
— Sandra Gauci, Bedford · #626708 — read full submission →
“This bill would remove funding needed for research that helps School Counselors and Social Workers do their jobs to better support our students.”
— Kara Claridge, Manchester · #619722 — read full submission →
- Bill is characterized as reckless or disconnected from evidenceOppose5 of 108 reviewed
Some opponents frame the bill itself as poorly reasoned or politically motivated, questioning why lawmakers would remove a system that is demonstrably helping students.
“It's absurd actually, the degree to which some members of this body will publicly criticize the state of public education while they make moves to scapegoat systems they don't understand and make public education unquestionably worse.”
— Danielle Van Dusen, Ossipee · #625652 — read full submission →
“Really? You're going to remove a proven system of support for student mental health and the improvement of behavior, attendance and course completion?”
— Sue Hannan, Derry · #614572 — read full submission →
Generated by claude-sonnet-5 (claude code agent) on Jul 22, 2026. Quotes are verbatim excerpts, verified against the cited submission before publication. Summaries are AI interpretation of the record, not part of it.
NH’s Multi-Tiered System of Supports for Behavioral Health and Wellness (MTSS-B) is a framework that helps provide behavioral health support to our students. The three tiers of this system work together to ensure that all kids in our public schools are given positive behavioral expectations. Some children can benefit from Tier 2, which simply means they will receive coping support and skill building. This can help children who are struggling in school. The kids with the highest needs have access to individualized behavioral health services through local community health care partners. There will always be some children who need more supports to be successful, and this is a thoughtful and impactful way of helping those children. MTSS-B can reduce exclusionary practices like suspension and expulsion. It can improve instructional time by decreasing disruptive behaviors in the classroom, and it can increase academic success. This initiative had bipartisan support and was signed into law by a republican governor just a few short years ago. I am not sure why this committee is considering ending the Multi-Tiered System of Supports before we see the impact it could have on our students. Please give this framework a chance to make a difference. Please vote ITL on this bill.
Students do not enter classrooms as blank slates. They arrive carrying stress, trauma, mental health challenges, and unmet needs. Research consistently shows that between 13 and 20 percent of youth experience significant mental health concerns, and fewer than half receive the support they require. For many students, school is the most stable and consistent access point for assistance. Removing a coordinated system of support weakens that access. MTSS-B operates through a tiered model. Universal supports create positive, predictable environments for all students. Targeted interventions provide skill-building and short-term assistance for those who need additional help. Intensive supports are individualized and coordinated for students with more complex needs. This structure mirrors how schools approach academic instruction. It is thoughtful, data-informed, and responsive. MTSS-B reflects a simple but critical principle: behavior is often a form of communication. When a student is struggling, the appropriate response is to examine the environment, the available supports, and the unmet needs. If we remove preventative systems, we increase reliance on exclusionary discipline and crisis response. That shift disproportionately impacts students with disabilities, students of color, and other marginalized youth. HB 1754 would dismantle a coordinated approach that supports both educators and students. It does not offer a replacement framework. It simply removes structure at a time when schools need clarity and consistency. On behalf of ABLE NH, I respectfully urge you to vote Inexpedient to Legislate on HB 1754.
MTSS-B offers critical support that NH children need. MTSS-B creates a structured, prevention-focused framework that supports both children and the adults who serve them. At its core, MTSS-B recognizes that child mental health is equal to physical health and must be treated with the same urgency, infrastructure, and access to care. Through universal supports for all students, targeted interventions for those at risk, and intensive individualized services for students with significant needs, MTSS-B ensures that no child falls through the cracks. In a time when youth suicide rates remain alarmingly high, schools cannot rely on reactive discipline alone; they must be equipped with proactive, layered systems that identify distress early and respond with care rather than punishment. MTSS-B also strengthens teachers and school staff by providing education, training, and clear pathways for action. Educators are often the first to notice warning signs, social withdrawal, behavioral changes, emotional dysregulation, but without a coordinated system, those concerns can feel overwhelming or unsupported. MTSS-B builds shared language, consistent protocols, and collaborative teams so teachers know what to look for, how to document concerns, and where to refer students. This reduces burnout, increases confidence, and transforms schools from places of crisis management into environments of early intervention and resilience-building. Most importantly, MTSS-B connects students and families to real resources. It aligns school-based supports with community mental health providers, behavioral specialists, and family services, creating a continuum of care rather than isolated efforts. By embedding social-emotional learning, trauma-informed practices, and restorative approaches into daily school life, MTSS-B builds protective factors that buffer against anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation.
Oppose HB 1754 HB 1754 moves our education system backward by removing the very tools designed to support the 'whole child.' For the sake of student achievement and classroom stability, I urge the committee to vote Inexpedient to Legislate on this bill
As a mental health professional working closely with schools to support students mental health, I have seen first-hand the importance of strong MTSS-B and interconnected systems. By providing early prevention, education for all, and intentional tiered supports, students are able to better access mental health supports that they need, when they need it. This allows them to better access their education. Without addressing underlying mental health needs, their academics are at risk. We must continue to address mental health and social-emotional needs in schools at all levels.
I oppose this bill because: As a child and family services therapist for 30 years, I found the inclusion of all the people involved in the child essential to providing the supports needed. The GAL would contact the professionals interacting with a child or family and ensure the child/family was well supported by the team to achieve best outcome.
Multi Tiered Systems of Support for Behavior (MTSS-B) are a framework, not a program. MTSS-B is prevention and support for student success, not punishment. Our schools are more successful with frameworks of support that prevent disruption, not relying solely on crisis management after behavior has disrupted the student and the classroom. In Milford, MTSS-B frameworks have decreased time out of the classroom and decreased student suspensions. Please vote ITL on the bill.
AFT-NH opposes HB 1754 because it repeals New Hampshire’s statewide MTSS-B framework, which is the system schools use to catch the signs of student stress, anxiety, or behavioral struggles early and offer the right level of support before problems escalate. MTSS-B doesn’t replace academics—it *protects* academic learning time by reducing classroom disruptions, helping students stay calmer and more focused on their learning, and ensuring teachers can spend more time teaching instead of managing preventable outbursts. Eliminating this statewide structure would remove a proven safety net for students and leave teachers without coordinated tools that improve academic focus and school climate.
As a teacher with 14 years experience working with Kindergarten through grade 4 students, I feel that it is imperative that schools have all of the support they need in identifying and providing resources for students' behavioral health and wellness needs. Teaching through the Covid pandemic and after has shown me that children's mental health needs are at an all time high, therefor I oppose House Bill 1754.
Honorable Chair and Members of the House Education Policy and Administration Committee, As a parent of two children in public school and a former public school teacher, I strongly oppose this bill. MTSS-B is an essential framework that helps students thrive academically and supports teachers.
Dear Members of the House Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee, I am compelled to voice my vehement opposition to New Hampshire House Bill HB 1754. This legislation represents a direct assault on our communities' safety and well-being, and we cannot afford to stand idly by while it threatens to erode the very foundations of justice and public health. A Reckless Misstep HB 1754 seeks to expand punitive measures without addressing the root causes of crime or the needs of our most vulnerable populations. Instead of investing in solutions that rehabilitate, this bill proposes to further entrench a system that relies on fear and punishment. We should be investing in prevention and community support—not adding to an already overburdened criminal justice system that fails to protect our communities effectively. The Cycle of Harm By focusing on punitive measures, this bill overlooks critical evidence showing that harsh penalties do not reduce crime rates. Instead, they perpetuate a cycle of harm, pushing individuals deeper into the justice system rather than providing the help they desperately need. Targeting symptoms instead of causes will only exacerbate the crises we face. Prioritize Compassion and Support Our focus should be on rehabilitation, mental health support, and community resources that empower individuals instead of driving them further away from recovery. This bill misrepresents public safety by promoting isolation and punitive action rather than connecting individuals with the support systems that actually work. I implore you to recognize the importance of thoughtful, compassionate approaches to public safety. Reject HB 1754 and work toward legislation that uplifts and strengthens our communities rather than tearing them apart. Thank you for your attention to this urgent matter. Sincerely, Kimberly Lawrence
This bill repeals the requirement for multi-tiered support for those who need behavioral health treatment. Coordination of support is vital for successful mental health interventions. Please don't allow the repeal of this system of support. Do not pass this bill.
A multi-tiered system of support (MTSS) makes sense in schools because it helps every student get the right help at the right time—without waiting for them to fail first. Students get what they need instead of a "one-size-fits-all" approach. Some students need extra support or a different instructional approach -- more intensive interventions at the tier 2 or 3 level are necessary. It's simply about good instruction and taking away the language of "MTSS" is plain foolish.
I oppose this bill. It is not a program. It is not punishment. It is a framework that helps schools respond early, work together, and keep students learning. Behavior is communication, not defiance. When students’ needs go unmet, learning, relationships, and school climate suffer. MTSS-B gives schools the structure to respond with support instead of discipline. HB 1754 would eliminate MTSS-B statewide. That does not eliminate student needs. It eliminates the system that helps schools meet them. Public schools are one of the most consistent access points for mental health and behavioral support. Disabled students and other marginalized students will be harmed first when those supports are taken away.
I oppose this bill. It is not a program. It is not punishment. It is a framework that helps schools respond early, work together, and keep students learning. Behavior is communication, not defiance. When students’ needs go unmet, learning, relationships, and school climate suffer. MTSS-B gives schools the structure to respond with support instead of discipline. HB 1754 would eliminate MTSS-B statewide. That does not eliminate student needs. It eliminates the system that helps schools meet them. Public schools are one of the most consistent access points for mental health and behavioral support. Disabled students and other marginalized students will be harmed first when those supports are taken away.
Parents bring their children in the world. Parents have beliefs and value systems. But parents cannot control who their children are or how their child feels. We have the research. We know the extremely negative impact when caregivers deny, disparage, or punish a child due to the child's identity. We have far too many children who have been emotionally harmed by their parents' inability to support them. The state should absolutely NOT consider an adoptive family for a child if the adoptive family does not support the child's identity. A child in foster care has a right to be placed in a family that will love and support them unconditionally.
I strongly oppose HB1754 because MTSS-B provides essential, evidence-based behavioral-health supports that help students succeed and reduce crises in schools. Repealing this framework would undermine mental-health services and create inconsistent practices across districts. I urge the committee to maintain MTSS-B to ensure students receive the support they need.
Mental and behavioral health supports are crucial for our students and our communities. Research shows that these supports work. Removing universal and targeted supports for our students’ very real and significant emotional needs is reckless and counterproductive, and schools without the resources they need to ensure their students are ready to be educated. Trauma is endemic to NH society and our kids are hit the worst. DO NOT remove MTSSB and leave our students stranded.
As an educator in a public school, I realize the importance of MTSS-B. Please support this bill and allow our school districts the money that these students and schools need.
We need all systems to work together.
Collaboration is important.
Stop cutting supports for our vulnerable kids. They need all the support they can get.
I oppose this bill which would repeal the statewide use of the multitiered system of supports for behavioral health and wellness relative to the systems of care for children's mental health. Repealing the current system would result in a fragmented system of care for behavioral health needs.