Background checks and waiting periods are common sense measures for transfers of firearms. Please support HB56.
HB56
House · 2025 sessionDemocraticKilled in HouseBackground checks for private gun sales
AIRequires most private firearm transfers to be processed through a licensed firearms dealer, who must conduct a criminal background check and observe a waiting period before completing the transfer, subject to certain exceptions.
requiring a background check and mandatory waiting period during certain firearm transfers.
Status
Killed in the House — Inexpedient to Legislate · February 20, 2025- ✓Introduced
- ✕House
- Senate
- Governor
- Law
Division of testimony
385 submissionsArgument digest · AI-generated
from 103 of 103 written submissionsHB56 would require background checks and a mandatory waiting period (frequently described as three days) for certain firearm transfers in New Hampshire. Supporters frame it as a common-sense public-safety measure that closes sales loopholes and gives people in crisis time to reconsider an impulsive act, while opponents argue background checks are already federally required, view the waiting period as an unconstitutional infringement on gun rights, and warn it could delay self-defense access for people facing imminent danger, such as domestic-violence victims.
- Requiring licensed-dealer sales/background checks closes loopholesSupport31 of 103 reviewed
Supporters argue that routing all firearm sales and transfers through licensed dealers with background checks prevents felons, domestic abusers, and other prohibited or dangerous individuals from obtaining guns.
“HB56 closes dangerous loopholes in firearm sales by ensuring that all transactions go through licensed dealers who perform background checks.”
— Blossom Dodge, Concord · #366479 — read full submission →
“I believe that we need to do all we can to ensure that firearms are kept out of the hands of felons, domestic abusers, those adjudicated to be mentally ill, and other individuals prohibited by law from purchasing or possessing firearms.”
— Diane Baringer, Newmarket · #378563 — read full submission →
- Waiting period provides a life-saving "cooling-off" windowSupport13 of 103 reviewed
Many supporters, including several sharing personal stories of loss, argue a waiting period reduces impulsive suicides and violence by giving a person time to reconsider before obtaining a firearm.
“She was aware of this and frightened by her altered and dangerous mental state. She immediately took proactive steps to protect herself from suicide every way she legally could.”
— Karina Nathan, New Orleans · #377874 — read full submission →
“Our neighbors son was allowed to purchase a gun and bring home same day. He took his life. He was just a young kid in college.”
— Susan LeClair, Hooksett · #382592 — read full submission →
- General "common sense" gun-safety framingSupport19 of 103 reviewed
A large number of supporters characterize background checks and waiting periods broadly as reasonable, common-sense measures that improve public safety without meaningfully burdening lawful gun owners.
- Medical/clinical experience with gun-violence harmsSupport3 of 103 reviewed
A few submitters identifying as physicians describe firsthand clinical experience with firearm injuries and mental-health crises as grounds for supporting the bill.
- Measure is compatible with responsible gun ownershipSupport1 of 103 reviewed
One submitter, describing themselves as a bill co-sponsor and Second Amendment supporter, argues the measure reflects the views of many gun owners themselves and is not a "gun grab."
- Concern about firearms in polling placesSupport3 of 103 reviewed
A couple of submitters separately raise concern about firearms being present at polling places, arguing it discourages voting and election participation.
- Background checks are already federally requiredOppose14 of 103 reviewed
Opponents frequently argue that federally licensed dealers already conduct background checks on all firearm sales, making the bill's requirement redundant and unnecessary.
- Unconstitutional infringement on Second Amendment rightsOppose13 of 103 reviewed
Many opponents characterize the bill as government overreach that infringes on constitutional rights to keep and bear arms and to dispose of one's own property.
- Waiting period endangers people needing urgent self-defenseOppose11 of 103 reviewed
Opponents, including some sharing personal accounts, argue a mandatory delay could leave domestic-violence victims, stalking targets, and others facing imminent threats without timely means of self-defense.
- No evidence waiting periods reduce crime; imposes burdenOppose8 of 103 reviewed
Some opponents argue there is no proof that waiting periods deter crime, and that requiring an already-approved buyer to wait days to receive a purchased firearm creates cost and logistical burdens without a safety benefit.
- Bill driven by out-of-state gun-control interestsOppose3 of 103 reviewed
A few opponents assert the bill reflects the influence of out-of-state gun-control advocacy groups and lobbyists rather than the wishes of New Hampshire residents.
- Could criminalize firearms instructors teaching gun safetyOppose2 of 103 reviewed
A couple of opponents warn the bill's transfer restrictions could make it illegal for a firearms instructor who is not a licensed dealer to hand a gun to a student during safety training.
- Vague legal term "possession" creates enforcement problemsOppose1 of 103 reviewed
One opponent, a practicing attorney, argues the bill's repeated undefined use of the legal term "possession" would create serious enforcement and compliance problems for both the public and law enforcement.
Generated by claude-sonnet-5 (claude code agent) on Jul 22, 2026. Quotes are verbatim excerpts, verified against the cited submission before publication. Summaries are AI interpretation of the record, not part of it.
As someone who went through the NH public k-12 system and experienced multiple credible school shooting threats through the course of my education, and who now goes to Keene State, where a huge concentration of future NH educators are, I want to give my full-throated support to this bill. Gun threats are a plague in our system, they are the one thing future teachers are the most scared of, and suicide, right now, is the 2nd leading cause of death in people aged 10-34. Firearms are a significant factor in those deaths, accounting for more than 1/3 adolescent suicide attempts in our state. Yes, it is fair to say this bill would inconvenience those people who want to purchase firearms, but it would save real, important lives of new hampshire citizens. This committee and the state have the chance to directly save the lives of not just young people, but people around the state, and the cost of it is only one long weekend. Please consider passing this bill, and do something genuinely good for this state.
This bill is a partisan attempt to circumvent both the Second Amendment and the Constitution of the State of New Hampshire. The title is not even honest: it says “some” when it means “all” Please throw this unconstitutional bill out.
Honorable Members of the House Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee, Thank you for the opportunity to testify today. My name is Daniel Pati, and I am a resident of Hudson, New Hampshire. I strongly oppose House Bill 56, which seeks to impose mandatory background checks and a 72-hour waiting period on certain firearm transfers. New Hampshire has long upheld a tradition of responsible gun ownership, balancing public safety with the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. HB 56 places unnecessary restrictions on these rights without demonstrating a clear public safety benefit. I have several concerns with this bill that I urge the committee to consider: Burden on Law-Abiding Citizens – HB 56 would primarily affect responsible gun owners who legally purchase firearms for self-defense, sport, or hunting. For those in urgent need of protection, such as survivors of domestic violence, a mandatory waiting period could put lives at risk by delaying access to a means of self-defense. Redundant Background Checks – Federally licensed firearm dealers already conduct background checks on gun buyers. This bill expands background check requirements to private sales, criminalizing lawful transactions between trusted individuals, such as family members, friends, and long-time acquaintances. No Measurable Impact on Crime – States with waiting periods and expanded background check laws have not shown significant reductions in violent crime. Criminals do not acquire firearms through legal channels, and this legislation does nothing to prevent unlawful firearm possession or violent crime. Burden on Rural Communities – In many parts of New Hampshire, access to a licensed firearms dealer can be limited. Forcing private parties to process transfers through a dealer imposes unnecessary travel, expense, and inconvenience on law-abiding citizens. Erosion of Individual Rights – The Second Amendment guarantees our right to keep and bear arms, and New Hampshire's Constitution further affirms the right to bear arms for defense. HB 56 imposes undue government interference in private transactions and places additional hurdles between responsible citizens and their constitutional rights. While I fully support measures that keep firearms out of the hands of dangerous individuals, HB 56 is not the right solution. It unfairly burdens responsible gun owners while failing to address the root causes of criminal activity. I urge you to reject this bill and instead focus on measures that target criminals, not law-abiding citizens. Thank you for your time and consideration. I welcome any questions from the committee. Sincerely, Daniel Pati
Please ITL this bill. I am a trial attorney, licensed and admitted to practice in in New Hampshire, Maine, Massachusetts, United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire, Maine, Massachusetts, First Circuit Court of Appeals, the United States Supreme Court, and various administrative agencies, state and federal that practices in the firearm world and realm. This bill is a feel good bill that does nothing but infringe upon the law-abiding. One of the most horrific things about this bill is that it claims to protect public safety from "domestic abusers". When seconds count, the police are likely MANY minutes away! Many individuals that had no interest in firearm ownership (and thus did not own firearms) suddenly decide that a firearm may save their life from their abuser. There are many examples of individuals waiting for firearm permits or firearms acquisition being murdered by their abuser/alleged abuser while waiting for that lifesaving tool-a firearm-would be a travesty and a death sentence for some. This will also add an unknown cost to the “price” of a firearm for the transfer check, which would hurt the average working person. The technical defects are too numerous to mention. Page 2, Line 2, "or pursuant to state law" WHICH of the 50 states' law? the one in GA or some other state that may still be a felony for spitting on the side walk on Sundays? Specificity in legal writing is critical. Judge’s cannot be made to GUESS about what the General Court intended. I advise many federal firearms licenses, and as private businesses a federal firearms licensee may lawfully refuse to conduct ALL PRIVATE TRANSFER OF FIREARMS. Regardless of ones’ position on this bill (which I vigorously oppose) a prudent licensee would refuse to conduct all private transfers of firearms because of liability to the licensee because of how poorly this bill is drafted, thus making it practically impossible for private sales to exist, as I cannot imagine any liability conscious FFL would agree to conduct private transfers of firearms, which is likely the goal of the sponsors of this bill. See Page 2, Lines 21-26 have all sorts of legal peril for the Federal Firearms Licensees that will be required to transfer the firearm, with conflicts too numerous to mention with their federal law obligations and now arguably by new state law obligations. Page 3, Lines 25-26 “The local law enforcement agency shall report all violations of this chapter by a licensed firearms dealer to the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives. “ So we are now giving authority over FFLs that may have little understanding of the complex federal law interactions to the State/local law enforcement that say they are already overburdened?? Penny Dean 603-230-9999 P.S. there is NO “loophole” loophole /loo?p'hol?/ noun A way of avoiding or escaping a cost or legal burden that would otherwise apply by means of an omission or ambiguity in the wording of a contract or law
I am a proud co-sponsor on this piece of legislation that is very important to myself and my constituents. Let me start off by saying that I support the second amendment, as I have many constituents who are gun owners themselves. I have had many conversations with constituents and they fully support a mandatory background check and waiting period for gun purchases. A majority of gun owners do not feel represented by the gun lobby organizations, and the notion that this is some kind of a gun grab is clearly an "alarmist" tactic. Due to the fact that we allow open/conceal carry it adds an extra layer of protection that those choosing to do so have legally obtained that weapon. Mental illness is a huge part of this conversation, and If we can in any way prevent another tragedy with this measure, it is all worth it. Please ask yourself the following as you consider this bill: 1. Where are the constitutional rights for the overwhelming percentage of this state who support these simple and precautionary measures? I urge you to support this measure and see it as a way we can ensure every citizen feels equally protected in the Granite State! I appreciate your time and apologize that I cannot be there in person this morning, Rep. Christine Seibert
I support this bill for New Hampshire
NH already has systems for the sale and purchase of firearms. As a woman who has been attacked with her child at a laundromat by a habitual sexual predator, it's unconscionable that the Legislature continues to waste time and resources on taking fundamental rights away from NH citizens. I oppose this and any other bill that infringes on our rights to self defense. Oppose this and any other bill that enabled criminals and harms NH law abiding citizens.
Dear Chairman Roy & Members of the Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee, My name is Dr. Maria Boylan and I’m a family medicine physician. I am writing today on behalf of the New Hampshire Academy of Family Physicians in strong support of HB56 which will require a background check and mandatory waiting period during certain firearm transfers. Our board consists of a large group of family physicians with collective decades of experience in which we all have cared for individuals affected by firearm-related injuries and violence. We believe it is crucial to prioritize public safety and the well-being of our patients, especially in the context of mental health. The evidence is clear: background checks are a vital tool in preventing individuals who pose a risk to themselves or others from obtaining firearms. As physicians, we are acutely aware of the delicate interplay between mental health and gun violence. Patients who may be experiencing acute mental health crises, or those with a history of violence or severe mental illness, should not have access to firearms without appropriate checks. The ability to purchase a gun without any consideration of an individual’s criminal history or mental health status can result in immediate, irreversible harm. In addition, mandatory waiting periods can prevent impulsive acts. Many firearm-related deaths are the result of impulsive decisions made in a moment of crisis. Whether it’s suicide, domestic violence, or a fit of anger, the presence of a firearm during such emotional state can be a recipe for tragedy. And as a physician, I have seen the tragic outcomes of impulsive acts that might have been prevented with a brief cooling off period. I will share a story about a patient of mine who was just a young man, 18 years old, who was in his senior year of high school about to graduate. He was going through a difficult time and struggling with depression that came on suddenly after his girlfriend had broken up with him. Rather than reach out for help by talking to his family or coming to see me as his physician or going to the emergency room, he purchased a handgun. Within just hours of buying that gun he drove into the woods where he took his own life. He left behind a loving family and large group of friends. And because he was allowed to purchase a firearm in such a quick and easy manner, he acted on his impulse and died by suicide. I can’t help but think that if he had to wait just a few days, that he may have acted differently or sought out help. Suicide is the leading cause of firearm-related deaths in the United States, and firearms are amongst the most lethal means of suicide. As a physician, I have counseled numerous patients who are struggling with depression, anxiety, or trauma and I have seen the devastation that can unfold when those individuals have easy access to firearms. From a public health perspective, reducing firearm-related injuries and deaths is a critical aspect of improving the overall well-being of our society. As physicians, our primary responsibility is to protect our patients’ health and safety. The statistics are sobering: firearms are among the top causes of death in the US and instituting background checks and waiting periods would be a step towards reducing this preventable health crisis. As family physicians, we strongly support measures that would introduce background checks and mandatory waiting periods for firearm purchases. These policies are not only prudent in reducing the risk of harm from firearms but also align with our responsibility as a society to protect vulnerable individuals and prevent avoidable injuries and death. We urge you to take these measures seriously as they will save lives, prevent tragedies, and help to ensure that firearms are kept out of the hands of those who may use them in moments of crisis. Please vote Ought to Pass on HB56. Sincerely, Dr. Maria Boylan, DO Dr. Douglas Phelan, DO- President of NHAFP Board of the NH Academy of Family Physicians
My name is Emma and on January 5th 2022 I lost the love of my life Nate Morin due to no holding period on purchasing a firearm. I strongly believe that had there been a holding period that he would still be with us today. Nate took his own life shortly after being able to walk into a firearm store and walked out the same day with a handgun. Had there been a holding period he wouldn’t have been able to act on his then current emotional state taking a wonderful life from the world and tearing apart the lives of those he chose to leave behind. Please I beg of you push this bill through and approve it. It could prevent many more deaths like this one that has affected his family and friends.
We need more common sense controls on guns and gun purchasing to avoid being the next state to experience a tragic shooting, along with additional mental health services.
I support requiring a 3 day waiting period on purchasing a gun. Our neighbors son was allowed to purchase a gun and bring home same day. He took his life. He was just a young kid in college. This law could save people's lives.
I’m a retired trauma surgeon(40 years). It’s wrong and expensive in dollars and lives not to support this smart and important bill. You’d be convinced to support HB56 if you would come with me to the ER at 2 am to see the victims and perpetrators. Some of those victims were accidental, some intentional. You have to see the insanity before turning down this bill. I’ll take you to see yourself. Use common sense and wisdom.
This Bill will negatively effect my 2nd amendment rights. Thank you.
I, Nathan Deady, officially express opposition to this bill. I view it as a direct infringement on our second amendment right, and is antithetical to our great state’s values.
Passage of this bill will undoubtedly save lives. Therefore, I wholeheartedly support its passage.
I believe this is an infringement of our second amendment rights and will hurt the state as a whole. We do not need more gun control in the state of New Hampshire.
I think it’s very reasonable for there to be background checks and waiting periods for gun purchases.
A three day waiting period protects both the individual looking to purchase a firearm and the general public— a sale of a firearm without a waiting period presents disproportionate risks to those struggling with mental health, especially veterans or sufferers of PTSD. A three day waiting period would grant what those lost to suicide no longer have: time. Time to think, time to get support, time to find an alternate, safer course of action. If a threat is so imminent that a three day waiting period is a conflict to a potential buyer, then that is where law enforcement serves as a valuable resource. Individuals have the right to bear arms and to equip themselves for self defense, and this bill does not deny this right. Rather, it protects it, but helping reduce the chance of guns falling into the arms of those ill fitted to hold them. This law has the capability to save a life and, even if just one, that should be all the reason to see this passed and implemented into law. Let NH become a safer place for all citizens: gun owning and not.
A 3 day waiting period would give a suicidal person a chance to get help. It would not unduly impact other buyers.
It is important to have a waiting period to buy a firearm. A waiting period will give the buyer a chance to calm down if they are buying the firearm because of a stressful situation. This could help prevent suicide as well as murder
Absolutely in support of this bill to save lives. In loving memory of Nate Morin and so many more.
Gun violence is ever increasing. I no longer go to any activities that involve large groups of people for fear of guns showing up everywhere. Common sense gun laws to include background checks, waiting periods are common sense. Protect the public!!! Please pass common sense gun laws! My right to feel safe, be safe out in public supersedes some troubled persons right to buy a gun.
This bill runs counter to the spirit of New Hampshire - Live Free or Die. This bill is the definition of government overreach that will only impact law-abiding citizens. I find it appalling that this bill was introduced in New Hampshire and am advocating for it to be defeated
Please support HB 56! This is a sensible, clear, rational bill that would help to promote safety for all New Hampshire residents and would impose no onerous or complicated barriers for law-abiding, rational prospective gun-owners. Including background checks and a waiting period before approving a person for gun ownership, the proposed law would provide a layer of safety that would not hurt anyone. Gun deaths by suicide and homicide as well as accidental shootings are far too prevalent in New Hampshire (as well as in the rest of our country), and we in New Hampshire can take this simple, uncomplicated, and reasonable step to make sure that guns do not fall into the hands of criminals who may use them to harm other people. Thank you..