NH House Testimony

SB285

Senate · 2025 sessionRepublicanSigned into law

Renaming physician assistant to associate

AI

Updates state laws to change the title "physician assistant" to "physician associate" without making substantive changes to the underlying law.

relative to changing the term "physician assistant" to "physician associate."

Occupational Regulation

Status

Signed into law · June 18, 2025
  1. Introduced
  2. Senate
  3. House
  4. Governor
  5. Law

Division of testimony

55 submissions
Support 45Oppose 10Neutral 0
Sarah ProulxSupportStratham, NHfor MyselfApr 16, 2025

I support this bill!

Robert MasseySupportDerry, NHfor MyselfApr 16, 2025

Honorable members, HB 285 seeks only to appropriately represent what the current title of "Physician Assistants" does not - it states that we work with physicians as part of a team ("associate"/collaborate with) and not just "assist" them... This title change would in no way increase our status, change who the head of a medical team would be (still a physician), or give us an expanded scope. We only wish to be able to adequately express to the community we serve what we actually are - Physician Associates, trained in the medical model to provide medical care in collaboration with physicians as needed. I thank you for your support of this bill.

Kellisue FriedmanSupportNorth Hampton, NHfor MyselfApr 16, 2025

I have been a PA for almost 30 years and have been so much more than an assistant. I support the name change to more fully describe our role in the health care community.

Cara WeinerSupportEnfield, NHfor MyselfApr 16, 2025

As a PA this bill will help support the advancement of our work and keep our job title relevant.

Joanne GuttSupportConcord, NHfor MyselfApr 16, 2025

As a longstanding certified PA, I strongly support this bill. The title change more accurately reflects our advanced degree, our important role in providing medical care, our prescriptive authority and our collaborative relationship with our physician colleagues. Joanne Gutt, PA-C, MSPA

Katherine GoodwinSupportLee, NHfor MyselfApr 16, 2025

I am a physician assistant in Manchester in family medicine. I attest the current professional title is very confusing to my patients. They often confuse me with a medical assistant and do not readily identify me as a medical provider. And if they do, they don’t realize that they won’t see a doctor after me (because “assistant” often indicates a supervisor or manager will come next). I think that this title change, while small, will create larger impacts in identifying our contribution to the healthcare field. As a provider that has her own panel of 1500 patients, I think a more respectful and responsible professional title will more accurately identify me to those I care for.

Alexandra CloughSupportConcord, NHfor MyselfApr 16, 2025

PAs are not assistants to physicians, we are advanced practice providers trained to evaluate, diagnose, and treat our patients independently! Our name should reflect that. To many people confuse us with medical assistants which are a very different role with different training involved.

Jonathan GottSupportManchester, NHfor MyselfApr 16, 2025

As a PA-C for 13 years I support this change. The word "assistant" has never done the profession justice and not infrequently while I practice independently, after having worked dependently while being trained for many years by senior physicians, patients in the granite state may be under the impression that I can not function autonomously at a high level but within our scope of practice, that I always check in with the MD or DO, or in some cases that I am a medical assistant or far less trained than say a Nurse Practitioner, none of which is true. This can be disorienting and confusing to patients before, during, and after visits though I don't mean to say always or mostly but when it does come up it takes up our incredibly limited time in the medical clinic to try and explain that you will get best care from us, just as you do from MD/DO, because just like an MD/DO if we don't have the exact correct answer we will find that answer via consult with our colleagues or specialists etc. Insurance companies will often have issues with our billing because they are made to be difficult and perseverate on the word 'assistant' and often demand an associated MD/DO's name even if that MD or DO was not involved in care. With the passage of HB1222 having insurance companies reimburse our services without a cosignature will go a long way to helping us to provide unfettered care to granite staters. As PA bills are proposed it is always worth mentioning that none of the recent legislation is meant to change anything that we haven't been doing for many years and that there are no data that maligns us with respect to delivering excellent patient care and outcomes. This bill will help us to continue to do so with less headaches but not change what we are already doing. I thank you for your consideration in approving the floor amendment that was proposed so that the entirety and spirit of this bill can move forward and I hope this finds you well . Best, Jonathan Gott

Kristin SchmidtSupportManchester, NHfor MyselfApr 16, 2025

Good afternoon. I just wanted to take a moment to write to you in support of SB285 relative to the title change from "Physician Assistant" to "Physician Associate". I have been practicing in Community Health in Manchester for the last 22 years. During these years I have had to explain many times to my patients that I am not the "doctor's assistant" but that I am a fully licensed medical provider that is able to diagnose, treat and counsel patients regarding medical issues. When the American Acadamy of Physician Assistants started to look at a title change prior to the COVID pandemic I recognized that this was an important step in helping our profession be better understood. Although many ideas were looked at ultimately the AAPA settled on Physician Associate and started the process for formal adoption of that name in 2021. Here we are 4 years later trying to bring our state in line with the national organization. I really struggle with why the NH Medical Society is opposed to this bill. Ultimately it does not hinder their ability to guide their members and is creating unnecessary anomisity amongst healthcare providers. There is a shift nationally when it comes to the provision of healthcare. There has been a slow, steady decline in the number of medical school graduates going into family medicine. My practice has had two open physician positions for over 18 months now that we have been unable to fill. During that same time I was able to hire 3 NPP providers (Nurse Practioners/Physician Associates(Assistants)) to meet the demand we have to provide primary care to the patients of our community. I am very thankful to work with a collaborative team of Medical Doctors, Doctors of Osteopathy, Nurse practitioners, Midwives and Physician Associates. I hope that you can put your support behind this important transition for our profession. Kristin Schmidt PA-C, AMD-NPP Amoskeag Health

Daniel FrazeeSupportAuburn, NHfor MyselfApr 16, 2025

We as a profession are simply aiming to follow the name of our governing body, the American Academy of Physician Associates. This does nothing to change any scope of practice within the state..

Jennifer VincentOpposeSalem, NHfor MyselfApr 16, 2025

We have an opportunity to stand by diversity, equity and inclusion. This is archaic and embarrassing. Everyone deserves basic human dignity, even when it comes to something as simple as using a bathroom.

Daniel RichardsonOpposeNashua, NHfor MyselfApr 16, 2025

Double Hell NO.

Margaret TrainorOpposeNashua, NHfor MyselfApr 16, 2025

I oppose implementing work requirements in a blanket fashion as each case has its own unique circumstances.

Richard JohnsonOpposeDunbarton, NHfor MyselfApr 16, 2025

The nomenclature for health care professionals has become very confusing to the public. Physician Assistant: clearly states the person's role in health care. This person is NOT a physician. Physician Associate: Misleads the public into thinking that this person is actually at some level a physician. Especially if the person in question has an advanced degree such as PhD, EdD or the like. These health care professionals are to be respected & appreciated for the value they bring to the table. But they are NOT physicians, and any words that mislead or confuse the public is NOT in the best interest of the public or the medical profession. Richard E. Johnson, MD, FACS

Robert BertiniSupportLondonderry, NHfor MyselfApr 16, 2025

Position recorded without written comment.

Mary BakerSupportLondonderry, NHfor MyselfApr 16, 2025

Position recorded without written comment.

Cathryn StrattonOpposeConcord, NHfor New Hampshire Medical SocietyApr 16, 2025

Position recorded without written comment.

Lisa CotnoirSupportAndover, NHfor MyselfApr 16, 2025

Position recorded without written comment.

Ernest TabiriSupportHooksett, NHfor MyselfApr 16, 2025

Position recorded without written comment.

Jonathan LeslieSupportDeerfield, NHfor MyselfApr 16, 2025

Position recorded without written comment.

Micala AbbiatiSupportGoffstown, NHfor MyselfApr 16, 2025

Position recorded without written comment.

Nancy RichardsonSupportFremont, NHfor MyselfApr 16, 2025

Position recorded without written comment.

Kristi CollinsSupportGrafton, NHfor MyselfApr 16, 2025

Position recorded without written comment.

Jillian GibsonSupportBrookline, NHfor MyselfApr 16, 2025

Position recorded without written comment.

Sara LupienSupportBow, NHfor MyselfApr 16, 2025

Position recorded without written comment.