Penny DeanNeutralConcord, NHfor MyselfJan 30, 2025
The idea is laudatory. There is no guarantees in litigation. I want May 19, 1986 repealed more than most. I am not sure the gamble taken (a very big one) will play out as the bill's author(s) believes it will. My very grave concern is whether or not the NH AG would vigorously defend this law, and who else will step up to the plate. There are many groups that may, but QUALITY counts more than quantity in legal representation. I think this is worth considering. I just think there needs to be CERTAIN guarantees from the Gov and AG needs to be obtained first.
J GrenierSupportNashua, NHfor MyselfJan 30, 2025
This is a good bill for some folks, though the misdemeanor charge for removing “firearm accessories” is vague and doesn’t really apply because those things do not require a background check anyway.
I would like to see it pass with that change.
Jonathan StoneSupportClaremont, NHfor MyselfJan 30, 2025
I support this bill, but unfortunately see it is not practical with clear conflict between state and federal laws.
Nathan DeadySupportAtkinson, NHfor MyselfJan 30, 2025
I, Nathan Deady of Atkinson New Hampshire, officially express my utmost support for HB381. I view the National Firearms Act as a direct infringement on our second amendment rights. I also hold the belief that this bill would greatly promote local business, further strengthening our state economy. It is my understanding that Texas has found great successes with a bill of this nature.
Nick HootonSupportDerry, NHfor MyselfJan 30, 2025
Having a 200 dollar tax stamp on something I am buying with my taxed income is double dipping by the government.
Joe FiguereoSupportBedford, NHfor MyselfJan 30, 2025
Exempting firearms and firearm accessories manufactured for in-state use only from the National Firearm Act makes sense. There should be no federal tax imposed on an item that will not leave the state.
Travis AllardSupportLyndeborough, NHfor MyselfJan 30, 2025
I support HB381. There is no reason to tax a right!
Adam RadfordSupportNew Durham, NHfor MyselfJan 30, 2025
The new administration supports this bill at a federal level. Its good for New Hampshire residents.
Gerald MeeSupportBedford, NHfor MyselfJan 30, 2025
I am in support of this bill. Kansas passed a similar bill in 2013, and it has not caused any negative consequences. This would be a great step in removing an unfair and pointless tax from NH residents.
Joanne LazarusOpposeNewmarket, NHfor MyselfJan 30, 2025
There is no viable reason for these accessories to be used in our state, to go against the National Firearms Act is ludicrous.
Daniel RichardsonSupportNashua, NHfor MyselfJan 30, 2025
NH citizens have NH Constitutional rights self-contained with the state! Federal level has no say in the matter. That's what makes NH the best state in the union.
Susan LaPointeSupportEpping, NHfor MyselfJan 30, 2025
The bill supports local businesses and reduces federal overreach into our state’s firearms laws. It’s crucial for maintaining New Hampshire’s tradition of firearm manufacturing and ownership.
Melanie NesheimOpposeHolderness, NHfor MyselfJan 30, 2025
There is no reason to exempt firearms and firearm accessories manufactured for In-state use only from the National Firearm Act.
Martha Jane RichOpposeEnfield, NHfor MyselfJan 30, 2025
I oppose this exemption and urge you to do the same. The National Firearm Act is intended to protect us from the epidemic of gun violence in our country, and there is no reason for this waiver. I trust the many responsible gun owners in our state, but worry about others who violate the serious responsibility of firearm ownership and use. Let's stick with protection. .
Kathleen MalsbendenOpposeNewmarket, NHfor MyselfJan 30, 2025
Guns manufactured anywhere need to be part of the National Firearms Act. My safety is as important as anyone’s gun. I oppose this bill.
Marie StraitonOpposePembroke, NHfor MyselfJan 30, 2025
Very intimidating and frankly unnecessary.
Teresa BrooksSupportManchester, NHfor MyselfJan 30, 2025
This bill would solidify the protection of the the right to bear arms of NH citizens from all outside infringement. It could also enhance the NH advantage by encourage small businesses formation, job creation and boost state revenue in areas related to the firearms and self-defense industries.
Jana MackaySupportOrange, NHfor MyselfJan 30, 2025
Live Free or Die. That is our motto and anyone who has read our history from the time of the Revolutionary War should knows why. We have a proud tradition of protecting our rights and one of those is supporting firearms manufacturers who support our military. Keep the Federal Government OUT of our business.
Susan AlmyOpposeLebanon, NHfor MyselfJan 30, 2025
The system is working. Children should not be seduced into marriage before they are old enough to understand what it means.
Danielle LaCasseOpposeNewport, NHfor MyselfJan 30, 2025
Our Gun laws are perfect in this state!
Matthew TyszkaSupportNewport, NHfor MyselfJan 30, 2025
This bill resists the federal laws which strip New Hampshire of its state sovereignty. The commerce clause should not impact commerce in legal items (firearms) made and sold only in New Hampshire. Firearms are legal and should be available to all New Hampshire citizens without federal permission.
Simon BerrioSupportDalton, NHfor MyselfJan 30, 2025
Other freedom loving states have done this. Why not us.
Courtney BlazonisOpposeBrookline, NHfor MyselfJan 30, 2025
Position recorded without written comment.
Aubrey FreedmanSupportBridgewater, NHfor MyselfJan 30, 2025
Position recorded without written comment.
Phil HatcherOpposeDover, NHfor MyselfJan 30, 2025
Position recorded without written comment.