I am currently a student in the state of New Hampshire. I am not originally from New Hampshire, but I spend most of my year in this state. I am taking courses in the fall and spring, and I will soon be taking classes in the summer meaning I will be here the entire year. Most students spend the majority of their year here in New Hampshire. I registered as a New Hampshire voter four years ago when I started university. Those who call New Hampshire their home for the majority of the year deserve to have their voices heard. This bill targets an entire generation of voters. It is unconstitutional to take away mine and my peers' rights to vote in a state we reside in for most of our years simply through the fact that our driver's licenses do not say "New Hampshire" at the top. I live in New Hampshire. I learn in New Hampshire. And I deserve to have a voice in matters of elections.
SB223
Senate · 2026 sessionRepublicanSigned into lawStricter photo ID for voting
AILimits voter identification at the polls to only the specific photo ID forms listed in statute and repeals the requirement that the education department supply the secretary of state a list of certain higher education schools.
(Second New Title) relative valid photo identification for purposes of obtaining a ballot and relative to the production of lists of certain schools of higher education.
Status
Signed into law · July 9, 2026- ✓Introduced
- ✓Senate
- ✓House
- ✓Governor
- ✓Law
Division of testimony
210 submissionsArgument digest · AI-generated
from 54 of 54 written submissionsWritten testimony on SB223, which would bar student photo IDs from being used to obtain a ballot, comes almost entirely from opponents. Opponents argue the bill would suppress or discourage student and young-voter turnout, contend voter fraud is exceedingly rare and does not justify the change, and say student IDs are already rigorously vetted and adequate for identification; some also object that the bill improperly links voting eligibility to in-state tuition rules. No submissions in this sample expressed support for the bill.
- Bill suppresses/discourages student and youth votingOppose44 of 54 reviewed
Submitters describe the bill as a voter-suppression or disenfranchisement effort that creates unnecessary barriers and discourages students and young people from voting, and argue NH should instead make voting easier and encourage youth civic participation.
“I oppose SB 223 because it deliberately targets college students by removing their IDs from the list of acceptable voter identification, even though they are legally eligible to vote.”
— Kathleen Malsbenden, Newmarket · #658961 — read full submission →
“But with this bill you make it harder for young people to exercise their right to vote. It is not only discriminatory and unfair.”
— Debora Hatcher, Dover · #658290 — read full submission →
“This bill has nothing to do with election security and everything to do with trying to suppress their voting rights.”
— Carla MacDonald, Charlestown · #659207 — read full submission →
- No evidence of voter fraud justifying the restrictionOppose12 of 54 reviewed
Submitters argue that voter fraud, including any involving students, is exceedingly rare in New Hampshire, citing low conviction numbers, so there is no problem the bill actually solves.
“As stated by the Secretary of State's office, there is no evidence of systemic voter fraud. Between 2016 and 2024, the state won around 15 voter fraud convictions.”
— Patricia Anastasia, Londonderry · #658709 — read full submission →
“This bill is not about addressing voter fraud which research has shown over and over again is very rare. This bill is about Voter Suppression and making it difficult for college students to vote.”
— Louise Ewing, Antrim · #658555 — read full submission →
“There is no reason not to accept a student photo I D for voter verification; there is solid verified evidence that there is not a voter fraud issue.”
— Mary Livingston, Langdon · #657991 — read full submission →
- Student IDs are already rigorously vetted and adequateOppose9 of 54 reviewed
Submitters argue that colleges verify substantial personal and financial information before issuing student IDs, making them a reliable and sufficiently secure form of identification for voting purposes.
“Colleges and universities don't just hand out student ID's to anyone. The student has provided a lot of personal and financial information to the school that is verified before an ID is issued.”
— Louise Ewing, Antrim · #658555 — read full submission →
“They are adequate identification for everything else! Students are vetted very carefully on campuses, so this is not an area where fraud would be happening.”
— Deborah McCarter, Goffstown · #658979 — read full submission →
“Student IDs are reliable forms of ID. Students meet specific qualifications to hold one. Student IDs should be allowed as verification of ID for voting purposes.”
— Linda Bundy, Antrim · #658846 — read full submission →
- NH needs to retain young people and studentsOppose4 of 54 reviewed
Submitters argue New Hampshire's economy and communities depend on keeping young people and students in the state, and that adding voting obstacles makes the state less welcoming and could drive them away.
“NH needs to encourage young people to stay in the state. Roadblocks to voting make NH hostile to the young people we want to stay in our state.”
— Patricia Anastasia, Londonderry · #658709 — read full submission →
“NH needs young people. Our businesses, our economy, our communities should be supporting them.”
— Debora Hatcher, Dover · #658290 — read full submission →
- Bill improperly conflates voting with in-state tuitionOppose4 of 54 reviewed
Submitters object that the bill mixes voter eligibility rules with in-state tuition status, which they argue are separate systems that should not be tied together.
“Voting and in-state tuition rules are separate, and this bill creates unnecessary barriers, turning away eligible voters and sending the message that some voters are less welcome than others.”
— Kathleen Malsbenden, Newmarket · #658961 — read full submission →
“It also ties voting to in-state tuition rules. Mixing two completely different systems. Voting and tuition are not the same thing.”
— Marie Straiton, Pembroke · #658858 — read full submission →
- Students domiciled in NH have a right to vote hereOppose3 of 54 reviewed
Submitters argue that students who live in New Hampshire for most of the year are legitimate residents entitled to vote there, regardless of what their driver's license or ID indicates.
- Alternative ID options impose unfair cost burdenOppose1 of 54 reviewed
A submitter argues that if a photo ID is required to vote, it should be provided free of charge, since not all students can afford to obtain a driver's license or passport.
- Bill reflects partisan motivationOppose2 of 54 reviewed
A small number of submitters characterize the bill as a partisan effort targeting particular voters rather than a genuine election-integrity measure.
“This is a blatantly partisan attack on student voting rights in New Hampshire. Voting is a right, not something reserved for members of a particular political party.”
— Alex Marshall, Durham · #658354 — read full submission →
“Another law trying to limit voting aimed at Democrats”
— Cindy Deal, New Hampton · #658271 — read full submission →
Generated by claude-sonnet-5 (claude code agent) on Jul 22, 2026. Quotes are verbatim excerpts, verified against the cited submission before publication. Summaries are AI interpretation of the record, not part of it.
This is an unnecessary and restrictive effort to restrict the ability of students' ability to vote. Our goal should be push for our young citizens to become involved in our electoral process, and to make this reasonable and as easy as possible for them. - Students are already required to provide documentation to register to vote - showing their student ID at the polls is simply to match them with the info on the Registered Voters List. This would be simply more bureaucratic overhead designed to suppress young peoples' ability to vote. - Voter fraud has been shown to be almost non-existent in New Hampshire, and there is no evidence of any voter fraud in NH involving students, - Instead of adding to our bureaucractic overload, let's recognize this bill for what it is, and get on with the legitimate business in New Hampshire that really demands attention. - This sort of legislation will only serve to give New Hampshire a bad name, and perhaps drive potential students away from attending college in our state.
Voting is important in a Democracy and we should be encouraging young people to vote rather than making it more difficult.
As a Deputy Registrar I oppose this bill. I have seen the turnout of young voters excited to exercise their civic duties and this bill will put an unnecessary obstacle in their way. As the First in the Nation we should be encouraging young voters to get involved in this process as best we can.
This bill serves only to disenfranchise students. Why is such a discriminatory bill even being considere? Shame on those who support limiting democracy by, in essence, limiting voting rights.
If you were still in college - proud to be there, and to have earned your college ID - you would want to use that ID when you vote. If you were smart enough to vote at college age, why don't you want current college students to vote?
This would result in voter discrimination.
This bill discourages young people from participating in our democracy and is unnecessary as there is no evidence student IDs are being mis-used.
Make voting in NH more open and easy, not for difficult for any NH resident.
Democracy needs more voices in the voting booth, not fewer. Out students must learn they can and should vote. We must include student ID as acceptable to the voting commission to hear more voices.
I oppose this because it is a voter suppression bill.
Our children are no less citizens just because they choose to attend college. This bill has nothing to do with election security and everything to do with trying to suppress their voting rights.
Just like HB 323 WHICH WAS ITL IN NOVEMBER, SB223 would also ban student IDs for voting purposes if passed. The Senate Election Law Committee gave this bill a recommendation of Inexpedient to Legislate back in November—and many of you even sent thank you emails! However, in January, that recommendation was set aside after Chairman Gray was asked to vote it down so an amendment could be made (removing the provision related to granting in-state tuition to students registered to vote in NH). This is another attempt at voter suppression in NH.
I think this bill discriminates against students while I think they should be encouraged to participate in our democracy by voting.
This would unnecessarily disenfranchise young voters for no reason. Removing student IDs as a valid form of identification discourages young NH residents from doing their civic duties. Don't support this bill.
We should be encouraging young people to vote and take part in civic life, instead of trying to make it impossible for them to do so.
I oppose this bill.
The United States has a very very low rate of election fraud. Trump insisted after the election of 2020 that there had been massive fraud. Endless recounts and researches were done all over the country. A very minimal amount of fraud was found. Trump, whose poll numbers are low and declining, is worried his party may not do well in the midterms. He is promoting "election security" and the "Save Act". We don't need it. He could use it to try to steal the election.
The law is clear - student IDs are proof of domicile.
While you may not read the comments. We need young people to stay in NH to help the economy. Helping our future economy is much more important of the un-proven risk of letting students use Student ID's to vote. Your focus should be to get more people participating in our democracy. How many people that want to participate would commit a crime to "influence" and election if they should not be voting
Just another attempt at voter disenfranchisement in NH. Vote no on this bill.
I am opposed to not allowing student ID for voting.
We should not be making it harder for students to vote.
I oppose prohibiting the use of student IDs when voting. We should be encouraging young people to vote, not putting roadblocks in their way. Voting should be easy and accessible.
This bill places barriers to voting for college students and is discriminatory. A deliberate attempt to disenfranchise them. I am against this bill. Please vote against it.