Dear Chairman Berry and Representatives, I am writing as chair of Derry Supervisors of Checklist in Derry, which has the largest and most dynamic checklist in New Hampshire. I support HB289 because 70% of registrations in Derry included an affidavit. Nearly all were citizenship affidavits completed by people born in the United States who did not present proof of citizenship. Naturalized citizens are familiar with citizenship documents and rarely required affidavits. Misinformation about proving citizenship is pervasive and persistent. Only 3 documents establish citizenship: a US birth certificate, passport, or naturalization certificate. Many Granite Staters believe a driver's license proves citizenship and reject outreach explaining it does not. Other qualified people do not have and are unable to obtain a citizenship document. Adoptees, for instance, testified to your committee last session; as well as people who lost household records in floods or fires. The elimination of registration affidavits will be especially devastating for Granite Staters registering on election day. In November, Derry Supervisors registered 2300 new voters. Even if outreach before the next general election is wildly successful and we bring the percentage of same-day registrants with documents for everything up from 30% to 60%, that still means that 1000 qualified citizens will be turned away at the next general election unless affidavits are allowed. The prospect of turning away so many qualified voters alarms me. I urge you to vote OTP and allow Granite Staters to establish their qualifications with an affidavit if they lack a document. Thank you. Judy Strakalaitis Supervisors of the Checklist, Chair Derry
HB385
House · 2025 sessionDemocraticKilled in HouseRestoring voter ID exceptions
AIReestablishes alternative methods, including affidavits and various forms of documentation, for voters to prove citizenship, age, and domicile when registering or voting without standard identification.
reestablishing voter identification exceptions.
Status
Killed in the House — Inexpedient to Legislate · March 27, 2025- ✓Introduced
- ✕House
- Senate
- Governor
- Law
Division of testimony
471 submissionsArgument digest · AI-generated
from 92 of 92 written submissionsHB385 would repeal HB1569's stricter documentary-proof requirements and reinstate the option for voters lacking photo ID or proof of identity, age, citizenship, or domicile to sign a sworn affidavit under penalty of perjury. Most submitters support the bill, arguing HB1569 disenfranchises eligible voters who lack ready access to documents like birth certificates or passports, while opponents argue affidavits and 'personal recognizance' invite fraud and undermine election integrity.
- HB1569's documentation requirements disenfranchise eligible votersSupport37 of 92 reviewed
Supporters argue many eligible voters, including the elderly, students, low-income residents, and people who have moved or lost documents, cannot easily produce a birth certificate, passport, or naturalization papers, and that a sworn affidavit under penalty of perjury is a reasonable safeguard that prevents these voters from being turned away.
“Many eligible voters—especially the elderly, students, low-income individuals, and people who have lost or misplaced their IDs—may face difficulty obtaining identification before Election Day.”
— Michelle Roberge, Goffstown · #449035 — read full submission →
“if we had needed to relocate her to this state, and then register her to vote, she would not have been able to do so under the provisions of HB 1569.”
— Deborah Bacon Nelson, Hanover · #425393 — read full submission →
“NH does not have a history of widespread voter fraud and removing affidavits severely disenfranchises a large number of residents that may not bring a birth certificate or passport when registering to vote on election day.”
— Daniel Healey, Nashua · #447359 — read full submission →
- Poll workers and checklist officials report affidavits work well in practiceSupport6 of 92 reviewed
Several submitters with direct election-administration experience (poll workers, ballot clerks, checklist supervisors) say affidavits have functioned reliably, noting heavy affidavit use in some towns with no resulting fraud problems.
“I support HB289 because 70% of registrations in Derry included an affidavit. Nearly all were citizenship affidavits completed by people born in the United States who did not present proof of citizenship.”
— JUDY STRAKALAITIS, DERRY · #460442 — read full submission →
“As a poll worker I can attest to additional barriers creating longer wait times which in turn can make it harder for working citizens to vote, particularly those with hourly jobs or child care challenges.”
— Maria Sillari, Portsmouth · #452220 — read full submission →
“An affidavit is very adequate proof, under severe penalties if false. A look at our records will show that voter fraud is nearly *non-existent* in our state”
— Debra Green, Greenville · #443312 — read full submission →
- Repealing HB1569 avoids costly ongoing litigationSupport1 of 92 reviewed
One submitter argues that repealing HB1569 would save the state money by ending a lawsuit challenging the current law's constitutionality.
- Affidavits and 'personal recognizance' invite fraud, undermine integrityOppose8 of 92 reviewed
Opponents argue that allowing voters to attest to identity, citizenship, or residency without documentary proof opens the door to fraud and impersonation, and that voters should instead be required to show a government-issued photo ID or citizenship document such as a passport or birth certificate.
“Only a certificate of citizenship or passport or birth certificate (with the same name as currently in use) is acceptable”
— Gordon Springate, Wilton · #436830 — read full submission →
“Anyone who wants to vote should, at a minimum, be required to show a state ID with a picture to prove who they are and their New Hampshire residency.”
— Jill Bouchillon, Keene · #438219 — read full submission →
“Do NOT carve out exemptions that undermine the faith and credit of citizens in elections.”
— tom luther, claremont · #437421 — read full submission →
- 'Personal recognizance' specifically is an inadequate substitute for IDOppose7 of 92 reviewed
A number of opponents object specifically to allowing poll workers' personal recognition of a voter to substitute for documentation, arguing this method lacks reliable verification and checks against impersonation.
“Allowing other voter ID exceptions such as “personal recognizance as a substitute for required documentation is an invitation to fraud.”
— Anthony Conte, Salem · #455510 — read full submission →
“Allowing individuals to vote based solely on recognition by poll workers opens the door to potential abuses and inconsistencies.”
— Richard Horowitz, Portsmouth · #455614 — read full submission →
“I oppose allowing voter identification exceptions such as “personal recognizance as a substitute for required documentation”.”
— Maritsa St. Jacques, Gilford · #455944 — read full submission →
Generated by claude-sonnet-5 (claude code agent) on Jul 22, 2026. Quotes are verbatim excerpts, verified against the cited submission before publication. Summaries are AI interpretation of the record, not part of it.
I work the polls in my town and have for years. Affidavits work and have always worked. Let’s get this fixed and bring them back.
I support the right to vote for ALL citizens and I believe this bill will protect that right!
Our current election system under HB1569 disenfranchises voters by creating unnecessary barriers to registration that will make lines longer and turns voters away. It undermines our communities by making it harder for people to participate in the democratic process. New Hampshire elections are safe and secure. Officials from both parties agree that there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud in New Hampshire. A recent poll found that 93% of voters have confidence that their votes are accurately counted. Under HB1569, New Hampshire arguably has the most restrictive voter registration system in the country – New Hampshire is the only state that requires documentary proof of citizenship when registering to vote. Every other state allows voters to register and vote by attesting, under penalty of perjury, to their US Citizenship.
I support this bill.
I am a Supervisor of the Checklist in the town of Wolfeboro
I oppose this Bill.
I respectfully ask that you stop trying to disenfranchise the voters of New Hampshire. It must be exhausting working so hard to destroy our republic.
I am in full opposition of this bill.
I oppose this bill
HB 385, allowing voter ID exceptions such as “personal recognizance as a substitute for required documentation.” This makes NO SENSE and is an open door to VOTER FRAUD
This is not a common sense bill. Personal recognition is not acceptable.
To legally vote in our state, you should have a state or government issued ID. I oppose people who show up at the polls to vote with no ID and no proof of residence.
I am very much in favor of the repeal of HB1569 which disenfranchises voters. HB1569 is terribly restrictive and wrong.
REESTABLISH allowing other kinds of ID when voting.
REESTABLISH allowing other kinds of ID when voting.
I support voter ID exceptions.
We do not need or want to disenfranchise voters in NH. There is no evidence of wide spread voter fraud or illegal voting in NH. There has not been a documented case of a non-citizen voting in New Hampshire. Please, remove the unnecessary impediments to voting created by HB 1569. More voters equals more democracy.
If we are trusting our election officials, then we should trust them.
I am a ballot clerk and I see how important it is that voter's be able to sign an affidavit when they don't have all tha documentation they need to vote. Affidavits are legal documents. They are a reliable way to make sure our citizens can vote and thwart and attempt at fraud, which is extremely unlikely anyway.
To the honorable election law committee: My name is Andrew Harmon, and I am a legally blind resident of New Hampton, NH. I am writing in support of HB 385, entitled “reestablishing voter identification exceptions”. As someone who had to relocate during the pandemic to assist family during the pandemic, I tried to vote in my local town warrant and municipal elections in 201. Unfortunately, my non-driver’s identification was out of date as I was still in process of moving back to my current residence in New Hampton, and thought the other identification I had would suffice as I did not know about the changes to voter identification rules. I had my birth certificate copy on my person out of sheer luck as I had been trying to get a Real ID at the time prior to my move, but the local official did not recognize the copy as legitimate as the technology had changed so radically in the 38 years since my birth in California. If HB 1569 had been in place at the time, I would not have been able to vote that day as the signed copy of my rental agreement showing where I lived would not have been accepted along with the affidavit I signed. I would not have been recognized despite living in that town for the lion’s share of my life, and having voted for at least ten of the years I lived in the town prior to attending college and later moving to Keene in 2010. I thank the committee for taking the time to read and review this testimony, and I urge the committee to please pass this necessary restoration of rights to the citizens by voting Ought to Pass. If you have any questions, I am happy to answer them via email or by cell phone at your convenience. Sincerely Andrew Harmon, Concerned Citizen 138 Main Street New Hampton, NH 03256 | andrewjharmon@gmail.com | Cell: 603-992-4053
HB 385l would allow a person registering to vote who does not have proof of identity, age, domicile, or citizenship can sign an affidavit and then register. An affidavit is a powerful legal document with serious consequences for a voter who attests to an untrue statement. This bill would have a positive impact on new voters, people who move frequently, young people, and those experiencing housing insecurity. Difficult life circumstances should not cause a voter to be disenfranchised, and HB 385 will address this. This bill seeks to correct the barriers to voting put in place by HB 1569. I ask that you vote Ought to Pass on HB 385.
I do not support his bill.
Our current election system under HB1569 disenfranchises voters by creating unnecessary barriers to registration that will make lines longer and turns voters away. It undermines our communities by making it harder for people to participate in the democratic process. New Hampshire elections are safe and secure. Officials from both parties agree that there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud in New Hampshire. A recent poll found that 93% of voters have confidence that their votes are accurately counted. Under HB1569, New Hampshire arguably has the most restrictive voter registration system in the country – New Hampshire is the only state that requires documentary proof of citizenship when registering to vote. Every other state allows voters to register and vote by attesting, under penalty of perjury, to their US Citizenship. There has not been a documented case of a non-citizen voting in New Hampshire Kansas’s brief, disastrous experiment with a documentary proof of citizenship law resulted in over 30,000 disenfranchised voters in 2 years, approximately 12% of voter registrations submitted during that time..
Election integrity is of utmost importance