Strongly in favor of this bill!
HCR7
House · 2025 sessionDemocraticDied in HouseProtecting abortion access resolution
AIDeclares that an individual's right to terminate a pregnancy before 24 weeks gestation shall not be denied or infringed in New Hampshire and directs copies be sent to federal and state officials.
recognizing abortion as a critical component of comprehensive reproductive health care.
Status
Died on the table in the House · March 20, 2025- ✓Introduced
- ✕House
- Senate
- Adopted
Division of testimony
2,818 submissionsArgument digest · AI-generated
from 303 of 786 written submissionsHCR7 is a House Concurrent Resolution declaring that abortion is a critical component of comprehensive reproductive health care and affirming that an individual's right to terminate a pregnancy before 24 weeks gestation should not be denied or infringed. The large majority of submitters support the resolution, framing abortion as essential health care and personal autonomy that New Hampshire law does not yet explicitly protect, while a smaller group opposes it on the grounds that abortion ends a human life and should not be classified as health care.
- Reproductive decisions are a matter of bodily autonomySupport61 of 303 reviewed
Supporters argue that decisions about pregnancy belong to the individual, not the government, often invoking New Hampshire's "Live Free or Die" motto as a reason personal medical choices should be free from political interference.
“New Hampshire’s motto, Live Free or Die, is a declaration of personal liberty and self-determination. That freedom must include the right for women to make their own reproductive choices without government interference.”
— Margaret Barry, Hebron · #476254 — read full submission →
“Please protect women’s rights and leave the current rules in place. We need people to hold to their campaign promises and not get pushed around.”
— Bridget Labrie, Enfield · #472263 — read full submission →
- Abortion is essential health care decided by patient and doctorSupport74 of 303 reviewed
Supporters describe abortion as a necessary component of medical care that should be decided between a patient and their physician, not dictated by lawmakers who lack medical expertise.
“Abortion is healthcare. Medical decisions should be made by a patient and their doctor, not by the government.”
— Sarah Nolan, Litchfield · #478253 — read full submission →
“I firmly believe that women have the right to make their own healthcare choices, and abortion is a healthcare decision.”
— Catherine Lanigan, Peterborough · #470734 — read full submission →
- Personal accounts of medically necessary abortion careSupport52 of 303 reviewed
Many supporters describe their own or a loved one's experience needing abortion-related care for miscarriage management, ectopic pregnancy, fatal fetal anomalies, life-threatening complications, or pregnancy resulting from rape or abuse, arguing these situations show why access must remain protected.
“I myself lost a baby at 16 weeks due to a blood clot that developed in my placenta. Afterward I need healthcare in order to discharge the fetus from my body.”
— Beverly Pietlicki, Loudon · #469961 — read full submission →
“I was fortunate that I had the freedom of choice and not forced to bear the child of sexual abuse.”
— Molly Campbell, Conway · #480044 — read full submission →
- NH is the only New England state without explicit protectionsSupport23 of 303 reviewed
Supporters note New Hampshire is the only New England state without abortion rights explicitly codified in law or its constitution, leaving access dependent on the outcome of each election rather than settled as a protected right.
“New Hampshire is the only state in New England where abortion is not a protected right.”
— Catherine Lanigan, Peterborough · #470734 — read full submission →
“the outcome of each and every State election could decide whether or not we loose our rights.”
— Christine Kelsall, Bedford · #475768 — read full submission →
- Holds lawmakers to their campaign promisesSupport14 of 303 reviewed
Supporters argue many legislators and the Governor campaigned on not further restricting abortion, and that passing HCR7 would be a way to fulfill those promises in law.
- Polling shows broad public support for abortion rightsSupport12 of 303 reviewed
Supporters cite polling indicating roughly 78% of Granite Staters or Americans believe there should be a right to abortion, arguing the legislature should reflect that public consensus.
- Restricting abortion makes it more dangerous, not less commonSupport11 of 303 reviewed
Supporters argue that banning or restricting abortion does not eliminate the need for it, but instead forces people into unsafe or desperate circumstances.
- Restrictions disproportionately harm marginalized communitiesSupport5 of 303 reviewed
Some supporters argue that barriers to abortion access fall hardest on people with low incomes, people of color, and rural residents who already face obstacles to health care.
- Abortion ends a human life and is not health careOppose22 of 303 reviewed
Opponents argue that abortion intentionally ends a human life beginning at conception, characterizing it as killing rather than health care and objecting to the resolution's framing.
“Abortion or the deliberate attempt to end any life is NOT health care. It is murder.”
— Diane Monico, Laconia · #470400 — read full submission →
“Abortion is murder. Period. Life begins at conception. The only expected outcome of a pregnancy is a human life.”
— Michael LeNeave, Amherst · #473254 — read full submission →
- Frames abortion as a lifestyle choice taxpayers shouldn't fundOppose4 of 303 reviewed
Opponents argue abortion is a personal lifestyle decision rather than medical necessity, and object to any public or taxpayer funding supporting it.
- Adoption and support for mothers as alternativesOppose3 of 303 reviewed
Opponents suggest resources should go toward supporting pregnant women and connecting them with adoption rather than toward abortion access.
“We can ensure mothers safety, care for her when she is struggling help her to adopt her baby out IF necessary and always remove the baby if they are dying or dead in the womb.”
— Alina Rapaj, Dover · #480250 — read full submission →
“Adoption not abortion”
— Save A life, Babies · #471027 — read full submission →
- Abortion should be rare, limited to exceptional circumstancesOppose1 of 303 reviewed
At least one opponent argues abortion should remain legal only in narrow circumstances such as rape, incest, or to save the mother's life, rather than being broadly affirmed as HCR7 proposes.
- Not a constitutional right; resolution is politically motivatedOppose2 of 303 reviewed
Opponents argue that since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, abortion is not a constitutional right, and characterize HCR7 as a politically motivated measure rather than a health care necessity.
“Abortion is not a right as SCOTUS determined in throwing out the Roe v Wade debacle.”
— Daniel DaSilva, Manchester · #478800 — read full submission →
“This is politically motivated by Democrats who want to keep their seats and not based on what is best for the American people.”
— Michaeleen Cook, Waterville Valley · #476205 — read full submission →
- Brief opposition without elaborationOppose4 of 303 reviewed
A number of opponents registered opposition to the bill with a short statement and no detailed reasoning provided.
Generated by claude-sonnet-5 (claude code agent) on Jul 20, 2026. Quotes are verbatim excerpts, verified against the cited submission before publication. Summaries are AI interpretation of the record, not part of it.
Abortions are in all too many situations a critically important measure to protect womens' health. While no one is particularly happy about them, they must remain an option when medically necessary to ensure a woman's safety.
Abortion is a critical aspect to women's healthcare and that decision should be left between her and her doctor.
"Live free or die." - our state motto. One of the things I prize most about our state is our commitment to freedom. Freedom of expression, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of choice. And yes, I do believe this must include the right to abortion access. Whether a pregnancy is maintained until term or ended early is a decision that should be between the mother, the father (assuming it was not a case of rape or incest), and her healthcare provider. In many cases, abortion is a critical healthcare decision. In the land of the free, we should be exactly that - free.
HCR 7 affirms the position that NH will not further restrict abortion, which is what many lawmakers promised on the campaign trail. The more we can affirm by law that there will be no further restrictions to reproductive care, the harder it will be for certain lawmakers to push more bans and anti-choice legislation, like the 15-week ban they just tried to pass last month. This bill would add an element of protection (or at least precedent) against that happening again.
The termination of pregnancy should be a private matter between a woman and her doctor.
While I am a firm believer that abortion is healthcare and should have absolutely no place in politics and anyone should have the right to an abortion as needed no matter at the point in the pregnancy, this is incredibly important for the women of New Hampshire to ensure they have a safe pregnancy. Statistically, pregnancies that are terminated beyond 16 weeks are mainly due to extreme life threatening complications to either the child or the mother. This bill ensures that those needing to terminate for these absolutely devastating reasons can do so safely without fearing legal backlash.
I believe every human has the right to body autonomy, and the government should not have the final say over what happens to someone else’s body.
Do not further restrict abortion. Access to all reproductive health care -- including abortion -- is crucial to women's health and economic security. Don't like abortion? Don't have one -- each woman can choose what's best for herself, in conjunction with medical advice from her doctor. Thank you. Your constituent, Rebecca Hedlund (Portsmouth)
Women are entitled to body autonomy. People who are already here, existing and living and breathing can’t use our body parts for survival without our consent even after death. If I am not an organ donor and my family doesn’t agree you can’t harvest my organs even if you will die without having them. How is it that I have less body autonomy when I am alive than I would after death?
I agree with this affirmation that NH will not further restrict abortion. My votes at the polls reflected the candidates campaign promises.
Women in NH and all states deserve the freedom and right to determine what is best for their body, mind and wellbeing. Medical decisions should be left between a women and her doctor without fear of governmental consequences. I fully support HCR7.
I strongly support this bill and implore it's passage. Reproductive rights are inexorably tied to bodily autonomy - and nothing is more "live free and die" than the right to control over one's body.
I fully support this bill. Please see to it that our mothers and daughters are ACTUALLY cared for in our state.
Introducing HCR 7 Good afternoon, Chairman McDonald and committee members. I’m proud to introduce HCR 7, a simple and straightforward resolution that allows our constituents to clearly see where the New Hampshire House stands on the right to abortion before 24 weeks of pregnancy. I have heard from so many constituents that they do not want any further restrictions on abortion in New Hampshire. I know many of my colleagues have, as well. We know a supermajority of Granite Staters want their lawmakers to take proactive action on abortion rights in New Hampshire. NH is the only state in New England that doesn’t have the right to abortion clearly spelled out in our state law or state constitution. This lack of clarity is confusing for Granite Staters, and it is our job, as lawmakers, to be clear. What HCR 7 does is clearly show our constituents what our House position is on abortion: that an individual’s ability to access abortion before 24 weeks of pregnancy shall not be denied or infringed upon by the government. We saw how important abortion was in the 2024 election. So many of us running for office promised on the campaign trail to not further restrict abortion in New Hampshire. Now, it’s time to put those words into action. New Hampshire, for so long, has had a long, proud, bipartisan tradition of supporting reproductive rights by voting against harmful legislation. It is important to vote against abortion restrictions and bans, but it's not enough. We, as an elected body, need to show Granite Staters our values, our priorities, and our firm and clear position. We can do that by passing HCR 7. I respectfully urge you to vote Ought to Pass on HCR 7 reflecting a commitment and an action to not further restrict abortion in New Hampshire. Respectfully submitted, Rep. Alexis Simpson Rockingham 33 Exeter, Newfields, Newmarket, & Stratham
As a primary care physician in the Seacoast for 25 years, what a person chooses to do with their body is their own fundamental right. Much deliberation and shared decision making is part of one's health care decisions. Having access and the option is an individual's right. Pregnancy termination is not a simple decision and not having abortion as a component of comprehensive health care can endanger the person carrying the pregnancy.
New Hampshire needs to get with the rest of New England and codify abortion access into state law. It is embarrassing that this is still up for debate.
The ability for a person and family to determine their reproductive outcome is vital to ensuring appropriate healthcare access. Please don't leave access to this capability in the hands on of non-medical officials looking to pander to folks.
I support this bill because I think that an individual's right to terminate their own pregnancy, prior to 24 weeks gestation, shall not be denied or infringed upon in this states. I think that this decision should be made by the woman and her doctor. The right to an abortion in the case of a miscarriage is critical to a woman's life.
keep the goverment out of womens rights only women can make that choice
Health care decisions should be left to health care professionals and their patients. Protecting access to abortion at the state level is an important way to ensure that NH citizens retain the right to make their own health care decisions. If you believe that limited government is an important NH value then health care decisions should not be left to legislators.
I dearly wish I could have testified in person for this bill. It restores the protection women had under Roe v Wade. As an RN who worked for 15+ years in inpatient maternity/labor/NICU care, I cannot state strongly enough that pregnancy is infinitely more complicated than most people realize. Yes, the majority of pregnancies and births are "uneventful", medically. But when something goes wrong, it goes wrong unexpectedly and rapidly, with high stakes outcomes: women die; women rupture a uterus and become infertile; women become life-threateningly septic (and so do their babies); terrible fetal malformities are discovered, which are incompatible with life outside the womb; SO MANY other terrible outcomes. Which is why it is so critically important that the government NOT be involved in pregnancy care decisions. OB-GYNs have years and years of education and training to deal with emergencies and complications as they arise. Having to work around the government banning certain procedures can tie their hands. We've seen the stories coming out of the south about women dying, almost dying, ending up with lifelong cardiac problems, becoming infertile, etc. Most of these horrible outcomes could be prevented by just letting doctors do their jobs without government interference before 24 weeks. The reality is that 93% of abortions occur during the first trimester (up to 13 weeks). 6% occur from weeks 14-20. About 1% occur after 20 weeks. (Data from CDC and Pew Research) That 1% seems to be the focus of most concerned people - and that 1% are the life-threatening, unexpected, devastating cases that usually require speedy emergency care. I promise you, no MD worth their license is just allowing women to come into a clinic and say, "I've changed my mind about this pregnancy" that late in the second trimester. Doctors need to be able to respond to these pregnancy emergencies without waiting for a callback from a lawyer. The women of NH deserve the basic protection of letting them make medical decisions with their doctors. This may be one of the most important pieces of legislation this year. Please let the women and doctors of NH manage pregnancy without unnecessary government interference. Thank you.
It is disappointing that there are no men joining to co-sponsor this bill. I am one of thousands of men who support it in NH.
Abortions saves lives!
I am a Republican who support reproductive rights and am increasingly concerned by the parties move to the extreme on this issue. I also do not appreciate politicians being vague or even supportive on these rights when campaigning, but then adopting such extreme positions after they are in office. This is a bait and switch, pure and simple and myself and many fellow citizens are already sick of it. The more we can affirm by law that there will be no further restrictions to reproductive care, the harder it will be for two-faced, extremist politicians to push more bans and anti-choice legislation, like the 15-week ban they just tried to pass last month. This bill would add an element of protection (or at least precedent) against that happening again.