I STRONGLY support making it easier for children to receive free and reduced price school meals.
HB703
House · 2025 sessionDemocraticKilled in HouseBanning school meal denial for debt
AIRequires school districts with USDA-approved meal programs to adopt policies barring the denial or stigmatization of meals for students with unpaid balances, and directs the department of education to cover unpaid school meal debt, with a $1 appropriation.
relative to prohibiting school districts from denying meals to students with unpaid meal balances, and making an appropriation therefor.
Status
Killed in the House — Inexpedient to Legislate · March 13, 2025- ✓Introduced
- ✕House
- Senate
- Governor
- Law
Division of testimony
298 submissionsArgument digest · AI-generated
from 55 of 55 written submissionsHB703 would prohibit school districts from denying meals to students over unpaid meal balances and appropriates funds to help schools cover related costs. The large majority of submitters support the bill, arguing that denying or stigmatizing hungry children over their parents' unpaid debt is shameful and harms children who bear no responsibility for it, while a small number of school-finance-focused submitters oppose it, warning that removing debt-collection tools will burden district budgets and taxpayers.
- No child should be denied a meal over unpaid debtSupport21 of 55 reviewed
Submitters assert a basic moral obligation that schools feed every student regardless of family finances, arguing children should never be denied food because of an unpaid balance.
“No child should be denied school lunches. NH is behind the times in terms of helping end food insecurity for children.”
— Rebecca Buzzell, Strafford · #366463 — read full submission →
“I oppose this bill because NO CHILD SHOULD BE DENIED STUDENT MEALS! What is wrong with the person/people who wrote this bill?”
— Resta Detwiler, Littleton · #367819 — read full submission →
“Although more is needed to comply with decades' worth of court rulings, this bill is a move in the right direction.”
— Mary Wilke, CONCORD · #379877 — read full submission →
- Denying or singling out students for unpaid balances is shamingSupport12 of 55 reviewed
Submitters argue practices like alternate meals, separate lines, or public announcements about unpaid balances humiliate and stigmatize children in front of their peers, and that such shaming is harmful and should be eliminated.
“Some of the activities restricted in this bill would be considered harassment. It is time to treat students, who are children and minors, with respect and dignity.”
— Claudia Istel, Acworth, NH · #378346 — read full submission →
“If a student is denied lunch, other students are aware of it. This creates humiliating shame for the student being denied lunch. That shame is deep and lasting.”
— Karl Johnson, Monroe · #375714 — read full submission →
“Eliminate meal shaming practices: Such as separate meal lines, alternate meals, or public announcements regarding unpaid balances.”
— Nicole Benson, Newmarket · #368793 — read full submission →
- Children shouldn't be punished for their parents' financial situationSupport9 of 55 reviewed
Submitters argue that unpaid meal debt is a family financial matter, not the child's fault, and that children should not bear the consequences of their parents' inability to pay.
“There are so many reasons a bill may not get paid, and regardless the kid needs to eat and not be shamed.”
— Sarah Wills, Westmoreland · #367113 — read full submission →
“It's not the kid's fault if balances are unpaid. Find another way to collect rather than letting kids starve.”
— Heather Gollnick, GOFFSTOWN · #362727 — read full submission →
“I support this bill because I think it's wrong to punish families who are burdened financially. Denying food to a family struggling to make ends meet is draconian.”
— Sarah Rockwell, Milford · #378617 — read full submission →
- Hunger undermines children's ability to learnSupport9 of 55 reviewed
Submitters argue that hungry students cannot focus or succeed academically, and that ensuring consistent access to meals supports better educational outcomes.
“When children are properly fed, they are healthier, happier, and better able to focus on their studies. This ultimately contributes to improved academic outcomes, greater opportunities for personal growth, and a stronger foundation for future success”
— Melissa Hansen, Portsmouth · #372334 — read full submission →
“Students cannot learn if they are hungry. It's imperative that an appropriation be made to so that schools will not deny food to children with unpaid balances on their accounts.”
— Nancy Miles, Hanover · #379846 — read full submission →
“Food prices are increasing, making it increasingly difficult to provide for a household and manage expenses such as housing and utilities. Hungry children don't learn well and all children deserve to eat.”
— Jennifer Corbit, Londonderry · #368807 — read full submission →
- Bill would ease broader financial strain on low-income familiesSupport4 of 55 reviewed
Submitters argue guaranteed school meals help struggling, disabled, or low-income families stay afloat more broadly, freeing up money for rent, heat, and other essentials.
“Many families in New Hampshire live in circumstances in which having the school provide at least one meal per school day would greatly aid their abilities to provide for their families in other ways such as paying rent for shelter, paying for heat, etc.”
— Chase Eagleson, Concord · #373792 — read full submission →
“For families of lower income, this type of meal program makes a big difference in whether they can make ends meet each month, including whether they can afford their rent.”
— Carmen Lorentz, Laconia · #359402 — read full submission →
- Concern that the bill's appropriation is too smallSupport3 of 55 reviewed
Some supporters worry the funding provided by the bill is inadequate to meaningfully cover unpaid meal debt, questioning whether a token appropriation would leave the bill as a symbolic gesture rather than an effective fix.
“My only concern is the initial funding. Why only one dollar? I hope that this doesn't make this bill just a statement with no real effect.”
— James Mason, Hancock · #366300 — read full submission →
“Currently, the schools struggle to cover these expenses which if not paid by donations, become a line on the school budget. I'm not sure about an appropriation as this money would come from something else.”
— Michael Cahill, Newmarket · #364826 — read full submission →
- Personal reliance on similar family food assistanceSupport1 of 55 reviewed
A submitter shares personal experience as a working parent relying on food assistance to feed her children, underscoring how important such support is for working families.
- Removing debt-collection tools harms school nutrition budgetsOppose1 of 55 reviewed
A school nutrition director argues that while no child should be denied a meal, requiring schools to serve all students without any mechanism to recover unpaid balances creates unintended financial consequences for districts and their nutrition programs.
- Cost of uncollected debt should not shift to taxpayers/DOEOppose1 of 55 reviewed
A submitter opposes barring schools from attempting to collect unpaid meal fees and objects to having the state (taxpayers) cover uncollected balances and fund a new program specialist position, arguing families who can afford to pay for meals should do so.
Generated by claude-sonnet-5 (claude code agent) on Jul 22, 2026. Quotes are verbatim excerpts, verified against the cited submission before publication. Summaries are AI interpretation of the record, not part of it.
It’s very simple. We need to feed the children in schools in order to help them grow and learn. Studies show hungry children don’t succeed as well as well nourished children. We need to feed all children. I support this bill
Children shouldn't have to go hungry because parents can't pay
Should we let children in need go hungry?
Although more is needed to comply with decades' worth of court rulings, this bill is a move in the right direction.
Students cannot learn if they are hungry. It's imperative that an appropriation be made to so that schools will not deny food to children with unpaid balances on their accounts.
Let's not make kids go hungry because their parents failed to pay the bill. That is absurd. Please pass this bill!
All children deserve access to healthy food, regardless of the income of their parents or guardians. Research suggests, and teachers will confirm, that students who are well fed have better academic outcomes than those who don't. Children also should not be penalized with the inability to graduate, attend field trips, or be required to do extra work than their peers to pay down their "lunch debt" solely because of their parents' or guardians' financial hardship. I support this bill, and I encourage the committee to as well.
I support this bill
No child should go hungry at school. They are there to learn and make connections with other students, not to worry about whether or not they will receive lunch. Children are our future, let’s treat them with respect so they treat us with respect later.
It is extremely important that we recognize the contributions our public schools make to our community and show that support by increasing the per pupil cost from $4100 to $7356. This is long overdue.
It is extremely important that we recognize the contributions our public schools make to our community and show that support by increasing the per pupil cost from $4100 to $7356. This is long overdue.
I agree with points a-e of this bill. I oppose prohibiting schools from making attempts to collect funds owed for lunches. I also oppose the idea that the NH DOE (i.e. the taxpayers) should be financially responsible for all uncollected meal fees plus additional fees to employ a new program specialist. I believe families that can afford school meals should pay for school meals.
It is extremely important that we recognize the contributions our public schools make to our community and show that support by increasing the per pupil cost from $4100 to $7356. This is long overdue.
The fact that this bill is even an issue is shameful. How can anyone deny food to kids because their families can't afford to pay? I am disgusted to live in a state DELIBERATELY running on fumes (-0$) and then claiming there isn't enough money to feed children.
We cannot deny children food.
Support all special Ed and school funding
it's shameful to think that a school district would deny food to students in need because of an unpaid bill. I support this bill because I think it's wrong to punish families who are burdened financially. Denying food to a family struggling to make ends meet is draconian.
There has to be a better way to make sure that students are fed at school than to deny them meals because their parents/guardians owe money on their meal tab or shame them by throwing their meal in the trash. or otherwise calling attention to them by any means that singles them out publicly or negatively impacts their education. Some of the activities restricted in this bill would be considered harassment. It is time to treat students, who are children and minors, with respect and dignity. Every interaction in school - and in life - can have a positive or negative impact, can be an opportunity to teach respect, responsibility, and compassion. What do we want children to learn by denying them a meal and publicly humiliating them and calling attention to their poverty? Being poor is not a sin. Shaming the child - and their parents - for not being able to afford a school meal isn't going to pay the bill. If you don't think their parents are already worrying about their children and their bills, then I ask you to put yourself in their place. We should be better than this, as this bill gives us an opportunity to be. Thank you to the sponsors for lifting up the need and giving the Granite State a means to show how to be compassionate and respectful. Also, let's feed the children so they are healthy and ready to learn.
Individuals who qualify for Medicaid should not be given additional obstacles and friction for assistance - they have already proven the need.
I'm testifying in support of HB703 because no child deserves to be punished for their financial situation. Students attending school to learn need to have proper nutrition, especially if they may not be encountering that at home.
Dear House Judiciary Committee members, I am opposed to bill HB476 that would further restrict abortion, reproductive healthcare, in New Hampshire. As you may know, 78% of New Hampshire citizens believe there should be a right to get an abortion, in every state of the U.S. Also, the great majority - I believe it is 68% - of us here in New Hampshire oppose a 15-week abortion ban. Therefore, your opposition to this bill would be representing the will of the people you represent. On a personal note, my niece was able to obtain an abortion after a rape that she would never have been able to prove, before Roe V. Wade was overturned. She went on to have to beautiful healthy boys. I believe all women and families should have that opportunity. Please oppose HB476 and support the health and welfare of New Hampshire families. Thank you for your service to the people of our State.
This bill is important to pass. Kids deserve to have a nutritious meal and not a cheese sandwich when their account is past due because their parents are struggling to keep up. Not only is not ok from a nutritious point of view but also from a social/emotional point of view as it's embarrassing when other kids notice.
Please help keep kids fed so they can learn to their potential!
No child should be shamed for not having the money to eat breakfast and lunch at school. They need nutrition in order to function and learn effectively. They should never feel embarrassed to access the same meals as every other kid in the program. They should certainly not be sent away from the line with a lesser meal. This would only encourage them not to ask for a meal at all, if there was a chance of being embarrassed in front of their peers.