This action would be highly unfair to all those whose primary language is different than English. Please oppose this Bill.
HB461
House · 2025 sessionRepublicanKilled in SenateEnglish-only driver's license testing
AIRequires all driver's license examination materials and testing to be provided only in English or American Sign Language, bars the department of safety from acquiring non-English materials, and prohibits translation assistance during exams.
relative to department of safety and department of motor vehicle training and testing materials.
Status
Killed in the Senate — Inexpedient to Legislate · May 15, 2025- ✓Introduced
- ✓House
- ✕Senate
- Governor
- Law
Division of testimony
340 submissionsArgument digest · AI-generated
from 105 of 105 written submissionsHB461 would require New Hampshire driver's-license examination and DMV training materials to be offered only in English. A small number of supporters frame this as reducing state costs and encouraging English acquisition, while the large majority of submitters oppose the bill, arguing it is discriminatory toward non-native English speakers, would make roads less safe, and would create unnecessary barriers to employment and licensure.
- Would reduce state costs and encourage English acquisitionSupport1 of 105 reviewed
A supporter argues the change would minimize costs to the state and create an incentive for people to learn English in order to fully participate in American life.
- General support without elaborationSupport2 of 105 reviewed
A couple of supporters state simple support for the bill without providing further reasoning.
- Bill is discriminatory/racist toward non-English speakersOppose53 of 105 reviewed
Many submitters describe the bill as racist, xenophobic, or otherwise discriminatory, arguing it singles out and marginalizes immigrants, refugees, and other non-native English speakers without justification.
“What POSSIBLE justification can you offer for passing a law that DMV materials be provided only in English besides flagrant racism? Our immigrant communities deserve far better than to be looked down on like this by the legislature.”
— Benjamin Stinson, Concord · #454645 — read full submission →
“We should not be creating barriers for people to be gaining licenses or certifications by excluding other languages. This country is a melting pot of diversity and that is what makes us wonderful, strong and powerful.”
— Molly Moran, Madbury · #457382 — read full submission →
- English-only materials would make roads less safeOppose24 of 105 reviewed
Opponents argue that a person's English proficiency has no bearing on their ability to drive safely, and that English-only materials would make it harder for capable non-English speakers to understand the rules of the road or could push some to drive without a license at all.
“As a former educator and also a former employee of the NH Division of Public Health Services, we know that the best and recommended practice for assuring compliance and safety is to offer training and materials in languages the public can understand.”
— Lindsay Dearborn, Lebanon · #451592 — read full submission →
“About 25% of people in this country and about 10% or people in New Hampshire speak English as a second language. Many of them drive for a living - UBER, Amazon, DoorDash, construction and landscaping vehicles.”
— James Steiner, Hollis · #437974 — read full submission →
- Creates barriers to employment and economic participationOppose15 of 105 reviewed
Submitters argue that a driver's license is essential for work and daily life, especially given limited public transportation in New Hampshire, and that restricting exam materials to English would block otherwise qualified immigrants and refugees from obtaining licenses and jobs.
“Providing these documents in languages other than English harms no one. Instead they allow new United States citizens with only limited or conversational English to understand this more technical information.”
— Lynn Lippitt, Milford · #451209 — read full submission →
“This bill will make it much harder for new residents--both refugees and immigrants--to get a driver's license which is so essential for holding employment.”
— Jeanie Holt, CONCORD · #446005 — read full submission →
- Accommodating other languages is not burdensomeOppose7 of 105 reviewed
Some submitters say providing materials or assistance in other languages already works well in practice and imposes little or no burden on DMV staff or the state, making the restriction unnecessary.
- No official national or state language requires thisOppose6 of 105 reviewed
Several submitters point out that the United States has no official language, arguing there is no legal or civic basis for restricting DMV materials to English only.
- Conflicts with "Live Free or Die" personal libertyOppose2 of 105 reviewed
A few submitters frame the bill as inconsistent with New Hampshire's motto and values of personal freedom, saying it takes away individuals' freedom to choose how to take the exam.
- Bill's real intent is to suppress votingOppose1 of 105 reviewed
One submitter alleges the bill's true purpose is unrelated to driving safety and is instead meant to prevent certain people from being able to vote.
Generated by claude-sonnet-5 (claude code agent) on Jul 22, 2026. Quotes are verbatim excerpts, verified against the cited submission before publication. Summaries are AI interpretation of the record, not part of it.
Dear Representatives of the Transportation Committee, It is my understanding that your role is to help make transportation as safe as possible in our state. Having every driver take an exam is part of that process. Whether they take a written exam in English or another language, does not impact whether the person will be a good driver. Even when a person speaks good English, exams in English are much more challenging. Lets vote NO on this bill and yes for safety of all drivers. Thank you.
It is reasonable to have materials in other languages. Naturalized people or folks who are here for reasons that include employment or education need to be able to drive to navigate NH successfully. It is safer to have people have access to needed materials in a primary language.
The US quite intentionally does not have an official language. While New Hampshire may have designated English as such, this is an unnecessary cultural barrier which marginalizes people residing in this country - even those who live here legally. I can think of many that are here legally who do not speak English natively. They are good people who came here, followed the rules, acquiesced to the law, and still find English difficult. I work in a pseudo-regulatory field. In our field, we often find ourselves bound with red tape, so to speak, which ends up being more harmful than helpful. This is an example of such a case. As someone who also works in a large, multi-national company with locations all over the globe as part of a team where I am only 1 of 5 native English speakers - I have found very few problems that cannot be resolved or supported by readily accessible tools such as Google Translate.
We are the Live Free or Die state. That is our motto, that is our chant. How is this anything other than taking away someone's freedom to live life as they choose? How does it harm anyone else if they choose to perform an exam in a language other than English? Say no to efforts to curtail our personal liberties.
We're all safer on the roads if people have access to information they can understand. Please oppose HB461.
this is a safety issue, the words on the test aren't the test.
More discrimination attempts coded into law by the GOP.
The United States has no official language. Requiring driving materials to be only available in English is discrimination.
This is racist.
We do not speak ONLY English. This bill is a waste of taxpayers time and resources. Republican lawmakers need to stop wasting time with these asinine bills.
This bill supports occlusion and I'm all for equality.
There is absolutely no reason to accommodate language barriers and differences. The United States does not have an official language. English is the most widely used language in the U.S., and some states designate it as their official language. People in the U.S. communicate in more than 350 languages. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, some of the most widely spoken languages other than English are Spanish, French, Tagalog, Vietnamese and more. People in the U.S. also speak Native North American languages such as Navajo, Yupik, Dakota, Apache, Keres, and Cherokee, among others. Limiting drivers test to only English or ASL is an unnecessary step and should be considered as arbitrary and limiting to Americans. As no all American citizens speak English.
We are all safer on the roads if driver exams and examination-related materials can be accessed in the language a driver is most comfortable with. Accessing these materials in a language other than English doesn't preclude test takers from learning and demonstrating knowledge of the rules they need to know to be safe drivers. In fact, this kind of accessibility does exactly the opposite. Please support accessibility. Please support road safety. Please oppose this bill.
Ending state inspections is long overdue. Represent the people, not the bad auto repair shops. Good ones don't need state inspections for business, A good reputation brings them more business than they can handle.
We should not be creating barriers for people to be gaining licenses or certifications by excluding other languages. This country is a melting pot of diversity and that is what makes us wonderful, strong and powerful. To disregard this is shameful. New Hampshire is a state that also has a multicultural history (despite its shocking lack of diversity compared to the rest of the country) with also dual language --French! --. I oppose this bill!
Totally oppose. Even back in the '60s when I got my license in MA they offered the test in several languages.
I am absolutely against this!
In order to promote public safety, we should do what we reasonably can to communicate with people who have business with the government in a language with which they are proficient.
Written testing exam should be available in the language of choice as reading and verbal communication are not the same and reading language comprehension takes far more education than to be able to communicate orally for a drivers exam.
English only materials at the DMV will make our roads less safe. People who speak many languages need to be able to read and understand the driving regulations here. The purpose of the DMV is to ensure that people know how to drive safely on our streets, not to enforce a language preference.
Transportation is so important for people who work or live in areas where there is no public transport or public transport doesn't go far enough or the right times of day, which is true of even our bigger cities like Nashua. People can read road signs and traffic directions safely but still find it difficult to understand a complicated written test. This would be a hindrance to people with English as a second language who are trying to be productive and assimilate.
Driving is often necessary in our state in order for people to be successful in life. Life is hard enough, don't make it worse for people.
Another attempt at "othering". There are many people here in New Hampshire whose English might not be great and have trouble understanding what's required. This bill would be an impediment to a non-English speaking resident having good and proper training when learning to drive, putting all of us at risk on the roads.
If this bill passes, the result will be more unlicensed drivers on our highways.