I support this bill because it will allow more voters to vote in primary elections.
HB714
House · 2025 sessionDemocraticDied in HouseSingle combined primary ballot
AIReplaces separate party primary ballots with a single combined primary ballot for state and congressional offices, letting any registered voter select among all candidates regardless of party.
creating a single primary ballot.
Status
Died on the table in the House · March 13, 2025- ✓Introduced
- ✕House
- Senate
- Governor
- Law
Division of testimony
234 submissionsArgument digest · AI-generated
from 58 of 58 written submissionsHB714 would create a single primary ballot listing all candidates for an office regardless of party, with any registered voter able to vote for any candidate and the top finishers advancing to the general election. Supporters, including many undeclared/independent voters, argue it reduces polarization and gives NH's large bloc of undeclared voters full access to primary choices, while opponents argue it strips parties of control over their own nominating process and risks strategic manipulation or confusion.
- General appeal of more choice, simplicity, and fairnessSupport22 of 58 reviewed
Many submitters offer general support for a single ballot as simpler, fairer, and a move away from strict two-party control of elections, without elaborating a specific mechanism-based argument.
“I believe that passing this bill will provide a level playing field for elections by calling for the same filing requirements for all candidates, regardless of party affiliation or office”
— Laura Brown, DOVER · #473609 — read full submission →
“More efficient, less costly, less hassle.”
— Julie Girard, DEERFIELD · #462768 — read full submission →
- Gives undeclared/independent voters full access to primary choicesSupport10 of 58 reviewed
Submitters, many identifying as undeclared or independent voters, argue the bill removes the burden of picking a party ballot and the hassle of returning to undeclared status, benefiting NH's large undeclared voting bloc.
“At least 40% of New Hampshire's voters are registered as Undeclared! The other proposed bill to wipe out Undeclared voters from primaries is wrong”
— Sue Nastasi, Dover · #474946 — read full submission →
“As an "undeclared" voter I value the opportunity to assess all candidates, then choose whom I want to run in the general election.”
— Liz Tentarelli, Manchester · #465550 — read full submission →
- Reduces polarization by favoring more broadly representative candidatesSupport7 of 58 reviewed
Submitters argue that current low-turnout party primaries favor candidates catering to the most extreme 'party faithful,' and that an open single ballot would produce nominees who better reflect majority views.
“Our current system leads to both parties nominating candidates with the most extreme views - both extreme left and extreme right.”
— Mary Menzies, Littleton · #469713 — read full submission →
“This approach to voting is the best means for reducing the polarization in our state.”
— Jonathan Doherty, Hopkinton · #468856 — read full submission →
- Product of a bipartisan Citizens Assembly processSupport3 of 58 reviewed
Some submitters cite the bill's origin in New Hampshire's first Citizens Assembly, a bipartisan public deliberation process, as a point in its favor.
- Primaries should remain each party's internal nomination processOppose4 of 58 reviewed
Submitters argue that primaries exist for party members to choose their own party's candidates, and that opening them to all voters lets outsiders influence a party's nominee, which they characterize as unfair or 'mob rule.'
“Primaries have a purpose and that is to allow members of each party to select their own candidates according to their political philosophy, not mob rule.”
— Linda Kaiser, Amherst · #470162 — read full submission →
“The various political parties are private clubs. Why is the state involved in anything to do with how they pick their candidates?”
— Curtis Howland, Manchester · #466316 — read full submission →
- Risk of strategic manipulation or partisan gamingOppose3 of 58 reviewed
Submitters worry the system could be manipulated, for example by voters or sham candidates crossing over to weaken a rival party's field, and some question the motives of the bill's sponsors.
“The public wants to be able to choose between a Dem and a Republican and not have to deal with the type of manipulation that exists in places like Alaska.”
— Cathy Baker, Portsmouth · #477364 — read full submission →
“Democrats or other criminally minded individuals, who actually voted in the Republican primary, hoping to derail the process such that the weakest candidate in the party ends up going to the General Election”
— Robert Kenney, Strafford · #462790 — read full submission →
- Prefers the current semi-open primary system / sees no need for changeOppose7 of 58 reviewed
A number of submitters simply prefer the existing primary system, argue it already works, or express general skepticism without a specific mechanism-based objection.
“A solution looking for a problem, this bill will reduce voter respect for, and participation in, the primary process.”
— Ray Chadwick, Bedford · #473195 — read full submission →
“I've been voting in NH over 40 years and like the system the way it is.”
— Marlise Bryant, Hollis · #472579 — read full submission →
- Equates the proposal with Ranked Choice Voting problems elsewhereOppose2 of 58 reviewed
Some submitters describe the bill as a form of ranked-choice voting and cite perceived problems with similar systems in other states.
- Voters need party labels to make informed choicesOppose1 of 58 reviewed
At least one submitter argues that removing party affiliation from the ballot deprives voters of information needed to vote knowledgeably.
Generated by claude-sonnet-5 (claude code agent) on Jul 22, 2026. Quotes are verbatim excerpts, verified against the cited submission before publication. Summaries are AI interpretation of the record, not part of it.
It can be manipulated too easily. This is a bill put up by a Democrat political science professor at Dartmouth who knows full well this can be used to win elections for Democrats.
Kill this bill. The public wants to be able to choose between a Dem and a Republican and not have to deal with the type of manipulation that exists in places like Alaska. Putting up sham members of the other party to split the vote for example. Notice who is sponsoring this bill and ask if they have an agenda, they do.
I support having a single party election putting all candidates on a single primary ballot allowing registered voters to vote for any candidate that is on the ballot will allow for greater and more accurate choices by the voting public. This will put the power back into the hands of the citizen and away from the two party structure.
I love this bill.
HB714 is a very sensible to support. Picture election day and it has been an easy routine for Undeclared voters to choose on that day which party ballot to request. In order to return to Undeclared can take weeks! The software that replaced ElectNet had & still has problems to process voters' request to return to Undeclared. Often voters requests are not picked up to adjust at all OR "there's a computer problem and we can't do it" which is so unacceptable. At least 40% of New Hampshire's voters are registered as Undeclared! The other proposed bill to wipe out Undeclared voters from primaries is wrong; it is against the freedom of this state's voters to choose.
I support passage of this bill and the establishment of a Single Primary Ballot. I am a registered independent voter who feels that the democratic process must continue to be protected and promoted. This bill will promote more voter participation in casting ballots and running for office by citizens (particularly those that are not party affiliated). More voters will be encouraged to vote because they will not be restricted by party affiliation at the ballot box and they will be able to choose from the full slate of candidates for any given office. Additionally, independent candidates will be encouraged to run as the playing field will be more level for initiating a campaign for elected office. They will also have full access to be supported by ALL voters regardless of party affiliation. The current dominant two-party system seems to discourage voters by making it difficult to vote for the candidate they feel best suited for the job regardless of their party. For example, a voter may like the Republican candidate for representative, but the Democratic candidate for state attorney general, but they are given only a single party ballot so they cannot truly choose who they feel is BEST for each position. New Hampshire continues to have a significant independent voter group that needs to have fair representation and access to political positions and processes in ALL elections and the Single Ballot Primary will help promote and ensure this.
Allowing the voters more information for when they vote should be common sense. We should be able to see all of our options and creating a single primary ballot will achieve that.
This is a form of Rank Choice Voting!! A system that has been hijacked in the states of CA, ME, AK and NY. There should always be separate primaries for all parties. There should always be a representative chosen from each party that will be reflected at the general election. One party rule only works for the party in power. Not the will of We The People.
The hyperpartisan nature of our politics, and people's general distain for it, feeds into people's mistrust of our electoral process. Here in New Hampshire, where there is a strong independent tradition of people voting across parties, it makes sense to simplify voting by using a single party ballot in state and congressional primaries. As New Hampshire Together's citizen assembly helped find, people across parties and positions agree that an open primary system would best serve New Hampshire by reducing polarization and giving voters more meaningful choices. I urge you to study and support this bill. Let's make democracy work better for the people of New Hampshire.
This bill is simply absurd. Voters need to know the party affiliation of candidates in order to make informed choices.
I believe that passing this bill will provide a level playing field for elections by calling for the same filing requirements for all candidates, regardless of party affiliation or office; and to require all candidates to be listed on a single ballot without reference to party, except when the candidate chooses to do so. I would like to vote for a candidates of my choice, that aligns with my views. And that is not always along one party line. This two party system is narrow minded and needs to be amended. I believe that we need to consider, with any law we pass, that no group of people should suffer while others thrive. The single ballot does not favor any one side. And, in fact, it creates less division among the people of NH. Thanks you, Laura
Dear members of the Election Law Committee, I believe that HB 714 is a step in the right direction for New Hampshire, and I urge your support of this bill. The goal in any election is that the best person be elected to represent their community or district or region in the office that is being contested. The voters do and should care about the candidates position on key issues. However, objectively, that is not to say that all the members of one political party are right and the members of another party are wrong. With the passage of HB 714, all voters will be able to consider all candidates, without being restricted to one party's ballot or another. Some voters will still remain loyal to a political party, and that is clearly their prerogative. With the passage of HB 714, voters will not be obligated to remain loyal to one party or another, and that is a freedom that all New Hampshire voters deserve. If you truly believe that electing the best candidate, regardless of party, is what we strive to accomplish in New Hampshire, then you will support HB 714. Thank you for your consideration.
HB172 Bars NH’s “undeclared” voters (40% of registered voters) from participating in primaries so this appears to be an improvement in our voting laws
This bill is dumber than dirt. We do not want to become California.
Semi-open primaries are a cornerstone of NH democracy. As an undeclared voter, I do not identify with either major party. Having the ability to vote in a primary gives me the ability to choose a candidate with a viable chance at winning a general election. This bill is voter suppression in a state that has always had a massive constituency of undeclared and independent voters.
A solution looking for a problem, this bill will reduce voter respect for, and participation in, the primary process. Not to mention diminishing the reputation of New Hampshire's First in the Nation Primary.
I not agree
I think having one ballot suits New Hampshires way of voting, will hopefully rule out any ballots being tossed, and have everyone have a fair chance at figuring out which person to vote for. Overall I hope this bill will help all ballots be treated fairly and equally while giving freedom to vote how a person would like to.
I support and appreciate that this bill is a step away from strict bipartisanship, a system that we know is not working in New Hampshire or nationally.
Leave the current process as is.
I've been voting in NH over 40 years and like the system the way it is.
This is voter suppression. You cannot force a group of people to pick a party as if it was the super bowl and you want them to pick a team. As long as they are not felons and are citizens, they have a right to vote on the same day as everyone else.
The primary system seems to be creating more polarized choices. I believe that a single ballot would help close the gap and give us candidates that appears to the majority, not the extremes.
Vote Free or Die! This excellent bill will allow voters to assess each candidate no matter where they lie on the party spectrum.