PUBLIC MONEY BELONGS IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS. If parents want to send their children to religious affiliate schools , private schools or home school they can pay for it themselves. Just like I did!
SB295
Senate · 2025 sessionRepublicanSigned into lawExpanding education freedom accounts
AIRemoves household income limits on eligibility for education freedom accounts, sets an enrollment cap that can grow annually based on prior-year usage, and establishes priority enrollment guidelines for certain student groups.
(New Title) relative to education freedom accounts.
Status
Signed into law · June 11, 2025- ✓Introduced
- ✓Senate
- ✓House
- ✓Governor
- ✓Law
Division of testimony
956 submissionsArgument digest · AI-generated
from 397 of 397 written submissionsSB295 would remove the household income eligibility cap for New Hampshire's Education Freedom Account (EFA) voucher program, making state-funded accounts available to families regardless of income (subject to an enrollment cap that can automatically expand). A small number of supporters frame this as expanding parental choice and educational freedom, while the overwhelming majority of submitters oppose it, arguing it would divert scarce public funds to wealthy families already using private education, worsen an existing state budget crisis, and further underfund public schools.
- EFAs give families freedom to choose private, religious, or home educationSupport3 of 397 reviewed
Supporters argue the accounts extend school-choice opportunities, previously available mainly to wealthier families, to a broader range of households and let families pursue what they see as a better fit for their children.
“The EFA has allowed me to homeschool my autistic son, and he is now thriving. I am now given an opportunity that used to only be afforded to wealthy people.”
— Renee Gruen, Manchester · #515177 — read full submission →
“As a mother of 4 grade school children, I support this bill for the freedom to support what’s best for our children and inspire competition to improve all schools in NH.”
— Bailey Sweet, Greenfield · #513061 — read full submission →
- Funding should follow the student, not the systemSupport2 of 397 reviewed
Supporters argue that directing money to individual students rather than the public school system reduces waste and special-interest influence and encourages competition that improves schools overall.
- Drains funding from public schools and raises property taxesOppose81 of 397 reviewed
Submitters argue that expanding vouchers pulls money out of the Education Trust Fund and local school budgets, forcing higher property taxes to make up the difference.
“it unfairly drains tax dollars away from our public schools, which are already grossly underfunded by the state.”
— Linda Terwilliger, Gilford · #515349 — read full submission →
“School vouchers hurt students, families, and communities by diverting public funds to private institutions without accountability, transparency, or oversight.”
— Susan Mills, EXETER · #512623 — read full submission →
- Primarily benefits wealthy families who already use private educationOppose80 of 397 reviewed
Submitters argue that removing the income cap mainly helps affluent families already sending their children to private school or homeschooling, rather than the low-income families the program was originally meant to serve.
“This Education Freedom Accounts is literally Welfare for the Rich. I work hard for the money I make, and I am happy to pay taxes to educate children in the community public schools”
— Kathy Welenc, Enfield · #514503 — read full submission →
“private schools maintain selective admissions and high tuition, meaning vouchers mainly benefit families who can afford private education.”
— Michelle Stith, Windham · #514445 — read full submission →
- Public money belongs in public schoolsOppose60 of 397 reviewed
Submitters argue as a matter of principle that tax dollars collected for education should fund the public school system that serves nearly all students, not subsidize private choices.
- Fiscally irresponsible amid a state budget crisisOppose57 of 397 reviewed
Submitters argue that expanding a costly program is reckless while the state faces budget shortfalls and is cutting other essential services like Medicaid and disability services.
- Vouchers lack accountability and transparencyOppose64 of 397 reviewed
Submitters argue there is little oversight of how EFA funds are spent, citing reports of money used for non-educational purchases like sports clubs or theater camps, and no clear measure of educational outcomes.
“We need guard rail on this money. It should not be used for soccer clubs, riding lessons etc. Concord monitor list what people are using this money for and it is not education.”
— Sue Downer, Bedford · #515290 — read full submission →
“There’s no accountability and it comes across as a handout. We don’t actually know how OUR money is being used.”
— Patricia Whitney, Dover · #516616 — read full submission →
- This is a step toward a fully universal voucher systemOppose65 of 397 reviewed
Submitters argue the bill's enrollment cap, which automatically increases as it is approached, is a mechanism to achieve universal vouchers incrementally rather than a genuine limit.
“This is an attempt to get universal vouchers passed so they can be further modified in the future.”
— Lisa Willis, Bedford · #513588 — read full submission →
“SB295 is a **thinly veiled attempt to push universal school vouchers** into law by removing income caps and creating a confusing, convoluted priority system.”
— Caroline Herold, Merrimack · #515165 — read full submission →
- Public funding for religious schools violates church-state separationOppose37 of 397 reviewed
Submitters argue that directing public tax dollars to religious schools through EFAs is unconstitutional under the New Hampshire Constitution's prohibition on compelling support for sectarian schools.
- Goes against the will of NH residentsOppose23 of 397 reviewed
Submitters cite public hearing turnout, town warrant articles, and polling showing most Granite Staters oppose expanding vouchers, arguing the legislature is ignoring constituents.
“3060 NH residents logged their opposition while only 243 registered their support for it.”
— Anne Citorik, Atkinson · #515747 — read full submission →
“Only 4% of granite staters support universal vouchers. This is a grossly unpopular bill.”
— Kristen Goodrich, Brentwood · #515632 — read full submission →
- Private schools can discriminate and exclude students public schools must serveOppose16 of 397 reviewed
Submitters argue private schools receiving voucher funds are not required to accept or serve all students, including those with disabilities or LGBTQ+ students, unlike public schools.
- The program already costs far more than projectedOppose15 of 397 reviewed
Submitters point to the existing EFA program running over its original budget estimates as evidence that expansion would be even more costly than advertised.
Generated by claude-sonnet-5 (claude code agent) on Jul 20, 2026. Quotes are verbatim excerpts, verified against the cited submission before publication. Summaries are AI interpretation of the record, not part of it.
Providing taxpayer funds to any parent who wants to send their child to a private school only weakens public education. However, this bill makes that worse by providing $5000 to even wealthy parents who are already sending their children to private schools. The Education Voucher program was originally sold to us as a way to level the playing field, allowing those not able to send their children to a private school. Those of you who voted or agreed with that should therefore be voting AGAINST this bill, which makes taxpayers pay for the private education of wealthy individuals. Please vote AGAINST this bill that is harmful to the average citizen.
NO TO UNIVERSAL VOUCHERS FULL STOP. You already know the arguments against vouchers. With our current budget problem, vouchers are even more stupid and irresponsible. NO TO VOUCHERS. SUPPORT PUBLIC EDUCATION. THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN. REPEATEDLY. I OPPOSE THIS BILL
This bill is complete fiscal madness. Why should cash strapped households pay higher property taxes to subsidize wealthy kids going to elite private schools? Please vote no!
I am opposed to raising the income cap for Education Freedom Accounts, which would drain funding from our already inadequately funded public schools. The state needs to adequately fund public education first and above all else!!!! Public school students are being shortchanged by the state's longstanding failure to meet its financial obligations to public education.
I totally oppose the School Voucher Program. The income cap should not be removed - the wealthy have no need for assistance to afford their children's private school education. The voucher program has no accountability and will eventually bankrupt our public school system. Public funds to public schools.
Parents have made choices with regard to education for decades. If their preference is not the local public school, they determine what they can afford with or without assistance from their church or a scholarship program. Yes, this may involve cutting back on certain expenses, but this is what families have done by choice and without state funding.
New Hampshire has a duty to ensure that all of our public schools are high quality and funded appropriately. Our taxpayers and our public schools cannot afford to remove the income limit for private education vouchers.
I voted to fund PUBLIC education not to send my tax dollars to pay for an elite private school. Sending my property tax dollars to private schools will only mean that I have to pay even HIGHER property taxes so that the children in the public school down the street from me get an adequate education.
Oppose
NO to providing universal EFAs! Why are we giving breaks to the people who don’t need them? We know that the majority of people using EFAs are already finding the means to send their kids to private and religious schools and I’m not convinced that quality home schooling is happening in NH. There’s no accountability and it comes across as a handout. We don’t actually know how OUR money is being used.
The House Budget just passed with draconian cuts to the most vulnerable individuals in our state (elderly, Medicaid recipients, individuals with mental illness, children in state custody...). There is absolutely no justification to expand eligibility for "education freedom accounts" in this budget environment.
Can we please prioritize the students that need the most help, and not those already able to afford a good education.
There is no public accountability or transparency in the use of vouchers. The legislature keeps cutting services to people in need citing the fact that the revenues are tight this year. Under these circumstances, giving vouchers to wealthy people who are already sending their children to private school is hypocritical!
I do not support vouchers. Public money should support public schools
I urge you to vote against this bill. I am against vouchers in general and especially against raising the income eligibility to receive a voucher. Families who choose private and religious schools for their children are welcome to make that choice and pay for it. Vouchers, can be for very low income families (below the poverty line) who otherwise might not be able to make that choice. Public school is what our tax dollars need to support. NH should support and take pride in delivering a top notch public education for all children.
I support our public schools!
We need all the funding we can get for public schools. Our school budgets are being voted down because property tax is our only source of local funding. People who can afford to pay for alternative schooling should not be getting money intended for public schools.
PUBLIC MONEY FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS. I’m tired of my tax dollars going toward unaccountable schools. They have no requirement to teach every child or meet any kind of standard. Just stop.
Expanding vouchers to anyone when you are trying to cut everything else is ridiculous. How can you justify it? Focus on funding public schools, and leave the voucher income limits in place.
Public dollars belong in public schools!
If a parent chooses to send their child to a private school, they should pay the entire cost including transportation. Public money is for public schools only!
Terrible
SB295 is yet another universal voucher bill, removing all income caps. New Hampshire cannot afford universal school vouchers. In light of budget shortfalls and cuts of essential services in the state budget by Republican legislators, it is fiscally irresponsible and reckless to expand an already expensive vouch program.We have a budget crisis in NH and a school funding crisis. Let's take care of these pressing matters now and put a stop to expanding the voucher program. No on SB295!
Can we stop with these school vouchers already! I'm so tired of paying for rich people to take advantage of my taxes to send their kids to preppy schools