Hi members of the House Education and Policy and Administration Committee, I support the banning of mandatory mask policies by school boards and public education agencies requiring students and members of the public to wear a mask for the following reasons: the standard surgical or cloth masks used in these cases are ineffective in preventing virus particles from passing through the mask. Virus particles are small enough to pass through. I Prolonged mask-wearing is a health hazzard to the wearer. Studies have been shown that wearing a mask alters the normal flora bacteria in the mouth, increasing the incidence of tooth decay. There is also the issue of the wearer re-breathing a higher percentage of their exhaled air than they normally would without the face covering, and a lower percentage of fresh air when they inhale, which decreases the concentration of oxygen, and increases the concentration of carbon dioxide in their inhaled breath, which is detrimental to their health. Please vote ITL on mandatory mask policies! Thank you for your consideration! Donna Peterson
HB361
House · 2025 sessionRepublicanSigned into lawBanning school mask mandates
AIProhibits school boards and public education agencies from requiring students or the public to wear facial coverings on school property, with exceptions for protective equipment and individualized education or accommodation plans.
prohibiting mandatory mask policies in schools.
Status
Signed into law · July 22, 2025- ✓Introduced
- ✓House
- ✓Senate
- ✓Governor
- ✓Law
Division of testimony
828 submissionsArgument digest · AI-generated
from 234 of 234 written submissionsHB361 would prohibit school boards and public education agencies from adopting mandatory mask policies for students or the public. Supporters argue masks are ineffective and harmful to children's health and development and that masking decisions should be left to individual choice, while opponents argue masks are an effective public health tool and that the decision should remain with local school boards and health experts rather than being banned outright by the state.
- Masks do not effectively stop virus transmissionSupport40 of 234 reviewed
Supporters argue that scientific evidence shows masks, especially cloth or surgical masks, do not meaningfully reduce the spread of respiratory viruses, making mandates pointless.
“Masks do not stop the transmission of an airbone virus in either direction. Universal masking is not statistically, significantly associated with any reduction in transmission of respiratory diseases.”
— Barbara Gladders, New London · #465097 — read full submission →
“I urge you to SUPPORT HB361 as this bill will guarantee that school children will not be subjected to being forced to wear masks, which have been proven time after time to not even work effectively.”
— James Gardner, Keene · #469342 — read full submission →
- Masking should be a parental/individual choice, not mandatedSupport45 of 234 reviewed
Supporters frame mask-wearing as a matter of personal and parental choice, arguing that government or schools should not be able to force families to comply with masking, likening mandates to government overreach.
“New Hampshire House Bill 361 is a crucial step in safeguarding parental rights and ensuring that families—not government mandates—make health decisions for their children.”
— Sayra DeVito, Danville · #462022 — read full submission →
“No one, and I mean no one has the right to mandate masks or anything else for that matter, and I don't want my child being forced to wear a suffocation device”
— Darlene Cartier, Derry · #471483 — read full submission →
- Masking harms children's development and mental healthSupport30 of 234 reviewed
Supporters describe masking as damaging to children's speech and language development, social-emotional skills, and mental health, citing effects like increased anxiety and impaired reading of facial expressions.
- Masks cause physical harm from reduced oxygen and bacteriaSupport15 of 234 reviewed
Some supporters argue prolonged mask-wearing itself causes physical harm, citing claims of increased carbon dioxide inhalation, reduced oxygen, and bacterial contamination on masks.
“Research has demonstrated contamination of the upper respiratory tract by viruses and bacteria on the outside of medical face masks – this has been shown multiple times when masks of students have been studied.”
— Barbara Gladders, New London · #465097 — read full submission →
“Studies have shown that masks also lead to excessive carbon dioxide inhalation when worn for long periods. If that is the case, this is terrible for the brain, that is not my opinion.”
— Jack Hayes, Merrimack · #480609 — read full submission →
- New governor gives a renewed chance to pass this banSupport4 of 234 reviewed
A small number of supporters frame the bill as a third attempt worth passing now given a change in governor, after prior vetoes of similar legislation.
- Masks are an effective public health toolOppose32 of 234 reviewed
Opponents argue that masks have been shown to reduce the spread of respiratory illness and that removing this option undermines the ability to respond to disease outbreaks in schools.
“Masks have proven extremely effective in limiting the spread of certain diseases. Just compare the data from states that required masks (blue) to those that did not (red) during Covid 19. The results are dramatic.”
— Stephen Barker, Springfield · #471562 — read full submission →
“Don't take away one of the more effective ways for kids and teachers/staff to stay healthy during cold, flu, and RSV season.”
— Dani-Jean Stuart, Weare · #480993 — read full submission →
- Decisions should remain with local school boards and expertsOppose30 of 234 reviewed
Opponents argue that whether to require masks should stay a local decision made by school boards guided by medical/public-health expertise, rather than being banned statewide by the legislature.
- Ban would endanger immunocompromised and vulnerable peopleOppose16 of 234 reviewed
Opponents argue that eliminating the option to require masks removes protection for immunocompromised students, staff, and family members who face greater risk from infectious disease.
- Bill has already been vetoed and is a repeat effortOppose6 of 234 reviewed
Some opponents note this is a repeat of similar legislation vetoed twice before, questioning why it keeps being reintroduced.
- A ban would also block masking for non-pandemic emergenciesOppose3 of 234 reviewed
A few opponents point out that facial coverings might be needed for reasons beyond disease outbreaks, such as wildfire smoke, air pollution, or chemical exposure, and a blanket ban would prevent that too.
- Legislature should focus on more pressing prioritiesOppose3 of 234 reviewed
A few opponents argue lawmakers are wasting time on this bill instead of addressing more pressing state problems such as housing or education funding.
Generated by claude-sonnet-5 (claude code agent) on Jul 20, 2026. Quotes are verbatim excerpts, verified against the cited submission before publication. Summaries are AI interpretation of the record, not part of it.
I support this bill for too many reasons to list.
HB361 would severely limit school boards ability to protect the health of students, teachers and staff in an unforeseen public health crisis. Please oppose HB361 and vote this bill Inexpedient to Legislate. Thank you.
I oppose HB361 because it severely limits school boards ability to protect the health of students, teachers and staff in an unforeseen public health crisis. School boards need flexibility to perform its duties not a straitjacket. I urge you to oppose HB361 and vote Inexpedient to Legislate. Thank you.
As a lifelong severe asthmatic who's been sick multiple times every winter and had a cold put me in the hospital, I oppose this bill. I kept masking after 2020 and haven't been sick since. Don't take away one of the more effective ways for kids and teachers/staff to stay healthy during cold, flu, and RSV season.
How about having the NH Health Commissioner define when an epidemic is occurring and declare that mask protections are directed to be used in a hool to prevent the further spread. Seems to be common sense to me. Surprised the legislature did not arrive to the same point of responsibility.
This has been vetoed twice already. Why does it continue to be brought up?
Masking children is scientifically ineffective and causes anxiety and hinders social interaction and breathing. Allowing masking will continue to be a catalyst of the exit from public schools, if ever used again.
No to mandatory masks.
No mandatory masks anywhere. If you want to mask up, go ahead.
I was going to drop some public health links regarding airborne viruses and the fact that respirator masks work, but I shouldn’t have to. It is absolutely ridiculous that we have to keep doing this. Nobody would dare suggest your children wear a mask frivolously, do you really want the school to be unable to do anything should there be a need to mitigate some disease spread? I don’t even have kids and I think it’s sad I care more about the future health of the children in New Hampshire than their parents or grandparents do.
Psychological and Emotional Effects Increased Anxiety: Masks can heighten anxiety in some children, particularly those with sensory sensitivities or pre-existing mental health conditions. A German study (2021) surveying parents reported that 60% of children experienced irritability, mood changes, or anxiety linked to mask mandates. Reduced Emotional Recognition: Masks obscure facial expressions, which are critical for emotional development in young children. Research from developmental psychology suggests that this can impair a child’s ability to interpret social cues, potentially affecting emotional intelligence over time. Feelings of Isolation: The combination of masking and social distancing measures may amplify feelings of disconnection or loneliness, as noted in anecdotal reports from teachers and child psychologists. Social and Developmental Impacts Speech and Language Development: Masks muffle sound and hide lip movements, which are essential for language acquisition, especially in early childhood. A 2022 study from the University of Miami suggested that prolonged masking could delay speech development in preschool-aged children, particularly those with hearing impairments or language delays. Peer Interaction: Social play and bonding, vital for child development, may be hindered by masks. Children rely heavily on non-verbal communication, and masking can disrupt these interactions, potentially stunting social skills. Educational Consequences Learning Challenges: Teachers and students report that masks make communication harder, especially in noisy classrooms. A survey by the National Association of Elementary School Principals (2021) found that many educators struggled to engage students effectively while masked, potentially impacting comprehension and participation. Attention and Fatigue: Discomfort from masks—whether physical or psychological—can reduce focus and increase exhaustion, as highlighted in parent and teacher feedback during school reopenings. Broader Considerations Limited Evidence of Efficacy in Children: Some studies, like those reviewed by the Cochrane Library (2023), suggest that the effectiveness of masks in reducing viral transmission among children may be less pronounced than in adults due to inconsistent usage and fit. Critics argue that this raises questions about the cost-benefit ratio of masking kids. Disproportionate Impact on Vulnerable Groups: Children with disabilities, such as autism or hearing loss, may experience amplified negative effects, as documented in case studies from special education advocates.
No mask mandates! The masks are not healthy especially for children and they also do not work. The virus molecule is much smaller than the filter of the mask. This should be a decision for the individual not by anyone else!
There must never be a mask mandate again. Time lost on learning was profound during the pandemic when young students were forced to mask. And the science didn’t back up the mandates.
I support this bill and urge a vote in favor.
Please never cover our children’s faces again with dirty masks that impact their speech, health, breathing and learning. Freedom to choose.
We are still recovering from the worst global pandemic in the past 100 years - and possibly expecting another one via avian influenza (all it will take is one small mutation to make it transmissible person-to-person). As an RN, I am appalled that someone thinks it's a good idea to prohibit mask mandates. I have worked 12 hour shifts with one short bathroom break in full Personal Protective Equipment, including an N95 mask. Yes, it was uncomfortable, but sometimes keeping our fellow humans from severe illness or death merits a little discomfort. Masking prevents the spread of infectious disease, and has been common practice in Asia for decades, as a common courtesy to avoid infecting others. It would have to be another incredibly severe circumstance that would cause public health officials to issue a mask mandate for the protection of the public. This bill is a selfish, childish way to say, "I don't wanna, and you can't make me". Please oppose it
I support this bill since our children deserve the best. Masks prevent students from breathing, speaking, understanding what other people say. In addition, masks are filthy if worn for prolonged periods of time. Masks do not prevent infection and if anything, contribute to people getting sick. Please vote "yes".
In my view, it does more harm than good to have children forced to wear masks in school. I think it is clear that it can effect their social development as it makes it harder to hear other people, and it especially makes it more difficult to read body language of other people during such a crucial time in a child's development. Studies have shown that masks also lead to excessive carbon dioxide inhalation when worn for long periods. If that is the case, this is terrible for the brain, that is not my opinion. Even through one's own subjective anecdotal observation you can see that breathing becomes more difficult with a mask on. I'd like to remind everyone that the virus itself is too small for most of the commonly used surgical masks to stop. Having so many of these polyester masks getting made and thrown away everyday is also terrible for the environment. We have enough plastic trash floating around for many generations already. It is my opinion that forcing children to wear masks everyday is psychologically damaging to children because you are forcing them under penalty of detention or revoked recess privileges to put something on everyday akin to a muzzle to "maybe" stop what is only going to present as a flu in most children. Children who are already immuno-compromised should probably choose to wear a mask I will agree but it should be them and their parent's decision. I'd also like to also remind everyone that a mandate is not a law. So therefore when you mandate people to do something and it is not constitutional, you are coercing someone through threat of punishment to do something that they did not vote on or had any say in which therein kicks the can down the road until a member of the public eventually spends the money going to court just to prove that the mandate is unconstitutional.
I do not support a ban on masks. Masks have been proven to be effective in preventing the spread of viruses and should be required when large populations are at risk of contracting and spreading a virus during a life threatening epidemic. We have all learned about how the epidemic impacted kids and adults in negative ways. There are better ways to prevent/mitigate that then banning masks. If masks saved 50 % of people from spreading covid, they were worth the lives they saved until vaccines and immunity was built up in our communities. If children can't wear masks, they should be remote learners until it is safe for people to be together without them.
Mask have been proven to be ineffective especially with children. The human immune system needs to be able to do its job
I do NOT support forced masking of children or adults. There have been far too many people that have masked up due to the pandemic that now have escalated respiratory issues.
This is a short-sighted ideologically based bill that threatens public health in an emergency situation. It removes a proven strategy for protecting public health from the repertoire of health care providers, schools, and parents. The Journal of the American Medical Association, in its review of studies on the effectiveness of masking, stated, "As demonstrated by the influenza virus and SARS-CoV-2, viruses spread by the respiratory route can cause deadly pandemics, and face masks can reduce the spread of these pathogens. The effectiveness of responses to future epidemics and pandemics will depend at least in part on whether evidence on masks, including from the COVID-19 pandemic, is utilized." Holding onto emotionally generated beliefs about masking does nothing to protect public health.
Masks save lives, period.
In consideration of our children’s futures, I oppose this bill.