When a child rejects a parent during a divorce, there can be many reasons, some of which should be treated or at the least, revealed. This bill offers thorough points of assessment by a capable psychologist. It is my wish that the assessment listed in this bill would be ordered BEFORE any psychological treatment was ordered by the family court. Too many times family court judges have ordered counseling lasting years without ever having the child assessed. Judges are not supposed to be considered professional clinical psychologists, and as such should depend on a professional assessment prior to ordering psychological treatment sessions.
HB335
House · 2025 sessionRepublicanKilled in HouseEvaluations in contested custody cases
AIRequires a court to order a risk assessment, and counseling if necessary, for a minor and their family when parental rights and responsibilities are contested in a family court matter.
requiring courts to order a minor and their family have psychological evaluations and, if necessary, counseling, where parental rights and responsibilities are contested in a family court matter.
Status
Killed in the House — Inexpedient to Legislate · March 6, 2025- ✓Introduced
- ✕House
- Senate
- Governor
- Law
Division of testimony
24 submissionsIf passed, this law would be financially and psychologically damaging to children and families.
The Office of the Child Advocate has concerns about HB335 requiring courts to order a minor and their family have psychological evaluations and, if necessary, counseling, where parental rights and responsibilities are contested in a family court matter, as written, including: * "Rejection" or "withholding" could be indicators of physical or sexual abuse, or psychological maltreatment, and should not be the basis to subject a child to a potentially inappropriate or traumatic "evaluation." Children involved in high-conflict parenting cases are often also involved in the child protection system. * Such an "evaluation" may not be appropriate or therapeutic for the child, as it could cause additional trauma by involving the child in divorce proceedings, and may not be beneficial or in the Best interest of the child. Evaluations should not be requested or triggered due to a parent feeling wronged in a parenting proceeding. * Much of the language of this bill is incredibly concerning, such as: " narcissistic-borderline-dark personality pathology," " shared/induced persecutory delusion," and "factitious attachment pathology," to name a few. * There is always some concern with children having diagnoses assigned to them that could impact quality of care later in life, especially the ones named in the bill, which do not align with recognized DSM diagnoses. This bill does not appear to be for the advancement of the best interest of children, which is the bellwether for 461-A determinations, but rather to advance the interests of one parent, based on questionable "science." For all of these reasons, the OCA would recommend the committee ITL this bill.
Why do we need a law that mandates a whole entire family submit to psychiatric services when a family law judge could just order that anyway? What happens when people don’t have Medicaid anymore, or even when they have the best insurance but they can’t get into a therapist in New Hampshire because we’ve had mental health crisis levels of provider shortages in this state for decades?
This is necessary for the protection of the citizens of New Hampshire and for transparency
I strongly support HB335 please pass this bill
Position recorded without written comment.
Position recorded without written comment.
Position recorded without written comment.
Position recorded without written comment.
Position recorded without written comment.
Position recorded without written comment.
Position recorded without written comment.
Position recorded without written comment.
Position recorded without written comment.
Position recorded without written comment.
Position recorded without written comment.
Position recorded without written comment.
Position recorded without written comment.
Position recorded without written comment.
Position recorded without written comment.
Position recorded without written comment.
Position recorded without written comment.
Position recorded without written comment.